Mantis01

Good luck convincing Cartoon Network to being back Young Justice, and maybe all of DC animated series back. Since they are against action series, I doubt we'll be able to see Young Justice again.

Young Justice season 3 is airing on Netflix. It was popularity on Netflix that gotten it 3rd season since fan convince people to watch Young Justice on Netflix .Cartoon Network wasn't against action series, they wasn't doing well on since comedy shows like Adventure Time and Regular Show was more popular. People tend to forget that CN had air comedy shows since the beginning. Greg Weisman say that Young Justice was cancel because of the loss of funding for the show;the toy line based on the shows wasn't a hit, so Mattel cancel the toyline causing to to use what they got left. This is the same reason why Thundercats gotten canceled. 

I find Batman V Superman to be a okay film, I suggest you watch the director cut because it explain a lot. 

TV-PG shows are family friendly, the show may get a little darker.

Ever since Nintendo reveal the Switch

I had The Jungle Book 2016 on Monday.

"There he is"

I have about these and watch every youtube video on IHE vs Derek Savage topics. Is he so protected toward his creation. Derek Savage really miss the point of IHE review.  Cool Cat Save the Kids could had been a good guilty pleasure to people and gain some popularly,  but Derek Savage didn't see it way. he believe that a bad internet review would ruin Cool Cat.

Some people hate or overreact on a character all because what they did, but had they not learn from those mistake. I never understood why Equestria Games was hated.  

I personally - TAKE NOTES HERE PEOPLE; I'M EXPRESSING A SUBJECTIVE OPINION - view crossovers as a lazy and half-assed attempt to avoid coming up with original stories of your own. Very little creativity and brainstorming goes into crossover stories. The worlds and characters are already fully fleshed out.

That depend on how the crossover is written. 

Archie meet the Punisher, a odd yet interesting cross over considering that Archie is suppose to be a light hearted comic and the Punisher is a dark comic. How that did they do it, have the Punisher mistaken Archie for someone else because he closely resemble the person. The comic when Archie will meet with the Predator.

The only Twilight I think that might be disliked is the fragile and weak Equestria Girls version that is basically Twilight forcibly stripped down of her character qualities and made more vulnerable all for the story plot.

Twilight was turn into a human, it was new to her and she wasn't use to it, plus she couldn't use magic  Not to mention that she's in a different world.  Sunlight Shimmer had been in the world a lot longer than Twilight and understand it more, Twilight just got there and freak out, she didn't even understand it and acted like her pony/alicorn self 

I don't even want to look at the Princess Twilight drama.  So Twilight is a alicorn, but she's still the same Twilight.  Her character to need to grow, she still have flaws as an princess. 

Crossovers are good defending how they're done. Some might hate them because of characters shipping.  

Intellectual property is absurd anyways, so I don't believe that Drawponies did anything wrong by tracing or selling traced works. It was wrong to lie about the tracing, though.

He not suppose to sell trace pictures, 1.It not his original work 2. He not giving credit for the original artist. 3.he making money off of copyrighted materials.

It is a disgrace to artists.

Tom Preston was criticised for tracing Big Ben, knowing that he could draw it, but instead he became lazy and trace it and decided to sale the picture for money

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mTStyttV2g

A chinese tokusatsu I got interested in

I heard about this on facebook. He actually think that he could get away knowing that he'll get caught. It shows how some people want to us the easy way of drawing art rather than putting effort in it.

It obvious that Angry Joe is just attempting to gain views, his Mario Party 10 video wouldn't be taken down if he haven't monetised it.

So you y'all don't think that they're harming the company, tell that to that developers and the company. There's more to a supporting a company than just showing yourself playing a game.  Y'all might to read this  https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/138161?hl=en 

What can I monetize?

Video game content may be monetized depending on the commercial use rights granted to you by licenses of video game publishers. Some video game publishers allow you to use all video game content for commercial use and state that in their license agreements. Likewise, videos showing software user interface may be monetized only if you have a contract with the publisher or you have paid a licensing fee.

What can't I monetize?

Without the appropriate license from the publisher, use of video game or software user interface must be minimal. Video game content may be monetized if the associated step-by-step commentary is strictly tied to the live action being shown and provides instructional or educational value.

Videos simply showing a user playing a video game or the use of software for extended periods of time may not be accepted for monetization.

Some Youtubers have permission or allow to from the company to use videogame content if they follow their conditions such using they let's play for promotional purposing . 

After watching the AVGN Hong Kong 97 I wanted to look for the full song.

You're kidding right? Please, please tell me you're kidding.

 

People don't need to watch of they don't want spoilers.

 

Let's Plays give exposure. This brings in MORE money to the company who's game it is. By nor allowing this Nintendo is screwing themselves AND their customers. Plus any potential customers who would find out about the game, but don't.

 

You missed the entire point of the video in the OP, or didn't watch it.

How are Let's Play giving money to the company? The profit is going to the creator of the let's play NOT the company.  I did mention the Nintendo creator Program.  

Moves like this is why so many people complain about Smash 4 not having an actual Story mode, and Nintendo actually said the reason being people putting the Brawl FMVs on YT. Epic Fail Nintendo.

People tend to spoils the story.

Going to take Nintendo side. 

 Here is something I had just looking up on something research. http://metro.co.uk/2015/02/08/in-defence-of-nintendos-creators-program-readers-feature-5053017/  and youtube to got a policy on use of videogame footage. Let Plays do infringe on copyright since they're just playing game fro start to finish for long periods of time.

Nintendo is trying to protect their copyright, they're giving youtubers permission to is use their contents with Creator program and sharing the profit to the creator and yet they still complain because they're not going to much off ad revenue. 

Microsoft and Ubisoft allow youtube to use video game footage if they follow their conditions. People who don't have permission find ways to avoid copyrights, by reviewing limited gameplay footage and use them for educational purposes. 

user who post a comment and disable reply

Was in my dream, a music video of anthro pikachu singing the song

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9czR9f2dV7c

This was stuck in my head

The hub was originally Discovery Kids. 

Cancelling young Justice wasn't sexist they also cancelled Green lantern both shows weren't selling toys. If anything it was unfair to green lantern because they did even give it a toy line

Young Justice has attraction more girl viewer than boys,  on to the Green Lantern, it true there was suppose to be a toy line based on the animation series, but not was never produced because stores didn't want to put one shelve since they already got a Green Lantern toy line which was the movie toy line, Stores didn't even know that this toy line was based on the series. 

I could go over all the stupid decisions Nickelodeon has made, (rejecting modyfiers pilot, canceling invader zim way too soon, overplaying spongebob, and rejecting adventure time for fanboy and chum chum) but I digress

 

As for Cartoon network, well http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/12/16/paul-dini-on-cartoon-networks-programming-decisions-and-why-boy-viewers-are-valued-over-girls

 

Disney would probably see it as something for disney junior.

Invader Zim was cancel because the creator quit and crew wanted to walk on other things. Sponge bob was too popular to end after the movie.

That because CN viewers was Boys 

I doubt that Disney would air My little Pony on Disney Junior, Look like something they would air on XD.

I wouldn't be against it airing on another channel. It just depends on the channel

 

Nickeldodeon would probably screw it up so bad.

 

Cartoon Network, well they treat their programming fairly, seem to have some vendetta against cartoons starring girls. I don't know, something about girls not buying boy toys bullcrap.

 

Disney Channel, the only real issue I see is it moving to disney xd (then again, it would probably be on Disney Junior), or being put on long hiatuses like Gravity Falls. Though on the flip side, that would mean Twilight Sparkle is a Disney princess.

What wrong with it airing on Nickelodeon? They would air MLP:FiM in the afternoon.

If cartoon network is against girls cartoon then why do they got Steven Universe. They would also aired Transformers. Prime.

Disney Junior aired cartoon for preschooler/younger kid, My little Pony would syndicated on XD or Disney channel.