Whenever I see a cat hunt, they stalk their prey and strike at the right time.  Why should a cat approach their prey and give it a fighting chance?  That's stupid.  Whenever there is an advantage, you take it and use it to the best of your ability.  I had a cat who loved to kill, he rarely ate the lizards and birds he found.  He's a psycho cat.

Whenever I see a cat hunt, they stalk their prey and strike at the right time.  Why should a cat approach their prey and give it a fighting chance?  That's stupid.  Whenever there is an advantage, you take it and use it to the best of your ability.  I had a cat who loved to kill, he rarely ate the lizards and birds he found.  He's a psycho cat.

Hunters have an unfair advantage. Its not like in Far Cry where a headshot from a gun doesn't kill them. Using guns are overkill and cowardice. Use a knife or bow and arrow.

Bow and arrow?

Humans use their deadliest asset: their intelligence.

Now, to be fair, I dislike hunting in general. Out of necessity, I'd accept, but for sport, well, that's kinda cruel. The movie Predator really changed my view of things

But c'mon. Calling hunters cowards for using guns is kinda low. I mean, there isn't anything manly about it. You shoot from a distance with an item... Well actually that is kinda cowardly.

That's why I think Spanish Bull Fighters are amazing. Don't like it, but I went to one when I was a kid and holy crap. They come so close to getting hit and I've heard stories of guys who get maimed by the bull. Permanent injuries.

You know what? I agree. Hunting is cowardly. If it's done for food, well, I can see why you'd want to play safe, but for sport, it's kinda sadistic. You kill wth zero risk for the fun of it. And again, it's like the Predator movie, except humans are the deadly aliens that Arnold beats...only after the alien takes off its mask for a fair fight.

Holy crap. The Predator is much more manly than a human hunter.

The Predator, who is hunting men, for the fun of it, gives Arnold a shot.

That's like if a man shoots a deer, injuries it, but it still has enough energy to ram and fight back, and the man tosses aside the gun and fights the deer mano a mano.

Now THAT is a brave hunter.

I have zero problem with hunting for food, using whatever is necessary to do that effectively. I hate sport hunting, though. The idea of ending something's life for the fun of it, I just have a problem with that.

Bow and arrow? Humans use their deadliest asset: their intelligence. Now, to be fair, I dislike hunting in general. Out of necessity, I'd accept, but for sport, well, that's kinda cruel. The movie Predator really changed my view of things But c'mon. Calling hunters cowards for using guns is kinda low. I mean, there isn't anything manly about it. You shoot from a distance with an item... Well actually that is kinda cowardly. That's why I think Spanish Bull Fighters are amazing. Don't like it, but I went to one when I was a kid and holy crap. They come so close to getting hit and I've heard stories of guys who get maimed by the bull. Permanent injuries. You know what? I agree. Hunting is cowardly. If it's done for food, well, I can see why you'd want to play safe, but for sport, it's kinda sadistic. You kill wth zero risk for the fun of it. And again, it's like the Predator movie, except humans are the deadly aliens that Arnold beats...only after the alien takes off its mask for a fair fight. Holy crap. The Predator is much more manly than a human hunter. The Predator, who is hunting men, for the fun of it, gives Arnold a shot. That's like if a man shoots a deer, injuries it, but it still has enough energy to ram and fight back, and the man tosses aside the gun and fights the deer mano a mano. Now THAT is a brave hunter.

Hunting for survival is fine, but yeah hunting for sport is sadistic. Spanish Bull Fighters are manly and brave as all get out. Also, I guess its kinda fair since hunters have little or no intelligence whatsoever(IE Those duck dynasty people).

Also, I guess its kinda fair since hunters have little or no intelligence whatsoever(IE Those duck dynasty people).

I wouldn't go that far. I spent the first two years of college attending Minot State in North Dakota, which is a very hunting enthusiastic state (it was there that my dislike for hunting really solidified), but I did become friends with some hunters.

They were smart and nice. They were college students and majoring in courses as difficult as medicine and biology.

Hunting is part of their culture.

Do I agree with it? No.

But it's ignorant to say that hunters have little to no intelligence.

That's like saying all bronies are cloppers.

The concept of hunting itself, I think, is cowardly.

But I'm pretty sure I do things that others could criticize, so I don't insult those who do hunt. I just wouldn't do it myself.

I wouldn't go that far. I spent the first two years of college attending Minot State in North Dakota, which is a very hunting enthusiastic state (it was there that my dislike for hunting really solidified), but I did become friends with some hunters. They were smart and nice. They were college students and majoring in courses as difficult as medicine and biology. Hunting is part of their culture. Do I agree with it? No. But it's ignorant to say that hunters have little to no intelligence. That's like saying all bronies are cloppers. The concept of hunting itself, I think, is cowardly. But I'm pretty sure I do things that others could criticize, so I don't insult those who do hunt. I just wouldn't do it myself.

The hunters who boast about killing have little to no intelligence. It would be fair to say some are smart, but the ones I've seen are people like Ted Nugent(aka super rednecks).

I love hunting! Meat obtained from wild animals is so much better and TASTES so much better than the factory farmed crap we get at wallmart!