Jump to content
Banner by ~ Ice Princess Silky

Sozu

User
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sozu

  1. 16 minutes ago, Cyralicious said:

    Exactly, it doesn't talk about 2 sexes getting married, therefore it shouldn't be a problem of them to get married, or should it?

    Why wouldn't it be okay for 2 same sexes having sex? No offense but that's none of your business.

    Because the bible says so. Men and female alike. Ask whoever wrote the bible is my suggestion. Well its technically a problem since homosexual lifestyle is frowned upon in the bible, but so is other stuff, i would just let it slide and hope they will just believe it afterawhile. But on that note, yeah sure.

    But look i am not for policing people's sex life, it just is not promoted as you go to hell for that stuff in the bible. If you want to do it you are free to do so but its against Christian teachings.

  2. Just now, Hierok said:

    And that's exactly why I think religion must be forbitten. No offens, because maybe I read this wrong, but I believe you said gay marriage is wrong because it is said in the bible. One more reason to not read the bible.

    Let those people be happy. Gay is totally acceptable nowadays. :)

    Well they tried under communism but that didn't go well. But if you want to then good luck. Maybe if you like get enough votes, but yeah. The approach would be very vital. I personally don't see anything wrong aslong as they don't harm anyone considering people from both sides can have its share of violent people.

  3. 2 minutes ago, Duzzkey said:

    So are you sayig that a church shouldn't have the right to wed gays if it's okay with them...? :confused: 

    Well i don't suggest religious supremacy or anything. I mean isn't it like you believe and take your children to that place and thats it. I mean most democratic countries have religious freedom for that reason. You wanna start a religious constitution and merry, go ahead. Its part of picking religion.

    Just now, Cyralicious said:

    As far as I know in the Bible there are not any words written that marriage is a pact between a woman and a man so gay marriage is completely fine imho, and people who consider themselves true believers and followers of god and jesus should be okay with 2 men or 2 women to be married, otherwise they shouldn't be called real believers/theists or whatever they consider themselves.

    No but its implied. But it never talks about men on men or female on female marriage though. Whether it does or not is not the issue, it still is not ok with the lifestyle of two same sexes having sex. But again i am not for policing people's sex life while still remaining the integrity of the doctrine.

  4. I like Final Fantasy 7. The summonings + Fanfare music is my absolute favorite in that game. Playing it on low res PS1 is what i preferred, i don't like the highly detailed on PC or other systems since i feel it ruins the emersion i had with the first game.

  5. Just now, meme said:

    So... why does your religion force you to make such a big deal out of nothing?

    I'll let you think about that. For now, I'm done here unless I'm wanted to answer a question.

    I don't have the answer to that. But the bible do tend to generalize homosexuals on the level of murderers and adulterers. Maybe it is talking about bad environments and not gays themselves. But i just think it is most likely against gay marriage because they can't have children. So marriage is traditionally wise considered an investment of blessings. Thats why i assume it has always been man and woman marriage.

  6. 1 minute ago, Duzzkey said:

    Okay...? :confused:

    An answer to the question that makes you sound like a bigoted christian fundamentalist is not that great of an answer.Even then, literally nobody asked anything or answered anything.

    Yeah but if we are to ignore it then why not just burry the church. I mean it makes zero sense to have one if one ignores the stuff in it. Its like ignoring rules, its kinda relevant towards religious people who believes in this stuff. Maybe not atheists but christians it has kind of a relevance. So it does somewhat affect them when you choose to ignore relevant stuff in order to obey the words. I am ok if you choose to be gay and not believe it, but when you step into church territory and demand something out of place.. Well this is the best place to wish you good luck and wish to believe, if not then why are you in the church in the first place?. If you don't believe or care. Makes little sense to me. Unless if its for property value "which you can get" as i suggested. So i don't see the problem now.

  7. Just now, Duzzkey said:

    So now you're trying to say everyone should be a Christian and police them on when they should have sex...? :confused:

    Then why make these posts suggesting that you do think that way...? :okiedokieloki:

    No. Just like reading about history about Albert Einstein or judaism won't turn you jewish. The option is there though

    Just now, meme said:

    Church whatever is irrelevant.

    I mean, yeah? That's called choice. I never said you had to have sex with anyone.

     

    I just don't see the point in caring so much about what other people are doing when it doesn't affect you at all.

    Because gays are asking these questions. And i had been thinking about this alot. Sometimes you need a answer to a question. And finally i found it, so i wanted to post it here to hear what you think. If you have a question to a math problem you end up asking questions.

  8. Btw incase you think i am one of those people who think you should have god in government. Emm no, the elites should not be mixed with religion in politics ever, unless it is for cultural reason but actual religion in politics is a bad idea since i am highly against religious fundamentalism. Like being religious in general in society i am ok with aslong as it doesn't affect politics, foreign policy and all that. Considering religious fundamentalism is what kills science, critical thought in society both past and present time, being religious i don't see much issues with aslong as its not the job in the government.

    Just now, meme said:

    Sorry, forgot to add that you should let people have sex with whoever too, man. (but only with consent, of course). And what are these "teachings"?

    Yeah more power to you. But church doctrine is still doctrine. Like you can, but if you dont want too you can do that too.

  9. Just now, Kyoshi said:

    So....are you basically saying that gay marriage is a bad thing then? Maybe I am tired and not reading it correctly, but to me it sounds like you are saying that those people will 'figure out' eventually that gay marriage is wrong or something. Do correct me if I am wrong.

    I am saying that people have their share or burdens. Try to think about it, porn junkies get married too but its not like they get stopped. I am saying that on a mental level as in homosexual lifestyle it is wrong on a dogmatic theological level. However, just letting them get married and see how it goes you can do without approving of the lifestyle. Some churches should adopt this instead of gay friendly since that is going against the scriptures. I mean if they do then ok but they are essentially ignoring it, that would be like me saying that porn is ok, now this doesn't mean i am going to people and say stop watching porn. But it is frowned upon by the churches and bible due to it not being ok. For example its nothing wrong with loving same sex, as in if two males or two females love each other, its only a sin if they do it sexually.

    I just think this is the best answer i could think of that would work, but only if its absolutely necesary like demanded.

  10. The best way is to not give it attention and just frown that they don't follow traditional norms. Thats the way people think about stuff, just make it ok to marry and see how long they go with it.

    My suggestion atleast, if they live it out. Fine. Just let it go. Either case church is within your hearts or whatever you believe in. That's sorta the thing in either case. Just because you letting it be allowed constitutional wise that doesn't mean you are ok with it personally as approval wise.

    I mean people basically rebel when not being allowed to watch porn. Let them watch, see how long it takes before they figure they need to take responsibility and like... not be huge porn junkie. Thats life. Let it just get it out there, and you learn from that. Thats a part of being human if you ask me, you do it and you learn from it... well atleast i hope they do. Depending if you had any good parents who teaches you to be traditional and keep up the good honest work of good intent. But yeah.

     

×
×
  • Create New...