Hugs of Sir Manys

Oh my, I may be a big Star Wars fanboy, but I actually do consider LOTR my favourite trilogy too! Especially Fellowship of The Ring always gets me. The way Middle Earth is being show in its grand vastness. It's amazing how this world's sheer size was shown in a single movie. Peaceful lands of The Shire, wilderness that stood between it and Rivendell, the depths of Moria... and it just goes on. And of course there's our dear Sam. Every good person in the world deserves a friend like him. How he never gave up on Frodo even when Frodo was corrupted by The Ring and became a... difficult companion to Sam... LOTR will always be dear in my heart... I am also not good at giving my least favourite one, but I guess I can give one that disappointed me. Mind You all it doesn't mean I dislike it (or it does? That I leave for You all to decide ) Star Wars: The Last Jedi. Like I said - I am not going to venture into if I like or dislike it, but the movie suffered from plenty bad decisions that have proven to be detrimental to its quality, plot and overall atmosphere. It was... revolutionary for Star Wars, unfortunately not in a good way. Force power introduced there felt like a plot convinience and I wish it was scrapped. One big story arc was meaningless to the movie and shouldn't have existed. It didn't take much to make it mean something so I don't understand why such actions were not taken. Villains were terribly incompetent except of the one that dies almost at the beginning, because somehow his superior is petty idiot. There are things I liked about the movie too though, I just wanted to list why it disappointed me.

Here's an idea I do have: make the show easily accessible via streaming services. I feel like Hasbro is doing awfully sloppy job with Friendship is Magic. It's hard to come by on streaming services, in Poland You can buy it on Amazon Prime, but cannot watch it, which is a lovely feeling. Thank You, Hasbro and Amazon, very cool. It needs to be released worldwide on a specific, easily accessible streaming website, be it said Amazon Prime or Netflix (which would be the best idea, given gen 5 is also there). When I wanted to rewatch the show I had to... download it from... places. I think everyone knows what I mean. Do I feel good about it? No. But I was given literally no choice as there was no other, clear alternative. That hardly encourages people to rewatch it or to be introduced to it. People, who took interest in gen 5 could've easily been pulled into gen 4 and that chance is wasted epicly. Now mind You, I speak from polish perspective - I am pretty sure access is better in USA. But there are a lot of fans in Europe that are effectively barred from easy access to the show. This kind of business decisions can damage just about any show's popularity.

Most certainly not, in my opinion. While it's true that most of power is in her hooves, she's also not one to rule with iron... hoof? She's benevolent to her subjects, full of compassion for their struggles, all while doing her absolute best to maintain peace and prosperity throughout her realm (and tend to The Sun, which is a difficult task all by itself already). Calling her a tyrant would be too much as that word has negative conotations that just don't mix with Celestia at all. Is she a troll? No. Troll is generally a negative word relating to negative Internet activity that only recently received more... positive traits. She is playful, likes to do small, innocent jokes and is definitely a humble leader, who shows no hesitation to be among others, but she's not one to just prank everypony around her. She's too much of a gentle spirit to be considered a troll. "Trollestia". I am not a fan of that as it takes away attention from Celestia's personality. But I don't judge those, who do enjoy it. To each their own.

I normally avoid corporate "politics" and take 0 interest in them. Yet even I had the doubtful pleasure of hearing of Chapek's "accomplishments". I hope that Iger will manage to breathe some life into Disney again. There are few times when CEOs mess up as spectaculary as Chapek did.

Nameless King from Dark Souls 3 definitely got on my nerves hard. He had very odd timing of attacks, which made dodging difficult. Timing had to be flawless to avoid being hit and then You also needed room for attacks and healing. Some people easily put him down (no idea, how), but I am not among them. In the end I had to cheese him, aka use equipment tailored specifically to resist his attacks making his damage silly if not entirely non existent. It's the only boss I ever cheesed. And I have to be fair with myself - I haven't beaten him. Defeating boss that way is like defeating a skilled knight in combat after replacing his armor and sword with cardboard. Maybe one day I will do another Dark Souls run... and this time beat him fair and square.