Jump to content
Banner by ~ Ice Princess Silky

Dethde

User
  • Posts

    58
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dethde

  1. Really depends on the time, RD's much less obnoxious in EG, however pinkie was turned into an exposition fountain in the EG, RR, and LE movies, which didn't feel good, then the other shorts turned up and made things much better for her, fluttershy i like the same for both, not much changed imo, Rarity just felt dull and boring to me, AJ felt better, but not much, and personally i prefer Sci-Twi over Princess Twi, it just feels more realistic as a high schooler than a princess in a castle, and i can see how that'd be much more relatable for some people, Pony twi seems to be less... out there as a princess, and Sci-Twi revives memories very well! The one i felt was better, was actually not part of mane six, it was
  2. I feel like something to do with the Mean 6 clones would catch my attention, otherwise i feel like that as long as a good writer handles it, we'll get a good episode, possibly better than good.
  3. So i've just rewatched the episode, and i've got to say tirek was hilarious, if i'd list a major positive about the episode it'd be either the humor, or cozy glow as a villain. I have to definitely agree with Dark Qvivut on the CMCs, extreme waste of potential in my opinion, i would have thought something that would imitate Dark Water in the comics where the CMCs were the driving positive force solving the problem, instead of their appearance in the episode which felt more like filler than actual character. However i will point out something that i see within the episode, the children were SO gullible, oh our classmates looks like they're in pain and sacrificing themselves, let's just walk away awkwardly, if the students atleast showed some disagreement aside from a face, that would have made slightly more sense, there was literally an unicorn who saw Cozy Glow yelling and locking the CMC behind doors, instead of even warning his classmates, just moonwalk away, sure that works.
  4. This conversation being half off topic doesn't make it any better for other people to view, If you want to continue arguing out in the public just for your purpose of grabbing backers, you can continue replying in public, you're continuing to slander and twist my words, i'm going to start pming you from here, since you've rejected invitations to either end this conversation or to keep it away from flooding the chat, see you there. So making it half on topic justifies flooding chat? Sure, i'll respond to the on topic argument, "I was just addressing the one thing I found important to address is the last thing I need is people thinking autistic people are like Cozy Glow." And you didn't need to start this argument here in public if you were only addressing it to me? " I don’t care about your opinion, I care about the argument you made that you are trying to defend by saying it’s just your opinion. My issue is you essentially justified Cozy Glow’s evil by equating it with autism. That’s what you’re saying when you confuse using your friends as tools for self-gratification with not knowing how to make friends, the former is evil and the later is autistic," You're not posting my argument of deconstructing that statement, No, i don't defend my arguments by using the opinion card, and i've already politely suggested it to you to stop slandering me by implying i do, actually, most if not all of the quotes you posted directly show you either stating points that will later be contradicted, or points that twist my words. : "I was just addressing the one thing I found important to address is the last thing I need is people thinking autistic people are like Cozy Glow." "I didn’t reply to persuade you, but to challenge your assertion for everyone else who was reading as your assertion had some nasty implications due to being based on false premises." " I don’t care about your opinion, I care about the argument you made that you are trying to defend by saying it’s just your opinion. My issue is you essentially justified Cozy Glow’s evil by equating it with autism. That’s what you’re saying when you confuse using your friends as tools for self-gratification with not knowing how to make friends, the former is evil and the later is autistic, and then you write her off as more sympathetic than Starlight Glimmer. That’s bad on two accounts. Autism is no excuse for being evil, nor does autism lead to being evil. " " I don’t care what you belief and I can’t change how you feel, but I care about what you’re adding to a dialogue far greater than you where many people might be listening." "You can’t just excuse evil by trying to write it off as mental illness, it betrays a misunderstanding of mental illness and let’s evil go unchallenged." I've been pretty damn consistent. Seems like you're just confusing "thinking autistic people are like Cozy Glow" with "Every autistic kid alive is as morally inferior as Cozy Glow" Yellow = Later Contradicted Red = Slandering/Word Twisting/Not Getting it Orange = Both. What? Because i stated something that started the argument? No, the argument wouldn't have happened if you didn't respond to that statement, see why you're not arguing with everyone else at the same time? You replied, you started an argument, the argument would have been cut short if you decided to use polite wording, and that would have been better than this. "it can clearly be seen that you claimed that she feels autistic and that she just didn't understand friendship" If i would have wanted to make you think she didn't understand friendship DUE to autism, i would have said "Some kid who didn't understand friendship due to possible autism", it's like getting "Your house is filled with bombs" from a guy saying "Your house is on fire." "I'm still left wondering why you thought it was significant that she has no horn," Ah yes, maybe due to Starlight's magic almost destroying all of equestria? Your counter argument wasn't on you being slyly rude, It's obvious that i'm not conceding for this second argument, which is based off of you twisting my words and painting my picture horribly, no, i wasn't pushing the blame on you, I have said in my reply that you can make the note, just do it in a way that can end the argument, or turn it to pms, you're not doing very well at that if you're doubling down on justifying your slanders out in public.
  5. ”in fact if she was extremely good at socializing, she would have refrained from expressing racism in the first place.” in context was that she would have hid her racism instead of showing it in front of anyone, not that racism was a reflection of bad social skills? It was extremely obvious, why would i insult everyone who weren't good at socializing by calling them racist? To end an argument you can either accept to end it, or to just not reply, arguing again doesn't work in your favor. You're again implying my entire point was that she's autistic so she's free from all evil, that is not the point, if you want to see my points for why i didn't enjoy her punishment, read my other replies, if you don't want to change the wording, what was your point of arguing anyways? you had the point of me putting out my opinion of her being autistic being wrongful as it'll lead others to think of autism to be similar of cozy glow's mentality, and that point clearly isn't valid anymore as you're refusing to give me a rewording option. "you also need to accept the consequences for expressing your viewpoint." Exactly, so if you start an argument, accept that you'll need to end it. "Finally, I’d appreciate if you didn’t use the phrase “autism victim”, it makes it very hard for me to take anything you say about autism seriously." Is one of the worst ways to request, it's not being polite, it's being rudely sly, if you say that was polite, me saying : "Why does stating that people are victims of a crippling disorder make it hard to take my points seriously? Is that just something you personally have trouble with or.." and: "I don't see why using the term victim is wrongful here, they've suffered from a neurological disorder that impacts their lives, I am by no means an expert, however if people do take offense in a verbal inaccuracy, i apologize, but you don't have to be politically correct to be an expert, it's comparable to me calling you an amateur at understanding opinions due to you misusing the term objectively." Would have been more than polite, i attempted to stay polite through out this entire conversation, to make it easier for both of us, but you wording your words that way didn't help either of us, this is getting off topic, if you want to continue this conversation, private message me.
  6. Multiple things wrong, first off, "Your belief that racism is a reflection of bad social skills is irrelevant to how autism actually impacts people." is extremely straight forward, in that statement you're pretty much saying "You thinking racism is related to bad social skills doesn't mean autism impacts people that way", i never stated that racism is a reflection of bad social skills, painting me in that way is just insulting. And, you were the first to bring up ending the argument, so, if you disagree to end it, very well. So this argument was pointless? You brought up that you didn't like the way i worded it and that Cozy Glow wasn't autistic, and then you don't want me to change it? I have literally said that i believe Cozy Glow is most likely not autistic already, i'm asking for a wording change, if you don't want to give one, that's that. She feels obsessed, she repeatedly lies, i'm not an expert on autism, and like i've said, if you want me to change the wording that's perfectly fine. But weren't you the first to whine about political correctness? You whined about me using "Autism Victim", i never whined about political correctness, i'm pretty sure that was you the entire time.
  7. Honestly i believe it wasn't tirek being smart, it was discord being er... Let me explain, Discord is intelligent, he doesn't have to have a plan, to make a plan, however, as is chaos, when something goes out of his plan and surprises him, he knows nothing of what to do, he's stunned, and panics, in a way he behaves like a child, easy to manipulate, shunned by consequences.
  8. Why does stating that people are victims of a crippling disorder make it hard to take my points seriously? Is that just something you personally have trouble with or...
  9. idk man, not her fault if you didn't properly word it. And you DID call it a borderline deus ex machina. Predictability can't be fully measured, it varies based on the person, so honestly, the argument about it being predictable is pretty much irrelevant and will easily rile up a toxicity feud. If you've been out competed in an argument and use "I don't care!" as an argument you're pretty much arguing for the sake of arguing, but just don't get too heated up.
  10. I respect that you disagree with my opinion, however it'd be better if you point out everything else you disagree about, so that i can get a better understanding of your points.
  11. To me, the movie felt mediocre, they've done wonders with EG, however this movie felt flat, a blatant piece of advertisement, Villain was a cringier tirek rip off (His previous designs were much better imo.), plot felt cliche in many ways, many characters were completely irrelevant, however other than that it felt likeable? I could see how bronies and non bronies alike could have seen the art style in the Movie to be hard to get used to and unlikable, i personally didn't have too much of an issue with it. To be honest i feel like they were anticipating a fantastic work of film featuring heavy lore patching and fantastic, enjoyable moments, and the movie disappointed them.
  12. To me, aside from season 8 both have been great, just that the fact that inexperienced writers without a proper understanding of the characters are being put to write episodes, which spoil the episode's value.
×
×
  • Create New...