Constructed world or real world? Anthro or human inhabitants?

[InvaderShy 18]

Many of us have different likes when it comes to reading a story or watching series/movie, ones stick with imagination, others stick with reality. Of course, I'm referring to the issue Constructed world vs. Real world, from whose also the Anthro inhabitants vs. Human inhabitants. 

 

Contructed world: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ConstructedWorld

Anthros: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FurryConfusion

 

Some say real story based stories are better than those which take place on an invented world created by a "person with a lot of free time" and others say that constructed worlds' stories are amazing and more intriguing, for they consider real world's stories are "boring". And of course it can shunt in a furry and no-furry debate about which one is better.

 

Things like story's complexity and the action of the characters influence on the reader or viewer's opinion, but at the end he/she will take in account these two factors: Constructed world vs. Real world, and anthro inhabitants vs. human inhabitants.

 

So, which ones you stick with? Which ones make, for you, an excellent story?

Edited April 26, 2014 by InvaderShy

[Scootalove 10,659]

I'll stick with a constructed world, the inhabitants are humans, they will have powers, and it will be a serious story.