Jump to content
Banner by ~ Ice Princess Silky

How would you combine art and science ? :3


Swift Marquis

Recommended Posts

Well Leonardo Da Vinci was both an artist and had a passion for science, so famous art and science can be combined.

But personally I would use science to create new and more efficient art supplies/utensils.

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The art of physics.  Physics concepts explained using art. 

 

My favorite is the rubens tube.  I made a ruben's plane for school and used it to show reasonance and fundamentals.  It was hilarious but it did a great job at explaining the concepts in a fiery way

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think of some of my programming projects as this sort of mixture. While we can create programs to be as efficient as possible with pinpoint, calculated, real time precission, there's always a human element in terms of the design, the coding style, the vulgar comments and little creative embellishments which makes something unique.

 

Or if you want to be very literal about it, there's the language piet where you create computer programs by creating bitmap images.

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a metalworker is a combination of art and science. Foundrywork and blacksmithing especially.

Actually, many aspects of science are combined with art. Of course both science and art can be controversially subjective.

Similar to how science and religion are very much assimilated, art and science are the same way. It's all about the historical context and perspective.

 

wait, was this supposed to be a serious discussion :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a metalworker is a combination of art and science. Foundrywork and blacksmithing especially.

Actually, many aspects of science are combined with art. Of course both science and art can be controversially subjective.

Similar to how science and religion are very much assimilated, art and science are the same way. It's all about the historical context and perspective.

 

wait, was this supposed to be a serious discussion :confused:

Yes, you can answear this in any way you want and in any way you believe the answear is worthy, but i like your answear, metalworking is a dam good example of the combination :3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's always a human element in terms of the design

Fractals disgree.

 

fractal-snc.png

 

Though of course, it's the human seeing art in the fractal, rather the fractal possessing anything in itself.

 

Found this cool post though.

 

Here's a question: If a fractal is accidentally created and it produces what someone calls art, and then another is deliberately created to make an artwork. Which of the two is more or less art than the other?

Edited by DJW
  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Art is subjective and personal and I believe that art can manifest in many forms (so in the end it's mostly just semantical, imo). Science, philosophy, and art go hand in hand. It's creative direction and the ability to see beyond the obvious that make the theories of science and philosphy advance. Einstein's famous thought experiment was strictly imagination given realistic bounds to produce the mathematical foundations to questions that had plagued physics since Maxwell. Creativity, in short, to break down the real world into the abstract and answer a problem with it. Art.

 

I'd honestly just do my thing. Not everyone has to be an artist or scientist, most human beings fall on the median of the bell curve after all.

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Join the herd!

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...