Jump to content
Banner by ~ Kyoshi

Altastrofae

Users
  • Posts

    666
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Altastrofae

  • Birthday November 20

Contact Methods

  • Discord Username
    Altastrofae#0091
  • Fimfiction
    Soul Shine

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Here
  • Personal Motto
    Sometimes people are idiots
  • Interests
    Stargazing, reading, meditation, poetry, music, anime, gaming, art, programming, computer science, watching YouTube in the dark

MLP Forums

  • Favorite Forum Section
    Everfree Forest

My Little Pony

  • Best Pony
    Fluttershy
  • Best Anthropomorphic FiM Race
    Deer
  • Best Princess
    Luna
  • Best Mane Character
    Fluttershy
  • Best CMC
    Scootaloo
  • Best Secondary/Recurring Character
    Coco Pommel
  • Best Episode
    Magical Mystery Cure
  • Best Song
    This Day Aria
  • Best Season
    5

Recent Profile Visitors

76,974 profile views

Altastrofae's Achievements

Kirin

Kirin (10/23)

925

Brohooves Received

Single Status Update

See all updates by Altastrofae

  1. What if black holes actually have negative mass? The concept itself is mathematically and scientifically plausable. This would not only support the popular theory of black holes condensing into a singularity, but give support for why it does this. If the concept of negative mass confuses anyone, it basically means the item's physical boundaries slip past itself on a quantum scale (I worded that weird, blargh!). Let's just say that there's more space inside of a black hole then there appears to be from the outside (think Doctor Who). It's technically not changing the mass number's absolute value, but there's more space inside, but relative to an onlooker, if you could see the "inside" of a black hole from the outside, it would be condensed. I'm not sure if this makes sense, but it's an idea that's been bugging me to put sense to, the concept of negative mass. It makes sense in my head, but there arent words to describe the ideas, so I'm trying to equate it to something we understand, at least a little, like a black hole, but its not quite what I mean by it. It isnt a good analogy. If only there was a way I could show you all my thoughts. Words are too insufficient.

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. Amanita

      Amanita

      Wikipedia is not a reliable source, peeps can just get on it and change everything on it to make it just opinions and not facts.

    3. Altastrofae

      Altastrofae

      Negative Momentum? So force would push it in the opposite direction? That could be, like, antigravity, in theory

      I'm grabbing at straws Duality, this is all theoretical, and I dont know how to word it, so I'm equating it to other conceptualized ideas, with little to no success

    4. Duality

      Duality

      @MiragetheChangeling

      Well, yeah, it's not like I learn everything I supposedly know from it.

      Wikipedia is just the most basic source to locate and throw at people to give them a general idea of what something is if they've never heard of it before.

      Most of that 'it's not reliable don't ever use it for anything' reputation is hyperbole, anyway; I've read many an independent source-evaluation article saying that it's actually quite reliable for most layman uses, except in the case of biographical entries.

      @CrystalBloodMoon, Scoffer of Humans

      Antigravity is another property it might possess. Being repelled by gravity instead of attracted by it.

      There's no real evidence for negative mass anywhere, though, so, unless we experience a paradigm-shattering discovery at some point, antigravity shall remain a myth.

    5. Show next comments  6 more
×
×
  • Create New...