Starlight Nova

besides my oc is a blank flank

because i would already know what my destiny entails, where i stand in the world, and would prevent me from trying to find meaning in my life,

i would be happy to stay a blank flank, for all that potential to try new things just like the crusaders to find my true purpose

yes u have labeled alot of differences in the privileges between the 2 ages even threw in standard from the states, but do we know her situation in the philippines remember at age 12 in the philippines any "child" has the privilege to consent to sexual activities whether physical or over the internet, sure we can say the 14 year old has just started puberty the fun part is puberty doesnt effect or cause mental maturity its a stage of development of the body not the mind, yes she is under the age for driving, guess what i'm 29 i still dont have a license that doesnt effect my mental maturity, the brain is constantly undergoing development well past once u hit adulthood, most of what a adolescent deals with is more based on environmental and hormonal influences, as for having a job Permissible Work[edit] Children are allowed to undertake work under certain conditions.[5] A child below 15 years old can be permitted to work if he/she is under supervision by family senior/ parents provided that the child works directly under the sole responsibility of his/her parents or legal guardian and where only members of his/her family are employed. The child’s employment does not endangers his/her life, safety, health, and morals, or impairs his/her normal development. The parent or legal guardian shall provide the said child with the prescribed primary and/or secondary education. The employer first secures a work permit for the child from the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE). Children aged 15 to below 18 years of age are permitted to work in any economic activity not considered child labor, but not more than eight (8) hours a day and in no case beyond forty (40) hours a week. They shall not be allowed to work between 10:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. of the following day, and employer should provide the child with access to at least elementary and secondary education.[5] she is 14 years old i wouldn't be surprised based on the screenshots that she is new to sexual relationships. lets see drinking In the Philippines it is disturbing that due to lenient monitoring and implementation, alcohol such as beer and hard drinks can easily be bought in grocery and convenience stores by teenagers. Our law sets the minimum legal drinking age at 18, nevertheless underage drinking is widespread and prevalent. u say sexual dysfunction that usually results from this kind of exposure, i believe it has more to do with this incident being spread across social media to be more damaging then a mistake made over skype inprivate, i was 14 once too and what she did was normal i've seen it, its not as damaging as u claim it is more to the contrary i've seen and heard and experienced similar circumstances i will leave names out of it as to respect privacy, she had a bad experience or toon was unable to satisfy her needs, highschool vs graduate not really ment on mental maturity for that one other then emphasizing the age gap, high school can either make or break a person on its own without external influences, another comment on the brain developing thing , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurodevelopmental_disorder we cant say this can be ruled out without knowing her medical or his medical background, thats the thing were all assuming she is the standard version of a human from the philippines but many factors determine her situation, her mental capacity, personality, what her homelife is like, is the abuse already in her life, is she disabled in any way is there anything that could affect her mental maturity and brain development prior to contact with toon, or after contact with toon, all environmental influences must be considered to her mental wellbeing before we can consider why she wanted to make this all public. from a logical standpoint (sally has just had a bad experience with a boy on the internet in private for over a year and is now starting to regret it, so at the end of the year she decides to block him) this is where logic point stops, now illogically (sally tales screenshots of the conversation they have been having for the last year, and sends them to this boy's friends to show how she feels a year after starting the escapade with him, she asks that it doesnt go public, "this is the internet where more people involved means less privacy" and yet if she didnt want it to go public she wouldnt of shared it to begin with), at this point in time 6 people or more knew of the messages and instead of just going to the authorities about it they decided to confront this person in a recorded skype call with more then just the 6 people seeing and listening in, "this is where it became public" by confronting him u turned it from a serious matter into a social spectacle which as u have seen is now plastered all over social media, and blown so far out of proportion that the real damage to the community was done by the community. yes we can confirm there are differences in appearance, sure mental maturity but it can go both ways toon even tho an adult can be more mentally immature then sally, i'm 29 i have the mental maturity according to my doctors of 12 year old, i do agree with them, so age doesnt really affect maturity, its more about ur body how it developed, environmental influences, and how u grew up, and to state for the record my favorite quote, "grow old is mandatory, growing up is optional". we can not state that sally is the child in all this we can not state toon is the adult in all this, both roles can easily be reversed, there are many differences between US standards of living and filipino standards of living, there are legal differences, responsibilities, roles, legal ages, privileges, and environmental differences. as such this topic whether aimed at toon innocence or sally's , will remain and open topic to be discussed as all factors need to be ascertained before a true verdict on ones innocence or mental maturity can be solidified.

https://www.lawphil.net/statutes/acts/act_3815_1930.html here u can read this it covers FELONIES AND CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH AFFECT CRIMINAL LIABILITY i be happy to webcam with ya to prove otherwise oh and i'm canadian by birth yes he did he admitted the claims against him were true that the screenshots were real but he did not admit to being a pedo or to be breaking the law, and were the screenshots that were leaked the same ones he admitted to were real sorry lucid was trying to quote the other one, and no its not that i'm a fan of toonkritic i'm a fan of the show not of the fandom the fandom and community have shown that they are no different then a standard fandom of any show there is nothing really special about this community

https://www.unicef.org/namibia/na.COP_Legal_Analysis.pdf oh sorry i figured u did ur research into the laws of the philippines in regards to criminal liability so i am giving u context u just have to read thru till u find it

3. Philippines The Philippines is among the top ten countries with rampant cyber pornographic activities involving mostly boys and girls aged 10-14 years.45 Hence, the government decided to enact a comprehensive legislation, the Anti-Child Pornography Act of 2009 (abbr.: ACPA), in order to combat all sectors of child pornography. a. Definition The relevant definition for the child pornography provisions provided for in section 3 ACPA states as follows: “Child” refers to a person below eighteen (18) years of age or over, but is unable to fully take care of himself/herself from abuse, neglect, cruelty, exploitation or discrimination because of a physical or mental disability or condition. For the purpose of this Act, a child shall also refer to: (1) a person regardless of age who is presented, depicted or portrayed as a child as defined herein; and (2) computer-generated, digitally or manually crafted images or graphics of a person who is represented or who is made to appear to be a child as defined herein. “Child pornography” refers to any representation, whether visual, audio, or written combination thereof, by electronic, mechanical, digital, optical, entities, to distribute any form of child pornography; (g) For a parent, legal guardian or person having custody or control of a child to knowingly permit the child to engage, participate or assist in any form of child pornography; (h) To engage in the luring or grooming of a child; (i) To engage in pandering of any form of child pornography; (j) To willfully access any form of child pornography; (k) To conspire to commit any of the prohibited acts stated in this section. Conspiracy to commit any form of child pornography shall be committed when two (2) or more persons come to an agreement concerning the commission of any of the said prohibited acts and decide to commit it; and (l) To possess any form of child pornography. As this provision contains different offences, the analysis will be split up in different groups. First of all, section 4 (b), (c), (d), (i), (j) and (l) ACPA are in line with international standards regarding the catalogue of offences. Special attention has to be paid to the differentiation of section 4 (d) and (l) ACPA. Section 4 (d) ACPA deals with the possession of child pornography with the intention to sell, distribute, publish or broadcast. If the perpetrators lacks this intention, he or she can still be sentenced with the mere possession of child pornography according to section 4 (l) ACPA. The differentiation makes sense as the range of sentence differs between the two offences according to section 15 ACPA: the sentence for an offence like section 4 (d) ACPA is higher than for the mere possession of child pornography. In the overall assessment, section 4 (b), (c), (d), (i), (j) and (l) ACPA meet the highest international standard. Section 4 (a) ACPA states that it is unlawful for any person to hire, employ, use, persuade, induce or coerce a child to perform in the creation or production of any form of child pornography. This offence has to be qualified as an abstract endangerment offence. This means that the offence does not require that the action of the perpetrator causes actual harm to the victim or infringes the legally protected right, hence causes a criminal “success”. The mere endangerment of the legally protected right is already conflicting with the legal order and therefore has to be criminalised. The hiring of a child in order to produce child pornography does not cause any harm to the child if the perpetrator never reaches the level of actually using the child for the production of child pornography. Hence, the criminalised action (hiring of a child in order to use it for the production of child pornography) and the actual violation of the child’s right (use of the child for the production of child pornography) are two different offences under the Philippine legislation. This differentiation is problematic as section 15 (b) sets the same range of sentence for section 4 (a) and section 4 (b) ACPA. This might violate the principle of proportionality. As an abstract endangerment offence such as section 4 (a) ACPA does not violate and harm the potential victim to the same extent as the actual offence (production of child pornography), there has to be a differentiation in the range of sentence. Otherwise, the provision might be declared unconstitutional. Section 4 (e) ACPA criminalises the provision of a venue for the commission of prohibited acts. This section is redundant as this conduct is already covered by the regular criminal rules of support actions. Furthermore, the provision lacks legal certainty as it does not specify the “prohibited acts”. Even though it most likely refers to other acts enumerated in section 4 ACPA, the law is not precise enough in this regard. Section 4 (f) ACPA is redundant as the distribution of child pornography is already criminalised in section 4 (c) ACPA and there is no recognisable added value to make a special provision for film distributors, theatres and telecommunication companies. This definition is equal to Art 2 c) OPSC, however, the definition does not specifically refer to children. Section 2 APA defines the term “child” as every person below the age of eighteen years. The catalogue of offences in section 14 (1) APA criminalises following conduct: A person who produces, participates in the production of, traffics in, publishes, broadcasts, procures, imports, exports or in any way abets pornography depicting images of children, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding seven hundred and fifty currency points or imprisonment not exceeding fifteen years or both. This provision does not meet international standards as it does not criminalise the possession and the accessing of child pornography. Furthermore, it narrows the application scope to “images”. Hence, video, text and sound are not included. b. Computer Misuse Act, 2011 Section 23 Computer Misuse Act, 2011 (abbr.: CMA) regulates child pornography as follows: (1) A person who- (a) produces child pornography for the purposes of its distribution through a computer; (b) offers or makes available child pornography through a computer; (c) distributes or transmits child pornography through a computer; (d) procures child pornography through a computer for himself or herself or another person; or (e) unlawfully possesses child pornography on a computer, commits an offence. (2) A person who makes available pornographic materials to a child commits an offence. (3) For the purposes of this section “child pornography” includes pornographic material that depicts- (a) a child engaged in sexually suggestive or explicit conduct; (b) a person appearing to be a child engaged in sexually suggestive or explicit conduct; or (c) realistic images representing children engaged in sexually suggestive or explicit conduct. (4) A person who commits an offence under this section is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding three hundred and sixty currency points or imprisonment not exceeding fifteen years or both. This provision equals almost entirely the provision in Art 9 BC. Hence, reference is made to the explanatory notes regarding Art 9 BC. The only difference is that section 23 (3) CMA does not limit the scope of applicability to visual depictions, but covers all pornographic material. c. Best Practices It is interesting to note that the act which intends to provide a comprehensive regulation of pornography related offences fails the international standard and is poorly drafted compared to the earlier provision in the Computer Misuse Act. Even though section 23 CMA covers many aspects of child pornography, it does not include mere erotic posing pictures and does not tackle the issue of sexting between minors. Philippines[edit] The minimum age for consensual sex is 12 years. United States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices lists the age of consent of Philippines as 12.[71] Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 12 is defined as rape, under Chapter 3, Article 266 of the Anti-Rape Law of 1997.[72] https://www.terredeshommes.nl/sites/tdh/files/uploads/hr_17021_tdh_report_webcam_manilla.pdf another thing u can read