Jump to content
Banner by ~ Ice Princess Silky

Dark Qiviut

User
  • Posts

    4,700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Entries posted by Dark Qiviut

  1. Dark Qiviut
    Author's Note: Credit goes to critiques from Tommy_Oliver, Silver-Quill, and VoiceOfReason for this critique of Flash Sentry.
    One of the biggest elephants in not only Equestria Girls, but FIM altogether. Both movies have a host of problems, and one of them is Flash Sentry. If there's one point where you can narrow down the laziness of the entire alternate world, it's him. Poor writing, lazy direction, character derailment, playing clichés to the letter. Flash Sentry is a lot like the characters of G3: flat, stereotypical, boring, pointless, and receives undeserved praise. On top of that, he's also a Gary Stu.
    But that's just slicing through the surface of Flash Sentry's issues as a character. To really get to the roots of the problems, we need to be really analytical with his character. What are the problems? What causes these problems? Any implications his overall concept represents?
    Crush on Twilight.
    Pedestria's* overarching plot is the ongoing crush Flash and Princess Twilight have on each other. Twilight and Flash Sentry keep bumping into each other, setting off the crush. Each time they do, Twilight's crush "deepens," so to speak.
    One very huge issue about the romance angle is how there's no chemistry between them. Twilight Sparkle is a very established character with several strengths and flaws that make her so endearing. During the middle of the first movie, her adorkable side came into play when she got so fascinated over the school library and later read the history book of Canterlot High that night. She may not freak out anymore, but that doesn't mean she doesn't become any less antsy, like her loss of patience over Rainbow Dash's inability to learn through the traditional methods and subsequent insults until Fluttershy called both her and Dash out. She has a passion to learn and is very logical in her approach.
    In Equestria Girls and Rainbow Rocks, Twilight only grows a crush on him because of his looks. Nothing about his personality. Nothing to create common ground. They establish nothing between them. Flash's lack of dimension doesn't mesh with Twilight's studiousness.
    Whenever the characters meet, they almost always bump into each other. It didn't just happen once nor was it organically varied. They bump into each other again and again and again. DHX, you're not creating anything unique or original when you have two prominent characters in EQG/RR meet up so predictably. The first time — in The Crystal Empire — was okay because they never met. The second time was pushing it to the point of predictable. But when she bumps him the third time, it was no longer interesting. It was predictable. There's a reason why Twilight spilling her drink on him isn't funny. By Rainbow Rocks, this cliché was beyond tiring. It was obnoxious. Any hopes for a developed relationship died before he bumped into the wall in the Rainbooms' studio because DHX doesn't know how to create FlashLight conversation without making the audience cringe.
    Twilight's reasons for her crush is out of character. Think of the implications surrounding teenaged hormones: the idea that teens attach to other people simply for how hot they look. She only likes him because he's hot, nothing else. This is a stereotype of how teenaged girls view their teenaged boy crushes. Even worse is how this universe never subverts this stereotype. Instead, they play it straight. With Twilight as the main character in both films (and an established, three-dimensional being to boot), she becomes very shallow. The crush angle is insulting to her character.
    But that's not completely correct; the crush angle is even more insulting to Flash. His a crush on an interdimensional being, one whose true form isn't even human, is his lone source of conflict. But this conflict is bypassed in the first film and only referenced in passing in the beginning of Rainbow Rocks, basically nullifying the plot point. Unlike Twilight, Flash Sentry made his debut much sooner, in EQG1. You could've had the whole movie play off subversions of the hot hunk cliché by giving Flash more originality in his character and time for Twilight to have a very tiny crush on him that could eventually build over time. But both movies hammer in their relationship when they offer nothing to make the audience legitimately believe they like each other.
    The biggest irony about this angle is how Flash's crush on Twilight actually feels more genuine than Twilight's crush on Flash.
    Think of the romance between Princess Cadance and Shining Armor. A Canterlot Wedding hammers in how much both loved each other, wanted to get married, and were basically made for each other. One major problem: The source of chemistry is exposition only. They have very little in common to create any organic perspective of both characters actually loving each other beyond that one asspull in the climax. When Chrysalis's brain was replaced with the Idiot Box in order for them to perform their counterspell, their credibility is more damaged. Show, don't tell.
    Past relationship with Sunset.
    One element from Equestria Girls that had literally no impact was the dumbest dialogue exchange in the first film:
    What made this scene so stupid was twofold:
    It was totally pointless. It had ZERO impact in the context of both this scene and whole film. It wasn't referenced again until Rainbow Rocks when Sunset admitted to using him for fame. Cut out this little piece of information, and nothing changes. Hell, it would've been a lot better if Flash and Twilight introduced each other after he helped her up. Instead of subverting the vile high-school-drama clichés, Flash Sentry fulfills one of the most obnoxious simply for that explanation. How? Because the evil alpha bitch (Sunset) has an ex-boyfriend (Flash) interested in the protagonist (Twilight). Sunset's character had no impact with her relationship with Flash. Because it was dropped as soon as it started, him being her ex-boyfriend never affected his friendship with Twilight, either. Instead of dropping it out of nowhere in the middle of the film and later pretend it never happened, why not do something to make their triangle feel interesting? Why not have Flash express his friendship with Twilight and Sunset, but not romance? Make him more focused on his studies and ability to excel in one of his fields (music) before he decides to get involved in romance again.
    That doesn't change anything. Again, the SunLight background romance had no impact in either film. It was there simply to fill in the formula mentioned above. The fact that he broke up with her is very similar to his car: It's not a personality nor is it a hint of his personality. You could've had her break up with him; it wouldn't impact either characterizations whatsoever.
    You see, when you play such a cliché down Broadway, even in passing, then you're weakening the characters even more. Having both movies mention SunLight in passing weakened Sunset's credibility as a villain and Flash's as a secondary protagonist (this I'll get back to later).
    But it's here where Flash Sentry's credibility gets permanently damaged. Even before the cafeteria scene, Flash was already a one-note character. Rarity's line to Twilight reduced him beyond that.
    He became a stereotype.
    Before anyone comes here to lie about stereotypes aren't inherently a bad thing, take a look at its most important definition:
    Stereotypes aren't three-dimensional characters. A stereotype is a very clichéd formula of a character. Instead of being genuine, the character becomes flatter than cardboard. They're predictable in the way they react, say, and do. Stereotypes aren't just typical formulas. They're insulting because they create a representation of certain characters as a whole. Stereotypes are caricatures of certain archetypes.
    The fact that Flash Sentry was Sunset's ex-boyfriend relegated him to less of a character. His potential as a character jumped the shark.
    There's no such thing as a good stereotype, period. For a generation that all but brags about how it can avoid stereotypes, having him play so straight to it is beyond shameful.
    No conflict.
    Outside of his interdimensional crush on Twilight, human!Flash has absolutely no conflicts. Let's break it down.
    Flash Sentry is really good at playing the guitar and is passionate about it. We saw this during the cafeteria song when he worked on it with the rest of his band with plenty of fervor. Financially, he's stable. Take a look at his car model:

     
    That car looks eerily similar to this 2010 Chevy Camaro:
     

     
    (Image credit.)
     
    Since Chevrolet revived the Camaro in the late 2000s, they aren't cheap. They can range from $25,000 for the coupe to over $40,000 for the convertible. Plus, Flash's fancy coupe has some intricate decals, which can cost plenty of money. So it's not like Flash makes end's meet. He's got a very stereotypical "bad boy" look. Think about it: jeans that reach the ankles, a shirt that's partially worn out, a black jacket, spiky hair, and plays the guitar. His attire fits the "rebel." How generically nice he is to Twilight. When he talks to or about Twilight post-interrogation scene, he stutters, becomes clumsy, and is just a plain goof.
     
    In case you're wondering, him being clumsy is not an organic flaw, because it doesn't affect his character nor any "conflicts" he comes across. Currently, his clumsiness is pure humor. The answer is very simple.
    Take a look at not just what the background ponies are doing, but also how their popularity started.
    For a few examples, Derpy, Lyra, and Colgate.
    You notice any similarities of the popular background ponies?
    Each of them stood out and did something.
    Derpy's eyes were wall-eyed.
    Colgate was dressed as a dentist (yes, dentists do use stethoscopes if their patients are older and/or have a medical history).
    Lyra sat on a park bench like a human.
    Vinyl Scratch had wild hair, wore big glasses, and bobbed to the tune as the record played.
    Dr. Whooves looked like The Doctor from Dr. Who and later contained many Dr. Who references like the tie, hourglass in SSCS6K, and 3D glasses as he jogged with Rose Luck.
    Octavia played a classical instrument.
    The list goes on and on. When characters in the background do something, it catches the attention of the fanbase. The community in Equestria feels very alive when background characters are active. They offer insight to their character; sometimes they're a part of the conflict, even for a split second. Headcanon is developed to flesh them out. For example, it's no surprise that many bronies love OctaVinyl; the tropes are there. Vinyl scratch's style of music playing is more modern. Visually, she's boisterous, loves to have fun, and just doesn't give a crap what you think. On the other hand, Octavia is very classical and formal due to her hair style and the playing of an instrument that dates back several centuries. They're perfect visual foils.
    Remember, they're called background ponies for a reason. They're there to fill the background.
    Conversely, Flash Sentry is a secondary character. Both movies billed him to be just as important as the ReMane Five. In other words, his character and actions become influential to the entire plot.
    Instead, what do we have? A one-dimensional piece of cardboard. For bronies who like and dislike him, they have no choice but to flesh out his character in fanart, fancomics, and fanfiction.
    The very same thing. Princess Cadance revealed Flash Sentry to be a new hire for the Royal Guard, but he was the one to announce Princess Twilight Sparkle's arrival. Later, he becomes a royal escort for Cadance (and presumably other ambassadors, if going by T'sK1).
    Rather than being shown hard work to join the rankings, Flash Sentry becomes one of the top guards simply because whoever's working behind the scenes wants Flash shoved in the spotlight. Consequently, Flash's character progression dissipates: Why confine all of his progression in the background when he was a secondary character and stated to be a recent hire? Don't leave it up for the fans to decide. Place in some effort to reward him for his efforts.
    Because his source of conflict is naught, bronies had to create some for him. One was through a look-alike featured in both Pinkie Pride and Twilight Time, unofficially named First Base.
     

     
    (Link to fanart.)
    In fanon circles, many bronies saw this as an opportunity to take a "character" into someone you can relate to. A big brother having a great relationship with a little brother. This isn't the first time, as these fanon relationships have been around for some time, most notably Dinky being Derpy's daughter (my favorite brony fanon), Snowflake being Featherweight's big bro, and Screwball (a.k.a., Topsy-Turvy) being Discord's adopted daughter. Despite being somewhat repetitive, this fanon doesn't get old because it's something each of us can relate to; many of us have very close relatives. The sibling bond is one great way for the characters to connect. For Flash and First Base, immediately it generates some form of conflict, and you can expand Flash Sentry in many ways:
    Does he miss his family? What does he feel about family in general? Where did he live? Where did he come from? How long did it take for him to climb up the ranks? If you mold the FB/FS fanon, what was their relationship? Do they write any letters to each other? Can you see the ample opportunities to evolve Flash into a living and breathing character? It's there, and Flash definitely has the background. Unfortunately, DHX evolved him to a point where they basically couldn't care less about him. With no visible goals in sight, Flash becomes a blank prophecy.
    Yes and no. I've made this point quite often in other blogs and posts, so for those who haven't read them, it's like this. Even though the characters have perpendicular counterparts, they each still represent that character. What do I mean? Even though the HuMane Five are different from the ReMane in Equestria, the HuMane Five should have some common sense, dignity, intelligence, ability to talk organically, and maturity. The HuMane Five's characterizations should match the ReMane Five — if any differences, keeping them subtle. Instead, the HuMane Five (Pinkie Pie exempt in EQG1) are flanderized versions of the ReMane Five. They're a lot shallower with a primary focus on one trait, and the vocabulary is simplified to the point where characters like Dash utter "awesome" several times.
    Flash Sentry, too. Albeit seeing little of him as a pony, the first movie suggests that their personalities are one of the same, too. If you saw Flash Sentry as a human personality-wise, you know his personality as a pony and vice-versa. If pony!Flash is completely different from human!Flash, then pony!Flash is out of character.
    Filler.
    I bet you've heard one criticism of some of FIM's episodes: "*character* is pointless. He or she can be cut out entirely, and nothing would've been lost." This was used a lot during several season four episodes like Rainbow Falls, Filli Vanilli, Equestria Games (although the criticism is for the deceptive setting instead); and several main IDW comics.
    Neither movie is exempt, especially Flash Sentry. Once more, his whole identity is Twilight's love interest. There's literally nothing about him that directly affects the conflict in any way aside from being a distraction. If you take away that drawn-out subplot, what differences would you get with either movie? Nothing. You can cut him entirely and not alter the story one bit. It could've been someone else who helps her get up. Twilight would buy the drink and sit by the lounge without the HuMane Six gossiping bull rubbish about Flash's past relationship with Sunset. Someone other than Flash would've retrieved the cutouts so Luna can end the interrogation. You could've erased him from Rainbow Rocks.
    Flash Sentry is the character version of Spongebob, You're Fired! There's a gigantic lack of quality simply by how pointless he is.
    "Someone other than Flash would've retrieved the cutouts so Luna can end the interrogation." (Then again, the whole scene was so stupid, it wouldn't alter the quality.) He's there for one reason only: to attempt to make the romance subplot convincing. As if there are other ways for Twilight and Flash to hook up. But when the results are the two babbling and blushing, the "chemistry" turns into a virtual checklist.
    Filler tests your audience's patience. Flash is filler.
    Gender politics.
    Silver-Quill made that point really clear in After the Fact: Flash Sentry (a great analysis and a basis in this critique; go watch it if you haven't). Other people were very critical of this, too.
    One gigantic issue with Friendship Is Magic is how it enforces a very sexist implication of how any form of entertainment with a specific gender or attitude brand in mind either can't have the opposite sex in a dominant yet positive role or can't have the opposite sex involved at all. We see this all the time in entertainment. Anime and manga have whole genres dedicated to presenting their products with a cast with one prominent gender, usually with the idea of pandering to one gender. MLP Tales, G3, and G3 also shove this sexist mindset in the audience's face.
    If you review this series yourselves, observe the roles of the male sex. For instance:
    Snips and Snails are stereotypical idiots in a character design. They're annoying, unlikeable, and one-dimensional. Boast Busters would've sucked much less if they didn't exist. The Diamond Dogs are the cliché villain of having plenty of brawn yet little brains. By writing them as stupid, it gives Rarity the edge to outwit them. This type of writing is very contrived because you're giving the protagonist the easy way out of the conflict. The moral itself is fantastic, but it's hurt by the lazy writing. Discord is extremely likeable even as a villain. Yes, he's evil, but a clever brand of evil. A villain with morals, he doesn't pull back punches while simultaneously not attempting to land them. His lone goal was to conquer Equestria while having fun. (I'm seriously thinking of a Return of Harmony analysis of his morals. Knowing how long I write them, it might be really long. ) When he became more chaotic neutral instead of evil, the writers had him play several hilarious mind games with the Mane Six. Spike is the longest running male character in the series. Unfortunately, FIM often puts him as the punching bag for humor, and most of it for no good reason. When he's written really well, he's normally the supportive character. But when he stars the episode, it's often terrible, like Dragon Quest, Equestria Games, and Just for Sidekicks. The dragon clan in Dragon Quest suffers from being so sexist, it's not funny. They're stereotypical bully characters, all of whom male. They do stupid things, steal, mock Spike for his size and femininity, and disregard life. DQ is one unfortunate implication of how it implies every single dragon other than Spike behaves like the stereotypes. Trenderhoof… *sighs crossly* Everything about him is so unlikeable. His personality is obnoxious. He's incredibly rude. He relies on trends just to fit in. How the bloody hell did Rarity ever get the crush on him?
     
    So what about her fantasy with Blueblood? Is that okay, as well? No. But there's a big difference between Twilight's on Flash and Rarity's on Blueblood.
     
    In The Ticket Master, Rarity presented a very stupid fantasy of wanting to be married to her prince charming. Here, her reasoning was blatantly recognized as being stupid. Why? Because every reason from the ReMane Five made just as little sense as hers. There was irony to her logic, and TTM played it as a joke tut-tutting the characters (who didn't know it) and the audience. Even though what Rarity did was in character at the time, it was stupid.
     
    In Equestria Girls, Twilight's shallow crush was considered pivotal to the story even though it was filler. Simultaneously, her lack of logic wasn't critique. It was praised. There are very few likeable males in this show. Discord is one, and so is Spike regardless of his characterization consistency. Cheese Sandwich is possibly the most likeable male character in the show for some fantastic reasons, one of them being how thorough and convincing his dedication to others' happiness is. He wants to deliver not just a great party, but an epic party. Big Mac is the most consistent stallion and is full of dimension despite his "eeyups" and "eenopes." (The two-part comic starring him is one hilarious way of delivering his character without having him say much.) However, his trademark remark is also a common punchline. More of him saying more words without confining him to singing, please!
    Flash Sentry has a strong sense of integrity. When there's something he believes is wrong, he's not afraid to get involved. Unfortunately, this positive trait is shared among the rest of the protagonists, so he needs another unique attribute to differentiate him from the rest of the cast. Otherwise, he remains relegated to being Walking Cardboard instead.
    What's really unfortunate for this show is how whenever a three-dimensional male is shown to be a positive role model, he's typically a one-shot. Cheese Sandwich, Fancy Pants, and Cranky Doodle Donkey are such examples.
    The gender politics are prevalent in EQG, Flash Sentry in particular. To quote from earlier:
    As mentioned previously, stereotypes are bad enough for they create one-dimensional caricatures. But that's not all. Presenting stereotypes and treating them as a good thing are damaging to society, especially kids. How? By delivering false perceptions of archetypes at best and lies at worst. It gets especially bad when stereotypes are used to spread morals; you risk creating a straw man, exemplified by Praiser Pan being a stereotype of critics in the Fluttershy Micro.
    Do you think that Flash Sentry, as he currently is, benefits kids by being a sexist stereotype and having Equestria Girls embrace it?
    I don't think so.
    Character design.
    (Credit goes to Silver-Quill for this segment.)
    If there's one final nail to confirm Walking Cardboard's status as forced love interest, it's the use of the color wheel.
    Here's what I mean:

    (Image credit.)
    When you see one color on the color wheel, its complementary is located on its opposite curve. There are three most-known complementary pairs: red & green, orange & blue, yellow & purple/violet. When these complements are near each other, the eyes play games. In design, a complementary color located in the background can make the foreground jump out, like a very subtle sky blue background behind a firm orange foreground. On the other hand, if the complements touch each other and are equal saturation, then they battle for visual attention, which can hurt your eyes. There's a reason why you often won't see red and green side by side in one design.
    Twilight Sparkle is a lavender alicorn — her natural complementary is yellow. Flash Sentry's fur or skin is predominantly yellow. Visually and psychologically, Flash is connected to Twilight. In essence, Flash's whole character is tied down to their crush.
    Now, I'm going to lay off the critiquing for a minute and analyze some color choices. The ponies in Equestria are visually versatile. Each of them has specific fur and mane/tail colors to give each of them an identity. When they're an animal, the color choices make connotative sense. As such, they don't stand out or create implications. Conversely, when translated to human form, they look uncanny at best. As a pegasus, Fluttershy's yellow fur feels normal, but when translated to human skin, it makes her look rather unhealthy.
    At worst, the colors are offensive. Big Mac's red fur feels very natural. But if Big Mac has red skin, then the public is reminded of something like these:
    Natives/Indians are some of the most oppressed people worldwide, and making Big Mac's skin red would perpetuate stereotypes so racist, FIM would've been canceled.
    Why is Cheerilee's skin a lighter purple instead of the deep purple? Very same reason. Cheerilee's fur color would trigger stereotypes of Natives on one end and — because she's voiced by a white woman — blacks on the other through subtle blackface.
    What does this have to do with Flash Sentry?
    Plenty.
    Pony!Flash's fur color has the hexidecimal value of FCC862 and CMYK value of 0/21/61/1. In other words, his fur color is a very bright yellow, almost a gold.
    Human!Flash's (Brad's) skin color has the hexidecimal value of F9E64A and CMYK value of 0/8/34/2. In contrast to his fur color, his skin tones are a very pale, dull tan. When comparing it to natural skin, it's near-accurate.
    Why is this so significant?
    Look at human!Flash's face, specifically his eyes:

    It has a very Asian appeal.
    Based on his looks, if you change his skin to that gold saturation from his fur, you'll trigger yellowface/yellow peril, an extremely racist Asian stereotype. If Friendship Is Magic had a character with yellowface, chances are you'll get a reaction worse than this from How I Met Your Mother.
    Flash Sentry has been a very problematic character from the start. Even if you ignore his characterization, his concept is based off being Twilight's love interest. Him being Twilight's visual complement, the clichés spewed in both films, and their poorly executed romance trigger the elongated subplot even when they're not conversing with one another. The crush damages Twilight's character because her reasons devolve to his looks. But it damages Flash's character moreso by having the narrative cling so hopelessly onto it with no end in sight. With his lone goal being her shortchanged love interest, Flash is beyond simply a Gary Stu. He's a one-dimensional plot device and stereotype. The stereotype label is what makes him offensive to the show. His character jumped the shark once Rarity revealed he was Sunset's former boyfriend, if not the minute he debuted.
    But to make it worse (from Part 2 of my RR review):
    By how little DHX cares for him, Flash's character has become almost irredeemable, and that's a damn shame.
    But it's not too late. There's still a little hope left to make him a three-dimensional character, but it'll require a lot of work. Sure, retconning's the easy solution, but both pony and human Flash have established characterizations. If you retcon them, then you're creating a completely different character, not Flash Sentry. Consequentially, a retconned Flash Sentry will be just as bad as the current Flash Sentry. The best solution is to revise his current character. Loosen him up so you retain his character foundation, yet don't lose who he is.
    What suggestions?
    Ditch the crush subplot. It offered nothing to the show and only holds Flash's potential back. Remember, it's Friendship Is Magic, not Clichéd Romance Is Magic. Obviously, DHX won't try to develop their relationship romantically. In conclusion, having Flash Sentry no longer crush on Twilight would give him a fresh start.
     
    Seriously, if a quick concept of Flash being a fanonical brother to First Base gives him much more dimension to his character than Flash in two 70-minute movies, then you're doing something really wrong. If Princess Twilight Sparkle returns for the Friendship Games, then the movie should give both of them some common ground. Rather than hammer in the obnoxious bumping, why not have Twilight and Flash meet in some other way, like a classroom, school cafe, or even Pedestria's version of Sugarcube Corner. Twilight's a geek. Flash Sentry is a mild geek himself. What interests do they have in common? Do they like some science? Complex theories, for example? Perhaps Flash Sentry needs to buy a better guitar because his old one is damaged beyond recovery, and his friends — both Twilights, the HuMane Five, or even Sunset Shimmer — help him locate an affordable guitar that can play just as well as the old one. What about his ethnic background? Don't throw it in there for keeps. Expand his background. Have him explore the rest of Pedestria. Maybe his family, other friends. For fanon-loving bronies, this is where you can use First Base and expand their fanonical relationship.
     
    What about his relationship with the rest of the characters? Flash Sentry and Sunset Shimmer haven't talked to each other much on screen since her character reset and redemption. Have them make permanent amends by having them talk amicably as friends. Have them get to know each other more and establish common ground. As for pony Flash, what is his relationship with the rest of the Royal Guard? How does he feel about them? How does he view the world in peace, peril, or in between? What has he done to gain in the royal ranks? For Celestia's sake, how did he get hired?
     
    How is he like when he's not so busy? Apparently, the guards protect Canterlot and all of royalty 24/7, but they're bound to take a day off or two to recuperate or merely enjoy life. Like what Jeric once suggested by letting Twilight "run her hair down" and have a great time being the the adorkable, friend-seeking geek that many of us got so invested in. As an equal, make him enjoy life. Maybe Flash is very innocent and childlike when he isn't so focused on being a royal guard.
     
    You can take these immature tendencies for human Flash, too. Think about it; he's a teenager, so he's going to be somewhat immature. Both versions can have their immaturity be a strength in their character for having the gift to defend and take things seriously in his schoolwork or job, but have it become a very distinct flaw. For human!Flash, his immaturity could affect his status in school and back home: rushing in his instrument work, homework, grades; being a little impatient with life back home; and wanting to feel a little freer.
     
    Pony!Flash could have this immaturity bite him on the plot, too. Perhaps he suspects a call of distress, and he rushes in to help before Shining Armor or Celestia create a plan and give him permission. It could turn out that the call for distress is either something so trivial, it'd make him feel or silly or something so serious, he's the one who must cry for help. Over a year ago, I conceptualized a fanfic adaptation of FIM by merging events from both Thomas & Friends and its adaptation basis, The Railway Series. Entitled The Equestrian Series, you can read the latest blog submission (Book 1 from over a year ago) here, which contains links to Book 0 and the overarching concept.
    My recent idea of adding Flash Sentry would be something similar to one of the later Railway Series books, Mountain Engines. Its leading character, Lord Harry, doesn't get introduced until the third chapter, Danger Points. Lord Harry was very arrogant — in Thomas fandom terms, too puffed up in the smokebox — and takes risks unnecessarily. One time, he decides to pay Culdee back for teasing him. Unfortunately, while pulling a passenger train, he derails at the summit, and this part of the Island of Sodor is very dangerous. When he was rescued, he was sent to the shed in disgrace and stripped of his name as punishment. In Devil's Back, he was released, but only allowed to shunt workmen up and down the summit at Devil's Back, a very difficult part of the Culdee Fell Railway. One day, there was an emergency, and #6 was sent up to rescue the workmen. Battling treacherous weather, he rescued the people. He was eventually named Patrick in honor of an injured workman who risked his life to save everyone else. Afterwards, he only took risks if necessary.
    In my idea, Flash Sentry would be a newbie training for the royal guard. He was modest, yet sensitive and immature. He'd let other pony's teasing get to him, resulting in him working too hard and being too reckless in his duties. As a consequence, he was scolded by his peers and sent to his quarters as punishment. Next day, he is allowed to return to train, but ignore their teasing and work with a mentor. That evening, it was windy, and other training pegasi teased him for his punishment, resulting in him saying he's brave. One of them dared him to take a load of cargo down the Canterlot mountains into the quayside about 500 feet below and about a dozen miles away.
    He would go, but forgot to light the headlamp and taillamp, so he couldn't see. He would stop at a siding and find some way to light up the lamps, but the wind kept blowing out the fire, and the wind was only getting worse. But he would stay until he could light up the lamps and keep them lit. Unfortunately, he couldn't, so he locked up the trolleys and flew around to find any shelter. He locates a signalbox, knocks inside, and asks the signalpony to help him light up the lamps. He gives him some oil to light them up and contains them so the wind didn't blow on them. Even with the nasty wind, Flash keeps on trucking and later arrives at the quay without any further trouble.
    Next morning, he returned to Canterlot to receive a warm welcoming for being able to find his way to unload the cargo without being so reckless and minding his safety. His fellow cadets apologize for daring Flash into getting involved, and each of them are demoted and forced to undergo more intensive training as punishment. Flash is invited to have a formal dinner with Shining Armor and Princess Cadance, but Flash declines, saying he must earn his way through the ranks first.
    If you other criticisms of his character and suggestions for improving his character, please feel free to comment below.
    *One brony on Equestria Daily coined the human world "Pedestria," and I'm going to use it quite a bit now.
     
  2. Dark Qiviut
    Do I need to say this again? FIM is not exclusively "for little girls" like G3, G3.5, or Tales. It's a show for EVERYONE and is written for EVERYONE! The same demographics as Disney's animated films, Pixar, and Harry Potter. Saying FIM "it's for little girls" when it factually isn't is an insult to every single person who watches and adores this show.
     
    In fact, it's also a major insult to Faust herself. Don't believe me? Read this famous screenshot of a reply by Faust to an anti-brony:
     

     
    So, people who claim FIM is "for little girls," get it RIGHT. You're doing nothing except reinforcing blatant sexism towards men and women by spouting the blatant "it's for little girls" lie.
  3. Dark Qiviut
    Source: S05:E01+02 - The Cutie Map
     

    This was from a little while ago. Now I'll get a little deeper into The Cutie Map.
     
    Even though I was a critic of various executions of Season 4, one of the bigger pluses is how much they approached maturer and grayer morals. Rarity Takes Manhattan talked about how you shouldn't quit your most positive qualities because someone took advantage of you. Pinkie Pride delved into the very mature theme of jealousy over an individual who can not only do the same talent you love and work on, but are also better at it. Everyone here knows how much I praise Testing Testing's excellently executed moral and approach to it.
     
    Season Five commenced it with one of the most mature conflicts of not just the entire show, but family TV altogether. It's an entire episode where the conflict between how two ponies approach what friendship is about. Is friendship supposed to be about agreeing with one another? Or is friendship about where despite having serious disagreements, you can still be friends? Can friendship work under the philosophy that conformity trumps all?
     
    Earlier today, I mentioned how The Cutie Map had a very eerie similarity of George Orwell's Animal Farm, a storybook criticizing the way the Soviet Union was governed and politicized. Starlight Glimmer's goals run through very similar propaganda. She continued to spread the idea that in order to be true friends, you must be equal. Give up what makes you you. The song, In Our Town, is revealed by Ingram himself to be heavily inspired by WWII propaganda music. This is a really bold direction that hones in the criticism of how strict communist countries had or currently run such as the USSR and especially North Korea. The fact that they explicitly describe the area it's located as "East Equestria" (an implied allegory of the old Eastern Bloc) confirms this powerful message further.
     
    One of the cleverest directions Sonneborn, Larson, et al. induced this skewed opinion of friendship equating conformity is how the show never told the audience the name of the town. If you give this town a name, you risk breaking apart the theme of conformity and how the only way to thrive is to be like everypony else in Equestria. The lack of name retains that mystery behind the history of the town. More importantly, it reinforces Starlight Glimmer's skewed opinions of how the only way to actually be friends is to not conform to the rest of society. Keeping it nameless makes this drab village very inviting by teasing about how despite its dinky appearances, it could be one of the best places you'll ever run across. It's a very tiny thing quantitatively, but it really established credibility in Glimmer's propaganda.
     
    Undoubtedly, Starlight Glimmer's a fraud. By not conforming to the very same messages she claims to celebrate (not sacrificing her cutie mark while forcing everyone else to do so), she becomes a major hypocrite. However, don't let that mean her beliefs lack any level of sincerity. As a character, she's incredibly sharp with a sense of how she can be one step ahead of the others. With the ReMane Five locked up, she manipulated FS into trying to out her accomplices. Even more, Starlight doesn't act like some magical being who reigned in terror æons ago. She's a unicorn with very strong magical powers, and we have no idea what her past is. There's no doubt that her lack of past is intentional; it makes her feel both relatable and real.
     
    Unlike the other villains, she does believe in the magic of friendship, but not the MoF that the others believe. Instead, she sees the concept of individuality as a hindrance of both growth and triumph. Her idea of the cutie mark doesn't translate to being someone of equal potential, but how you must conform to Equestrian matriarchy/patriarchy. By telling everyone to give it up, force them, and hammer it in, she's making them believe that her totalitarian opinions will lead to an eventual Equestrian revolution. Not "revolution" as in warfare, but "revolution" as in how a new ideal of Equestria can be legitimately established. Even after she was revealed to be a hypocrite, she never relented that belief. Consequently, this further legitimizes her gray opinions on Equestrian society.
     
    Starlight Glimmer is a very credible, three-dimensional villain. She has very legitimate motives that back up continuity from not just the whole series, but also Magical Mystery Cure. One big problem from that finale is how it conveniently changes the whole definition of the cutie mark from being something you innately like and look forward to for the rest of your life to how it's forced upon you. Starlight Glimmer — and the two-parter's theme itself — openly critiques the very structure and magic of the cutie mark. Surprisingly, SG's political assessments and critiques of the cutie mark system not only opens up further discussion and history of the cutie mark, but it also closes the continuity gap that Magical Mystery Cure opened. Her angst over the cutie mark isn't plucked out of thin air. It's an ongoing discussion in the fandom, including Pinkie Pride itself. There's legitimate backing to it, and she has very good reasons to tell passersby to abandon the practice. By being a very slick motivational speaker, Starlight Glimmer becomes both imposing and very threatening.
     
    A common problem in two-parters is the lack of naturality in the dialogue. Only Return of Harmony had much conviction in the dialogue. The Cutie Map's dialogue is incredibly believable. Sure, there's some repetition in Rarity's "divine" comments, but that's me being a little picky. Pinkie Pie was incredibly on point throughout; if you're a very big brony of her, you will like her here. She retains that same zaniness that we grew to know and love, but she's not a random idiot. Her comedy has purpose, and her obliviousness isn't exaggerated. She was acutely aware of how forced the ponies were acting, and it creeped her out. When she wasn't liking how Fluttershy bobbed to the propaganda, her glare snapped her out of it.
     
    Honestly, the disagreement the Mane Six had with their impressions over the town was awesome! Pinkie Pie was extremely apprehensive over the town, Starlight Glimmer, and the townsponies. However, Fluttershy had a completely opposite opinion of the town. Despite Glimmer's scary predisposition, FS wasn't willing to quit on the town and believe there were some good intentions behind everything here. In Bats!, FS's skewed opinions of how to handle the bats was completely wrong, yet treated as in the right despite Applejack having more justification to get rid of the vampire fruit bats. Here, both FS and PP had very solid opposing opinions of the village. This establishes not just the gray morale in this whole episode, but also Starlight Glimmer's politics. They were a driving force in the conflict, but neither side was one-hundred-percent right. Each of the Mane Six had strong, solid, differing convictions of the town. None of them were right nor wrong.
     
    There's one bugaboo that I must talk about: "The Staff of Sameness." Not the staff itself, but the naming. It's extremely blunt and very anticlimactic. It gives off that feeling of evil before SG confronted them. While the rest of the episode had extremely clever writing, the name of the staff comes off as extremely convenient. If there was more cleverness in the name, like "equalibrium," "The Gate to Freedom," or something else (if you can give me other names in the comments, feel free to), it would make SG's morale even greyer. Fortunately, Sonneborn and Larson were able to overcome this stilt and deliver a story that was extremely solid from top to bottom.
     
    @@LZRD WZRD mentioned this in his analysis, and I'll do it here. "In Our Town" is an accurate, yet creepy, tribute to WWII propaganda songs. There's a sick stench of utopian creepiness that will make you shiver down your spine. But one meter really hones in Glimmer's justified philosophies: "You can't have a nightmare if you never dream." What makes it scary is how there's truth into this line. The idea that dreams are describes as an inherent nightmare; in order to have a true good night's sleep, how about giving up the ability to dream? It's a scary question to ask, but how the song's written and delivered creates a mirage of how this may be one of the best ideas out there. The line offers serious implications over how you can tackle this internal conflict. (I'm thinking of breaking down the entire song in a future analysis.)
     
    I'll do more at a later date, but for now, it's safe to say that this episode ranks as one of the best at this point. There are very good reasons why The Cutie Map has so much intrigue in this fandom. The conflict concept is bold and fantastic. But what it did was tackle this dark theme, merge the concept of the cutie mark in both MMC and the rest of the show, and approach it very naturally. It's extremely believable, and its execution is utterly fantastic. A very bold direction like this is extremely needed, and to have it done and done well in TV-Y programming is revolutionary.
     

    Now, I want to talk about the idea of getting into video brony analysis. Like I said on here in public and PMs, one of the reasons I don't go into video analysis is how I don't have the wherewithal in the technology to get into it. I'm a huge novice into the video-making and audio-merging equipment. Plus, I'm a major perfectionist, and written reviews are much more forgiving than video analysis, especially since YouTube doesn't allow you to reupload and keep the URL. However, now with season five here, I'm starting to think of tackling this rich field, possibly during the summer break. What I want to do is create a video setting as well as create an actual screen where I can get people's attention. There are two ideas in mind:
    Inspired by Winnie the Pooh's "Thoughtful Spot" and the storytelling from Pocahontas, I'm thinking of creating a campfire scene. The background will be a dark, rich blue. With a simplified version of my ponysona on the left-hand side (while sitting down, BTW), there would be a campfire. The logs burn as I talk. Either above or in the campfire, a screen will periodically appear to show clips of the show, comic, or imagery. They will fade in an out as I narrate the analysis. Depending on the tone and character's face, the fire will change color, from yellow out of surprise to blue out of anger (blue fire is the hottest) to red out of coldness. The fire comes on when starting, ending, or transitioning in the analysis.
     
    Another spinoff idea from this is how the background stays dark, basically a very dark brown shade of my ponysona's stroke color. However, only his head, horns, and maybe legs will peak out as they're near the campfire. When the campfire lights up, his head's visible. Once it goes dark, he vanishes.
    I'm thinking of keeping my ponysoan as is. However, what I'm thinking is tinkering it to make my ponysona's head as the screen. As the screen plays, the background changes color depending on my tone and mood. This, however, feels really incomplete.

    If anyone has more ideas, feel free to give me a comment or two below.
  4. Dark Qiviut
    "Weeaboo" is an insult people use to bash anime and manga fans, especially ones who behave rowdy. "Hasdrone" is an insult people use to bash bronies who still like the show post-season two or three. "Hasdrone" isn't so widely used anymore compared to the hiatus between seasons three and four, but "weeaboo" is still widely used online. Both of them are a byproduct of cyberbully culture and used by entitled, self-absorbed scumbags who feel it's a great idea to bully or troll others.
     
    Well, newsflash: There's no factually good reason to be a bigot and use either slur under ANY circumstance. The second you use either of them, you don't look better than them. Instead, you become one-hundred-percent more pathetic than the people you shoot down.
  5. Dark Qiviut
    One of my biggest peeves in reviewing is giving something a calculated score, because it's very difficult if not impossible to reduce the quality to such a mark. Plus, whenever many people see a score, they tend to not read the review at all and rely on the score/grade itself as proof for purchase.
    Nonetheless, if I were to grade the following based on the following items below, they would be the followings below the first rule. The grades are respective and separated to the following categories:
    Season 1 Season 2 Season 3 Season 4 Season 5 Season 6 Season 7 Season 8 Season 9 MLP: The Movie & Specials Equestria Girls series, RR animated shorts, specials, and IDW comic/annual Main Comic Series* Micro-Series Friends Forever If you want to see my order of every FIM episode from best to worst (with grades), click here.
    Be warned: There are no reasons given for any of the grades, and they're all subject to change. Let's begin!
    Season 1:
    Friendship Is Magic: C The Ticket Master: C- Applebuck Season: B- Griffon the Brush Off: D+ Boast Busters: F Dragonshy: B- Look Before You Sleep: B Bridle Gossip: F- Swarm of the Century: B- Winter Wrap Up: A- Call of the Cutie: B+ Fall Weather Friends: B Suited for Success: A Feeling Pinkie Keen: D- Sonic Rainboom: B Stare Master: C- The Show Stoppers: F A Dog and Pony Show: C Green Isn't Your Color: B Over a Barrel: D+ A Bird in the Hoof: D The Cutie Mark Chronicles: A- Owl's Well that Ends Well: F Party of One: A+ The Best Night Ever: A+ ———
    Season 2:
    The Return of Harmony: A- Lesson Zero: A Luna Eclipsed: B+ Sisterhooves Social: A+ The Cutie Pox: C May the Best Pet Win!: F The Mysterious Mare Do Well: F Sweet and Elite: B- Secret of My Excess: B Hearth's Warming Eve: B Family Appreciation Day: B Baby Cakes: C+ The Last Roundup: B
    The Last Roundup (edited): F The Super Speedy Cider Squeezy 6000: C- Read It and Weep: B- Hearts and Hooves Day: D A Friend in Deed: B Putting Your Hoof Down: F It's About Time: B- Dragon Quest: F- Hurricane Fluttershy: A Ponyville Confidential: D- MMMystery on the Friendship Express: D- A Canterlot Wedding: C- ———
    Season 3:
    The Crystal Empire: F+ Too Many Pinkie Pies: C+ One Bad Apple: F- Magic Duel: B+ Sleepless in Ponyville: A Wonderbolts Academy: A- Apple Family Reunion: B Spike at Your Service: D- Keep Calm and Flutter On: D+ Just for Sidekicks: D Games Ponies Play: F+ Magical Mystery Cure: C- ———
    Season 4:
    Princess Twilight Sparkle: C- Castle Mane-ia: B- Daring Don't: D Flight to the Finish: A Power Ponies: C Bats!: F+ Rarity Takes Manehattan: B+ Pinkie Apple Pie: B+ Rainbow Falls: F- Three's a Crowd: C+ Pinkie Pride: A Simple Ways: C- Filli Vanilli: D Twilight Time: B It Ain't Easy Being Breezies: D- Somepony to Watch Over Me: F Maud Pie: C+ For Whom the Sweetie Belle Toils: A- Leap of Faith: C Testing Testing 1, 2, 3: A Trade Ya!: F Inspiration Manifestation: B Equestria Games: D+ Twilight's Kingdom: B- ———
    Season 5:
    The Cutie Map: A+ Castle Sweet Castle: A- Bloom & Gloom: A- Tanks for the Memories: D+ Appleoosa's Most Wanted: F Make Friends but Keep Discord: C+ The Lost Treasure of Griffonstone: C Slice of Life: A Princess Spike: F Party Pooped: C- Amending Fences: A+ Do Princesses Dream of Magic Sheep?: D+ Canterlot Boutique: B- Rarity Investigates!: B Made in Manehattan: C+ Brotherhooves Social: D+ Crusaders of the Lost Mark: A+ The One Where Pinkie Knows: C Hearthbreakers: B- Scare Master: B+ What About Discord: F The Hooffields and McColts: D+ The Mane Attraction: A- The Cutie Re-Mark: A ———
    Season 6:
    The Crystalling: B The Gift of Maud Pie: C+ On Your Marks: B+ Gauntlet of Fire: A- No Second Prances: F Newbie Dash: F- A Hearth's Warming Tail: A The Saddle Row Review: A Applejack's "Day" Off: C Flutter Brutter: F+ Spice Up Your Life: C- Stranger Than Fan Fiction: B- The Cart Before the Ponies: F 28 Pranks Later: F- The Times They Are a Changeling: A Dungeons & Discords: B Buckball Season: C- The Fault in Our Cutie Marks: A- Viva Las Pegasus: B+ Every Little Thing She Does: D P.P.O.V. (Pony Point of View): F Where the Apple Lies: B- Top Bolt: B To Where and Back Again: F ———
    Season 7:
    Celestial Advice: B- All Bottled Up: A- A Flurry of Emotions: B+ Rock Solid Friendship: C+ Fluttershy Leans In: C Forever Filly: C+ Parental Glideance: A+ Hard to Say Anything: F Honest Apple: F A Royal Problem: C- Not Asking for Trouble: B- Discordant Harmony: A- The Perfect Pear: A+ Fame and Misfortune: F- Triple Threat: B- Campfire Tales: C+ To Change a Changeling: B+ Daring Done: C+ It Isn't the Mane Thing About You: A- A Health of Information: B Marks and Recreation: A Once Upon a Zeppelin: A- Secrets and Pies: D Uncommon Bond: A- Shadow Play: A+ ———
    Season 8:
    School Daze: B- The Maud Couple: B Fake It 'Til You Make It: F Grannies Gone Wild: A Surf and/or Turf: A Horse Play: A- The Parent Map: B+ Non-Compete Clause: D- The Break Up Break Down: A+ Molt Down: A- Marks for Effort: B+ The Mean 6: A A Matter of Principals: C- The Hearth's Warming Club: A Friendship University: B+ The End in Friend: B Yakity-Sax: D On the Road to Friendship: A The Washouts: A A Rockhoof and a Hard Place: A+ What Lies Beneath: A- Sounds of Silence: A- Father Knows Beast: B- School Raze: B ———
    Season 9:
    The Beginning of the End: B+ Uprooted: B+ Sparkle's Seven: A+ The Point of No Return: A- Common Ground: A She's All Yak: A- Frenemies: A Sweet and Smoky: B Going to Seed: B- Student Counsel: B+ The Last Crusade: A+ Between Dark and Dawn: A The Last Laugh: A- 2, 4, 6, Greaaat: D A Trivial Pursuit: B- The Summer Sun Setback: A She Talks to Angel: B+ Dragon Dropped: A A Horse Shoe-In: B+ Daring Doubt: B Growing Up is Hard to Do: C- The Big Mac Question: A+ The Ending of the End: C The Last Problem: A ———
    Specials/Movies:
    My Little Pony: The Movie: C Best Gift Ever: C+ Rainbow Roadtrip: B  
    Equestria Girls:
    My Little Pony: Equestria Girls: F- The Fall of Sunset Shimmer: A- MLP Annual #1: C- My Little Pony: Equestria Girls — Rainbow Rocks: D Equestria Girls Holiday Special: F- My Little Pony: Equestria Girls — Friendship Games: F+ My Little Pony: Equestria Girls — Legend of Everfree: C-  
    Dance Magic: C Movie Magic: C- Mirror Magic: D- Forgotten Friendship: C ———
    Rainbow Rocks Shorts:
    Music to My Ears: A Guitar Centered: C Hamstocalypse Now: C Pinkie on the One: D+ Player Piano: C- A Case for the Bass: B- Shake Your Tail!: C- Perfect Day for Fun: D  
    Life Is a Runway: A My Past Is Not Today: A Friendship Through the Ages: A  
    Main Comic Series:
    (Individual issues and overall arc are graded separately.)
    The Return of Queen Chrysalis: B
    a. Part 1: B+
    b. Part 2: C-
    c. Part 3: B
    d. Part 4: B Nightmare Rarity: F
    a. Part 1: D-
    b. Part 2: D
    c. Part 3: D-
    d. Part 4: F Zen and the Art of Gazebo Repair: B+
    a. Part 1: B+
    b. Part 2: A- Neigh Anything: B
    a. Part 1: B-
    b. Part 2: B My Little Pirate: Friendship Ahoy: D
    a. Part 1: C
    b. Part 2: D+ The Bookworm: C-
    a. Part 1: D
    b. Part 2: C Reflections: F
    a. Part 1: D+
    b. Part 2: D-
    c. Part 3: F
    d. Part 4: F Manehattan Mysteries: A-
    a. Part 1: A-
    b. Part 2: A- The Good, the Bad, and the Ponies: F-
    a. Part 1: F-
    b. Part 2: F- Siege of The Crystal Empire: F-
    a. Part 1: D
    b. Part 2: F
    c. Part 3: F-
    d. Part 4: F- *The main comics have been so bad, until they clean up, I refuse to read them again.
    ———
    Micro-Series:
    Twilight Sparkle: F+ Rainbow Dash: F- Rarity: B+ Fluttershy: F- Pinkie Pie: A Applejack: D+ Cutie Mark Crusaders: A- Princess Celestia: B- Spike: C- Princess Luna: C ———
    Friends Forever:
    Pinkie Pie & Applejack: F Cutie Mark Crusaders & Discord: B Spike & Princess Celestia: C- Twilight Sparkle & Shining Armor: B Fluttershy & Zecora: A Rainbow Dash & Trixie: C+ Pinkie Pie & Princess Luna: A- Rarity & Applejack: D+ Rarity & Babs Seed: B Rainbow Dash & Soarin': A I wound up growing uninterested in reading Friends Forever, hence the short list.
  6. Dark Qiviut
    Author's Note: As of Monday, January 26, Mr. Enter's YouTube account has been revived. With that, comments here are locked.
     

    As many of you already know, cartoon reviewer The Mysterious Mr. Enter had his account terminated last night courtesy of multiple copyright violations from Viacom (the main corporation responsible for managing companies like Nickelodeon). He had one review taken down two days ago, and then YouTube vacuumed up his account, hitting five total videos with copyright strikes consecutively.
     
    I posted my response on EQD's page detailing his account closure (with Silver Quill's and Dr. Wolf's videos informing others). My response is below, C&P's from EQD itself:
  7. Dark Qiviut
    Warning: This review contains massive spoilers for the movie. If you don't desire to be spoiled, click the back button.
     
    ———
     
    My Little Pony: Equestria Girls is the semi-blockbuster for the My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic franchise. The fourth generation has garnered hype and popularity since its inception on October 10, 2012, with the help of the target audience (families), market audience (families and families of little girls), and periphery demographic (everyone else — the teenager-and-up bronies, for example). However, unlike Friendship Is Magic, Equestria Girls's market audience is adolescent girls — ages ten to fourteen. With the premise revealed and controversy surrounding the spinoff, how does the movie itself hold up?
     
    To answer several questions and thoughts before I write the official commentary:
    If you watched the , you'll notice one segment where Twilight has trouble flying, a retcon from the ending from Magical Mystery Cure. The clip from that commercial came from this movie.
    Flash Sentry, who was featured not that much and didn't have much dialogue, was a love interest. In passing, Rarity said Flash Sentry and Sunset were a couple, but were broken up. Twilight gained a crush on him, and the two mutually respect each other.
    Derpy is featured at least twice in the movie, once deep in the credits dancing to the tune and the second during Equestria Girls (the song). In the latter, she appears walking in the lower-right-hand corner.
    There was a common question about why Twilight not stealing the crown back before retreating as fast as she could to the portal. Spike queried to Twilight about telling Twilight why she didn't ask Principal Celestia where it was, but that was the closest it came to this idea. Twilight didn't bother searching for it at any point in the movie.
    In the back of Sunset Shimmer's toy packaging, she's references as a former student for Celestia. She was Celestia's former student.
    Twilight Sparkle, while in her human form, didn't attended classes (at least on screen).
    At no point is the word "human" even uttered.
    If you wish to see the plot summary, head to its wiki page here.

    Now to my standard review.
     
    My Little Pony: Equestria Girls markets to female teenagers via the content within, but DHX and Meghan McCarthy are responsible for animate and write the movie. On one hand, there is plenty of material to attract the parents and periphery demographic with the wit and humor. On the other, there is so much, from the little details to the characterization to the overall concept, that is extremely patronizing to the periphery demographic to the point of segregating them from the rest of the audience. It has the potential and shows it occasionally, but on the whole, it's one gigantic clunker.
     
    First, there are strengths:
    The animation of the ponies is extremely fluid. To repeat, one element from the series that is often overlooked is the quality and improvement of the animal animation. Instead of using Flash as a cost-cutting measure, DHX uses it as a crucial tool to develop the animation and make it as useful as handdrawing them, akin to a full-length Disney animated picture. The same can be said for Spike as both a dragon and dog. The way bot designs move gathers no noticeable hitches or glitches.
    In the alternate world, the environmental graphics are solid. It's school, but it feels like a lively school, with bright colors, land, shadows, and many other nuances. In front of Canterlot High is a horse statue that contains numerous details to make it look polished and beautiful. You can see, pause, and observe the details in that statue.
    There are no complaints for the excellent voice work. Whenever they talked, the dialogue, reactions, and exclamations didn't sound fake or poorly acted. When Twilight was anxious, she appeared anxious. When Spike was concerned or snarky, he was exactly that. The tones were believable. Sunset Shimmer was a bully, and her aggressive voice (as a human, pony, and bitchy demon) fit her personality.
    Like the episodes themselves, one crucial point in the series is both the background musical score and song score.Once more, William Anderson performed well. Each time his score came into play, the mood resonates and correlates. When the situation was calm, the score captured that feeling of calm. When Twilight was anxious or panicking, Anderson's tunes captured that panic. During the lone fight scene, the score revved up to represent adrenaline and urge, and it matched the scene well.
     
    And if you are a Star Wars geek like I am, take a listen to the score once Twilight opens Principal Celestia's door open with her head. You'll notice a tiny bit of a Star Wars-esque tune before it switches into something more fitting to Celestia.
    Daniel Ingram is responsible for the song score, and what he did really harnessed the feeling of youth. The songs are teen pop, which tends to be upbeat, young, and urban in its music. According to Ingram, this is something very foreign to him, which he did quite well in three songs:
     
    A Strange New World: This is the most unique of the songs in terms of tone. In the other songs, you can really notice the similarities in the drums, symbols, and rhythm. In this one, however, the mood is much more different, which means a change of pace in the music. It's lower and doesn't have as much adrenaline compared to the others.
     
    Equestria Girls: The second the song begins to plays, there's a tribute to Queen's We Will Rock You. It's by far the catchiest song in the entire movie, and Ingram's upbeat, high-paced score (akin to a song played at a baseball game during a road team's mound conference) revs up tremendous adrenaline, starting small and then climatically ending on a continuously high note.
     
    The instrumental theme for the characters' transformation. If you're going to give this moment any impact, it's important to put in a great score for it. Ingram did exactly that, combining the teen pop genre with the feeling of magic and majesty in the instruments.

    [*]The characterization of the humans is rather decent. Twilight's misadventures as a human really fits her, for she transformed from a pony so suddenly. As for the other humans, their dialogue fits their personalities and roles (Principal Celestia, Applejack, Rainbow Dash, etc.).
    [*]But there's one human who stole the show in some capacity: Pinkie Pie. If you love Pinkie Pie, you'll love her glorious performance. For almost the entire movie, she was extremely in character and random, but didn't behave like a mindless clone from Too Many Pinkie Pies. Whatever she was going to say, you had no idea when or where. But whenever she did, it fit her so well. She wasn't random for the sake of it nor was she random during very crucial, dire moments. If she was serious, she was. When she was surprised, she was surprised. When she wanted to surprise someone with her hilarious antics, you had no idea how, whether it's her "hunch," breaking the fourth wall, or hanging upside-sown with a megaphone in her hand. She was fantastic here and gave her character so much justice.
    [*]A little detail, but Principal Celestia shone early in the movie. Her sassy, snarky expression once Twilight entered her office was funny, and she showed both patience and impatience. In that small clip, she displayed a bigger sense of character than her pony counterpart: her strength of wisdom, but a psychological flaw of greater importance and not wanting to waste time taking needless conversations.
    [*]When Spike is well-written, he is a tremendous character, and he was excellent here. The design choice of him being Twilight's dog is still stupid because it relegated him to a pet instead of Twilight's surrogate brother, but he was the level-headed figure of the duo. He was intelligent, witty, and the wiser of the two. He sometimes said something that was hilarious and not as smart as he hoped, but he knew Twilight very well and guided her whenever she got stuck, lost, or anxious. DHX, this is how Spike SHOULD be written: not a comedic butt of jokes, but a character who's worth his screentime and attention to the audience. Suffice it to say, it's his best role since The Crystal Empire.
    [*]Twilight Sparkle was adorkable, but not the same Twilight compared to season three. All of the character growth from the pilot to Magical Mystery Cure was retained: nervous, mature, capable of quickly regaining her composure. Her leadership, which isn't highlighted as much as it should, played a role in many parts of the movie, from making her human companions of her friends friends again to being the one who helped clean up the mess in the hall to leading the chase in the end.


    That said, there are many issues, some small, some quite big.
    One big issue in many of season three's episodes is the pace, either because it's too fast or too slow. This issue is evident here on many occasions.
     
    a. Twilight was transformed into a human and had to adapt in order to retrieve her Element of Harmony. In what is a seventy-minute movie, Twilight had to adapt to being a human in only three days. Transformation from one species to another is not as easy to adapt as you logically think. Think about a baby walking. When a baby tries to walk the first time, he or she will stumble and fall down. Eventually, the baby will walk, but it won't happen right away. It takes plenty of time to adjust, and this example applies to Twilight. She's smart, but isn't going to go from acting like a four-legged mammal to a human who's capable of wiggling her fingers and walking on her two feet in a couple of days. Getting used to having different anatomy takes plenty of time to adapt, and it's too quick.
     
    b. A common issue in the series: explaining a villain's backstory with as little detail as possible. Sunset Shimmer is the main villain in the entire movie, and Celestia didn't explain her history as thoroughly as she should. If given one or two more minutes to explain her past more, then Shimmer's transformation from a confident student to a dishonest, egotistical bully might've made more sense. Instead, Celestia's explanation was rushed and only opened up more questions regarding her past. Sunset's flimsy excuse following her defeat didn't close the door on these questions, but rather left them just as open, if not more.
     
    c. Twilight's crush, Flash Sentry (a.k.a., Brad), is boring and flat. As a character, he has very little personality. Sure, he's supposed to be kind and gentlemanly, but when he spoke, there was so little to demonstrate something from him that stands out and make him thoroughly three-dimensional. Any physical, psychological, and emotional flaws that make the characters thrive are absent, and he had so few roles to make him verbally stand out. Basically, he was a tertiary character.
     
    d. The mutual respect for both Flash Sentry and Twilight resorts to three common clichés: Flash helping Twilight to her feet; Flash and Twilight bumping into each other, having a "crush-y" moment, and Flash being Sunset's ex-boyfriend.
     
    The latter cliché is such a major copout for two reasons: It creates unnecessary conflict (which never got brought up following the revelation), and it's written as a cheap excuse to hook Twilight and Flash up. If you want to write genuinely good quality cruses and romance, don't fall for these stupid traps that intellectually insult your audience.
     
    Furthermore, the family-friendly romantic feelings were implausibly developed. At one point, they met. The next, Twilight developed a crush. The third, Flash and Twilight developed mutual respect for each other. There was so much going on, no time for them to mutually communicate was given.
     
    e. The plot, from the beginning to the end, crammed way too much information for it to flow plausibly. This is a seventy-minute movie that featured several plot points, and it's up to McCarthy and the rest of DHX to have everything flow smoothly and plausibly: Twilight learning how to be a human, regain the crown, team up with her Human Five counterparts, defeat Sunset Shimmer, develop a crush on Flash Sentry along the way, and return home all in three days. What was given the ample opportunity to develop everything well was cut for the required time given for the movie. When you're forced to cut corners to cram so much detail, you run the risk of really diminishing the quality of the story. That's exactly the case here, with the plot going, "too much information, too little time." If anything, this movie should've been longer.
    While the animation of the ponies and other animals is fluent, the humans are very subpar. With the exception of the twirling during Equestria Girls, the humans don't appear fluid at all. For one, the squash and stretch (an important principle in animation) are missing most of the time. When they walk and run, it doesn't have that organic motor of their legs. When the characters walk, run, pose, or throw, it's as if I turned on a machine. Instead of using Flash as a crucial tool to produce high-quality animation, it comes across as a crutch to cut corners.
     
    While a nitpick, Snails carried that wheelbarrow full of bricks as if it was empty. One brick alone is extremely heavy, and he's pushing at least a dozen. That's about two hundred pounds of bricks. For a team that takes its physics very seriously, DHX slipped up here.
    The cause of the division of the Human Five is out of character. While teens are extremely naïve, the Human Five are extremely intelligent, and they were all friends when they went to High School as freshmen. When Sunset Shimmer sabotaged their friendship with questionable messages, in-character beings of themselves would've gone to the supposed messengers and ask if they genuinely sent them. If they weren't friends to begin with, then that's not a problem, but it's very problematic and didn't make sense.
    While the callback to the pilot with Fluttershy being shy to Twilight is fine as a concept, it doesn't make sense as she communicated with Sunset Shimmer. Following the confrontation, Fluttershy wouldn't have been as shy to talk with Twilight, who helped her and saved her from getting any more verbal abuse. If Fluttershy was quiet and meek while communicating with Sunset Shimmer, then the correlation wouldn't have been a problem.
    The periphery demographic is segregated from both the market and target audiences, relying on constant current pop culture and brony references to retain attention. While it's fine to reference the brony fandom in the form of Vinyl Scratch (with and without her shades), Trixie, Photo Finish, and Derpy, it's important to balance everything out with well-written plotlines, intelligent dialogue, and thorough characterization; this movie forced itself to divide the demographics.
    I called this out way too many times, particularly in my editorial.
     
    The human character designs are extremely formulaic, both male and female (with very few exceptions [i.e., Snips, Snails, Celestia, Granny Smith]).
     
    What makes the ponies stand out is how individual they all look even from either a basic silhouette. The pony base design is so strong, a mane and tail are all needed to create a character in a basic shape. With the humans, however, the hair immediately recognizes who the characters are, but that isn't enough, especially if going by a basic template (and to replicate well-recognized characters). Here, you need to really make the clothing varied to make the characters individual, and altering clothing like the skirts or boots just a little bit isn't enough. You need extreme variations in the height, anatomy, clothing, and so on to make them recognizable in a basic outline. For the Mane Six, besides Rainbow Dash's athletic pants, they're so similar; you can swap the completed designs from one to another, and they'll still fit.
     
    I repeated this in my editorial, so I'll copy and paste it:
      While Equestria Girls is both well-sung and well-composed, the other songs' lyrics are extremely repetitive. A Strange New World used the same message over and over again, while This Is Our Big Night (both the original and reprise) continued the same lyrics and tune. The latter is short, but it could've used much more variety to make the lyrics much more interesting. The creative genius that we normally see in the lyrics and song score is lost in its repetition and lack of necessity.
     
    The song played during the credits, A Friend for Life, albeit interesting and brings back the implied message My Little Pony: Equestria Girls sends, is very forgettable. It doesn't have catchy lyrics nor the bouncy rhythm that makes Equestria Girls intriguing to listen and see.
    Although the Human Six are in character, with the exception of Pinkie Pie, Spike, and Rarity (to an extent), the dialogue comes across as stilted. What makes great, three-dimensional characterization isn't merely having them be in character, but also not being able to predict somewhat what they're going to say. Whenever Rainbow Dash, Fluttershy, Twilight, and Applejack spoke, I honestly expected what they were saying. It doesn't have to be an exact match, as long as the message correlates. Pinkie's characterization was great because you didn't expect what she was saying, but you can here with almost everyone else.
     
    It isn't only the Human Six, either. Sunset Shimmer, Snips, Snails, Vice Principal Luna, and Flash Sentry have the same issue, too. As they each spoke, I could predict what they were about to say.
     
    Rainbow Dash, despite being in character, had the worst dialogue. Her lines are not only way too stilted, but also too simple and limited in her vocabulary. Review the movie and see how much she says the word, "awesome."
     
    There's a big difference between in character and a combination of in character and three-dimensional. Most of the characterizations leaned on the former rather than the ladder.
    For a character who was supposed to replicate wisdom and intelligence, Vice Principal Luna showed none in her brief appearances, especially while interrogating Twilight in her office. Instead, we got someone who couldn't recognize a blatant cutout. The picture of Twilight causing the mess in the gym isn't a photoshop. It's an image with Twilight cut out and glued on the front to make it look like she caused the mess. Any vice principal with an ounce of intelligence would immediately recognize the ploy. Paper has texture, and you can feel the image being cut out immediately. The real Vice Principal Luna would notice this immediately, find Sunset Shimmer, and interrogate her rather than rely on a semi-Deus Ex Machina to get Twilight out of trouble.
     
    Simply put, Vice Principal Luna is an atrociously, out-of-character idiot.
    The story's extremely predictable, playing it way too safe. While Friendship Is Magic mostly developed the characters conservatively, the writers aren't afraid to throw a curveball to make the plot interesting and accessible, sending a message to families (of little girls/teens) that good quality, fresh entertainment is available out there. But instead of throwing a great curveball that makes the audience whistle by how nasty it broke, Uncle Charlie lazily hung in the middle of the strike zone. This movie doesn't play fresh one iota. Instead, it sticks to the common clichés in high school with nothing genuinely interesting or faithful to the main series to keep things interesting. It's the typical "newcomer-arrives-at-High-School-meets-new-friends-gains-her-bully's-ex-as-a-crush-kicks-bully's-ass-and-the-story-ends-happily" plot, only with My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic slapped on the front to make it appear related. It's extremely formulaic; I felt like I honestly saw or read the same plot in another book or show.
    Snips and Sails are extremely unrecognizable as characters. Sure, their faces, bodies, and voices exist, but there's a difference in seeing them visually and seeing, hearing, and identifying them. Snips and Snails spoke, but they're not them.
     
    In Equestria, Snips and Snails are innocent-minded characters. While they tend to say and do stupid things, they're not evil. In the alternate world, they're evil! They're villains, and that's NOT them! They're a dumber version of Diamond Diara and Silver Spoon, but as males instead of females. "Alternate Universe" is no excuse for disrespecting the original characterization and making them different characters with "Snips" and "Snails" slapped on the obverse.
    Sunset Shimmer is a TERRIBLE character. There was so much criticism for King Sombra for being flat and boring, with nearly nothing to make him a full-fledged, developed character. However, Sombra still has plenty of potential to become such a dastardly villain that Discord would squirm.
     
    Sunset Shimmer is just bland and uninteresting. As a personality, she is the typical, high-school-clichéd, one-dimensional bitch. What could've been a highly manipulative, calculative, cocky, greedy, proud villain is relegated into a cardboard with the typical bully, with bright colors and a black jacket dressing her. Swap the shared "personality" Diamond Tiara and Silver Spoon had from One Bad Apple into Sunset Shimmer, and you have the same character with only a different character design and voice to separate them.
     
    Also, if she was interested in obtaining magical genius while studying under Celestia's tutelage, then why would she decide to venture into Canterlot High, a place where magic is much more obscure and difficult to conjure, in the first place? Instead, wouldn't she venture to another area to study harder, like a restricted section in the school library or another school where she feels she can study to her very best? Celestia describes Shimmer as hardworking to a huge fault, greedy, and thirsty to be the best sage. Greed and pride can describe Shimmer fantastically, but it wasn't used properly for her because the concept of the alternate world shuts down magic, and she behaved dimwittedly. Instead of shutting down her perceived intelligence to make Twilight and the rest of the characters better, use her intelligence to make both Twilight and Sunset equal rivals, and use Twilight's intelligence to problem-solve.
     
    Then there's her excuse why she became cruel and dishonest:
     Her reason for becoming so evil is flimsy and shallow, making her a flatter, dumber character, and inorganically shoehorning the Magic of Friendship in the canon. Her cruelty needs to have much more basis than this. If she's going to be evil, don't throw in a rushed two-liner. Give her evil a basis to make her evil solid, logical, and empathetic. In the ending, Sunset is at her most vulnerable. Show us why we should feel sympathy for her. That throwaway line doesn't give her character justice. Instead, bullshit is delivered, stomping on any integrity her concept once had.
    The ending makes no sense.
     
    a. Like the rest of the plot, the climax was way too quick. There was so much to deliver, explain, show, and tell, but the whole battle was crammed into five minutes.
     
    b. A second Deus Ex Machina bloomed. Flash showing up to get Twilight out of trouble was the first. The second came here when Twilight and her human friends harnessed the power of the Elements of Harmony. While the Elements of Harmony were definitely going to impact the movie somehow, Twilight was able to activate its power without the tools necessary to activate the Magic of Friendship. If the physical tools were unnecessary, then why did Discord steal them in Return of Harmony, and why did Twilight have to safeguard them from Keep Calm and Flutter On to Magical Mystery Cure? The DEM handwaves the purpose of having the tangible objects to begin with (using that "intangible tangibles" cliché) and creates a big plothole that the universe didn't need having.
     
    c. As funny as Twilight was in the dance, her going to the Fall Formal at the end is completely out of character of her. She's running on time, and she barely entered through the portal before the clock ran out. What if she went into the Formal and didn't make it on time? She would really regret doing it. It would've been best for the plot if Twilight went on to say, "no," say goodbye to her friends, and leave for home.
     
    d. The fact that Twilight went back to her world this quickly is just plain stupid! This event is a very big change for her to adapt. High School and the Fall Formal are completely foreign environments, and it's up for her to adapt as well as she plausibly can. Furthermore, it's up to her to survive. But to be there from the beginning of the movie to returning to her own world makes no sense.
     
    1. It shows right from the get-go that this movie's primary purpose is to sell toys. The plot is second-nature, and it shows how much how DHX has to try to cram such a dumb concept into the plot in order for the alternate dimension to make sense professionally and canonically.
     
    2. It's such a huge mea culpa and exemplifies why converting Twilight from an alicorn back to a unicorn is such a stupid idea. It tells the audience that DHX spits on the concept and wants to do whatever it can to "rectify" an idea that's so unfaithful to Friendship Is Magic's roots. But this plot point is so cheap and admits to the audience that the movie shouldn't have been made, period. DHX and Meghan McCarthy are implying, "This movie conceptually sucks, and we'll do whatever it takes to get out of it." It's as if McCarthy ran into Writer's Block and sifted through The Generic Book of Generic Clichés just to escape. It have It takes whatever "soul" — or lack thereof — Equestria Girls already "had" and destroys it.
     
    If DHX wanted to disguise the blatant toy promotion more convincingly, have Twilight not be able to return during the movie. As in, the only way to get back to Equestria is to wait for the next thirty moons or have Twilight adapt in High School, better expand the Magic of Friendship to Sunset Shimmer, battle through rough times in High School, become triumphant, and graduate. But this canonical method is cheap and lame: It tells the audience that DHX and Hasbro don't desire to explain and expand this world further.
    Finally, this movie as a whole has absolutely no soul. Just because there are patches of great work doesn't mean the passion is exactly there. It's very possible to churn high-quality work just for the sake of it. The movie's concept is extremely typical, but McCarthy and the rest of the crew didn't do something to make it stand out and make it not only differentiate from the rest of the typical High School plotlines, but also faithful to the roots of Friendship Is Magic. The concept is old to the core, but McCarthy could've still done something to make My Little Pony: Equestria Girls refreshing and not fall into the samey plotlines that have killed many movies (both blockbuster features and home videos). But Equestria Girls didn't dare to take chances and slapped in many brony references to capture the periphery demographic's attention. Too much was crammed in simultaneously, forcing the movie to hold its breath until the credits rolled. Like a furious and impatient conductor rolling through his or her notes, Equestria Girls speeds through one page after another and cuts corners to fit everything into one package. It's completely different to Magical Mystery Cure, where the path wasn't linear. Here, it was very linear with no thoroughly great characterization, poorly done character development, and the overall impression that DHX and Hasbro didn't care for the overall quality and performance of the movie at all. Executive meddling is no excuse for giving My Little Pony: Equestria Girls a Dementor's Kiss.

    My Little Pony: Equestria Girls is a spinoff with the ability to expand the universe into more uncharted, interesting territories. Despite a concept that doesn't stay faithful to the core of the main series, the Next Big Thing for Friendship Is Magic provided ample opportunity for Hasbro and DHX to take it and make something fresh and good out of it. There are patches of high-quality characterization (primarily in Pinkie Pie and Spike), music, character backstories, and overall potential. Instead, the story is safe; the humans' animation is inorganic; the lyrics are often repetitive or forgettable; and the overall script quality is sacrificed for time. In what could have been a great way to sidestep executive meddling and send a message to families, adolescent girls, and the overall periphery demographic that the High School concept can show a breath of fresh air, the clichés deliver the opposite, disappointing message and further prove that the concept just doesn't work. Although the potential is there, what is executed instead is mostly a convoluted, lazy, soulless mess. Overall, My Little Pony: Equestria Girls is a terrible movie.
  8. Dark Qiviut
    I talked about this on here and friends on Skype over the weeks, but I'm feeling pretty resigned.
     
    I don't how many users from the Sonic Stadium Message Board are on here, but longtime users there know how fervent I am when it comes to supporting Sonic. I've been a fan since my dad lent me his Genesis and games (including Sonic 1) since 1991. But these days, my health comes first.
     
    You see, ever since I was a kid, if I played games too long or too many times, my eyes started to twitch. The games had so many jerking actions and lights that my eyes and the muscles around it tire and lose control. I tended to ignore it, but then I stop after getting bored or playing too long and wait for the twitching to stop.
     
    One day in 2000, the gaming caught me. I suffered a photosensitive seizure. Literally one of the scariest days of my life. Since then, I cut down on my gaming and took very serious measures to stop it from ever happening again. This included playing games — since Adventure, Sonic games only — in a very bright room from a corner during the daytime and when I was fully awake. This included only playing games in short bursts (about fifteen to thirty minutes with an equally long break). If I felt any twitching signs, games go off.
     
    Well, now that I'm much older, I must think about my life in front of me. This includes considering my health. I haven't attempted to play any video game for over a year now. The last time I attempted, I thought about my photosensitive eyes and immediately turned it off. I loved playing Sonic, but the majority of the video games out there are way too dangerous for me, and I don't want to play a video game that could kill me. This includes Sonic. No hobby is worth risking triggering an epileptic seizure, period.
     
    As a result, I accept the fact that my days of playing video games are over.
  9. Dark Qiviut
    Everyone who's seen DeviantArt knows this logo:
     

    Since 2000, DeviantArt's trademark is iconic. You have the "d" and "a" forming what looks like the roof of a house, representing unity and hominess. Despite its angles and changes over the years, it's been rather consistent. Does it look dated? Maybe, but it's a really bad idea to change an iconic logo, because you risk damaging its already established brand identity. Some have worked.
    The Twitter canary from a simply cute bird to one where the shapes have meaning.
    Nike changing from the Swoosh/oblique type to just the swoosh.
    Apple's rainbow apple and complementary wordmark to just the silver apple.
    Simplifying the Starbucks logo into the green mermaid they've used for years.
    Microsoft's flag being simplified into windows instead of adding a combination of gradients that amounted to nothing.
    NBC's peacock in 1986.
    FedEx's current logo we have today from the generic American Express from yester-decade.
    The current Poniverse logo.

    But this?
     

     
    This is NOT an improvement.
     
    I mean, let's look at the technical aspects. It's actually really good. It's extremely polished, and the sharp angles have the edge of moving forward, something we've seen in logos like Dodge. And if you're looking for a bold color, the green is a perfect balance with the black.
     
    But there are several huge problems.
    It's way too cold. If you want to see what I mean, compare it to the current Nickelodeon logo.
     

     
    Despite the casual attitude Nickelodeon presents in its wordmark, the biggest flaw here is how corporate it feels. It doesn't have the fun or energy that the old Nick splat had. It's cleaner and works well in smaller sizes, but it's too rigid.
     
    DeviantArt's new logo is exactly that. DeviantArt's previous logo had a feeling of comfort thanks to its abstract roof and quirky design. It's way too mechanical, and its precision is actually hurting its presentation.
    The trademark has one fatal look when it comes to making the logo smaller. Take a look at where the stroke and bars meet and the corners. There are little curves, which are completely opposite of the wordmark. Those little nubs will vanish the second they reach a certain size, and that decision will look like a big mistake.
    It doesn't speak as "art." There are many ways to ask yourself, "What is art?" One key reason why they do it is because it allows people to show what they can do. Art lets them feel loose. Instead, it feels like a bastardized version of the Via Rail Canada (the logo itself is a simplified rail system).
    The fact that DeviantArt had to explain the point to the audience, both by Spyed and this video.
     

     
    One of the most important rules in logo design is how much can you reduce it to a point, yet still have the audience to get it without help. NBC's peacock, ABC's button, the old UPS shield, Enron's RGB block-E, the New York Yankees, FedEx's arrow, the Dallas Cowboys sheriff star, Toblerone chocolate's bear, the CBS eye, and the Swoosh are instantaneously recognizable. You don't need to explain these to the audience.
     
    But when you ask the crowd about the new DA logo, you're going to get completely different answers. Many say it looks like a Z, an F, a don't equal sign, or two A's (my observations).
     
    Instead, it's supposed to be an abstract dA.
     
    DA's logo is TOO abstract. One of the biggest cardinal sins in logo design is having to explain to your audience the logo's purpose. Your audience is supposed to immediately capture the essence of the logo and recognize its visual cues. If you have to inform your audience about your logo's meaning, then your logo sucks. It doesn't matter if anyone likes it or not. From a view of objective quality, it's bad. Plain and simple.
     
    While recreating the logo, DeviantArt user Nsio picked up another big flaw: the lack of amodal completion. Basically, the brain is able to pick up visual cues to create the shape. Here's one of the more famous ones:
     

     
    Your brain is able to pick up the two triangles. The black-stroked triangle is visually connected with each other, and the same is said with the white triangle. It's a key component in graphic design, and psychology of visual perception is a required course for my graphic design bachelor's degree.
     
    There are absolutely no visual cues with the new DeviantArt logo. You can't make out the "dA" without any help. There needs to be more with the trademark to make it look remotely like "DeviantArt."

    Quite simply, the logo is a massive failure of a rebrand and the worse I've seen since PepsiCo and Arnell rebranded Tropicana's famous packaging in 2009.
  10. Dark Qiviut
    The worst written scene in all of FIM is Vice Principal Luna interrogating Twilight in her office. Luna bought into "evidence" of photos that were clearly cut out and glued together. The whole scene has no tension, because it lasted barely over a minute. Flash's moment of intervention could've been removed in favor of the Mane Six or Luna not falling for that stupid trick. It's so broken, it turned the first film into a colossal failure, and nothing after would save it.
     
    But my most hated part of all of FIM occurs during the climax. Sunset Shimmer was presented as the mean-girl, alpha-bitch stereotype and turned into a she-demon from a Diabolous Ex Machina, and then the EoH are acted by a Deus Ex Machina. The EoH defeat Sunset Shimmer…and completely destroy her character.
     
    Sometimes we can get tired of redemption stories in the show, and part of it is twofold. One for the villains not being well-written, the other for having the redemption story be poorly done. Redemption stories by themselves, though, aren't bad or good. You need the execution to be good to make it satisfying.
     
    Including the IDW comics, Sunset Shimmer's redemption is the second-worst in ALL of Friendship Is Magic. Worse than Sombra from Siege of The Crystal Empire. Worse than Discord. Worse than Luna/Nightmare Moon. They're better than Sunset's. One exception is Radiant Hope from Siege, because she's a complete Mary Sue, lured in villains to sabotage the Empire, and watched others get hurt and killed all for the goal of reviving Sombra without a shred of guilt.
     
    The one big problem with Sunset's redemption and the idea of me thinking of forgiving her is the fact that the Sunset seen in EQG1's resolution, Rainbow Rocks, the Holiday Special, the shorts, and Friendship Games isn't Sunset Shimmer. What we see in the films is the Elements of Harmony replacing her original personality with a brainwashed version of her. This is how the Elements want Sunset to be. This is the Elements influencing Sunset's psyche and development through a personality they created.
     
    Sure, she has the same memories, clothes, hair, and voice. But there's more to a character than those. The mannerisms and natural development from villain to protagonist matter, too. Sunset never had that. She never had that moment where she actually chose to change for the better. She didn't decide during the climax that she was going to try and make things up. The EoH's version of Sunset is the one doing all the redemption for her. As a result:
    Her whole redemption lacks any conviction. The scripts try to tell the viewer that Sunset is the one who caused it, and she's the one who can change it. But how can Sunset change it when the real Sunset doesn't even exist anymore? The quality of Rainbow Rocks and Friendship Games worsens. Each of their plots is partially about Sunset's redemption and spreading her wisdom to others. But neither acknowledge how Sunset became the way she is. They acknowledge her defeat, but that's it. In fact, both films flimsily hide her complete character change.

    Villain!Sunset is flatter than Flash, but the current Sunset is completely fake by how forced her transformation and development are.
     
    Sunset's current personality has factually way more dimension than the prior. There's no denying that. And there are reasons why she is popular. But when it comes to something like a magical lobotomy, I don't care if Villain!Sunset was a stereotype. If I want to see Sunset redeemed, I want to see Sunset redeemed, not a brainwashed figure in her place. To this day, it's my most hated aspect of the spinoff. What the EoH did was so evil that Equestria Girls hasn't recovered from that scene. Until they settle it once and for all rather than treat her redemption as something she chose throughout, it won't.
     
    The way she changed is similar to Nightmare Moon's defeat and change back to Luna. But even the first film screws it up. Princess Luna grew so jealous of Celestia that she turned herself into a completely different pony. Nightmare Moon is Luna, but Luna isn't NMM. The EoH relaxed her anger, bitterness, and jealousy and reverted her to the Luna of old.
     
    Now, contrast Sunset's with Starlight Glimmer. Unlike Sunset, Starlight is the best villain this show's ever had. Rather than re-write about her, I'll quote my analysis:
     
    A lot of people focus on the what and the time (the latter being an okay reason) and not the why. Take a look at why The Cutie Re-Mark showed she became the way she was and focus on obvious details.
    Starlight and Sunburst were blank flanks, and the episode pins down that he was her only friend at the time. When Sunburst saved Starlight from the book collapsing on her, he got his cutie mark. His friends and family celebrated, and they never saw each other again. In what was supposed to be one of the best days of Sunburst's life, Starlight lost someone she cared for most.
     
    Now, on a more complete scale, does that sound rather petty? Yes. Even Starlight admitted it by saying "he moved on, and I didn't." She knows it's a petty feeling, but the event that etched deep in her subconscious triggered anger for cutie marks and the thought that if it happened to her, she won't let that happen to anyone else so they don't feel the same pain. She never blamed him. Each time this event was addressed, she always blamed his mark, not him. Sunburst was an equal to Starlight, but when he got it, he was seen as the really special pony in her town. To her, he achieved a much higher status, while she was still stuck there. Those things don't go away, especially when you're a kid.
     
    Unlike Sunset, who wallowed that she never found another way even as a teen/adult mare, Sunburst was sent off to Canterlot while Starlight was still a foal. Kids are impressionable, and what may look like simple, petty feelings to us as adults can leave a lasting impact on kids. It doesn't matter if she talked with her family or not. If this kind of event created a trauma trigger as a kid, talking to parents won't go away so easily.

    In short, cutie marks and the idea that the cutie mark = someone may be more special or better reminded her of that event. Their cutie marks are trauma triggers, and they can be just about anything. That's why she created Our Town and repressed others' talents. She believed by repressing others' talents, everyone will be on equal level, and she'd create true friendship and true harmony. Unlike the other three-dimensional villain Discord (who willingly manipulated the Mane Six), Starlight truly believed she was doing the right thing. But when she was outed and her entire world crumbled, Starlight became angry, desperate, and hungry for revenge. If she lost her comfort and her home, then Twilight will suffer, too.
     
    Why Twilight?
    She led her friends to Our Town. As the Princess of Friendship, she bears similar responsibilities to Cadance, Luna, and Celestia even on a lower level. Alicorn princesses have a lot of weight in their words and ideology. Current Equestrian canon relies on the princesses' decisions, because they affect everyone else around them. She has a higher class status. Twilight Sparkle tried to figure out a plan to free the townsponies from Starlight's totalitarianism. Focus on the scene outside Sugar Belle's bakery. She kept her friends in check when they were arguing and pointed her head at Double Diamond. Secondly, while they were all locked inside Starlight's jail, they had to come up with a plan. Twilight was the one who helped lead the idea of Fluttershy being the one to find clues and defeat Starlight, for she was the one who bought into them. 'Shy outed her, but Twilight helped plan the ruse.

    Even when Twilight told Starlight that her interrupting the Rainboom, Starlight didn't believe her, accusing her of lying and being egotistical. This indicates not that she doesn't care, but in reality is completely unaware of the consequences.
     
    But what changed and started her path to redemption are three things:
    Starlight being extremely startled by the wasteland. Observe by how said that there's nothing here. This expression:

     
    Remember why "show, don't tell" is lauded. By showing reactions and details, vivid images embed subconsciously. The clearer the image, the more impactful. That image was the mark of when her ascension began. And it was here where the audience truly realizes that what see saw from Starlight as evil isn't what Starlight thought as evil. This led to the flashback scene in her hometown followed by the climax and resolution. Starlight snapping at Twilight when she hoped Starlight'd change her mind. It was one of the most literally insane soundbites I've ever heard. Starlight wasn't just fighting hard to gain revenge on Twilight. No longer did she focus on the wasteland. Literally, she lost control of her own conscience and showed a moment of fury. Starlight looked…lost.

    Even though the climax didn't rely on lasers and topographical destruction, it was one of the tensest in this show's history. Twilight and Spike's lone path to returning the timeline to normal was stolen and on the verge of being destroyed by a unicorn trapped in her own psychological destruction. Insane fury brimmed in her eyes and bled on the parchment. The loss of her friend plus the loss of the town she helped rule ate her up, including still denying the destruction of her timeline.
     
    There, Twilight demonstrated how far she'd come. Rather than literally fighting her, she had to convince Starlight with Twilight's own lessons she learned. Rather than take her out physically, she had to help her and convince her that this path wasn't worth it. And even if Starlight as worried that what happened with Sunburst could happen again:
     
    And after Starlight agrees to take her hoof and let the Sonic Rainboom occur, Starlight's redemption was Sunset's done correctly. Rather than forcing a redemption out of her and brainwashing her into redemption, she gave Starlight the opportunity to choose redemption. By letting her choose, you see the character's thoughts, actions, and consequences all in one go. Her redemption feels genuine.
     
    But to make that better, becoming Twilight's protégé makes her redemption feel very satisfactory. She chose to face the consequences, but rather than force her to spend time in exile, Twilight elected to teach her so she can use her powers for good. She knew Starlight was powerful, but rather than let her go with no direction, Twilight believes her leading Starlight into doing good things will allow her to use her magic expertise and knowledge for the benefit of everyone. More importantly, it recognized one of Keep Calm's flaws, even if backhandedly: Discord was redeemed because Celestia assigned them. Celestia didn't assign Twi, Twi decided to herself.
     
    Also, the comparison between the Equal Four and CHS is apples and oranges. The CHS were frightened of her from the start and hated her. The Equal 4 (and by extension, the rest of Our Town) didn't hate her. They felt betrayed. If the four didn't want to forgive her, who can blame them. But they believe Starlight's apology was genuine and forgave her.
     
    For those who are curious, here's my ranking of redeemed antagonists/villains, from best to worst.
    Diamond Tiara Starlight Glimmer Trixie Nightmare Rarity Gilda Discord Nightmare Moon Snips & Snails (EQG) King Sombra (Siege of the Crystal Empire) Sunset Shimmer Radiant Hope

  11. Dark Qiviut
    Equestria Daily reported on the Anderson dramaseen on Round Stable, MLP Forums, /mlp/ (Horse-News), and so forth, and the news has spread around the fandom that writer Ted Anderson has since been fired as of yesterday.
     
    What I have below are concrete thoughts on the drama and Anderson's dismissal. They were on here and EQD combined and tidied.
     

     
    Anderson doesn't deserve any sympathy for what he did, and he completely deserves to be fired.
     
    David McGuire is a bit more obscure (in my perspective), but he has a history of hating bronies as a people himself, as noted by Horse-News and @@Wind Chaser in his blog.
     
    Dragon Dicks/Cuteosphere is much, much worse. She's supposedly older than I am, and she's known to hate male bronies simply because they dared to like the show, advocate misandry, promote the fraudulent "Down with Molestia" charity that PinkiePony operated, and profit off anti-man hate art. "I hate all boys" in Fluttershy's voice is possibly her most famous because it resulted in the caption art responding to her sexist trash. But she's done others like "Literally anything before bros" — obvious brony-bashing — printed on a T-shirt (the same shirt Anderson wore in his now infamous picture) and "Boys are scum."
     
    If he cried ignorance on the whole thing and plugged them in because he liked the style, then maybe IDW would've let it slide. (Doubt the fandom would because he admitted to plugging them in freely in his Tumblr.) But Ted Anderson admitted at least twice to not only agreeing with DD's misandry, but also supporting her and David McGuire's vile opinions.
     
    (Click "spoiler" to view the images")
     
     
     
    Then to make it worse, the new one found on EQD:
     
     
     
    What he said in the first two screenshots are some of the dumbest comments I ever read because it's just as possible to be sexist towards men. But to make things worse, he then pulls the idiotic analogy of how it's not racist for blacks to mock whites for their way to drive. That's just as dumb because it's just as possible for blacks to be racist to whites as a way to support DD's so-called "satire." Ted, "satire" doesn't make it funny, and dressing it as such only weakens your argument further. Thankfully, I never feuded with DD, but I've seen them from the sidelines; her attitude is everything but satirical.
     
    By including those cameos, gloating about them, and openly siding with their bigotry, to quote @@ghostfacekiller39, he flipped off every single brony who bought his comics, read them, and praised them. On top of that, he mocked every parent (brony or non-) who bought IDW's FIM comics so they can read them with their kids. Through these three screenshots, he admitted to hating the brony fandom and manipulating everyone here to make a living, and it's morally criminal to use others. On top of that, per what @@Nuke87654 posted here, there's the possibility that Anderson signed a contract preventing him from utilizing third-party material as inclusion or inspiration for his work. If this is true, then he not just violated it, but blatantly disregarded it for the sake of inserting some of his unneeded politics into a professional product.
     
    His antifeminist, misandrist garbage goes against everything FIM, Faust, and Bonnie Zacherle stood for. Sexism is a form of bigotry, and DD and McGuire shamelessly represent sexism towards men. The last screenshot openly implies how much he'll tolerate racism towards whites, a backwards mentality that should alarm everyone! There should be no tolerance to bigotry, period, because it affects EVERYBODY even when they're not firsthand. Bigotry has no place in society. There was plenty of drama because people in and out of the fandom were rightfully offended by the implications of those two background cameos and Ted Anderson's support of two well-known bigots, and it was right to call him out and threaten to boycott against IDW.
     
    You screw with your consumers (and deliberately disobey a contract you signed with your employer, if confirmed), you're going to lose your job. It's that simple.
  12. Dark Qiviut
    Link to the blog.
     
    And here are three articles: Eater, EpiCurious, & Gawker
     
    ———
     
    Okay, I know most of us LOVE deep-fried food. Of course, there's the chips/fries, chicken, turkey on a stick, potato chips, plantains, dougnuts, beignets, calamari, and spring rolls. But then there's the funnel cake, Twinkies, Oreo, pickles, Mars bars, and ice cream.
     
    But deep-fried BUTTER is the icing on the cake! X__X
     
    Or should I say, batter on the arteries.
  13. Dark Qiviut
    I posted a status ranting about it, so I'll say it again here.
     
    According to Wikipedia:
     
    One word I absolutely hate its guts is "manchild." I've hated it since I entered this fandom in 2011, and I've grown to hate it more and more. Although it doesn't have the stinging power of "autism" or "retard," it's no less bigoted. "Manchild" is inherently an ad hominem attack; instead of attacking the argument, you're attacking the person on a really deep level. The second you use "manchild," you're throwing an extremely sexist slur towards men.
     
    Just like any other slur (including the two already mentioned), "manchild" or any of its derivatives like "manchildren" is bigotry. Whether any of you like it or not, there's absolutely no excuse to use it under any circumstances, and you're deluding yourself if you think there is. You have absolutely no credibility in whatever you say anymore if you ever use it because you can't help but chip down to people on a personal level. Only bullies use "manchild." To use the slur makes you a bully.
     
    And if you don't use it personally, yet support or embrace opinions containing the slur? In my opinion, you don't look any better than the people who use it.
  14. Dark Qiviut
    Coming out of the closet as LGBTQ+ is more impactful than coming out of the stable as a brony. But that doesn't mean coming out of the closet as a brony shouldn't be taken any less seriously. I live in a very liberal society, have a very liberal family, and hugely hate gender norms. The liberal feminist in me is proud to live in this type of society.
    Not everyone is so lucky. Often, people in many socially conservative areas like the Bible Belt depend on living through social and gender norms to survive. Dating back several decades, there's a sociocultural fear of men liking feminine products, including FIM.
    A few years ago, a brony on here was bullied by his family in real life after he came out as one. Some members here might remember reading it when it first surfaced. I still do.
    Michael Morones attempted suicide as an eleven-year-old because he was bullied for liking FIM.
    A brony was bullied by classmates for bringing his Dash backpack to school. Rather than punishing the bullies, the school blamed the victim for it by telling him not to bring it because it was a bullying trigger.
    Near BronyCon in 2013, Mom and I talked with a brony who came from Kentucky with friends. He was a proud brony to us, but back home, he was a closet brony: He really believes his family will spew ableism and homophobia towards him if they find out.
    Other anecdotes where male bronies are called "gay" or "autistic" simply because they love the show are out there. Other bronies witness blatant homophobia and sexism by their family and keep their love for FIM in the closet as a result. Bronies ought to be able to express their love for the show and not be stuck in sexist gender roles. Closet bronydom doesn't live in a vacuum.
    The opinion — hell, even the idea — that anyone needs to refocus on how they live because they fear they'll be bullied for liking the show by their friends, peers, or family is one of the most homophobic, sexist, ableist, and overall dangerous morals I've ever heard. Anytime I hear something similar, you admit you don't give a damn about social justice.
    What makes this opinion so harmful? You blame the victim. Rather than blaming gender roles, you blame closet bronies. To blame closet bronies for being in the closet is to scapegoat a girl/woman for wearing attractive clothes for having men/boys gawk at her. Whenever you say, "It's your fault for being in the closet, brony," you're actually telling the LGBTQ+ community to stay in the closet. Nobody should be forced to hide who they are and what they like. You send genuine unfortunate implications by downplaying a very real fear.
    The common solution to closet bronydom is to just admit you're a brony. This is no less dangerous than One Bad Apple's moral. Just like how there's no one solution to the bullying epidemic, there's no one solution to closet bronydom. Some families don't care about their peers being bronies. Some merely tolerate it. Some can disown them for bring a brony because they refuse to give up on it. To many of us, this looks trivial, but to some closet bronies, it's anything but. Parents have disowned their kids for something much smaller; if that can happen, so can closet bronies for liking a show. Each problem is individual; what works for one brony may not work for others. You can't throw a blanket solution and hope it works. Real life doesn't work that way.
    Like I wrote before, coming out as LGBTQ+ has far more impact than any brony coming out as a brony. But once again, that doesn't mean we shouldn't treat the issue of bronies keeping their love for FIM in the closet with respect. Closet bronydom is a byproduct of a larger societal problem: It exists because society peer-pressures us as a people to live by social and gender constructs. Nearly all of us feel the pressure of pandering to gender norms every day for our entire lives, even if that pressure is a smidgen. Sometimes, fighting them is no problem. Sometimes, it can be a royal struggle. Many bronies succumb to this pressure. We should be aware of that.
    Social justice and civil rights aren't picks and choices. They intertwine and affect each other. The fear of shame just for liking a product that "violates social normality" — male bronies liking a feminine product — is a very real social and feminist issue, and we should be sensitive towards it.
    Why feminist issue? Feminism breaks down and eliminates gender inequality. Normally, girls and women aren't persecuted for liking feminine and masculine products. But whenever we see women being ostracized by gender norms, don't ignore them. Extend our hands to help them fight these norms. Remember, closet female bronies and closet bronies of minority genders exist. Sexism towards men liking feminine products dates back generations; FIM/bronydom is one example. As a people, extend our hands to help them, too.
    Endorse the idea that anyone (male, female, or minority gender) can love the show without fear of gender roles and the people who support gender roles bullying them. Challenging social and gender ostracization as a whole impacts communities vying for civil rights, including the LGBTQ+, African-American, Muslim, and so on. By spreading awareness to sexist roles and challenging them, you're telling other communities that they can do the same. Downplaying closet bronydom and trivializing this sexist societal problem tells us you don't care about not only challenging social constructs, but also addressing the civil rights issues the other communities face.
  15. Dark Qiviut
    Thank this thread's topic for giving me the muster to be angry.
     
    For a while, Just for Sidekicks was my most hated S3 episode. Two reasons: Spike Torture Porn (and a bastardization to boot) and royal disappointment. I could barely think about JfS without feeling bitter despite Spike at Your Service being much worse.
     
    Today, the bitterness is gone, and I only dislike it. Now I have one S3 that I now truly hate(and this is more recent): The Crystal Empire.
     
    My friends know why, but I'll again explain it: It's the test. With the Empire revived and hanging in the balance, Celestia assigns Twilight to a test to protect and save the Empire.
     
    Think about it. A test to save the Empire from Sombra. Why? To prove to Celestia that Twilight is ready to ascend to princesshood.
     

     
    WHY THE FUCK SHOULD PROVING THE ABILITY TO LEAD HAVE TO REVOLVE AROUND PLAYING GAMES WITH INNOCENT LIVES?!!
     
    An entire empire was revived, and thousands of lives are at stake. Twilight, her friends, SA, Cadance, and the kingdom's inhabitants. Sombra is pure evil; he will kill just to achieve his goals. Rather than immediately flying to protect it, Celestia puts Twilight, who has no knowledge about leading a kingdom, in charge of something that could've gotten her and everyone else killed.
     
    Rather than pointing it out, the entire two-parter puts little emphasis on everyone's safety. Instead, Twilight passing the test is the primary goal. Surely, Twilight would care more about sving the kingdom. No, she doesn't. Her entire focus was on passing the test. When she couldn't do it on her own, she gave up passing it and told Spike to return the Crystal Heart.
     
    But once it was over? Twilight sulked about not being able to do it herself.
     

     
    Seriously?! Spike helped save thousands of lives, and you're more disappointed about not passing your test?!
     
    Rather than tell the audience about how innocent lives shouldn't be treated as a means to an end, the narrative tells the audience the test is more important. Lives aren't supposed to be treated as a means to an end! To make it worse, TCE treats this game as okay even AFTER this episode: In Keep Calm, Celestia nonsensically assigned Fluttershy to "reform" Discord, and she later put Twilight under another test to complete Star Swirl's incomplete, canonically contradictory spell. Like Rainbow Falls with the Games, TCE caused the Twilicorn evolution arc to jump the shark. However, unlike the Games, her ascension's expectations were ruined before it even began.
     
    The test was evil.
     
    The moral was evil.
     
    The whole episode was evil.
     
    Celestia was evil.
     
    A lot of bronies really dislike Tyrantlestia. Unfortunately for them, The Crystal Empire paints her as a tyrant thanks to this garbage. Until this series ever addresses this and actually stops excusing her actions (FF #3, I'm looking at you!), it will continue.
     
    If I knew about these implications back when they aired, I would've blown such a gigantic gasket. My anger towards the Holiday Special comic here would've paled in comparison. It may not be the worst FIM episode of all-time, but it violates my morale so much, I can't look at it without my blood boiling.
     
    I — HATE — this episode!
  16. Dark Qiviut
    Author's Note: Credit goes to @@The Second Opinion, @@Buck Testa, @@~StatesTheOblivious~, @@Wind Chaser, and @ for this analysis. Parts of this analysis were revised to clean up some inaccuracies and add some insight from other reviews. My critique of Fancy Pants was revised as a result of feedback from both @@Nuke87654 and @@Sunny Fox.
    Also, thanks, Walmart, for the entry image.
    Since season three, episodes starring Spike are very notorious for being the ones many folks don't look forward to. As a fan of Spike, this notoriety's very well earned.
    Owl's Well That Ends Well: This is the episode that began the Spikabuse train. In a very clichéd story about jealousy, Spike is written as the antagonist despite having very reasonable fears of being replaced. The Mane Six appear completely ungrateful by being super-impressed with Owlowiscious despite never seeing him before, while giving Spike the same present last night after being around them for (maybe) a year. Twilight's reasons for keeping Owlowiscious makes no sense, for most of it's in the daytime, and Owlowiscious is up and driving Spike crazy. This is a classic torture porn. Dragon Quest: Season two's worst. Mean-spirited characterization of the Mane Six. Sexist implications by mocking Spike for wearing a "feminine" apron and presenting stereotypical male bullies. Xenophobic by stereotyping the entire dragon race as a bunch of thugs and writing a terrible moral implicating how ponies are better than dragons despite how his friends caused the whole conflict. Spike at Your Service: The start of Spike's flanderization and persistent out-of-characterization. The reliable, intelligent assistant is disregarded in favor of the incompetent, idiot servant. The Timberwolves are contrived. The Dragon Code is contrived (and had its original continuity disregarded by being taken seriously despite being a play card earlier). The climax is rushed and OOC of Applejack. Spike couldn't learn the lesson unless he was told directly. Spike's fear of being abandoned were completely ignored. Applejack's and Rarity's characterizations can't save this train wreck. Just for Sidekicks: Three words. Spike — torture — porn. An episode that made him act as if the morals he learned in Secret of My Excess and Dragon Quest never existed. Power Ponies: Not a complete disaster, but still really, really weak. The main problem was how Spike's role of comic relief was completely hammered in. They keep expositing how useless he is as Humdrum, while the other characters become useless with the obvious intent of making Spike the hero. Not all good satires have to be subtle, but the destination was too close to the viewer's face. Equestria Games: The biggest drawback was how The Hub and Hasbro tried to sell the Games, only to play against their expectations and make it merely filler. But even if the setting was different, Spike was still really stupid here, and the treatment the script gave him was painful. Discovery Family/Hasbro has always put in some effort to publish at least one teaser to excite the audience. The day before Appleoosa's Most Wanted aired, a teaser was published, and there was reason for hope: It was the episode's best scene. So when Princess Spike's synopsis appeared, plenty of people like myself were apprehensive toward it for the reasons outlined above. When there was no teaser for it, fears conjure up even more.
    After watching it, I can see why. Princess Spike is a mess.
    Now, to get it out of the way, contrivances aren't inherently bad. The point of a contrivance is to serve and advance the plot. If you're going to be a writer, you must add them. The catch is to hide it. Every episode has at least one, but some are more naturally hidden than others. The issue is when the contrivance becomes transparent, hence "contrived." Rainbow Falls and Trade Ya! are two examples of very contrived episodes.
    Currently, Princess Spike is season five's most contrived episode. How?
    We'll start with the exposition in both the prologue and Act 1.
    I made this point in so many other reviews/analyses, including Rainbow Rocks, but for those who haven't read them, I'll repeat it. When you have so much exposition very early, you suck the tension out and make the journey feel boring. Exposition shouldn't have to be relied on to progress the plot.
    In Flight to the Finish, Mrs. Harshwhinny told the fillies the rules of the contest. But you see chalkboard illustrations as she speaks. Their exposition sets up the plot, but it's ancillary and enhances the conflict.
    The Cutie Map starts out with some exposition when Rainbow Dash summarizes why Twilight has The Castle of Friendship. Quick, done, moving on. Like Flight, Pinkie tells us and her friends about the townsfolk's creepy smiles, but we get to see it, and the exposition enhances the conflict.
    In other words, good exposition shouldn't feel out of place or dependent. Princess Spike depends on telling the audience elements of the plot. At the minimum, good exposition should be the chocolate syrup on the sundae, not the ceramic plate for the sundae.
    One obvious contrivance occurs right in the beginning when Twilight is so sleepy, she can't stay awake. What happened was completely adorkable; it doesn't make as much sense sleeping on the floor as opposed to a pile of books. But what really gives it away is twofold:
    By having her prepare for it offscreen, Cadance has to be the vessel to move the plot forward. Because the title appears on the screen during this part, the journey to Spike's conflict suddenly becomes realized: Twilight is asleep, and he must make sure she isn't disturbed. In the same sequence: The minute he promised to Cadance, you know something is about to go awry, either with him or with Twilight. For long-time bronies, Spike's line spells trouble because almost all of his episodes involve him screwing up, making himself look like a fool, antagonist, or combination of other factors. One of which is being out of character. Why this is so transparent is how the conflict commences by mostly telling the audience. Do we see her exhausted? Yes. But do we see her get to that point? No. If Princess Spike showed us how hard she worked, then the conflict adds some impact. Witnessing the effect is one thing. Witnessing the cause is another.
    In addition to telling the cause of the conflict, three others were introduced: the polo game, the dragon sneeze trees, and the broken water pipe.
    Originally, the game felt natural in the story. But once the dragon sneeze trees appeared, it became extremely transparent. How it was going to be involved was unknown, but FIM doesn't leave plot devices hanging often. Later, the field was greatly decreased, making playing the game much more difficult, so the size was going to impact the story. The dragon sneeze trees have every single reason to be knocked down. Not only were they a health hazard to dragons. But the trunks have difficulty supporting the leaves' weight, hence the swaying animation. If one tree falls down and lands on somepony, then the royalty faces a major lawsuit.
     

    Well…I hope. There are many factors behind water main breaks, including very cold temperatures in the winter and their ages being older than most of my family tree. But one thing I know is if the pipe is in imminent danger of breaking, you must take care of it. A broken water pipe is a hazard whether it's a cartoon or not. Alone, the contrivances were very obvious. When combined, they expose a really confused tone. When he initially tried to keep Canterlot quiet so she can sleep, the entire setup for his role behaves less as a serious matter and more as a joke. He wants her to sleep peacefully, but silly cartoon logic gets in the way. But rather than playing the matter seriously, the script tells the viewer how they're not as dangerous in-verse as we think they are. Nick Dusedau, Thiessen, and Big Jim Miller present the script and story with key hazards, both to ponies and dragons. But how can the audience treat it seriously when the tone's presentation is silly? There's a way to make the audience laugh and simultaneously acknowledge its serious moments, like The Cutie Map. But it's trying to tell both, yet can't figure out what to tell and how to balance them.
    I'll return to the confusion later.
    @The Second Opinion points out a moment in the prologue where Spike's role in canon and to the audience starts to unravel:
    Notice the contrast. Spike tells everyone in the hall how he wants to help anyone, but everyone ignores him. This tells the audience the plot's angle, but the approach is subtle like knuckles clanging steel.
    There, another major contrivance is presented: Canterlot's citizens behaving like a hivemind towards the princesses, especially Twilight. I have no idea where this inspiration came from, but part of me believes it comes from Canterlot's past complacency to other high-end ponies, first seen in Sweet & Elite. The big difference between here and Sweet is how Rarity's and Fancy Pants's high-quality taste and conviction help sway Canterlot's elite. But Fancy Pants doesn't blindly follow everything; his maturity is capable of seeing variations of good even if it's simple like Rarity's underdeveloped dress for Twilight. But in Princess Spike, Canterlot's citizens are presented as a bunch of out-of-character idiots.
    Why is Canterlot out of character?
    Both the arborist and construction worker have very valid reasons for their work. It doesn't matter if Spike told them to stop in Twilight's name. If they were really as smart as they should've been, then they would've ignored Spike and continued working to keep Canterlot safe. The New York stallion and Whinnyapolis mares (the latter a Fargo reference with a stereotypical Minnesotan accent) went to Princess Twilight to sort out speeches about their local economies. But when "Twilight" "sorted out" the problem, this happened:
      …
     


     
    Okay, what the hell is this?!
     
    Seriously, just because Twilight is a princess doesn't mean she's right about everything. Princesses make mistakes just like any common pony or being. Luna can make mistakes. Celestia can make mistakes. Cadance can make mistakes. Twilight has made mistakes. Princesses won't always make the right decisions. So what if any of their decision is royally stupid? Should the ponies act like drones and suck up to them, or would it make much better sense to think for themselves?
     
    Apparently the latter, because it gets worse. Later in Act 2, one of the stallions wanted to see Twilight because of a friendship problem. The problem?
       

     

     

     

     
    I'll be blunt. The fact that a stallion actually wondered if he should preserve his friendship with someone over a seat competes with Rainbow Dash wheeling herself to Rainbow Falls as the second-dumbest piece of writing I've ever seen in this show. Any sensible being isn't this pitiful. If your friendship is going to be broken up over someone taking over your seat, then maybe that friend really isn't your friend. (More is added later.)
     
    Canterlot's poor characterization is condensed to this exchange in two things. Firstly, when Spike called him out for this, Fluffy Clouds told Spike he only wanted to hear Twilight, not "some random dragon's opinion." FC's xenophobia calls back how Dragon Quest's narrative stereotypes dragons as bullies, thugs, and dummies and him being ignored in the prologue in favor of the princesses. A dragon's or common pony's opinion can be just as valuable as a princess's, if not more. You just need to pay attention to him or her and critically think whether his or her advice makes sense. Don't take advice at face value. Think. Secondly, as Fluffy Clouds whines, several background ponies are in earshot and equally involved in the same dilemma. Why didn't anyone else call out Fluffy Clouds and tell him to not to waste her time over trivial matters?
     
    Oh, wait, if that happened, then we have no plot! You had a whole queue asking "Twilight" for advice. She's not the only royalty in Canterlot. Cadance, Luna, and Celestia also exist, and they are all a part of the summit. Rather than wasting time in line and bothering Twilight, why not take time to ask any of them?
     
    And another thing. Why the hell did Celly and Luna disappear following the prologue? It's as if either the script pretended they don't exist or the Royal Sisters don't matter. Either way, they're there preparing for the summit while Twilight's asleep. Celestia is just as revered and has lived for over a millennium, and Luna isn't far off. So won't it make just as much sense to talk with either of them instead? I'll get back to Cadance later.
     
    On top of that, Fancy Pants's characterization is also called into question. In Sweet & Elite, Fancy Pants was, well, an elite, but he wasn't afraid to dissent against the rest of Canterlot's high-end suck-ups. When Twilight's dressed was mocked, he complimented it. During the middle of Act 2, he wasn't any better than the rest of the background idiots, for he groveled over Twilight equally and asked to have access to every meeting and party in the Grand Equestria Royal Summit. Although he was fine with the rejection, he's still much more humble than that.
     
    As far as his anger in Act 3 is concerned, there's validity. When a royalty tells someone to stop working on a hazard, implications are sent to him that she cares about nopony but herself. Fancy Pants worked hard keeping an eye on the hazards to protect everyone. Because he doesn't know that she was sleeping, he has every reason to feel suspicious. On the other hand, he shouldn't squarely blame Twilight. Even though he called out the public workers, he never held them accountable when he should've. Only "Twilight" told them to stop, but they never got complete approval from any of the other princesses. So while it was great of him to forgive Spike, and he was okay at best, his overall characterization feels hollow. To put it short, the ponies in Canterlot's summit are a bunch of numbskulls.
    I'm a big Spike fan. I love to see this kid succeed in stories that starred him beyond fanfiction and fancomics. Unfortunately, sans Power Ponies and Just for Sidekicks, whenever a Spike episode is bad, they're really bad. Owl's Well That Ends Well, Dragon Quest, Spike at Your Service, and Equestria Games are all among the bottom twenty. Two** are in the bottom-ten. Despite liking Spike, I outright despise the majority of Spike-centric episodes due to their objectively low quality.
    Spike's treatment is this episode's most outward flaw.
    The really confused tone in the beginning — which I mentioned above — sets up the quality of the story. Just like the background characters treat the hazards seriously, Spike himself treats the whole situation seriously. He's very proud of being her assistant and doesn't want to let anyone down. Each time there's noise, Spike starts to panic, and he doesn't want to let Princess Cadance down. Listen to his frantic vocality and watch him flail his arms as the bird sings on top of Twilight's horn.
    Then immediately after, Canterlot suddenly becomes very bustling. Like the bird, his motives are very sincere. Without sleep, she can't function for the ceremony that night. Spike may be a child, but he wants to really do a great job.
    But where the episode starts to hurt is when real-life hazards are introduced. Even though he's naïve, he's not dumb. He's not incompetent. To make a mistake is one thing. To really lack proper judgment and tell the arborist and construction worker not to clear the dangers is another. If the two background ponies were as competent as they supposedly are, they'll tell him something like this:
    As biting as this is, this is a much more satisfying direction for the plot. Why? Because Spike is so desperate to not wake her up, he's overlooking much more important social and environmental issues. Normally, you don't see anyone criticize a princess canonically. Equestrian royalty is highly trusted. A citizen calling out a princess with very valid reasons wakes him up from his desperation and (minutely) snaps the canon out of treating Canterlot's princesses as deities. By the virtue of criticizing Twilight, Spike is hit personally because they're supposedly very close. Spike is supposed to look out for her best interest, but he's overlooking everyone else's, his own based on the trees, and the summit.
    But despite very dangerous problems in Canterlot, the ponies blindly support Twilight and stop working out of plot convenience. Is the situation treated respectfully? No. Rather, their incompetence is designed to make people laugh.
    This is where the real trouble begins. Spike is treated as a punching bag right from the start. When Cadance accidentally smashed Spike in between the door and the wall, the audience is given a clue about how the writer and editor (in this case, M. A. Larson) thought about Spike here. Immediately, Spike was a victim of really terrible slapstick, and the audience is supposed to laugh. But whether the viewer has watched the show for a long time or it's his, her, or hir first, the joke fails. Why?
    Notice the sequence.
    Not one minute into the first act, the scene is enough to make people cringe. The accident put a child in a lot of pain. Yes, it's short-lived, but that doesn't validate the treatment. He's just trying to open the door, but it resulted in him getting smashed.
    Is it a joke?
    Yes.
    Is it a good one?
    Hell, no! It's mean-spirited!
    Unfortunately, the jokes remain relentless until the commercial break. Every sequence (of sound) — the bird tweeting, Canterlot's collective noise, the trees/Spike's nasty allergies, the ponies' ineptitude — are all jokes. But like I wrote in my impressions, every joke here is terrible because Spike doesn't deserve it. The poor dragon isn't being sleazy, greedy, or abusive. He's trying to do his job. If any of the chaos wakes her up, how do you think he'll feel? I have two guesses:
    Disappointed for breaking his promise to Cadance. Disgraced for failing to let Twilight sleep. But after Act 1 finished, the episode started to shift in tone and characterization.
    While the episode plays off to be comedic, it tries to be serious also. Pop culture references sprout in these scenes in order to make the audience laugh, but the conflicts are also played straight. Like I said before, Spike legitimately worries about what he needs to do to not only keep Twilight asleep, but also prove he can do a really good job. You can understand his internal conflict: He doesn't know what to do. From a storytelling perspective, Dusedau is juggling to balance them both. But instead of treating the conflict respectfully, their stereotypical voices and petty arguing injure the mood of the tone.
    The mood is damaged more when Fluffy Clouds whines about his friendship with some other dude ending over a seating conflict. For me, I'm not sure if this scene is supposed to be either a joke or serious. Part of me believes this is supposed to be funny because the conflict is so trivial. But Fluffy Clouds treats this matter seriously, and two delegates were also serious. If this is all supposed to be a "joke," I'm not laughing. If this is supposed to be serious, then it doesn't risk overtaking the beginning of Rainbow Falls, Act 3, as the second-dumbest moment. It competes with EQG1's interrogation scene as FIM's dumbest altogether.
    There are several big problems with his bout of greed.
    He already understands the consequences. In Secret of My Excess, he learns how a dragon's innate greed causes them to grow at the expense of their genuine personalities. If he doesn't control it, then he risks hurting someone. When he realized the damage he caused, he felt incredibly guilty. Dragon Quest's intended moral is to not succumb to peer pressure and grow into your own conscience.
     
    Since Spike at Your Service, his characterization resets. If you watched Just for Sidekicks, you watched Secret, because the internal conflict and moral are very similar. But it also pretended how his past growth didn't exist. Power Ponies and Equestria Games retreads his desire to prove his worth from Owl's Well without the envy.
     
    Princess Spike marks the third time he learned about how his lust hurts others. Sure, there's the flat disguise of not to be selfish and take advantage of Twilight's position of power, but that's on the surface. Just's and Princess Spike's are very similar. First, he lets his greed willingly corrupt. Secondly, he realizes how greed hurts others when confronted about it. Then he understands how not to allow his selfishness and greed control himself and take advantage of others. In short, Princess Spike rips off a ripoff and makes him out of character. Until the fourteenth minute in, his corrupt side had nothing to do with the story. Spike used his connection with Twilight to try to restore order. Each time he ordered for Twilight, he intended to help unload some of her schedule. To him, if he succeeded, then she won't have to chase for her bed and sleep through the summit.
     
    Unfortunately, he made some extremely stupid decisions, thus enforcing his flanderization dating back to Spike at Your Service. The polo ponies need a lot of room to play their game, or else they'll get tangled and can misfire. Each dragon sneeze tree must be chopped down and the broken water pipe must be fixed for safety reasons. The little dragon is a "baby," but he's also very intelligent. When Twilight was getting out of control in Lesson Zero, he wrote to the princess to have her intervene. When the teenage dragons ordered him to smash the phoenix egg, Spike stood his ground. When Inspiration Manifestation continued to corrupt Rarity, he tried to steal it and later ate it. In other words, this kid understands danger. He's competent. He's not stupid. He'll try to do the right thing even if his friends don't confront him.
     
    If Spike was his in-character and competent self like in Inspiration Manifestation, Lesson Zero, EQG1, and Dragon Quest, he would've allowed the arborist and construction worker to continue working, and he'll fix the sound problem some other way. The tower's window is open, and her room isn't sound-proof. If he was truly responsible, he would've attempted to lock the window and go to maybe Celestia to conjure up a sound-proof spell for Twilight.
     
    So what caused the drama in the climax? Resolutions he came up with very early in the episode. When Spike moved the polo teams, the field shrunk. This lead to a crowded and reckless game. The punted ball toppled the dragon sneeze trees like dominoes. After a tree landed on the broken pipe, it burst, causing a major flood on the streets and inside the hall. Dragon sneeze plants floated into the hall, which erupted Spike's allergies and caused him to sneeze the statue to smithereens. Led by Fancy Pants, a mob of delegates infiltrated Twilight's tower. None of his greed or abuse of power came into play at that point. Each time "Twilight" decided, his logic behind why was semi-believable.
     
    So what happened when he acted like an antagonist? A pony messaged his back. Chef Gustave le Grand baked him some jewel cupcakes begrudgingly. A background pony painted a portrait of a sexy adult Spike, calling back from A Dog and Pony Show. And an endless bucket of jewels to gorge. That's it. Did anything here relate to the overall conflict? No. Divide the halves, you get two severely disjointed stories.
     
    Aside from the moral, what did his antagonism mean to Princess Spike? Nothing. Spike receives all of the blame for the drama, and the source is his abuse for power. But like what I wrote before, the drama is the consequence of good intentions. By blaming him for trying to do the right thing, you tell the audience no matter how much he tries, he's going to remain stuck in mediocrity. If he tries to do the right thing, then you let Canterlot down. If you don't, then you let Cadance and Twilight down. From the get-go, Spike is caught between in between two precarious predicaments with no ability to balance them. Cadance's enforcement of his promise doesn't create compromise.
     
    In fact, Cadance is a source of the problem. Spike has never been in such a position before on screen. To us, this is foreign for him. So, why didn't Cadance tell him to come to her if he has trouble solving any political problems? She rules the Crystal Empire, so the audience will assume she knows something about diplomating. But by ignoring his bold-faced lies and letting him abuse his power, she shares some of the blame for the drama. But the script doesn't call her on it nor put her responsible for some of the trouble, leaving Spike as a scapegoat.
     
    (BTW, she made one two really stupid decisions during the climax. Firstly, she left a child alone to drain the massive flood. Secondly, blocking an active water pipe is extremely dangerous; prior, someone should've turned it off.)
     
    But there's another source of the problem: Twilight for organizing the convention and spending three sleepless days just to get it ready on time. Unfortunately, her struggle to stay awake resulted in conferences and events conflicting with one another. If Spike doesn't get involved and clean it up, then the summit would've been a worse public relations disaster than Unicon. In short, she earns a bit of the blame. On the other hand, con preparation is very hard work, and the visuals dictate how much effort she put into it to make it special, so I can't dominantly fault her for the conflict. She earns some shuteye. Although the moral itself is really good, the approach is broken.

    a. It's complete filler. He learned two other variations prior. If I want to watch an episode with a very similar moral, I'll watch SoME, not a double retread.
     
    b. It reinforces the clichéd formula seen in past Spike episodes. With the exception of one, every Spike episode has him screwing up badly at some point. As a result, you're going to make the audience wonder what he'll do to badly screw up. This formula has been used in almost every Spike episode. As a result, you'll merely tire long-time bronies. Inspiration Manifestation has him making a big mistake, but his alibi makes sense: Rarity had a complete meltdown in front of him after a client bashed her stage for focusing on the visuals rather than the utility, so he didn't want to see the same problem repeat.
     
    To make it worse, many Spike episodes — Owl's Well, Dragon Quest, and Service — reuse clichéd storylines without changing anything beyond the surface. @Buck Testa describes how Princess Spike closely follows the "dumb guy" cliché seen in several 1990s/2000s sitcoms:
     
    "The dumb guy makes a really stupid decision that will get him in trouble if found out, so he tries to hide it. By covering it up, he worsens the problem. Finally, he's confronted personally, and he spews a moral he never learned."
     
    Spike is the dumb guy here, and a dumb and incompetent Spike is an out-of-character Spike! By hammering it in, he's a flanderized Spike, too.
     
    c. Spike is the only one held responsible. Again, what caused the problem were his three terrible decisions very early in the first act, even though his irrationality has some believability. But like what @~StatesTheOblivious~ said in his review, none of Spike's actions are written to be in the wrong until late in Act 2. They were encouraging, and it looked like he was trying to do the right thing. In other words, his actions helped save the con.
     
    However, a coincidence and careless oversight resulted in him being the bad guy for everything, including reorganizing the con. Canonically, he apologized for abusing his power, yet he really apologized for saving royalty's backside. This implication hurts kids because Spike is blamed for everything here even though all four alicorns ought to share the majority of it for failing to properly organize the event and keep Canterlot safe. Celestia and Luna really deserve a lot of scorn for apparently being AWOL much of the day.
     
    (Also, why didn't Cadance call Spike out in Act 2 for not addressing the safety hazards when the construction worker's complacency's happening right in front of her?)
     
    d. It's a non sequitur. Even with the climax bridging the two halves, the moral is off-topic and disconnected. But despite all the problems, the approach to giving Spike his recognition was really sweet. When he tried to rebuild the statue and failed, all of the delegates united with him. Cadance said it best: No matter how much you play your part, you're as important as everypony else. During the last part of her speech, she looked at Spike sincerely, implying to both him and the audience how important he is to everyone. Even with all the torture porn in this episode, at least he has his moment at the end…
    …But this tasteless joke fucking ruins it!
    The imagery is disgusting. It was already painful to see Spike's eyes swell from allergies the first and second time around. The poor dragon suffered enough. Why overwhelm him — and the audience, by extension — by reviving it once the moral is resolved? Damn it, the later the scene, the more the grosser details hurt. DHX confirms to the audience how much of a punchline Spike is. Even though the audience can assume he's a constant joke, the resolution gave the audience faint hope that Spike is more than a one-dimensional piñata. That he's as equal a character as the Cutie Mark Crusaders. Instead, the only main male character is relegated to a sideshow who does nothing but get himself into situations where he'll badly screw up.
     
    What worsens this implication is how FIM is supposed to be a pro-feminist show. A show with proud, unique qualities that can attract all sorts of demographics. A show that teaches us new techniques of masculinity and femininity without being tied down to sex. The morals are supposed to reach out to people young and old. When the morals are really mature, kids are respected. One of its most important morals is to be yourself. By endlessly punishing Spike and making him suffer long after he learns his lesson, kids are being told how meaningless the show's morals are. Even after you learn your lesson, karma will still bite you back. Spike is a really unique character, as he's the only dragon and male/boy of the main cast, so there's ample opportunity to bring a fresh perspective of Equestrian society. With this scene, DHX tells longtime and first-time watchers that being different means the show can make a complete ass out of you, and you will like it. My question to you is this: What does this teach children? What does this teach parents of children? For me, being ordinary is the way to live. Sticking out from the crowd and being yourself makes you inaccessible. Having a fresh voice in life invalidates your existence. Say I'm a father of a young kid and want to find a good cartoon show for him/her and me to watch together. If this was my first episode of Friendship Is Magic, I would feel horrified, never let my kid watch the show again, and not recommend it to other people in my inner circle.
    In addition, what does this teach in the name of feminism? Remember, feminism is bringing all genders at an equal level. This scene asks the viewer where Friendship Is Magic stands for as a feminist icon. For me, this scene confirmed a major hit in its credibility. How? Because it implies a return to the status quo for Spike in a rather daring product. As the rest of his friends mature, he's stuck and will have his character reset for the next episode, maybe in another clichéd episode with another clichéd setup with the possibility of characters as stereotypical as the bullies from Dragon Quest, Snips and Snails from Boast Busters, or Tree Hugger from Make Friends But Keep Discord. For he's different in both species and gender, this scene doesn't furnish feminism, but anti-feminism instead. To echo @Wind Chaser and merge his thoughts with mine, the scene and aforementioned episode epitomize hypocrisy in a show that champions individuality and challenges the status quo, two main goals of third-wave feminism. Season five has dared to move in a fresh direction with their characters, plots, and morals. Despite being imperfect, it earns credit for advancing in this path. To suggest a return to the status quo for the only main male character and not even attempt to hide it calls the ethics of FIM's canon and production into question.
    Ironically, a clip from Slice of Life had Vinyl's bass cannon literally jump over a shark plushie. Because of how flanderized and out of character he is, how much Spike is abused in the episode's canon, Princess Spike's terrible writing quality overall, and how much DHX panders themselves to this complacent pattern, Spike episodes have officially jumped the shark to me. I held out hope that we could have more and more really good Spike episodes. Instead, DHX acts like they don't have a clue how to approach him. Whenever he stars an episode, they tend to pick really unimaginative stories, attach terrible implications, or torture him for the sake of a lazy joke. For a while, this pattern annoyed me. But it hasn't improved. In fact, I argue it's getting worse, for Spike is slowly being reduced into one flat note. Now this pattern disturbs me. As a feminist, Spike's treatment in this show goes against my own morale. Echoing , these episodes are self-fulfilling prophecies. His roles as a secondary character have been rather decent. This season, he was the victim of some slapstick in Castle Sweet Castle, but it was situational, very brief, and it didn't reappear. He meant well, fulfilled his job, and got rewarded. Currently, I have no hope for Spike episodes in the future.
    As for the writing quality of this episode…well, without a doubt, it's season five's worst by a long shot. Appleoosa's Most Wanted is awful, but Troubleshoes is a very endearing, lovable, and relatable character who caught a break. Spike never caught a break here. If you were to tell me which are the worst written episodes of the show (without putting any emphasis in any category) prior to PrS, the bottom-five list would be like this:
    Rainbow Falls Boast Busters The Mysterious Mare Do Well One Bad Apple The Show Stoppers Now it's like this:
    Rainbow Falls Princess Spike Boast Busters The Mysterious Mare Do Well One Bad Apple Princess Spike's writing quality is worse than Boast Busters! Where it's placed in my bottom-ten episode list overall remains to be seen.
    Because Princess Spike's so bad, I'm now beginning to look forward for EQG: The Friendship Games in some capacity despite really hating the whole spinoff. Even though the past two films suck, Spike was the best written character, and EQG1 gave him his best role and characterization of the entire generation (including this hilarious line). Hopefully, he'll be written with some dignity in the third film, too.
  17. Dark Qiviut
    If I'm allowed to put a swearword in a title, I would, because it needs it.
     
    After re-reading and rewatching angry reviews of Breadwinners, I had the itch to bitch about it again because once isn't enough. I'd stop, but I might've lost a few years of my life, so whatever.
     
    Nickelodeon's Breadwinners really pisses me off! If you think modern Spongebob and Sanjay & Craig are at the bottom of the barrel, you ain't seen nothin' yet. Because Breadwinners is much, MUCH worse!
     
    How bad?
    The animation and character designs are goddamn terrible.
     
    Firstly, the voices don't match the lip-synching sometimes. The movements themselves are very stiff. A bunch of the scenes (hell, almost all of them) rely on stock images slapped and lazily animated, making the scenes look very awkward.
     
    Secondly, these "characters," SwaySway and Behdeuce:
     

     
    In case you're wondering, yeah, they're supposed to be ducks. Instead, they're geometric blobs. Flash is a tool to create great animation. Like Friendship Is Magic, Johnny Test, and Littlest Pet Shop, Breadwinners uses Flash, too, but doesn't put in the effort to design characters that look like ducks or smoothly animate their puppets!
     
    When Johnny Test, a widely panned cartoon, understands the tools of Flash animation better than Breadwinners, you're doing something wrong!
    The "humor" is stupid. Every "kid" joke relies on flatulence or a reference to a butt. The toilet humor is abundant, out of place, and lazy. They pretty much can't think of any joke beyond this or a disturbing "Getting Crap Past the Radar" moment. (We'll get to that later!)
     
    Speaking of cheap "humor," these "ducks" have a tendency to twerk. Yeah, a show with a content rating of TV-Y7 contains a sexually provocative dance. And it's not rare, either.
    The two main "characters"? Who are they? The two ducks who are supposed to be two, yet have almost the same personality? They aren't characters. They're obnoxious, disrespectful, stupid caricatures who will annoy the hell out of anyone who wishes to watch the "cartoon" with their brains turned on.
    The plots are shallow at best and creepy at worst. There's a lot of filler to slow the pace. It ignores its own continuity. Some of the concepts and resolutions create unfortunate implicationd. It relies on disturbing "humor" and stupidity to bypass any resemblance of logic or sense. Hell, they break the rules of their own show sometimes to pander to kids.
     
    To make it worse, many of the episodes rip off other Nickelodeon cartoons. And not just the good ones, either. Even objectively horrible episodes from modern Nick episodes (including ones from modern Spongebob) are ripped off into Breadwinners.
     
    The "creepy" part? Some episodes rely on stereotypes for a cheap laugh: Thug Loaf, for example, uses racist stereotypes as a joke. Another episode tortures a main character for simple laughs.
     
    And then there's one that was loudly bashed online: Love Loaf.
     
    If you want to read the synopsis, click the "spoiler."
     
      
    The saddest part? This show was rated #1 for kids ages 2-11 for a few weeks…and it's being renewed for a second season.
  18. Dark Qiviut
    Take it away, Miz!
    Over the past several weeks, excuses after excuses after bashing after bashing from anti-bronies (and fellow bronies) have been chapping my teeth. First, it was the "it's for kids" excuse, and I wrote a blog calling that excuse (and the general population who uses it) out. Next, it was the bashing of the FIM analysis community (BTW, calling analysts "ANALysts" isn't cute or funny; it's stupid), and I'm seriously thinking of prepping for a defense of that community. Another imbecilic claim I see (including from other bronies) is how the older bronies and the community itself "stole the show from little girls."
    Newsflash: That statement is full of shit. Older bronies never stole the show from ANYBODY. They're just as part of the fandom as the little kids and vice-versa. They're just as entitled to appreciate a good show, see it grow, want what they like to see (as long as it works in FIM's context/roots and doesn't deviate from the content rating), and critique it so it gets better as the kids and their parents. The core fandom is a very relevant part of sales, and bronies altogether are very influential both in merchandise and the show big or small, like fact-checking the Celestia doll from pink to (off-)white and (because the core fandom and little kids are growing up along with the characters) helping edge FIM into a more mature direction for season four (e.g., Testing Testing 1, 2, 3 calling out the public school system; Flight to the Finish addressing Scootaloo's inability to fly; plagiarism in Rarity Takes Manehattan; the Twilight/Tirek fight scene). Hell, don't even bother denying it — Because the show spread popularity to bronies young and old, we even have seasons four, five, and beyond.
    And what's more idiotic is how some so-called "feminists" pull this "bronies are entitled/steal the show" bullshit. If you claim to be a feminist and then pull that card, then, well…this should explain nicely.

    Any feminist with an ounce of common sense would never pull that antifeminist, sexist card. It's hypocritical (about as hypocritical as Femme Fetale from The Powerpuff Girls), and if you really are a feminist, you should feel guilty for saying it, much less thinking of such bigotry.
    Bronies regardless of age, gender, or culture NEVER stole FIM from ANYBODY, and it's downright antifeminist and sexist to believe otherwise.
  19. Dark Qiviut
    Eleven years ago yesterday, a major terrorist attack struck the World Trade Center twin towers and Pentagon (with a fourth plane plunged down in Pennsylvania by passengers who weren't willing to give up a fight and let more people be killed). Once the attacks were over, nearly 3,000 innocent people were murdered. Tens of thousands of people mourned, a whole nation went into pain, and a whole world prayed for the U.S., which is considered to be the focal point of the globe. Normally, the U.S. doesn't get hit hard by attacks, but when it does, time stops, and it becomes eerie and disturbing.
     
    Eleven years later, I still remember what happened that very day. I was asleep when my mom woke me up to tell me that the north tower was on fire, either by some kind of in-house fire or a helicopter. I went upstairs to see what was going on, for I can see the towers from the roof of my building. When I did, more than twenty people were there watching, and cops showed up not long after to protect it. About ten minutes later, the second tower got hit, and all of us were into a "holy shit" mode. I was speechless, I didn't know what was going on.
     
    Soon, I walked down and turned on the TV to discover the south tower had collapsed. It was a terrorist attack into the towers, the Pentagon, and another one that was diverted by passengers. About ten minutes before the north tower collapsed, I ran back up to the roof and saw Downtown Manhattan billowing in thick, black, brown smoke and dust and the north tower burning up to the point where I knew it was going to collapse at any given moment. And a few minutes later, the north tower collapsed. I was stunned and shocked. I was fourteen at the time, so I was more aware about death and huge tragedies at the time, but witnessing one and reading them are two different things. I watched thousands of people dying in front of me, and it took only later that night, the tributes, and age to fully soak it in.
     
    Later that day, Mom told me that I watched the worst attack in American history, and she's right. Long before my time, and even before my mother's and aunts', a major attack by the Japanese hit Pearl Harbor in Hawaii on December 7, 1941. 9/11 is this generation's Pearl Harbor for Americans.
     
    And even though it was America that was hit the hardest, 9/11 shouldn't be forgotten for the following.
    It changed the entire American culture, particularly New York City and Washington, D.C. Part of the skyline's fame is the tall towers, and the twin towers were easily recognizable because of their tube-like structures. Part of the FDNY's background logo is the twin towers. In addition, the New York Mets' scoreboard skyline from Shea Stadium (which is now the roof decoration for Citi Field's Shake Shack) had the towers, and it was wrapped in the red/white/blue memorial ribbon following the attacks.
    It completely changed everything we know about security throughout not just the U.S., but the entire western world, too. Notice all the security measures before and after 9/11. Many of those, from the tighter security check-ins in the airport to more cautious reviews of people's passports to the controversial screening and pat-downs in the U.S., are a result of 9/11.
    The United States is, more or less, a place where people consider themselves safe, especially New York City's hearts like Downtown Manhattan, the revitalizing of Downtown Brooklyn, and Times Square. People come to the U.S. as a way to get themselves off the ground and function in society. The terrorist attacks on 9/11 broke that seal and "bereaved a lot of people" (Vertekins, the SSMB).
    It was an attack on the military core. The Pentagon was hit hard by the attacks, and if it weren't for the brave passengers on the flight that crashed in Pennsylvania, that plane would've hit the White House. The Pentagon, Capitol, and White House are part of the core that makes up the United States military.
    It didn't just affect one nationality. Everyone from all nationalities and religions, in some way or another, were affected. Jews, Christians, Catholics, Muslims, etc. The remembrance of 9/11 is a tribute to the nearly 3,000 people who died from the attacks; to commemorate, remember, and honor the loved ones who perished; and mourn along with the tens of thousands of loved ones. Not one nationality nor religion was exempt from the terrorist attacks.
    Thousands of brave men and women joined together to aid others, even at the cost of their own lives. The NYPD and FDNY sacrificed themselves in order to save innocent people from the burning World Trade Center. The hospitals worked overtime to care and heal those injured on 9/11. The boat workers went beyond the call of duty and rescued people hurt and dusty from the debris and get them back home to safety. Forgetting about it makes their hard work purposeless.
    It's a chain of events that happened in broad daylight, on live TV, for the world to see. As a New Yorker, I watched nearly the whole thing live, both on the news and in front of my very eyes. Compared to atrocities like North Korea and the wars in Africa, we don't capture this raw, graphic footage and pictures anywhere, especially when it's rolling as I'm watching. I, and millions of people around the world, watched almost 3,000 people DIE from the time the first tower was struck to the days after the collapse of the World Trade Center. Events like this are horrifying and very hard to sink in.
    Telling people to "get over" it is completely insulting to yourselves, myself, and the entire world. Eleven years, even today, is still not a very long time to end mourning. It especially doesn't make much sense due to the fact that people were killed in the masses by cowards, and the dead's family and friends couldn't do anything except watch and hear the voices of their loved ones tell them, "I love you," and die as the infrastructure is crushed on top of them. On YouTube is a very disturbing phone call from a man whose line got cut off when one of the towers collapsed on top of him.
     
    Furthermore, telling people to "get over it" demonizes the police and fire department who went beyond the call of duty, put all of their training to work, and rescue as many innocent people as possible KNOWING that they were likely going to be killed themselves. You also desecrate the graves of the passengers who were on that flight that crashed into that Pennsylvania field if you tell people to "get over it" and pretend it never happened. Those passengers sacrificed their lives to make sure the terrorists didn't murder any more innocent people. You're basically calling their efforts to rescue as many innocent people as possible meaningless!
     
    And lastly, telling people to "get over it" does nothing but tell the entire world that we didn't learn anything from 9/11, period. September 11th, 2001 was a wake-up call to the U.S. and the entire planet that we had to be more secure and watchful of what we say and do. We can't just use this "we're jesting" excuse. Many new security measures began as a result of 9/11. Have you heard of this phrase, "If you see something, say something?" Ever recall the Patriot Act (and, yes, I hate this Act due to its ability to withhold habeas corpus for non-U.S. citizens)? But this phrase, higher security measures (however controversial they are), and reminders of 9/11 are there to tell people about it and make sure we don't get another occurrence such as this again. Will it never happen again? We don't know. Hopefully, it never does.

    The last reason is much more personal. I rarely, RARELY mention this anywhere on the Internet because it's that personal to me. In fact, besides today, I've only talked about it twice only. So I'm hiding it under spoilers.
     
     
     
     
    I recommend to read and watch documentaries about 9/11. Around the tenth anniversary was raw, never-before-scene footage of a rescue mission by one house of the FDNY on CBS. It lasted for hours, straight through, uncensored. It showed the urgency of the house, the people jumping to their deaths, the anxiety of the FDNY, and the sound of the towers collapsing. It was disturbing, raw, and emotional. I deeply respected the brave NYPD and FDNY for sacrificing themselves in order to rescue the innocents. This show made me respect them more and showed the more gruesome horror of the terrorist attacks and the brave responses of the FDNY.
     
    If that doesn't work, attend the 9/11 Memorial or look at pictures of it. Opened on the tenth anniversary, it's a place where everyone who died from the attacks is memorialized. It's quiet, somber, and shows a complete amount of respect for those who perished from those cowardly attacks.
     
    September 11, 2001 was a dark day for the U.S. and the entire world. Forgetting about it means the sacrifices of the police, fire department, other rescue workers, and the passengers on that flight that crashed into the Pennsylvania plains worthless. While we don't need to have an annual tribute show, it is nonetheless important for people to know about 9/11, research it, remember it, and understand it to ensure that a mass, concurrent tragedy like this never, ever happens again. I witnessed it as a New Yorker, and while I didn't lose any loved one, I understand and feel for the pain for those who are still mourning for the losses of their loved ones. 9/11's anniversaries and tribute, no matter how big or small, keeps the memories of the dead alive, and forgetting about them diminishes those memories and their sacrifices. 9/11: Never Forget.
     
    P.S.: Credit goes to Vertekins of the Sonic Stadium Message Board for some of the pieces of my blog post here.
  20. Dark Qiviut
    EDIT: The revision from last night was edited.
     
    Here is my original design of my ponysona.
     
    Below is my revision.
     

     
    Differences:
    Three-quarter view and standing up instead of sitting down. Will likely replicate the original pose later. New nose/muzzle. Bigger eyes/highlight. More saturated color for the fur. Simplified the fur edges.

    As for the edits from last night:
    The red has been dulled a bit to make him a bit rustic. Darkened the stroke color, too. The steel gray color for his hooves has been changed to a saturated sand. As a result, there is now a dark brown stroke. The back front leg is also moved down a bit. The secondary sandy mane (behind WO's head) now has a stroke closely matching the color. Fattened the bottoms of the front hooves.

    I also divided the front legs into three pieces so I can move them up and down.
     

    The layout will be next. If you have any comments, please do below. ^^
  21. Dark Qiviut
    Have you ever seen a half-assed excuse used so much, it drives you crazy? Way too many drive me nuts, and one of them is "it's for kids" — specifically "it's for little girls" in and out of the fandom — as an excuse for shortcomings. As far as FIM (and this message board) is concerned, when making an in-depth analysis or review of something, the most common response I get and see is the "FIM is for kids/little girls" excuse. Friendship Is Magic's show and IDW comics are for all ages, enjoyable by anyone. But even if it was simply "for kids," it doesn't change the fact how that STUPID argument should forever be quelled.
    Why should it never be used again? A few reasons:
    It goes against the foundation of Friendship Is Magic. Back when Lauren Faust helped lead the show, she wanted to create a feminine-looking television product with brand new archetypical standards. Instead of school, the mane ponies are adults, some of them with full-time jobs. (The first part of the pilot — Twilight being transported to Ponyville from Canterlot — is a response to this cliché.) Rather than focusing on crushes all the time, every single mane character is independent and free-willing with more important things to do. Faust tells its audience there are many ways to be a girl in media besides the stereotypes. For the most part (outside of A Canterlot Wedding, Twilicorn, and EQG), it succeeds in subverting those archetypes and create new, feminist rules of intelligent, hardworking, independent females in media.
     
    By using the "it's for little girls" excuse, you're spitting on those foundations. You're telling everyone these foundations have no merit; they're pointless. It talks down to Faust and any single person who actually comprehends the standards they — DHX and Faust — instilled on the product as well as the standards they (the people behind the scenes) are responsible for helping build and raise. It's very ageist. By throwing around the "it's for kids" excuse, you're saying kids are inherently stupid and will eat up any shit they see. This mindset is dangerous, because kids are like magnets. They observe their surroundings and respond accordingly, sometimes acting like their idols. Yes, including fictional characters. Quality family-friendly television is important because you want high-quality protagonists to be well-written and suitable for kids to love and idolize. Three-dimensional characters who stay in character, mature along the way, and properly learn their morals through the right context are vital in family-friendly entertainment. If adding to that, intelligent conflicts, intelligent humor with multi-layered referencing to appeal to a wide audience, intelligent graphic design, great music scoring, and so on. Writing that respects multi-demographical audiences regardless of age, sex, or culture. The excuse patronizes kids. By patronizing kids, you're embracing mediocrity. Even if you claim you don't, dishing out the "it's for kids" excuse shows otherwise. Do you know the basis of why this fandom grew and sustained it? Because the quality of the storytelling reaches out to people young and old. Objectively good writing doesn't segregate demographics. The embrace of mediocrity does. Whenever you use "it's just a kids'/little girls' show/*whoever audience*," then you're passively calling Friendship Is Magic — and every single product with an audience in mind — inherently weak. Any product worth our time and money respects demographics across the board. Including periphery demographics! Products that do use this excuse are often to be complete garbage.
     
    You want examples of the latter? Fine.
     
    a. My Little Pony: Equestria Girls. You already know how much how I hate this overrated, idiotic, antifeminist piece of shit (along with its sexist toyline), so I'll move on.
     
    (But some don't know this, and I'm not joking, either. I actually respect Tales, G3, and G3.5 more than Equestria Girls. While they're all garbage, EQG tries and fails to mask its bold-faced lie that it's FIM-related [when it genuinely isn't]; but the other three actually show it's MLP, minus the audiences they're pandering to.)
     
    b. My Little Pony Tales, G3, G3.5. Just like Equestria Girls, obnoxious toyetic pandering to little girls at its worst. Tales also deserves the scorn for making the characters unlikeable, stupid, and overly cynical for the sake of "realism."
     
    c. Modern Spongebob. Watch A Pal for Gary, One Coarse Meal, Are You Happy Now?, The Splinter, Pet Sitter Pat, any modern episode that tortures Squidward, and so on. The writers for Spongebob today don't know nor care what made classic Spongebob successful, and Nickelodeon itself doesn't care.
     
    d. Nickelodeon's Breadwinners. There are reviews (both video and otherwise) bashing the show apart on sites like YouTube or TV.com. Or at the very least, you can read my rant. How the FUCK did this insulting piece of trash become the #1 cartoon on Nickelodeon for a bit? I don't get how anyone can enjoy it unless they want kids to enjoy quality equivalent to JERSEY SHORE! (And, yes, I compared that "reality" monstrosity to a Nick cartoon "for kids." I won't take it back.)
     
    e. Series 8-16 of Thomas & Friends. The stories are far too generic. Several of the newer characters show up once and never again (something that's been rectified with the CGI era). A bunch of trains and other vehicles to pander to young kids and third-party companies that produce their toys. Massive flanderization and derailment of the characters with complete disregard for the Laws of the Railway. Fortunately, the new team from Series 17, KotR, and 18 are apparently pushing the series in the right direction; and I suggest you watch them.
     
    f. Approximately every single anime 4Kids dubbed and mangled. One Piece, I'm looking at you!
     
    g. Many of the Disney animated movies in the late-1990s through mid-2000s like Chicken Little, Pocahontas II, Belle's Magical World, Home on the Range, Hunchback of Notre Dame II, and Cinderella II.
     
    h. Star Wars's prequels, especially The Phantom Menace and Battle of the Clones. Jar Jar Binks, a character with the purpose of pandering to children, was slammed for this along with being a racial stereotype. (There's a reason why he's basically nonexistent nowadays.)
     
    i. As a big Gargoyles fan, The Goliath Chronicles is full of flanderization, lapses of logic, poor animation, and also out of characterization. This product spits on those who watched the first two seasons along with the newcomers.
     
    And this is only the shit marketed "to kids." I can go out and bash horrific entertainment aimed at adults, too. It's an outrageous double standard that demeans the fandom, its growth, and its sustainment. Since points go through one ear and out the other, I'll repeat it: Do you know or remember why the fandom sustained in its size? Because the show has a quality that bridges demographics together. The characters are relatable. Several high-quality episodes emotionally connect with people on a very deep level, like Suited for Success; Hurricane Fluttershy; Testing Testing 1, 2, 3; Pinkie Pride; Winter Wrap Up; and Sleepless in Ponyville.
     
    You can't say plenty of the content bridges beyond the base demographic, yet simultaneously claim this is a product "for five-year-olds" and that the older voices don't matter one bit. Like what Tommy Oliver lambasted in his Equestria Girls review, these statements are incongruent, and "it's for kids" is inherently hypocritical. It's either for all ages (which it is, and anyone who claims otherwise is lying) or "for little girls" (who, by the excuse, you imply that they deserve the pandering schlock that nearly killed the franchise in the first place). The people you're talking to doesn't determine the quality of the product. The execution of the content determines the overall quality of your product. The audiences you're trying to attract only determines the content rating — what is allowed or not by law. Friendship Is Magic, for example, is rated TV-Y in the US, by far the strictest rating. Hasbro and DHX can't afford to put in more graphic content in hopes of not having the FCC or standard-and-practices lawyers being sicced on.
     
    A few decades ago (notably the 1990s), several cartoons weren't afraid to step across the boundaries and deliver quality entertainment. Sure, some of them were misses (Powerpuff Girls's Mime for a Change for its out-of-character ending; Collect Her for its mean-spirited commentary towards older fans), but plenty were hits. Hey Arnold! (not one of my favorites) is a great cartoon that took its audience seriously and portrayed many city and child problems tactfully, thus expanding the characters' dimensions. Courage the Cowardly Dog is unbelievably creepy with plenty of great slapstick, but it wasn't afraid to tackle real problems and portray them seriously; check out The Mask for its commentary on domestic abuse, sexism, and homosexuality. Or another Hasbro product: Beast Wars's "Code of Hero." Heck, even pre-movie Spongebob is still remembered because most of the time, it didn't fall into the traps that factually bad animations make.
     
    Then again, if Nickelodeon can get away with close-up shots of ripped toenails, portraying suicide realistically to mock it (twice), blatant animal cruelty, racist stereotypes, and rape jokes in cartoons rated TV-Y7, then— I don't wanna think about that idea anymore! NEXT! Kids are never a target audience. A target audience is the idea of selling a product to someone. Do you think kids are going to be buying those products? No. So how do they get? By their guardian's approval. The guardians (particularly ones with common sense) decide if the product is suitable in both content and quality for his or her kid(s), not the kids themselves. And what "children's" television works best? Ones where kids and adults are treated with equal respect. MLP:FIM, in terms of the comics and animation, is suitable for all ages. Young kids, teens, parents, and any adult who enjoys quality animation. It's the same audience as the Disney classics, Pixar, several classic children's books, and other current products of today that know what they're doing. If people love and enjoy factually bad shows as kids, there's a chance they'll enjoy factually bad shows as adults, too; that's intolerable. Kids should be directed to quality family entertainment so they can create sets of standards.
    Because kids are easily influenced by the voices and sights surrounding them, family entertainment should be enforced with STRICTER and HIGHER standards, not lower. If the quality is good, it should be recommended. On the other hand, if it's bad, it should be called out and criticized sternly — if it's abominable, very harshly. "It's for kids" is no excuse for bad concepts, bad executions, bad animation, bad writing, and bad products in general. The more various sections of the brony fandom and people in general use it to bypass quality flaws that make or break the story; episode; comic; or movie, the more they'll accept any kind of quality, including the really bad kind that Spongebob's going through now and Thomas until last year. The less the lazy "it's for kids" handwave is used and the more the excuse is called out, the better.
  22. Dark Qiviut
    Author's Note: Initially, this was just a ranking for the first half of Season 4. But as of March 3, it's a personal ranking for Season 4 at large. With Twilight's Kingdom now officially aired, I compiled my final rankings and will link this list back to a review of the entire season.
     
    ———
     
    Like my MLP Micro-Series ranking, I'm ranking the Season 4 episodes as we go along. Here, I'm ranking them from most favorite to least favorite. Unlike my mega-sandwiches, these aren't critiqued objectively and observed with more of a subjective eye. (I, however, will call out quality flaws and strengths for my thoughts, but how much they'll influence me is personal.)
     
    Unlike the Micro-Series, I categorized the episode list to six sections: "love it," "like it," "meh," "dislike it," "hate it," and "unknown" (as in not finding a spot yet and will have to think where).
     
    Let's begin!
     

    Love it:


    1. Testing Testing 1, 2, 3: Originally, this was fifth on my list, but after a rewatch, it climbed up. After watching the episode more and more, it really climbed up in my favorite rankings. As of today, it's my all-time favorite episode! Of the episodes to be featured this season, this one is by far one of the most mature in terms of morals and theme. "No method of learning is better than another. What works for one may not work for another" is something you don't normally see in any media; it takes guts, and did AKR brilliantly execute it. First, the characters are very in character and three-dimensional; Twilight Sparkle actually showed some character for the first time since Twilight Time, and she was the one to write the lesson in the journal, a brilliant twist to the lessons post-Season 1. The worldbuilding was excellent, including plugging in Faust's most favorite pony, Firefly, into the plot as a Wonderbolt. While sometimes the setting tends to be an arbitrary gimmick to the moral (thus making it pointless), the setting and moral communicate with each other. In addition, the episode contains an incredible balance of humor and drama without making either overbearing. Not to mention the foreshadowing early was very subtle, yet noticeable. Pinkie Pride is one of the best episodes this season, if not the best, but you can argue that TT123 is just as good if not a little better than PP.
     
    2. Pinkie Pride: What else to describe it? This is easily not just one of my most favorite episodes this season, but also among the best of the series. (In fact, it's in my top 5, fourth place behind Sleepless in Ponyville, Magic Duel, and Testing, to be exact.) Pinkie is Pinkie Pie instead of an out-of-character idiot who blubbers randomness all the time for no good reason. This episode did what MMDon't: write a musical in twenty minutes without sacrificing quality. Cheese Sandwich is a wacky name, but fits Weird Al so well, and he was AMAZING. So far, it's the only episode this season where I watched it more than ten times. There are some logical flaws (including a script/storyboarding error in Spike being dropped from the episode during Act 3), but they're so small, they don't detract from the experience. Easily the best episode this season and will stay that way until something grander comes along.
     
    3. Pinkie Apple Pie: Part of the five-episode stretch where three great episodes came out of it. For one of the few times this season prior to Pinkie Pride, Pinkie Pie was very in character. There's a completely big difference between being offbeat (which is a unique style of humor with substance in mind) and random. Pinkie's the former, not the latter; in PAP, she's the former. Excellently portrayed with great humor for the right reasons. the core four Apples are very realistic with their fighting and constant screw-ups, but PP did care because she thought she found family close by and wanted to know the ins and outs. Apples to the Core is a musical masterpiece (although I like the background clapping a tad more, but that's just my preference). While the plot comes out of thin air and Pinkie's status of being an Apple or not is hidden by exposition, it's hidden very plausibly because the characterization, journey, personal reasons for each character, and humor are superb.
     
    4. For Whom the Sweetie Belle Toils: Initially, I said RTM was Polsky's best episode. FWtSBT more than likely eclipsed it. The conflict was very believable. Just through the tension, even without SB blurting out the "fifth birthday" comparison, Sweetie Belle had obviously lived under her bigger sister's shadow for some time and was getting tired of it. When the play she worked hard on got overshadowed by Rarity's fantastic dresses, it was as if her work became null. So it made plenty of sense for Sweetie to ignore the consequences of her actions and destroy the headdress. But the consequences she received (the nightmare) was delicious and one of the best examples of "show, don't tell" in the series. Instead of being told the consequences, she was shown, not just through Luna, but also her own angry mind. It's a Christmas Carol reference done beautifully well. Although the ending followed a rather typical cartoon gag of twirling the windows and the cat-and-mouse chase, it all paid off well at the end.
     
    5. Rarity Takes Manehattan: For the first time since Sisterhooves Social, a good Rarity episode. While the song tells too much and puts her generosity front and center, its reprise is fantastic and delivers fresh consequences for her behavior the night before. But her not being so generous to the Remane Five had an extremely fantastic reason. Rarity's generosity was once taken advantage in Suited for Success, but Suri is the first to vindictively do so by plagiarizing Rarity's clothing. As a creator, when your hard work is stolen so cruelly, then it hurts you at the very core and questions your worth creatively and emotionally. It isn't pretty and can get you into a fit of rage. I don't blame Rarity for this. The moral itself is fantastically woven in and deep. It's also a different type of episode for Polsky, as it's more down to earth compared to his original concepts. Good thing, too, because it really helped him create a great episode that paid attention to a fantastic concept and ended with a very relatable moral. To see a longer review, click here.
     
    6. Twilight Time: This is one that caught me by surprise in a very good way, and I'd argue this is the most underrated episode this season. There is humor, but like RTM, the slapstick is rather toned down (except the final scene where the apple exploded). As far as the CMC are concerned, the approach to the conflict was simple but realistic. DT and SS received the attention, and the CMC want it. Any criticism of SB being an incompetent airhead is just, but she felt jealous, collected, and immediately regretted it when things got out of her own control. Each of the CMCs shared tendencies from their sisters/protégés, but weren't identical of them, still being individual yet showing the audience how much they're growing up. Ironically, SS and DT were antagonistic (but unlike One Bad Apple and Flight to the Finish, they were individual characters with separate personalities who didn't go for the typical one-dimensional low blow that marginalized Scootaloo's disability), but it was the CMC who brought the conflict upon themselves. It was also much better to see the Disasterly Duo and the rest of the fillies getting caught in the act. Even better, Twilight demonstrated serious growth without breaking her character. She was geeky, but not so extensively to regress her character, and the continuity from Games Ponies Play wasn't distracting. It was easily her best role in an episode since Magic Duel. The only real hangups are the timing of the fanaticism (if this were like the fourth episode, I'd buy it), DT/SS suddenly worshiping Twilicorn despite her living there for at least a year, Pipsqueak expositing the CMCs' plan, Spike being reduced to Spikabuse (writers, we're tired of this shit! ), and how the week-long progress was reduced to a couple of scenes. That aside, it's simple, but mostly effective and definitely one of the genuinely good episodes of the season. To see my longer observations, head here.
     

    Like it:


    7. Castle Mane-ia: As contrived as the traps and gags are, there is so much grand humor to go by. On a personal level, my most favorite thing is how the Sidekick Five (including Pinkie, by association) suffered some hilarious consequences for trespassing the old fortress. One of my biggest pet peeves in the entire series lately is how when a character does some stupid stunt, bullies, or some crime of friendship, it isn't surprising for the character to sometimes not only get away scot-free (Babs Seed in One Bad Apple; the Remane Five in Mare-Do-Well), but also rewarded (Rarity in Sweet & Elite; the Mane Six in Games Ponies Play). The five ponies infiltrated the fortress without prior knowledge from Luna and Celestia and suffered all those booby traps and dark humor as damning punishment for their idiocy. As stupid as the Spikabuse was near the end, this gave the building much more depth. How well it'll hold up remains to be seen.
     
    8. Three's a Crowd: One word: Discord. Without question, the best part. Hilarious and subtly menacing by tricking Twi and Cadance into getting a flower that could've gotten them killed. He may be somewhat of a prankster now, but the charisma and neutral attributions to his character make him a treat to watch, especially when he rubs everyone the wrong way. And Glass of Water ain't exactly a good song, the visuals and franctic pace reinforce his character and disguise de Lancie's lack of singing talent well. Unfortunately, the plot is way too slow. Pinkie's a flanderized airhead. Twi and Cadance were easily convinced by a character they (especially Twi) know she shouldn't trust him. Some — if not all — of the pop culture references during the song are very blatant, giving the scenes great risk of becoming very dated in the future. And the vocabulary is way too repetitive given the franchise's base market (six and up). An above-average episode, but Discord's breathtaking comedy is worth it.
     
    9. Twilight's Kingdom: This is an episode where so much was on the line, as it should. Tirek was ruthless, manipulative, and tyrannical. He wouldn't let anyone interfere in his conquest. The fight between Tirek and Twilight is easily the most action-packed and violent fight in the show; even in its current state, the fact that FIM still retained the TV-Y rating surprised me. And the whole Discord arc arrives full circle, now a part of the family with him gaining Twilight's trust and friendship. When it got epic, it really got epic! That said, the plot is marred by stupidity, poor dialogue, mechanical lyrics from You'll Play Your Part, poor pacing, and unpleasant graphic design featured in the final act in Part 2. I like it, and it's very satisfactorily, but objectively, an above-average finale. You can read my whole review here.
     
    10. Inspiration Manifestation: A bit of a surprise for me. Only the second Spike episode I like nowadays (Secret of My Excess the other). Spike had some nice characterization early on. Inspiration Manifestion (the book) brought some really great moments with Rarity going crazy in her creativity, from doing things small to becoming addicted and imposing her corrupted will on everyone in Ponyville. The yellow-brick-road reference was very clever and contributed to the anticlimax. That said, some big problems. Rarity's overdramatic whining was out of place and flanderized her. The "who" joke never got funny. And the biggest issue: the conflict went too long: By basically tagging along Rarity and glowing praise during Acts 1 and 2, the conflict started to plod on his side. As for Spike himself, there's a line between being naive and being stupid. As he continued to blindly support Rarity, he crossed it, even during his dilemma before the last commercial hit. If he realized it much sooner (maybe midway in Act 2), then you could do something about it. Overall, above-average.
     
    11. Daring Don't: From a quality perspective, it sucks. It's easily one of the worst episodes this season (either third- or fourth-worst in my calculations). Continuity from Read It and Weep (Daring Do being a Dash recolor so Dash can connect to her and become her fantastically) was swiped away. The pacing was all over the place and had absolutely no flow, ruining the foreshadowing. Rainbow Dash's characterization and growth are put into serious question. The fan/creator relationship (even from a meta level) wasn't told well at all. Almost all of the M6 minus Dash and Twi are background ponies. There were plenty of really stupid moments (the M6 watching the fighting scene instead of helping Daring Do, Dash being a bumbling idiot while tag-teaming with Do in Act 2). But I simply can't help but like it. Maybe because of the charm that's there, some of the comedy, foreshadowing, and potential in the worldbuilding. If it weren't for Rainbow Falls, Equestria Games, Somepony…, and It Ain't Easy Bein' Breezies, this would be the worst episode this season.

    Meh:


    12. Power Ponies: This episode is, well…conflicting. At one point, I was very excited to see how Spike's role as a secondary butt of jokes was going to be stabbed at. While it's done hilariously, it was very poorly paced. The way that can be noticed is by all the info-dumping, especially the repetitiveness of it. When you have to cram this point in the script every few minutes, it becomes moot, and I tell the screen, "Get on with it already!" It also doesn't help when Fluttershy decided to abandon her friends during the middle of an important fight. (As a FS fan, the flanderization here is plain dumb!) But some things were done right: the humor, the henchponies keeping the M6 frozen after every few minutes, the cheesy "mane" puns from Mane-iac, and how Spike was the one saving the day in a self-contained episode. So, personally, average, but a bad performance.
     
    13. Maud Pie: For a couple of days, I had no idea where to place the latest episode, but I do now. Maud Pie is a very interesting and relatable character with a tremendous amount of passion despite showing very little enthusiasm in her voice. The storytelling isn't all that clumsy, and it doesn't rely exclusively on exposition, instead showing the conflicts and consequences. And the fact that Pinkie really desires to have her friends be friends with her sister enforces Pinkie's biggest quality: being happy as the result of the others being happy. The way the social awkwardness (particularly the expectation Pinkie laid out for them) made it all pretty plausible, and I can appreciate them trying to get along better with Maud without trying to look incompetent and stupid. Unlike several other episodes this season (a.k.a., Daring Don't), the Remane Five were there for a good reason and shared plenty of screentime.
     
    On the flipside, there are many issues to cover. Firstly, the climax was contrived: You could've had Dash race to rescue Pinkie while Maud jackhammers through the rock. Its pacing was very wonky, starting from slow and then speeding up to the end. Surprisingly, the animation isn't all that polished, either, as in-betweens and keyframes are much more visible to the naked eye. Spike wasn't written in at all, making his association with the Mane 6 becoming more and more of an afterthought. Although this episode is as much a character study as a comedy, Maud's other interests revolve around rocks, which makes her look very two-dimensional as a first impression; if you varied it and introduced something new that have her focused on other interests, then you could've kept her introverted personality yet make her more interesting upon seeing her for the first time. To make it worse, her introverted passion and overall dryness of the humor are overplayed, risking a severe detachment of her character to many viewers and making her boring; don't beat a dead horse. Also, there's way too much exposition among the Mane Six, forcing the scenes to suddenly pause or end. Because MP tells too much, the morals and overall theme lack focus, going from one to another without any time to delve into them. Lastly, the episode — inadvertently or otherwise — wants you to laugh at how uncomfortable the Remane Five are in response to Maud, but then suddenly criticizes the audience for laughing in the first place. Dry humor has an appeal, but it got too dry sometimes, and it would've been far better if some of the scenes and responses weren't played for laughs.
     
    Compared to IAEBB and StWOM, MP has many good qualities, and there's enough to call it decent, if not good, from an objective quality perspective. On the other hand, because there are many issues that hold MP back and don't fulfill its potential. I don't like it, but I don't dislike it, either. It's a shame, because I was really looking forward to it, and I really wanted to like it. Maybe I will sometime in the future, maybe I won't. That'll depend on my future feelings with MP.
     
    14. Filli Vanilli: I think all of you here know why, but I'll do it, anyway. Fluttershy's stage fright was explored, this time when exposing her singing talent. Big Mac gets a role beyond saying "Eeyup!" all the time. The many continuity nods don't ram you on the head (Flutterguy, Rarity learning from Green Isn't Your Color, Fluttershy the one responsible for spreading the Ponytones's popularity in Ponyville).
     
    But a few problems exist. The Remane Five stared in disbelief over her beautiful singing voice (as if Find a Pet and her other songs don't matter ); sure, you get a subtle clue, but it's too subtle to be noticed immediately, causing the continuity from several episodes (including Hearth's Warming Eve) to overlap. Zecora was Miss Plot Device again. Continuity from Hearth's Warming Eve wasn't fully paid attention to (from that episode, Fluttershy was on stage as a side character instead of a lead role, but she was very important; it would've been better if that was addressed somehow). Lastly, Pinkie Pie was not just an out of character idiot, but an insufferable asshole that the audience was supposed to laugh at and find it okay! Pinkie's behavior wasn't okay in the slightest, and the fact that it was written to be a good thing is inexcusable. And not just breaking character to Fluttershy (disregarding her morals in Griffon the Brush Off and the lessons she learned up to this point), but also to Big Mac by rubbing her victory in knowing that he was sick. In short, what would be loved and good is marred by Pinkie's offensive behavior.
     
    15. Leap of Faith: One of Haber's biggest weaknesses is how he tends to follow the cliché down to a "T" without really altering anything to make it refreshing, a similar problem with CM-ia and Simple Ways. Here, one of AJ's strengths is her characterization to a certain degree. The Flim Flam brothers are still very funny. The moral — telling the truth may be hard and hurt others, but lying hurts even more — is mature. But it's marred by a few things, starting with the formulaic "placebo effect" cliché and lack of subtlety in its subtext. Secondly, Silver Shill doesn't have a strong personality; although he learns his lesson, his realization is weak and relies on formulaic dialogue. Finally, the plan was very obvious from the start and had to rely on stupidity just to fool everyone. By far, season four's most average episode.

    Dislike it:


    16. Simple Ways: While Trenderhoof isn't a jerk, he's an extremely flat character who served one purpose: to force the plot along. Plot-induced stupidity and incompetence doesn't a good plot make and, after enough viewings, changes the viewing experience from fun to cringeworthy and obnoxious. This is the main issue here — how Rarity and TH turned into incompetent idiots and couldn't really do their job right. While Rarity was funny initially, her forced Southern accent and stereotyping became a chore to watch, while AJ's accent and sensual behavior (even if "accidental") remained a laugh riot. It also doesn't help by how the moral was exposited and rushed, making it all anticlimactic. On the flipside, Spike's character is who he should be: sarcastic, deadpanning, but caring and didn't have his crush on her holding him back. Plus, so much crap went past the radar, I'm surprised it still holds the TV-Y rating. That said, it doesn't save SW from competing with Sweet and Elite as the worst Rarity episode.
     
    17. Bats!: Some things hold up: the M6 suffering bad consequences for forcibly altering the ecosystem, the song itself (Williams's second song this series), some of the humor with Pinkie ('cept her yelling and drilling into the ground ), Flutterbat, and the awesome visuals. Also, this is the first episode this season with a very solid pace from start to finish.
     
    Unfortunately, the fact that AJ and crew were villainized despite having a plausible worry of the bats chewing up the crops and Dash simply thinking of the cider don't help. In itself, the entire conflict was broken in favor of supporting Fluttershy's implausible, idealistic opinions. Moreover, the conflict between animal rights and protecting the farm was a stepping stone for the moral, marginalizing a really sensitive political issue into a hapless gimmick (something this show NEVER gets right!). I once liked it, but the issues bug me more and more, and the way the politics were poorly written hurt this episode (in both quality and enjoyment) tremendously.
     
    18. Princess Twilight Sparkle: Mechanical dialogue really stifles the flow. Then there's Pinkie being flanderized here and there. *glares at her tumbling down the stairs* Twilight, who was able to fly in MMC, was suddenly incompetent; the contrivance kept going for far too long. Zecora and the Alicorn potion is both a Deus Ex Machina as well as a cheap gimmick to push the script along. The pace was inconsistent, namely the second part and very quick flashbacks. The flashbacks and Tree itself hone in the idea that ponies' futures, specifically Twilight's, are predestined, the glaring plot hole that helped make Magical Mystery Cure the worst season finale thus far. The timeline was poorly constructed: While I'm sure McCarthy was trying to say that some time has passed since the pilot, the wording and importance of the event made it feel like only a year passed. Discord's appearance and antics, the action, animation, want to contribute and not screw up, and excellent solution to the Elements of Harmony concept helped prevented the premiere from being a dud. That said, it's still rather weak and possibly the worst two-part opener outside of the pilot.
     
    19. It Ain't Easy Being Breezies: Fluttershy's key episode, and so much doesn't add up. But first, Seabreeze is a jerk, but has a very good reason: He wants to get home before the portal closes, and he's the only one who seems to care about not just where he lives, but also his family. He's the only breezie with a sense of perspective. Secondly, the breezies are cute and don't rip off the G3 ponies. Thirdly, the main moral is very deep. Fluttershy learned that sometimes being kind and keeping someone complacent despite knowing they'd be in grave danger does more harm than good, and being firm is the kindest method. But there are several problems.
    The breezies are really cute and decently designed, but they're there for no other reason than to sell toys (both the M6 breezies and the others). Yeah, FIM may be a commercial, but it's a good commercial that usually disguises it. When you disguise it as poorly as Equestria Girls, you're doing it wrong.
    There's so much exposition, robbing the episode of any deep conflict and symbolizing the poor pacing throughout.
    Plenty of the humor fell flat. Dash's lines are bleh. Rarity's vanity made her look like an idiot. Just poor comedic timing. The only moment was the reversal of Sonic Rainboom in the prologue.
    The ending is dumb for a few reasons.
     
    a. It's a DEM.
     
    b. It showed the audience that the episode was almost over and makes this episode a chore to finish and later rewatch.
     
    c. Twilight was a background pony up to this point. Having her barge and memorize a spell we had no idea existed in a few hours is out of place.
     
    d. You question Twilight's character and how the writers resolve conflicts whenever she participates now. you risk making her an extreme know-it-all-type character that the writers can pluck out and solve conflicts five minutes in unless you dial back her IQ. You risk cheapening her other roles simply by having her do these powerful tricks. In other words, a character with a role equivalent to Celestia or Zecora (without the cryptic rhyming).
     
    e. Possible the biggest flaw: It marginalizes Fluttershy's epiphany by pushing her importance to the background.

    This episode feel flat from beginning to end and felt a lot like something out of G3. The lack of investment, blatant infomercial that'd give EQG a run for its money, and sloppy writing hurt IAEBB's credibility. Easily the fifth-worst episode in season four.
     
    Conversely, Levinger deserves some credit for doing whatever she can to hide the toyetic being. Rainbow Falls was lazy; Breezies actually had some effort to integrate the breezies, but the overbearing exposition told the audience she was trying too hard to hide the promotions, thus making the plugin more glaring.
     
    20. Trade Ya!: Three words describe TY!: messy, predictable, stupid. For a bit, this was an episode I hated, but not anymore. The plot is very formulaic, falling for every single cliché in their books and filling in . But the biggest problem is the horrendous characterization of the Mane Six. Not only are they out of character. They're also very stupid and incompetent! To quote my comment from its "Pick a Flaw" thread:
     

    Hate it:


    21. Flight to the Finish: How far it's fallen, from the low "like it" list to now one of four I hate. Which is a shame because Hearts Strong as Horses took some getting used to, but I've warmed up to it, and I now really like it, especially when Sweetie Belle's singing it. Although Dash doesn't show the professionalism till later, she retained the character growth, especially maturity, from seasons past, including Daring Don't. And Scootaloo's inability to fly was a very daring concept to focus on, and you can definitely relate to her. How Valentine approached Scootaloo's possible disability was really sweet and helped her grow as an individual.
     
    One big problem: DT and SS are flat antagonists again — carbon copies of each other. Because they were flat and were only there to antagonize Scootaloo via the lowest common denominator, they had no purpose to be there. In fact, their presence and low blow underminded the entire conflict. If Scootaloo came to this realization in some other way rather than having an underhanded and predictable bully gimmick intruding FttF, the conflict would've had more weight. As a result, I take this a bit more personally than Simple Ways's stupidity, PTS's sloppy gimmicks, and Breezie's shortcuts. Is it one of the worst episodes this season? Not even close. But I really can't help but feel really stung by it because the Disasterly Duo are catalysts for the main plot.
     
    22. Somepony to Watch Over Me: On the positive side, the Cutie Mark Crusaders are in character. The interruption of the song was absolutely hilarious. None of the Mane Six outside of AJ show up. Some of AJ's actions were funny. In the third act, the visuals, action scene, and chimera's design kick ass.
     
    On the flipside, Good God Almighty, the rest of the episode's a complete train wreck. Acts 1 and 2 revolve around AJ suddenly pampering Apple Bloom when it wasn't needed. When AB read the list aloud, the portrayal was suddenly going to hurt badly. When AJ completely ignored AB and instead replaced her rational, proud, well-thinking brain with the Piñata of Idiocy, she was turned into a complete caricature of herself. If this was a season one episode following Call of the Cutie, it would've worked in nicely and possibly resolve the continuity and characterization issues surrounding Bridle Gossip. It's extremely out of place now and COMPLETELY out of character of Applejack. She may be my least-favorite of the M6, but I like and respect her for being full of personality. That character was sacrificed for contrived stupidity that has no business being here.
     
    If that wasn't bad, the method the moral was approached was destructive. "Apple Bloom made a small mess, resulting in Applejack becoming Applestalker. But the fact that Bloom disobeyed AJ and nearly got herself killed is enough to become independent"? Without a doubt, the worst Applejack episode and third-worst episode in season four. I took the episode apart here.
     
    23. Equestria Games: The second-worst episode of the season and my second-most hated episode overall behind Rainbow Falls. Of the four episodes centering the Games, three of them emphasized it to a degree of major importance. Because of the way seasons three and four (and the web advertisements) hyped the arc, there was a level of anticipation for an event that was consider grander and more important than the Grand Galloping Gala. Instead, it was a pointless backdrop for Spike, concluding an arc that doesn't deserve its disrespect. Add contrived plot points and poor characterization of Spike from the halfway point onward, you got a disaster. Refer to my review for my ripping.
     
    24. Rainbow Falls: Derpy, the griffons, and the scenery were the only bright spots throughout. The rest of it was a bunch of sloppy, lazy bullshit. Objectively the worst episode in season four and my most hated episode of this series so far. Read my review to see how much I tore it.
     
    Unknown:
    N/A
×
×
  • Create New...