@-Solstice- I try and do the same, but I think I have come to the conclusion that you can only get so far down the rabbit hole whist staying entirely in the realm of cold, empirical rationalism. I think that lot of understanding nessecarily has to come from participation in the the phenomenological which is why I mentioned it above. I have come to the conclusion that, as we are a part of our universe and do not exist outside of it, only a portion knowing can be extracted from detached analysis. Along with this is the problem of intellect vs intuition. Intuitional understanding (knowing something so well that you no longer have to think about it consciously such as balancing whilst riding a bike or knowing an intellectual topic so well that you can describe it entirely in your own words by thinking of the concepts themselves as apposed to thinking about the linguistic content of how it was taught to you. Think of the "Aha! *snaps fingers* I get it now!" Experience as something moving from intellectual understanding to intuitive awareness) requires practical experience and therefore participation.
The reason I bring this up is because I believe that in order for us to understand certain things intellectually we need to have certain prerequisite intuitive understandings forming a framework of awareness required to even perciceve the patterns of certain concepts via intellectual perception.
Consider this somewhat akin to, as you put it, the increasing awareness of the noosphere, but on the level of individual consciousness.
The problem that can occur with this way of thinking is that it opens up the possibility of getting pulled into certain ways of thinking and either not being able to, or not wanting to escape from them. I think there are solutions to this though.
The conclusions that i have some to in this regard may me wrong and I am most definitely missing some things but I have found this an exceptionally powerful way to understand material and gain insights into ideas that I would of never found otherwise.