Forgot your password?
Sondash Studios, June 1, 2018
Small part in a good movie.
Having a part in a good movie, I hate acting. And also, I would have a reputation for being in a "good" movie. Not a "bad" movie.
I would prefer a small part in a good movie. It's not worth it to be Johnny Depp looking like a 39 year old woman.
He's asked by a character why he makes gum if he hates it. He says "You really shouldn't mumble, because it's kinda starting to bum me out." You really couldn't have just given an honest answer, Johnny?
I rather be a small part in a good movie just because A then I won’t get recognized that often and B I won’t have to live down that I was in one of the worst movies....
Which one pays more? That's all I'd really care about.
If i would just have a small role in a good movie, i would have to be extra good to even get hired for more. Being the main actor in a bad movie gives you more time, maybe the movie would be bad, but you could be the one actor who is the only good part of the movie.
Also you could tell your friends about this really really weird bad movie you starred in, that would also be pretty cool, instead of just having a small cameo and being not really important at all. I would rather be the main actor in a bad movie. Also i wouldnt be a good actor anyway and i dont want to give a good movie a bad taste.
I'd say a main character in a bad movie. That wouldn't mean I would try, I would give the hammiest line deliveries I could get away with and chew on as much of the scenery as possible. If the movie was inevitably going to become one of those things like troll 2, might as well be one of the fun characters.
To me both are great.
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Already have an account? Sign in here.
No registered users viewing this page.