Jump to content
  • entries
    9
  • comments
    46
  • views
    3,979

Why BO3 for last gen is lazy.


Chara

1,467 views

Why on earth are the graphics for Black Ops 3 PS3 SO LAZILY DONE!!!

 

Just look at Black Ops 3 here:


The graphics are terrible
it runs on 30 fps
and there is no campaign.

 

Now just look at ALL of these games.

 

 

Destiny:

 

Battlefield 4:

 

and here are some other titles
Advanced Warfare
Need For Speed
Forza (for 360)
MGSV
GTA V
Payday 2

 

all of these have multiplayer
all of these have single player
all of these have better graphics

 

 

 

 

So why is Black Ops 3 graphics so lazily done? I know there was A LOT of things added to the game that would not run on last-gen, but that is not an excuse though. These games I just mentioned have AWESOME graphics but "Beenox" (the people who made the last gen) left so much out of the game it is unbelievable. They might as well just got rid of last gen itself.

  • Brohoof 3

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

Something else too, ever seen MGS V on a PS3? My brother has it and I have to rub my eyes every time I see it. It's kinda the same thing as BO3, the graphics are awful, the framerate doesn't even look like 30 FPS, (probably closer to 20 with all that's on-screen at once), and people still bought it! I guess it's because I've become sort of a graphics whore, but I find it to be unacceptable that it was even given the greenlight to even be on last-gen consoles.

Link to comment

Hang on.

You're complaining about BO3 being lacklustre on a last-gen console?

 

You know, the PS3 is almost a decade old (in fact, by November 11th this year, it will be), it's outdated now, the next generation is starting to become the main focus; game developers are beginning to forget about the last-gen consoles because, A:) They're underpowered and developing games for them while also developing for the current-gen consoles is difficult as changes in programming and such happen, and B:) More and more people everyday are leaving last-gen and moving to current-gen, as such the demand for last-gen games is decreasing and less and less profit is being made on them. Soon enough, the PS3 and Xbox 360 will be forgotten about like the PS2 and original Xbox. 

Link to comment

Hang on.

You're complaining about BO3 being lacklustre on a last-gen console?

 

You know, the PS3 is almost a decade old (in fact, by November 11th this year, it will be), it's outdated now, the next generation is starting to become the main focus; game developers are beginning to forget about the last-gen consoles because, A:) They're underpowered and developing games for them while also developing for the current-gen consoles is difficult as changes in programming and such happen, and B:) More and more people everyday are leaving last-gen and moving to current-gen, as such the demand for last-gen games is decreasing and less and less profit is being made on them. Soon enough, the PS3 and Xbox 360 will be forgotten about like the PS2 and original Xbox. 

Battlefield 4, Destiny, Skyrim (a 4 year old game for craps sake!) have MUCH more content, better graphics, and are 60 fps. I see the last-gen is outdated and I have no choice but to agree, and I can say 5 games that had multiplayer campaigns. I realize the campaign was so flipping hardcore and the Ps3 cannot run it but the point I am trying to prove is why did Activision even make a last gen port in the first place?

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Join the herd!

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...