Jump to content
Banner by ~ Ice Princess Silky

Kronos the Revenant

User
  • Posts

    1,460
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Kronos the Revenant

  • Birthday 1997-03-09

Contact Methods

  • YouTube
    GeneralSonicboom
  • Steam ID
    |ZeronN| Kronos, the Revenant

Profile Information

  • Personal Motto
    No matter what happens, always remember: Dying is gay.
  • Interests
    Video games, mobile games, beat-em-ups, shooters (both first and third person)

My Little Pony

  • Best Pony
    Autumn Blaze
  • Best Mane Character
    Twilight Sparkle

Recent Profile Visitors

18,422 profile views

Kronos the Revenant's Achievements

Seapony

Seapony (14/23)

2k

Brohooves Received

Single Status Update

See all updates by Kronos the Revenant

  1. First Tumblr gets a massive ban hammer by deleting all the NSFW blogs, aka the fun blogs, now COPPA is gonna screw over YouTube by nuking 75-90% of the content on it because it’s not “kid friendly”. Fuck you, COPPA. YouTube is not exclusively for kids. YouTube is for everyone. Animation is for everyone. Stop making things boring “for the kids” because they’re not the only ones watching. Plus, it’s not YouTube’s fault. It’s not the creator’s fault that kids are watching the content they dish out. No one is telling these kids what to watch. If you want to fine anyone for this crap, fine the parents for supposedly exposing their “precious little angels” from the cartoons they see on YouTube or, God forbid, ORIGINAL FREAKING CONTENT THAT NO NETWORK HAS A CLAIM TO.

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. Miss

      Miss

      Well I think one of the big issues is that there is a charge accompanied by videos that are labeled "kid-friendly" when they actually "aren't," and with YouTube's insane system that is going to be rough determining which is which. 

      So YouTubers have to go in on every video and put they are not suitable etc. of course means they lose possible ad-revenue as well. But I have been reading that doing so doesn't save you from the charge actually, so who knows if that even works. 

      The problem here is someone might think they're video is suitable, but YouTube/COPPA says otherwise, now they have to pay a hefty fine, and like their video was kid friendly actually and now they have to go and fight for it. 

    3. Kronos the Revenant

      Kronos the Revenant

      And that’s the problem. The dumb regulations enforced by YouTube and COPPA might reduce incentive for creators to put out more content. Either that or their content would have to change entirely, causing said channel to become unrecognizable. They won’t churn out the same content you came to those channels for. Pretty soon, the only video that would be uploaded would be toy unboxing videos and parents playing with their kids, turning YouTube into what YouTube Kids was SUPPOSED to be. 

      I think another problem is that the audience under 13 years old either don’t know what YouTube Kids is or, from what I heard about it, are not interested in what YouTube Kids provides in terms of content. Still, I’m afraid of what might happen to YouTube come 2020. I hope it doesn’t get nuked like Tumblr did a while back. 

    4. Pentium100

      Pentium100

      @Misscellanio it's the opposite. If your video is not kid-friendly (meaning kids don't watch it), then Youtube can collect the data. If your video is kid friendly (kids watch it), then you have to mark it as such, so that Youtube won't collect data on those who watch it.

      The possible fine (I doubt if creator will get fined) is if you have a kid-friendly video, but not mark it as such, meaning Youtube collects data on those who watch it.

×
×
  • Create New...