SpeedIsMagic

Discord. The embodiment of Chaos. Not making Sense. Posting a small joke on the matter. Sheesh Seriousponies today.

But isn't that discord's thing? Not making sense? When you think about it, it seems legit.

No muffin refunds for you.

Sorry to tell you this mate. But.... 1. "The fandom isn't dead, but the show is going down hill. Season 5 is the worst season yet. " It's you're opinion. This is not fact. You cant really say it's the worst season without seeing the WHOLE season. It's like seeing 1 second of a trailer and saying the trailer sucks. Or the game/show/movie sucks. Without actually bothering to lift a hoof to see it! 2. Only tough people who can handle being told nasty stuff frequently should be on YouTube. If you are a wuss like I am, stay away from YouTube. Again your opinion is there. Your opinion is not fact. Stop telling ponies what to do, and what to believe! D:

I will post what I would post, but posting them in the form of a JonTron Gif would be more entertaining.

B-b-b-b-ut you're here. Posting. In a pony related topic on a pony related forums. *Aims the Liar Cannons*

If I quit the fandom does that mean the fandom is the dead? Well the answer would be yes. To those people that left it, the fandom is dead to them. To us who are in the fandom, it is alive. To the sheep who don't know either or.... refer to the following accurate depiction.

>Talking about End of MLP/MLB/MLG community as if they regretted it Ending/ Or something similar to the matter. >Meanwhile I'm here like.. > THE SHOW MUST LIVE ON~ Random Director Guy 2k15

You there! I believe you meant to say what op meant to say which is what I meant to say. Which is MLG forums... :okiedokielokie:

Goes on the most active MLP forums in the community. Asks if the community is dead.

Is there a database that lists when the fansites were first online? I am currently in the midsts of making a MLP Racing series starting off in 2010. and I'm looking for fan-sites that started up in that era. Here is a sample of what I have. I know most sites started around 2011-2012. (Not sure if this is the right place since I spent a good 30 minutes and thought this might be it. Sorry if this is the wrong place)

This episode sounded promising, though the Description. The actual episode was "meh" at best. Some parts did get a laugh. Like the sleepy drunk twilight scene. However I digress. This is one of my Skippable episodes. In which 1.) You really aren't missing out of much if you didnt watch it. 2.) Skip through the episode, and skill get whats going on almost. Then again it is a spike episode.

Main issue: Most the for the episode is basically that it was made for the fans, which if you bothered to read the description or the episode title. It's clear to see that it was. Issue with current retorts: I don't mind people debating about the episode when there's actual points being made. Other than "This sucked", "Wow, this was made for nergasms", etc . No real constructive criticism involved. The point was with those 2 lines of text was about the select group that are unhappy because it didn't cater exclusively to them and their interest. Plus there was no real conversation about the episode >on THIS topic<. (Yay Topic De-railment) The minimal conversation about the actual episode was with my post, with the first 2 lines of that post. Which didn't really delve into the episode itself, but rather most of the generic negativity over it. With no real points being made. So don't know where I'm on my knees praising the episode in a matter of 2 lines of text; as the rest are about the actual topic at hand instead of the episode. That being said the main focus here being the "I waited 3 weeks for this?" issue. With a abhorrent amount of ignorance no less. Not the actual content of the episode at all, but the wait for the episode. So I kind of find it funny that you tried to change the issue, a bit. With trying to get the focus shifted to the actual episode itself despite clear context that this is not the main point of the topic. I do believe we have those types of topics already.

Gummies Voice Confirmed OP. RELIVE THE GATOR GLORY (Gummies Monolouge) https://youtu.be/1s9AoEDUsXo

Oh neat; More topics criticizing an episode which was basically a thank you from the creators to us. We can't even accept an episode made for us; because in essence it wasn't made for (Me/you). With this out of the way; let's dive into the actual reason the show was held back. Here's something that urks me already, The creators have ABSOLUTLEY no control over when the episodes get aired. They make the show; complete the show. Weeks or months in advance before the premiere date. ONLY The Discovery Family channel gets to decide when it get's aired. They decide if it's weekly, or not. Since they control the time slots, and what get's broadcasted. They essentially can withhold an episode Indefinitely - if they desire. Look at Top Gear EU Season 22. Episodes are completed but the BBC 2 Network has withheld them. This is the networks doing. Despite the different situations that have occured, this is an example of a TV Network holding back already completed content. TV networks do stuff like this all the time, for special events or such. I love how absolutely one has brought this up until now; and just slammed the animators and creators of the show out-right without realizing how TV actually works. 100 Episodes is a big milestone yes. But that also means it can be syndicated/ IE Re-runs and the lot. I know this seems a bit harsh; but this is the fact. Yell at Discovery Family for the show being pushed back. Not the animators/ writers/ producers/ Voice actors, etc. No-where did the 3 week wait state that the episode had to be fixed, or worked on, as a reason for the 3 week hiatus. So not sure where evreypony is getting that fact from in-order to yell at the animators. So we are left to blame the network.

Not saying you did; Never said you did. Never actually associated you with what I was talking about anywhere in my recent post. ( i double checked) Nor have I Implied it . Not sure where you're getting it from. Note: If it was to/about you I would've brought it to PM's, or put your name in it directly. I dislike Beating around the bush using implications. That's not my style.