Laurel

And by that i mean mostly World of Warcraft. I will admit its a greatly made game, i even prefer the modern one compared to when i tried it in 2007. Because its much more helpful now to quest and level up. Because the whole point is to get to the highest level so that you can chill and raid with friends whenever they want too. The leveling and questing isnt the funnest part of the game its when you reach the top. But either way the problem i have with MMORPGs is that to me its too much time consuming. Games like Elder Scrolls for example tends to not feel so time consuming because i feel i dont spend too much time on it just to get to a highest level. Its more just to beat it for fun as a overall goal of exploration. With wow it feels much more like a obsession. Its like if you like Oblivion so much that you are willing to spend hours upon hours, and restart it again hours upon hours. Maybe its a mind trick but i just dont have patience to trick my mind to this. I have a character in WOW but i dont play it. What is your views?

Because its fun for some reason. If i die it would be by trying to be good. But just talking to them is nice aswell.

Ah yes, it says at the bottom if you scroll all the way down My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic™ and all related properties are © Hasbro."

I am... sort of. I like gays. I do, really really do.

I read somewhere that it links to Hasbro.

They have something called Aaron and Todd. Something very random that i watch every new years eve. I bet they will talk about Trump. What do you think they will talk about? Here is one from 2011 just to put some example.

What is your views when people write hurtful comments to hurt others. I think its normal to not like or disagree respectfully. But it turns into lots of cursing and anger and just naming others as this and that. In real life when you had TV you could disagree respectfully, but on the internet you are free to say whatever you want.

I was memorizing some South Park episodes with Rob Reiner where he is anti smoking, its a running gag because he's eating all the time. I think neither, i mean i have never smoked and never will do it because it doesn't attract me. But thats just what i would pick though, i just can't think of it as the greatest thing.

I miss the uptight gym coach with tight t-shirt.

Nationality: Norwegian From your stance how much does this affect you with our current digital technology. For me it means people abuse the system on welfare and are just lazy and tend to eat junk. Our neighbor Sweden seems to be doing much better in comparison to say the least https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology_of_obesity

I notice it among females but males aswell. Sitting too much and eating too much junk most likely. That is sad. http://www.newsinenglish.no/2010/09/13/norwegians-steadily-gaining-weight/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology_of_obesity#/media/File:World_map_of_Male_Obesity,_2016.svg

Never liked Banjo Kazooie, it feels too countryside for my taste. I had to play it with a friend as a kid, he owned both 1 and 2nd game, we played it on multiplayer often and i never enjoyed it as much as he did i bet. But i am overly critical, for people who owned a N64 and didnt have a PS1 i am sure it was fun to come home too and play after doing homework.

Eh i was wrong but i just made a theory that since they dont wanna milk the series then they decided to scrap the N64 version due to the review saying "Move over Mario" as if working with Nintendo or something. But either way this is corrected by that it likely didn't sell so well on PS1 so they didn't sell the N64 version even though it was all ready to be shipped which is why they got the review from nintendo official magazine because it was originally going to be on both PS1 and N64

This only was on PS1 cover, because from this IGN article this was ready to ship in terms of the n64 cartridges, but i think it sold poorly and was the reason why they didn't sell it as an N64 port. http://www.ign.com/articles/1999/12/17/40-winks-future-uncertain Instant classic on Super Nintendo.

Who should Mario move over too? I remember having that game bought, i think it might have been the last PS1 game i had bought, or well my dad bought it for me. Its actually on PS Store for sale which is suprising since i didn't know it was that popular type of game. Whether this is true or not... It would be kinda fun if it was https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/j6xgr/must_have_been_a_really_bad_day_at_nintendo/

So i can preorder a Nintendo Switch from a website. The prize is 6000 NOK which is about 620 US Dollars, although someplaces says 4990 NOK. When PS3 came here it costed about 6000NOK aswell, which is not 599 US Dollars but almost. This brings back memories from PS3 for some reason. What will the prize for Nintendo Switch be in USA or other places?

I threw away my red 3DS because i saw it as waste, little to know that Pokemon Sun and Moon to be released. But either way i am just wondering if Nintendo plans to make a new Pokemon game in the future after this?

If my guess is correct and if they market this thing right it will sell much less than for example touch phones or touch pads does. So it will sell ok or maybe good. But whether its gonna be good or not is a different story, although they have done a better job at marketing the Switch now than WiiU. WiiU had lots of 3rd party developers, atleast more than Wii which ended up not developing stuff on it. The question is why should they do the same for something that would attract people with phones who plays on apps?

Switching over from controllers gamecube to wii was a huge gamble and ended up being successful, because no consoles had this idea of it. But with Wiiu since most already had touch screen and iphones etc nobody was interested. Now considering the new gimmick from Switch is to have a tablet. It could end up as a failure. Although it looks greatly built, but i just feel people will buy it because Mario and Zelda. But then again they are also selling or planning on selling it on apps so i see a problem there. I don't mean to bash nintendo or anything but i think they just need to go back to making consoles for TVs and create games for it and let the game speak for itself I am betting that maybe PS4 is a safe bet in 2017 if it gets more games. Crash Bandicoot 1,2 and 3 remake is planning to be released on PS4, same with Yooka Yaylee. Although PS4 and Xbox One technically dont have games worth of interest yet, i have a feeling 2017 may turn that around if they get more new developers because its not a bad system in my view in terms of Ps4 and the controller itself.

That they like the outside world and is not too much of an indoor person. Although watching something in the evenings is always fun like movies etc

I consider WOW to be a good game. But its too long for me. Good but too long, like most MMORPGs. In either case i think the problem is most MMORPGs are more or less the same as wow, questing, leveling up, raiding, nothing new to say the least. I enjoy games i can come back to, not to obsess over because then i feel i never get out of my room. Pokemon for example i dont feel makes me obsessed, its a game i can put down and play again, a pretty simple game. But that is just to my taste.

I tend to like it over Wii even if GameCube could be described as somewhat lackluster and i dont want to get it again. I mean Wii had some good games but to hook up the censor infront of the TV is such a pain when i have to vacuum clean and stuff. But i did like Mario Galaxy 1 and 2 and Donkey Kong Country Returns on it. But GameCube i think had in someway better graphics than Wii if you for example look at Mario Kart Double Dash, although i am glad they focused on making games rather than trying to be pure graphical achievements of specs.

Yeah i read too fast. My bad. But 2006 is a very infamous year for video games. Sonic 2006, but i do know a few games that arent the best that year either. And i can assume because it tried to improve and make graphics shine on a new engine like the use of physics engine and stuff to add to the realism, and due to that the overall game animations and function didn't work a 100% If one for example look at "Donkey Kong Country Returns". That works, the background is fully alive and the graphics are charming and its an overall fun game. I am not saying all modern games are perfect but they work and thats what i think they improved upon. Now all what is needed is creative people making new ideas. Yooka Laylee is one which i am looking forward to seeing more of to mention one example.

Crash 1,2,3 and CTR is perfection. Crash Wrath of Cortex and Crash Twinsanity was in the 2000s. Although Twinsanity could've been worse to be honest i just think of it as lackluster. Lack of inspiration i consider it the reason it crashed. The 2000s i think lack innovation which is why i consider it the worst era for games. 2010 and upwards i think has done for the better recently. 1990s has lots of gold games in my view. Although Pokemon games i guess would be the best bet in the 2000s since they haven't changed much since it was made.