Showing results for tags 'Animation'.

So,as the title says, Is Blue becoming the next FiM? Why do I ask, well because it appears to be very popular in more than just Australia (Where I am from and where the series is made). It teaches lessons about life and friendship in a way that children can understand, but also in a way that adults can like it too. Honestly, I'd be pretty happy if it does become the new FiM.

We all know that we all love the MLP stuff, but i've been wondering about what everyone's thoughts on the other stuff on the Hub? And in no particular order i'll start first. -Pound Puppies: Love this show, liked the fact they did an Elmyra character right with Dot, though I am mad that it got killed cause of Toy sales. -G.I. Joe Renegades: Liked it, same song and dance with the toy sales though. -Strawberry Shortcake 2010: Haven't seen too much but thought it was ok. -Littlest Pet Shop: So I like the show alot, but would much rather be watching Pound Puppies sometimes. I might be missing a few but this is what I thought of them I actually like this shows a bit that I asked a Youtuber friend if he would consider making a ranked or tier list of episodes of any of them and he said he would consider it, fingers crossed

I'm surprised there isn't a thread for this yet. Seeing as many of you like dem japanese cartoons, feel free to list the last ones you watched here!:D I recently finished Bungou Stray Dogs and TTGL.

So, I looked around a bit, and didn't find a great thread with this subject so... I ask of you, one Hasbro franchise to another, which is your favorite transformer? Personally, I like a lot of them, but when I have to choose a favorite... I really like Starscream. I appreciate how in G1, he's always trying to accomplish his evil goals, despite near constant failure. That said, I like how in later Gens he can also be a nuanced character with his own quirks and ambitions beyond just usurping control of the Decepticons (it was neat to see him be really manipulative and scheming in Prime). Also, wow I love his color scheme in G1, and think it should have been kept for later gen installments. XD So who's your favorite transformer?

Do you prefer MLP in a 2D style or 3D style and why? I like when simple cartoon characters come in life using 3D animation, so that's what I prefer.

For example, Captain N The Game Master Super Mario Bros. Super Show Adventures of Super Mario Bros. 3 Super Mario World Sonic the Hedgehog Does anyone like to watch these things despite how bad and cheesy they are?

For me, it's the last segment of the 1st Terror Tales of the Park from Regular Show. Apart from that it's Teen Titans' Fear Itself. I think it's these two that seriously freaked me out because they had a lot of really scary things onscreen. But for Regular show, it was initially frightening but now I actually so hard I hurt. So what other disturbing episodes in any TV show did you see?

Since there was no official thread for the new animated series, Hazbin Hotel, I took it upon myself to create it so that there would be a thread for it where people can discuss their thoughts and ideas about the show as well as to further hype for more episodes, fan over certain characters/waifus/husbandos and even talk about other things like how it is amazing that we see a bunch of independent creators can come together to work on something like this without the backing of a corporation which often limit the artistic freedoms when it comes to attaching their names/labels on said shows. This animation was spearheaded by Vivziepop, also known as Vivienne Medrano, who went ahead to form a group called SpindleHorse Toons, a collective of amazing artists and animators working together to make videos and toons. In any case, the pilot was officially released on the 28th of October on Youtube close to Halloween. This cartoon is not meant for younger viewers as it contains a lot of adult material. What do you guys think of the series so far? Any characters that you in particular love (I think you know who I love )? Do you think this could be a testament to artists not requiring the backing of companies? I've gone ahead and also added in Helluva Boss which is a separate animated series by the same artists and Vivziepop that still takes place in the same universe as Hazbin Hotel does. Perhaps Helluva Boss could be a separate topic of its own, but as it stands, we can talk about it here as well~

With Amphibia's recent end and with The Owl House also on its way out, what do you think will be the next big cartoon for Disney?

Both the Kludge from Big City Greens and Vanzilla from The Loud House can be considered bad poorly built cars. But which is worse?

There’s a new Sonic animated adaptation coming. Since it’s developed by the former DHX, it’s going to be casted by Vancouver talent…. which means PONIES . Regardless, this is mere speculation, as no character other than Sonic is known to appear. Here’s the revealed list so far: -Deven Mack: no speculation here, he’s been confirmed to voice the blue speedster himself. He has been working as a professional voice actor for a while now. Sadly, no poneh -Ashleigh Ball: judging by the billing, she’s probably voicing Tails. She usually doesn’t play boys, but I can see her being tails. I hope she uses her Rumble voice, so adorable -Shannon Chan-Kent: Hitch wasn’t the only poneh in the live action film … I’m almost sure she’s voicing Amy Rose -Brian Drummond: he plays lots of villains, so it’s possible he’ll voice Robontik. HOWEVER, I don’t think they’ll leave Knuckles behind. Besides, he previously voice Knuckles in Sonic Underground -Vincent “he took my waifu” Tong: not sure if Tram Dark will be involved, but for the lack of guesses, I’ll assume they’ll do. I can see him as Shadow -Ian Hanlin: if you judge him with his pony roles, you may not picture him making deeper voices, but he does. I can picture him as Omega -Kazumi Evans: sexy bat with the sexy voice of the most fanservice girl in Equestria Girls? Count me in -Adam Narmada: I only know him for a role in Dragalia Lost, so I don’t know? If Brian Drummond is voicing Knuckles instead of Robontik, he may take over the role

I prefer 2d for organic character animation, various effects (like water, fire, dust, explosions, lightning, etc), painted backgrounds, deep canvas style texturing, and other organic animation. I prefer 3d for robots, vehicles, machinery, props, large creatures, complex environments, action shots, CGI effects, references for 2d animation, etc.

Netflix recently suffered a big drop in subscribers, as well as a BIG loss in money, and as a result, the company is laying people off. Unfortunately, this might mean the end of animation on Netflix. https://www.thewrap.com/netflix-animation-shakeup-executives-fired-shows-canceled-staged-data/

This is a show I've seen tiny bits of in the past, though never a full episode. I gotta say, it looks very interesting. Puppies are always fun and the idea of them taking on all sorts of different roles to pull off wild rescue missions sounds to be a very fun concept. I heard the movie was pretty okay too...although it DOES feature Kim Kardashian, and I will never be over that as long as I live I created this thread cause it really surprised me that it didn't have a thread already (...as far as I could see, anyway). 6teen and Detentionaire are understandable, they're obscure shows, but PAW Patrol is one of the most legendary kid's shows on the planet. I'm curious to know y'all's thoughts on it, or if it has any fans here. It looks very promising. Also, PAW Patrol is a Canadian cartoon, and in case you didn't already know, Canadian cartoons are basically my lifeblood I don't really have much to say on this one because I haven't seen enough of it to fully state my opinion, but I do think it could be a show I could easily get into, between the cute puppies, fun concept and well, being Canadian (god I'm biased ). I wanna hear everyone's thoughts. Have y'all seen this show, and are there any fans here? Feel free to reply! Or don't. I'm not your boss. Marshall for president!

I made a thread for Detentionaire (which you can check out here btw!), and I figured...why NOT make a thread for my all-time favorite cartoon? I couldn't find one, so here you guys go - from me to you, a thread for FreshTV's original masterpiece! 6teen is a show made by Nelvana and FreshTV (my two great loves) about a group of six lovable teens hanging out in a giant mall, growing up, getting jobs and learning life lessons. The main teens have a lot of differences, but they have a very strong friendship and love each other's company. The main six teens are: Jude Lizowski (the stoned skateboarder who's smarter than he looks) Jonesy Garcia (the lovable serial flirt with some bad job luck) Caitlin Cooke (the ADORABLE rich girl who is perky, energetic, sometimes shallow but REALLY sweet. Think Pinkie Pie combined with Rarity) Jen Masterson (the also-adorable hard-working athlete with a mega dork side) Nikki Wong (the grumpy punk-rocker who is basically a human reincarnation of Cera from The Land Before Time...y'know without the racism) Wyatt Williams (A sensible but easily-stressed coffee lover with musical talent) Together these teens go on fun adventures together in the Galleria Mall, working to get jobs, find their dream dates, having fights but always coming back together in the end...it's much lower-key than Detentionaire but it's also a very comfy series with a lot of heartwarming moments and hilarious jokes. Caitlin and Jen have always been HUGE comfort characters of mine, especially Caitlin, she's REALLY important to me - she helped me through some really dark times. If you're curious, you can check the show out here - on the same channel as Detentionaire I cannot recommend this show highly enough! It's a truly wonderful show. And some of it might remind you guys of a certain show about a certain group of horses I'll leave you with a cute pic of the gal pal besties~

Has anyone heard of the new cartoon The Legend of the Three Caballeros? If you haven't, don't feel bad. It was released on the Disneylife app, and the show is only available in the Philippines. However, you can watch the show online on Youtube or on sites like Kimcartoon. That's a shame, because it's actually a really good show.

Does anyone hear contribute to the community? By contribute, I mean do fanwork like fanfiction, art, animation, cosplay, ect. Personally, I don't. I am a terrible artist, not willing to write fanfiction, and have no knowledge in cosplay.

if you could life in any anime (coughs) or mlp (coughs) what would it be? me i would be durarara or sao those seem pretty good bets soul eater and bleach are also good in my eyes it seems i have too many to choose! what do you think what would you choose?

So for those who haven't heard, Disney and Jon Favreau have confirmed that the latter has been pegged to direct a "live-action" (i.e. CGI) remake of their beloved 1994 classic, "The Lion King." OK... I have some thoughts... Sorry, needed to get that out of the way. Ahem, now that that's over, let me proceed to tell you all why this is a horrible, bad, terrible, no-good, rotten, dumb, asinine, and completely nonsensical idea. First, some background. For some years now Disney has been engaging in a rather lazy and obvious cash grab by remaking many of their past films, both classic and obscure, as live-action remakes. Their justification for this is that they are "updating" the stories for modern audiences. While the quality of these films varies, most of the ones they've released so far can be justified for a variety of reasons: (1) "Maleficent": while the movie itself ranges from bad to mediocre, the idea of focusing on the villain in retelling the story is a good one, it just wasn't executed well because Disney went for the easy "oh, the villain is just misunderstood and is really a tragic and good character" cliche, which especially doesn't work for a villain as unapologetically evil as Maleficent. (2) "Cinderella": again, while the film actually failed in some of the ways it tried to update the original (prominent Internet critics like Doug Walker have pointed out that Cinderella actually comes off as more incompetent and less in control of her life in the new one than in the original) it makes sense that a movie as old as this one, and a classic fairy tale no less, could get a modern retelling. However, that modern retelling already exists in the far superior "Ever After" starring Drew Barrymore. Still, the justification for making the film is there. (3) "The Jungle Book": it's weird even calling this a remake since all it remade was the Disney film from the 1960s, which has virtually nothing to do with Rudyard Kipling's far more interesting collection of stories. The biggest justification for remaking it is in having an actual child actor (and an Indian one no less) starring in it, and as a technological achievement it's pretty amazing. That said, most online critics I've watched who reviewed it have said that while it's perfectly harmless, it also felt completely unnecessary, and elements from the original that they tried to call back to were awkwardly shoehorned into that film (more on that later as it pertains to "The Lion King"). (4) "Pete's Dragon": this movie was so obscure to begin with that no one in their right mind would even give a flying buck that it was being remade. The remake itself sounds like it's perfectly fine, and there's absolutely no surprise there considering it's not some beloved classic to begin with, hence the filmmakers probably had plenty of freedom to just make a perfectly original update. It got good reviews but very much underperformed compared to these other remakes, most likely because, again, who the buck was asking for a "Pete's Dragon" remake? Disney is also releasing and/or planning to have remakes for "Beauty and the Beast," "Mulan," "The Little Mermaid," "Peter Pan," "Tinker Bell" (not sure how that qualifies considering there's no original Tinker Bell movie besides "Peter Pan"), and most likely many more. Now that this quick overview is out of the way, let's get into why Disney may be pushing their luck with these remakes, and why "The Lion King" is the perfect example of a movie they should DEFINITELY not be making. (1) What does 'timeless' mean to Disney anymore? As you can see, with most of these films, Disney has justified them by saying that they "need" to be updated for modern audiences. Now none of these remakes needed to be made, BUT so far there has been nothing wrong in and of itself with the idea of remaking them (although Disney has most definitely exaggerated how many updates have been made, the importance of them, or how they've "enhanced" these stories). But now we're REALLY getting into the cream of the crop of Disney classics. To this point, the closest to classics that Disney has remade were Sleeping Beauty and Cinderella, both of which, while certainly beloved, were both old, old films and also drawn from fairy tales themselves, hence there is plenty of room for retelling. Today, however, Disney's walking on thinner ice with some of these, namely in the proposition to remake their landmark titles from the Disney Renaissance which are barely over 20 years old. These movies, upon release, were hailed as instant classics: "The Little Mermaid," "Aladdin," "Beauty and the Beast," and "The Lion King." They're Disney at its finest doing what it does best, and people young and old hold them dearly today. But if they're so great (which Disney has no trouble proclaiming), then one has to ask, why remake them in the first place? If a movie's timeless, it's presumably perfectly fine as it is, with no need to change it. Thus, Disney can't simultaneously proclaim a movie a timeless classic while also going forward with remaking it; either the movie's not a timeless classic and thus in need of a remake, OR Disney is just lying to us in order to poorly justify remaking a movie that doesn't need a remake. The phrase "nothing is sacred" gets thrown around a bit too liberally sometime, but here it actually seems apt to use it; Disney is sacrificing the creative integrity of its studios (which are doing plenty fine as is with no need of these remakes) for the sake of making a few more dollars. Hardly surprising, but from a creative standpoint, deeply disappointing. (2) The new medium doesn't work for "The Lion King" Another element that has been key in Disney justifying these remakes is the idea of having live action, human characters thrown into these classic settings from animated movies. Even "The Jungle Book" was able to do this with Mowgli, even if the rest of that movie was all CGI. Again, this is a weak justification, but it at least somewhat justifies the new medium, to a certain extent. In the case of "The Lion King," however, the justification completely falls apart and we see how weak it really is for any of these remakes. Simply put, there are no human characters in "The Lion King." It's a very human story (heck, it's based off of Hamlet for crying out loud), BUT the setting is inhabited entirely by animals. Why did such a story work so well as an animated film in the first place? For very much the same reason "Bambi" works as a film as well; in both instances, the filmmakers utilized the strengths of their medium to their advantage. Animation allowed them to make the animal characters look very realistic while also giving them just enough human features to come across as characters with human mannerisms and emotions recognizable to human audiences. The animals make facial expressions that their real life counterparts cannot, and display an emotional spectrum that only humans possess. In animation, this is acceptable because it's a part of how one tells a story in that medium; people don't expect animation to perfectly reflect real life, but rather depict it's own set of characters in its own particular setting in its own particular way. This is also why in animation, you can have such a wide range of characters in film or television and still tell a story that audiences can latch onto; whether it's something as outrageous off the walls as Ren and Stimpy, as cheap looking as South Park, as massive as anime like Gurren Lagann, as small-scale as a show like Rugrats, or, yes, as seemingly naturalistic looking as Bambi or The Lion King, in all of these humans are able to accept the characters presented to them as characters somewhat like them because they understand that they inhabit an animated medium, where liberties can be taken with appearances and the laws of physics. The animated medium also allows for musical numbers to be seamlessly blended into the storytelling in a way that even the best live musicals/musical films can't do. One minute Simba and Nala can be talking to each other about ditching Zazu, the next minute they can be bursting into song with dozens of other animals that have really no reason to be singing with them, and we as an audience accept it because we know it's an animated setting, where something like that can just happen and then never be brought up ever again. In "The Lion King," the liberties afforded to the animated medium are on display in ways that many animated features do not capture. The anthropomorphism of the animals in that film is a very strange balance of naturalism with fantasy; they look for the most part like their real life counterparts, and they even exist in an ecology which reflects a real life savanna ecology, but at the same time, they display emotions, mannerisms, and facial expressions that only humans can, some look more cartoonish than others (like Timon and Pumbaa, Zazu, and the Hyenas), break out into song on occasion, and even have things happen like a lion cub getting raised by a warthog and a meerkat and growing up to live beside them. All of these elements were critical in telling the story that the makers of "The Lion King" had unfold in their film. Now then, having said all that, we must ask ourselves this very important question: can you do ALL of this in a CGI/live action medium which is supposed to depict the animals as realistically as possible? I for one do not believe that it's possible. Let's take a look at the film that will probably closely resemble this proposed Lion King remake the most, the 2016 Jungle Book. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=noZF9Mh4y08 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUi5rquFiB8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKkm2h8STrY Right away, there's a couple things one notices. Now, as far as CGI goes, this all looks gorgeous, no doubt. HOWEVER, if one is comparing it as a remake of an animated film populated by anthropomorphic animal characters, then it fails UTTERLY. How so? The expressions. ALL of the emotion conveyed by any of the animal characters here hinges ENTIRELY on the voice acting. There are a FEW things they can do with the mouths and the eyes, but not much; in making the animals look so much like their real life counterparts, they've sacrificed a major storytelling feature of the animated medium. The most interesting character to look at is Mowgli, since he's played by a real kid, and "The Lion King" won't even have a character like that. Thus, faces like the following will be entirely impossible for the remake to achieve. These are CLEARLY all facial expressions that animals do not make in real life, and thus in the remake, we shall lose a CRITICAL element of what made the characters in "The Lion King" come to life. All emotion will be purely conveyed through the voice acting or body movements, but NOT the faces! It doesn't help that character designs like Scar's won't even be possible; Scar is clearly very exaggerated and cartoonish in his appearance, which helps convey his status as villain. I anticipate that the live-action one by comparison will look far more dull and generic. In addition, you'll notice a rather jarring musical transition in the second clip with Mowgli and Baloo. The song "The Bare Necessities" just kind of... starts out of nowhere. The bad singing doesn't help, but more than anything it just comes across as completely awkward because you have no idea WHY they're even singing in the first place! This again shows a damning limitation of the CGI/live action medium, particularly when it comes to remaking films largely if not entirely populated by animals. Transitions to singing in live action are tricky things to handle no matter who the characters are; in musicals, the audience is just supposed to accept that it's a thing that happens, but even then they need to be led into because the characters themselves are the ones always breaking out into song. Animation, however, affords some flexibility, and "The Lion King" is a perfect example of this. There are two types of songs in that film: (1) songs which the characters sing in real time (i.e. "I Just Can't Wait To Be King," "Be Prepared," and "Hakuna Matata") and (2) songs which are sung off-screen or in the character's minds (i.e. "The Circle of Life" and "Can You Feel the Love Tonight"). Again, these work in the animation medium because they function as a part of telling the story in their own way. However, I have NO idea how this is supposed to work in a CGI/live action remake, ESPECIALLY for "The Lion King." If the animals LOOK as realistic as possible, then it is simply not possible for a song like "I Just Can't Wait To Be King" or "Be Prepared" to happen. ANIMALS DON'T DO THAT, hence it would simply be entirely bizarre for two lion cubs that looks like this- -to suddenly start singing in real time. They MAY be able to keep "The Circle of Life" and "Can You Feel The Love Tonight" since, again, those songs are sung offscreen, and I'm sure they'll find a way to shoehorn in "Hakuna Matata," but again, in a movie that is supposed to be entirely populated with as realistic looking animals as possible, making it a musical simply doesn't work! (3) What is there to add? This ties back into my question about timelessness earlier, but more specifically in the case of "The Lion King," what is there to add? If the film is as timeless as most people seem to think it is, what could Disney possibly add to it? Making it "live-action" clearly isn't something, because as I've already covered, this will most likely take more away from the film than it adds to it, namely so much of what made the original film work. There are storylines that got cut out of the film (some of which were added to the Broadway musical) which they could add, but these would not work for a family film. The most prominent I can think of is if they choose to expand Nala's part in the story (in a bid to say that they're "expanding the most important female character's role," and don't get me wrong, I love Nala, but that would be such a weak way to promote it) by adding in "The Madness of King Scar" scene. For those of you who don't know, this scene was originally shelved from the Lion King film but added to the Broadway musical; in it, King Scar's madness is on display as he basically attempts to seduce, and then nearly rapes, Nala, prompting her to flee the Pridelands in search of help. In the Broadway musical it works very effectively, namely because of the unique and beautiful way in which that story is told through a blend of live actors and GORGEOUS puppetry, but it was very wisely shelved from the film. Children would not understand such a scene and it might very well scare them to see such a thing as potential sexual violence depicted in a family film. Naturalistic looking animals, many of which at many points in "The Lion King" are chasing characters to either eat or kill them, will also look very unsettling to children; in an animated medium, they can look intimidating one moment but then the next second normal, hilarious, or even adorable. But again, as CGI/live action animals, there are only so many expressions they can give them, hence some of the perilous situations in the film may be too much for children to handle. The warmth and charm of the original will most certainly be updated, but in its place will be cold realism and naturalism; that doesn't exactly sound like a worthwhile update. So again, I am left asking myself, what is there to add to such a timeless classic as "The Lion King." In conclusion, let me just put it this way... this seems like a bad idea. I can't pretend to be unbiased; "The Lion King" is my all-time favorite Disney movie and holds a VERY special place in my heart. But these questions I raised don't just apply to "The Lion King"; many of them, I believe, are going to increasingly apply to more and more of these planned Disney remakes. Is every Disney remake a bad idea? Of course not! But some of them seem at best completely unnecessary, and in "The Lion King's" case we find a project which seems to have every potential to utterly fail as a remake to a movie that quite frankly didn't need it and surely won't be improved by making its characters look more realistic. Sometimes, timeless is just that, and doesn't need to be touched one bit. Let's hope a majority of audiences agree and decide not to reward Disney if this cycle of remakes starts to get out of hand. Feel free to leave your thoughts below, I'm interested in what everyone else has to say about this rotten news.

Arthur has gone downhill the past few seasons. Not QUITE as much as Simpsons or Spongebob, but still noticeable. There’s an episode where Arthur tells Ladonna and Buster that the other has been talking bad about them behind their backs so they won’t be friends anymore, and an episode where Thora scares the shit out of DW with spiders. Could you see the characters acting like that in the earlier seasons? I doubt it. What happened to the show?

I couldn't pick just one so multi-track it is!

https://www.facebook.com/cabbageconvention/ To any Avatar fans there's going to be a convention happening Columbus, Ohio!!! Midwest USA for those who are not familiar! I'm super excited! The creators of this convention were responsible for a successful 2 year Steven Universe convention in North Carolina: https://www.instagram.com/empirecitycon/?hl=en (check out pics) The kickstarter for the Avatar convention apparently went live today! Check it out! I'm definitely gonna try my best to make it there next year!

Tokyo Mew Mew Artist Mia Ikumi Passes Away Artist for iconic magical girl manga supervised upcoming new anime before March 7 passing Link:https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2022-03-14/tokyo-mew-mew-artist-mia-ikumi-passes-away-due-to-hemorrhage/.183553

Hello everyone, I'm Cast Executive Director of a My Little Pony inspired creation called Equestrian Tales, we originally started doing panels and posting about this in mid 2015, then realized to stay alive we needed to play it safe and go into stealth mode we have finally gotten to the point where are comfortable coming back into the light, and finally start to share what we have been working on, first to the place where it all started, the mlp forums. We wanted to finally give an update to the progress, and where exactly we are in the production. But first just a little about the story and what we are trying to do. Equestrian Tales story takes place over 1000 years in the past of the current FiM series, pulling together elements from generation 1 and a number of our own lore building to build a bridge between the shows, and making them into one my little pony universe. We will be following the journey of a small band of friends who set out into the world to record, and retell the stories of their adventures together, helping to inspire hope in the pre-equestrian world. We have several wonderful people helping push this show through, including Rick Farmileo animator of several characters during Disney's golden age of animated movies, including Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, Oliver and Company, Rescuers Down under, Little Mermaid and several others, Rick was also the animator of Tulio in Road to El Dorado by Dream works. Along with Rick we have secured elements of Don Bluth animation, who created works such as The Land Before Time, Secret of Nimh, American Tale, and Anastasia. These guys are leading our animation of the generation 1 and historical elements of the pilot. We also have the help of Minty Root, Brutal Weather, Ruffu, imdrunkontea and Konsumo among others helping to push the art side of this forward. On the music side we have Marcato music, corvus, and Slender Duck (Duo Cartoonist lead composer) to start things. We are currently looking for voice talent for a few of our new characters as we push forward with production, if you are interested please leave a message here, or fill free to email me at- kenneth.casteel@harmonizeentertainment.com. We are not casting cannon characters at this time, very few will appear in the pilot, and will be used with permission. I have included just a sample of the work that's being done right now, from some concept artworks, to music samples and we will be releasing more as we can, exclusively right here and with out spoiling to much. We will also be relaunching our youtube page, will be linked here once she is ready to go again. Also some external links if you wanted to see what we had posted before- Equestria Daily New Animatic not yet released to public- Tallest Tale Part 1 - One of our talented animators of Equestrian Tales, we will be able to announce a few more soon-

Thought I’d make a thread on this since the crew has at least a couple people (I don’t actually know much about who’s involved) from the earlier seasons of MLP. A DC Super Hero Girls series is coming to Cartoon Network. Lauren Faust is an executive producer and M.A. Larson is the head writer. It premieres with a one hour movie called DC Super Hero Girls: Sweet Justice on March 8 at 6 P.M. After that, regular episodes will air Sundays at 4 P.M. starting March 17. https://deadline.com/2019/02/dc-super-hero-girls-trailer-wonder-woman-batgirl-supergirl-1202557874/ Some shorts are up on the DC Super Hero Girls YouTube channel. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMUrvXfdTR3gzTaBia2ZOLiz0Ib1WEGc0 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMUrvXfdTR3jXpUM19nTipRRY9JrtlUXz