K1539

I think our multiverse [not multiverse as it's currently being studied, but the next level up, whatever that might be; omniverse for simplicity] is structured in such a way that allows Humans to create their own heavens, by choosing a set of beliefs, or inherently believing in something, and whatever they expect to see is what they will see. Christians will see Lord Jesus and live in what they think Heaven is, for example. I believe some people will cross the Bifrost and dwell in Oden's Hall. And etc. I think people who believe they will go to Hell because they feel unworthy will go to Hell and live out their perceived sin. I believe Atheists will have a slightly different journey. I think they will find their selves on a different world comparable to our own, just more elevated towards whatever they think life on Earth should have been like, perhaps on some advanced alien world. Or perhaps they will perceive that they are waking up from some sort of simulation. I believe people who believe in what I do, or who don't like the idea of any existing Heaven, Hell, or Atheist philosophy, will be able to choose or design their own Heaven, or Hell, according to their personal habits, whether objectively or subjectively. I believe some people will want to continue living here on Earth, and so they will remain here long after their physical body has disconnected. But I also believe in reincarnation, and at some point a being will feel inclined to return to this life, or a similar one, after it has had its fill of its Heaven. To put it simply, I believe Humans are in control of their realities, even if they don't yet realize it or know how to "sail their ship." While this is not necessarily a topic about God, I will say my theory involves God [an absolute collective mind, or the omniverse itself, of which we and our universe are a part] having given individual centers (of which we are a form) the ability of expression for no other purpose than to simply exist as a part of the Absolute. I do not want a grand reason for being and was never able to come up with one, we simply are. But this is why I believe Humans can become "gods" able to form realities, yet still believe in the existence of God as the structure and center of the reality of which we can mold. And it is that God which holds things together when we are still "infantile."

I am one to dwell on theoretical worst case scenarios. For me, getting rid of some thoughts is as easy as willing them dead on the spot. Other times it requires a distraction. FiM is a distraction. Anything to get my mind off whatever it is. I don't usually bother getting rid of the thoughts if it requires a distraction. I don't always allow myself to act on feelings so it doesn't matter if I have them. Even fears. Sometimes I'll be thinking something, and it will be distracting, and I'll just tell myself that those thoughts serve no purpose and I'll will them away.. I don't know if everyone else can do that. SO I'd have to say just take up a hobby. Something time consuming, requiring full mental attention. Learn something new. Learn how to do digital painting. Anything that you can do which requires your mental attention. It cannot be something like jogging if jogging is something you can do instinctively without thinking. You can't have the mind freed up or it might run away from you with those thoughts.

I'm now curious as to whether or not someone would even be capable of developing a language with nobody to talk to. Well, realistically I think these two would have major psychological differences from us and each other. SO it's hard to say. Let's pretend they have the same instinctive nature as our race, generally. They would probably find some primal attraction to each other which would lead to option 1. But if a human is hungry enough, they will eat anything. SO if one of them happens to be starving when they first encounter, they will probably try to eat the other.

Long story short: There was no training. And that is why I remain inherently confused as to this entire system. The goal seems to be talking (or writing, as the case may be) in general, with no specific goal in the underlay. SO I will do that. I do not care if nobody sees this. SO. I have known how to type for many years. My average speed is seventy words per minute. I have gotten up to one hundred twenty though. For a long time now, I have never been able to move my finger off the shift key before I hit the O after the S. I have grown accustomed to leaving it as SO, since it has grown on me to resemble when someone is prepared to "go all or nothing" and all they can say is "so.." with an upward inflection. I've grown rather attached to the sapphire encrusted cupcake which seems to equate to my rank, as it were. Soon I will lose it to unattractive animals and droll changelings. The artwork is appealing, of course, but the concept is not. I would have been satisfied staying a Cupcake, a Muffin even more so. But alas, we must grow and our names must grow. I would like to quote a segment of the forums, particularly a certain sentence. "The application process can rigorous, and if anything, it only raises standards for potential candidates." Can you find out where it is? Can you see the error here? Need a hint? Buzz, buzz, I'm busy as a be! 1 - 2 - 3 You see? Easy! Twilight Sparkle is currently my favorite pony, but this is subject to change. While I will refer to her as the best pony for the Japanese booze of simplicity, she is not, in fact, the best pony. There is no best pony. I loathe the English language. It is dull, it is disease ridden, and horribly dissatisfying to the tastes; a wild beast which resists the whip. I tend to play around with the language, deviating from the "proper system on high." I have a keen attraction to deviations. I do not mean Danny Phantom shipping art. I mean breaking the rules, as it were (I have nothing to say on the matter of Danny Phantom shipping art breaking the rules) But I do not get carried away and float about a fiend. Rules have their positions in maintaining an intellectual balance, or bridge, as it were, between Humans and societies. They are valuable tools. They support happiness. Back during the days of LiveMocha, I used to help people learn English. Despite not being a professional teacher, I always posted my criticisms as professionally as I could, and worded them as simply as I could. After all, they'd probably be reading a machine translation in their native language. I assisted people from Japan, Korea, Saudi Arabia, I think there was someone from one of the -stan countries, and even some people from Mexico and some parts of Africa. I'd use the color highlighters to color-code my corrections to their work. I'd explain why something was supposed to follow a certain formula. Most other critics would just post something like "awesome work" or "good job" even when there was a blatant error, or even one giant error with a little bit of "right" in it. I wanted to excel at this, even though I wouldn't be rewarded. Why did I do that? I don't even like this language.. The old LiveMocha let people post about their culture, take pictures of things they saw, or ate, or anything. They could tell a story about it. LiveMocha's site eventually "upgraded" and that function seemed to have been cut. It became about the languages solely, even though a language is more than just words. Nowadays, LiveMocha doesn't even exist anymore. It's like a bridge between nations fell apart. You can learn Japanese wherever you want. But if you don't know about their culture, you still won't know how to talk to Japanese people. I am holding off on uploading a profile picture, or "Avatar," as it were, for just a while longer. I am working on a digital painting of my own. Nine hours in the making, and probably after an estimate of another eight, it will be done. A portraiture, which shall serve as the face of yours truly. On that note, a lot of people within my personal life have said my artwork is amazing. And while I see one thousand and another mistakes they will never see, it has come to my attention that I am hesitant to put it out there. I am one to dwell on the worst outcomes I can think of. What if it is worth nothing? What if I'm constantly attacked by fiends who would steal it? Maybe I am just too isolationist, and have the wrong idea of the online communities. Better to try and fail, then fail for no tries. Right? Okay. I'm done for now. I hope this entry was manly enough. No, I should give myself more credit. There is nothing manlier than dreaming about being a Muffin. Especially a digital manly Muffin. "Every post will feature Muffins and Ponies because that's my Ninja way!" -The Manliest Muffin Ponykage, the Real Slim-Muffin Good Early Morning UTC-08:00 !

Werewolves and vampires seem to have the intellect to manage their food sources to where they wont run out. Zombies, on the other hand, usually don't stop eating until everything is dead. So, even without the edge you gave the zombies they would probably be the most dangerous to humans as a species. Individually speaking, it would depend on the particular ability of the vampire and the witch. Ghosts abilities to possess are hard to analyze. Since it's easier to say zombies are more dangerous to humans collectively, I'll choose that.

I am a 1, relatively speaking. Although I'm apparently a pretty passable cross dresser, I can't rate myself on that.

None of these are effective or desirable means to manifest world peace and I cannot vote on any option without deviating from my beliefs. The natural state of the world in and of itself calls for conflict of some sort. Conflict is a factor within life. I believe it could be considered peace to combine all aspects of reality into a singularity. I could consider that peace, only if there is absolutely nothing, including nothingness, outside the bounds of the singularity. This presents the problem that there is still alternative possibility, which is how you obtain your conflict. The singularity would have to be everything, and therefore it couldn't include nothingness at an absolute level, at least on the level that human logic (my own) can comprehend. Additionally, the singularity would have to be boundless to encompass everything, and without bounds it wouldn't be able to enclose anything specifically. But that is the closest I can think of to world peace. More or less. Kind of. Whatever it is, as it were. In order to lessen the aspiration, we could say that world peace means uniting all the nations and peoples of earth. I think the most efficient way to do this would be to destroy all of the humans except one. Then there would be absolute power over the human race. This is not theoretically ideal. Humankind would go extinct when that human dies, and there would be no way to stop it without a mate for the human. But introducing a whole new mind would bring about differences, subtle as they be, which would generate conflict, subtle as it may be, within the human race. More idyllic, but still not wholly ideal, we could select one group. Everyone who is of that particular group would ideally have matching beliefs, skills, intellect, etc. Then dismiss the rest of humankind into destruction. There would be far less conflict in that one group than we observe in our lives, even with some of our friends. Relatively speaking, that would be peace. But there is no way to obtain absolute peace. That one particular group would grow and evolve and anomalies would occur and the peace would eventually end as new factors enter the psyche. This will always be the case with more than just Humankind, unless Humankind finds a way to alter the natural laws of our apparent reality. Again, I do not believe any of the methods in the poll would be even remotely effective or ideal towards what I consider world peace. I'm sure everyone else already has their own ideology on it. I might have used compassion, empathy and altruism as the example for idyllic relative peace. But that would destroy people as they are, and I consider honest death more ideal than forced selective personal and emotional contempt.

I believe I'd be willing to permanently transport myself into Equestria, assuming I can go to an Equestria exactly like it is in the show but with humans instead of ponies (It wasn't clear to me if that was against the rules) Leniency granted enough that equine features and qualities are reasonably converted into human forms. I do not care that they are ponies. I care about their story and their personalities. I do, however, have certain needs and desires only other humans can fulfill. Assuming that is against the rules, then the humanization can bounce and I will just go to Equestria as it is. I mean there must be a way to travel from there to the EG universe for all that other stuff I mentioned right. And I don't think it'd be too difficult to weave my way into a friendship with Twilight in order to secure a ticket. After all, I am a new species that needs to be documented But my reason for going is simple. I'm curious. I have nothing to lose. The pain of attachment is fleeting.

K is a sigil (apparently that word isn't recognized) bearing deep meaning to me. I won't go into what it means to me. 1, 5, 3, and 9 are all numbers which bear particular meaning to me, of which I won't go into for now. 1, 5, 3, and 9 in that particular order has another meaning. And K1539, yep, you probably guessed, has another meaning. I will tell you what K1539 means. It means me.