Anneal

On 11/20/2019 at 4:28 PM, Kyoshi said:

Good music in general is already dead, in the US at least. Europe seems to still embrace well crafted music from amazing bands, but the US? Seen something yesterday about some list on the news of "Top 10 albums of the decade" and they mentioned the top 3. #1 was a Kanye West album. That legit made me feel anger. Good music in the US is dead and buried, only alive in the underground scene. Now it is all about the most generic trash possible, whether that be country music or horrendous "hip hop". All corporate, no true musicianship whatsoever. The US general public only wants soulless trash.

Kanye West's older albums were fine. A lot of the hate he gets nowadays are due to his  political commentary (which is all over the place as is) and his tendency to be quite random. My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy is still considered one of his best works, even among music critics who normally aren't into hip-hop. If that's what he got #1 for, I would say it's actually pretty well deserved. And if your image of country music and hip-hop, let alone "popular music" is limited to the top 40 radio songs, then your image of music is quite narrow.

Country music isn't my cup of tea, but there are still many good country artists like Brad Paisley, George Strait, Ryan Adams, and Carrie Underwood. And hip-hop artists like Kendrick Lamar and Eminem are skilled rappers who have the ability to discuss certain controversial topics within their music. Not all hip-hop is Soundcloud rapping. There are even certain hip-hop groups like Death Grips or clipping who sound completely different from your normal hip-hop. They might not get much radio play, but they are in no way underground, considering plenty of their albums regularly top the Billboard and have a noticeable following online. Some albums have even sold gold or platinum.

There are also bands like the Black Keys, Vampire Weekend, Paramore, and Breaking Benjamin, along with some older bands like RHCP, Green Day, Foo Fighters, and Nine Inch Nails, and many people still listen to them, so I doubt if the general public wants soulless trash that they would continue listening to them.

I mostly listen to entire albums, but The Suburbs by Arcade Fire is a really solid one. Here's the opening song for it:

There's also Lonerism by Tame Impala:

Weezer's White Album:

AM by Arctic Monkeys:

El Camino by the Black Keys:

And A Moon Shaped Pool by Radiohead:

9 hours ago, Olly said:

People have been claiming rock was dead since the moment it became a genre. It's been said over and over for decades. It's a cliche, and one I'm particularly sick of... we don't seem to say this about other genres, like blues or country or hip hop. The Black Keys put out a killer album this year, and Jack White last. You've got King Gizzard playing late night shows and Greta Van Fleet too. 

 

For the love of god can we stop saying this.

Not to mention there are many other genres such as heavy metal and emo that haven't been mainstream for quite a while, yet continue to have a massive following. Just because you stop hearing it on the radio doesn't mean it's dead. In fact, emo music is experiencing a revival in the indie scene in recent years, and metal is more experimental than ever since its peak in the 80s.

Also, Australia is experiencing a revival in psychedelic rock and bands like King Gizzard and Tame Impala has clearly shown that there is far more to the genre. There are also other bands like Arctic Monkeys, Screaming Females, Drive-By Truckers, Arcade Fire, and Muse, and many post-punk revival bands are still active (even if they aren't as well-known as they were in the early 2000s peak) like Interpol, The Killers, Yeah Yeah Yeahs, and The Strokes. Honestly, the only reason I feel The Strokes and other post-punk revival bands started losing commercial success is because of media pressure; back in the early 2000s, the media wouldn't stop talking about how they were going to be the "saviors of rock and roll". I'm hoping we don't do the same thing to bands like the Arctic Monkeys and Black Keys again – I fear that it would ruin them.

15 hours ago, Renegade the Zombiecorn said:

The holy trinity of80s music: New wave, punk, and heavy metal (at least, in my book).

Punk didn't actually last very long into the 80s. Punk rock was fairly short-lived in the mainstream and pretty much gone after the Sex Pistols had disbanded. Most major punk bands like The Clash, The Ramones, and Dead Kennedys either switched to hardcore, post-punk, or new wave. Punk won't really make a mainstream comeback until the mid-90s with pop punk bands like Green Day or blink-182. It might be more accurate to include hip-hop instead of punk, as hip-hop quickly flourished and grew in that decade with groups like Run-DMC, A Tribe Called Quest, Public Enemy, and Beastie Boys. At the end of the decade, gangsta rap began to pop up with groups like the N.W.A. and rappers like Ice T.

16 hours ago, Renegade the Zombiecorn said:

Quick update: power pop has quickly become one of my fave music genres; it's sadly overlooked due to the stigma that classic pop-rock akin to the 1963-1965 era Beatles, the 1962-1965 era Beach Boys, and the 1965-1969 era Who is nothing, and that rock music just be treated as solely an art form, with all the pretentiousness that entails.

honestly (and I think fellow power pop fans like @Anneal can agree with me on this), power pop is a genre that needs more respect and love. Frank Zappa once said the definition of rock journalism was, and I quote, “People who can't write, doing interviews with people who can't think, in order to prepare articles for people who can't read.”

Nowhere does this ring more true in the case of power pop. To quote Ken Sharp, power pop is "the Rodney Dangerfield of rock 'n' roll. ... the direct updating of the most revered artists—the Who, the Beach Boys, the Beatles—yet it gets no respect."

Anyone else agree?

Yeah, one of my favorite bands is Weezer and they can partially be considered a power pop/alternative rock band, depending on the album. Power pop is still active in the modern music industry, though most of it is indie nowadays like Ozma or Teenage Fanclub, save for older power pop bands like Cheap Trick.

3 hours ago, The Historian said:

I generally stick with the European side because I'm more likely to find things that interest me. But, honestly, I have bands that originate from all over the goddamn world. I tend to look outside the US so I can experience a broader range of bands from across the globe. Like, Japanese power metal isn't the same as Swedish power metal. The cultural influences of each country are something I like to look for. South American metal has a different tone to Russian metal, as another example. American stuff has kinda lost its luster for me, but I still pop it out from time to time when I need that sound.

I can agree with that at least. Mainstream music tends to be overwhelmingly dominated by the Anglosphere countries and it is not very common to find non-English music in the mainstream. It's also worth pointing out how in some countries, musicians don't even follow the customs of music that we are used to in the Western world (12 tone temperance, common time signatures, pentatonic/heptatonic scale), so even the same genre of music in different countries can be wildly different in terms of structure, rhythm, and even melody.

3 hours ago, The Historian said:

It's not haphazard and not even the first time Call of Duty used chemical weapons in a campaign. MW3 included it as a central plot point. Hell, Spec Ops: The Line included white phosphorous for the same reason. Dismissing a game because it has chemical weapons in it is basically saying "this is a video game and they cannot touch certain things." It's not casual and never has been. I hope it's still there and didn't get cut because it made some people get their panties in a twist.

The difference is that in Spec Ops: The Line it was a plot point to specifically show how cruel and inhumane chemical weapons were and deconstruct common themes of first person shooters. I am not personally against a game having chemical weapons treated as a serious topic in video games. What I mean is that in Modern Warfare, at least from recent news, they are using it as a killstreak option, turning something that should normally treated with seriousness as some cheap way to get extra kills in a deathmatch game.

16 hours ago, The Historian said:

If you want decent rock and metal from the current era, unfortunately, American stuff is really not the place to look. I've listened to my share and while there are some bands I like, most of it I find to be kinda dull. Okay enough, but doesn't have any substance to it. Just shit about women or drugs or something equally banal. As of late, when I look for something new, I check out Europe, specifically the Nordic countries. Norway, Sweden and Finland all produce god-tier bands that have more to their songs. Sprawling epics. About dragons and shit. Much more satisfying listening.

To be fair, I don't think I have many bands that are only 2009 and newer that are new and aren't formed from musicians who have been in other bands before. That said, however, if you're interested in that scene, and want something other than Blind Guardian or Sonata Arctica, give Sabaton, Rhapsody, Powerwolf and Ayreon a listen. To be fair, Ayreon started in the mid-90s but their albums are listening experiences you won't soon forget. Hell, anything Arjen Lucassen is involved with is good for a listen. Dude's a machine. I swear.

That's kind of just power metal. It's an interesting and fun genre in of itself, but you shouldn't really dismiss most of rock like that. Maybe you've been listening to too much top 40s and mainstream radio stations and you have to just dig deeper. Like I said before, there are plenty of great contemporary rock bands and musicians: Arctic Monkeys, Black Keys, Jack White, Arcade Fire, Tame Impala, Vampire Weekend...and  alternative rock bands from the 90s like the Smashing Pumpkins, Weezer, and Queens of the Stone Age are still active. Rock may no longer be the top genre of the music industry but it is far from stale. And some of these bands are capable of making deep and insightful albums and songs.

There are some recent bands that do stand out though. The Struts, Rival Sons, and Fleet Foxes are good examples. Nowadays it's a bit harder for indie bands to get mainstream attention simply because of strong competition and the fact that rock no longer dominates mainstream music anymore, not without adopting pop, electronic, or hip-hop (ex: Imagine Dragons, Fall Out Boy, twenty øne piløts) into their songs. The Black Keys was basically underground for the first seven years until they got mainstream attention with Attack and Release.

18 hours ago, Frostgage said:

Greta Van Fleet is a good one (although, they're heralded as a Led Zeppelin throwback so maybe not what this thread is looking for? still). This song is awesome.

Eh, their albums aren't something to write home about. I tend to focus and listen entire albums rather than specifically pick out the singles to listen to. Not to mention they sound too much like Led Zeppelin – which actually makes their flaws stick out more when they are inevitably compared to each other. They need to find their own sound and be more original. I feel they are just a byproduct of people being too caught up in nostalgia and looking back at the past that they are unable to look towards the future and make something unique.

Still going to point out the white phosphorous controversy that showed up a few months before the game was going to release. I'm not sure if it's been removed yet or if it's going to show up in a later update, but while playing a first person shooter game might be cathartic to most, I'm a bit more reluctant to support the game if it casually puts chemical weapons in their game.

All this talking about modern rock and I'm surprised no one has even mentioned the post-punk revival era in the early to mid 2000s. Multiple bands from the post-punk revival era are still here to this day, and the genre mixes the rawness and aesthetics of garage rock with the DIY ethic of post-punk. The Strokes, Interpol, and The White Stripes (most people probably know them for "Seven Nation Army") really pioneered the genre at the turn of the 21st century, and while The White Stripes has disbanded, Jack White is still actively producing and releasing music. And then there were other post-punk revival bands that popped up in the mid-2000s: Franz Ferdinand, Arctic Monkeys, and The Killers. There are also other bands like The Black Keys, Muse, and Arcade Fire, both of which are influential bands in their own right. And Modest Mouse and Weezer – both 90s bands – are still active. Nine Inch Nails is still keeping industrial rock alive as well.

On 1/1/2018 at 3:52 PM, Denim&Venom said:

I think rock has fallen to the way side for two reasons. People in america have poor taste, hence why pop and rap dominate the charts. And 2. Rock has been over taken as the most intense, aggressive and complex form of music by heavy metal. It can't really keep up. 

It still has a place. It just won't be because it's popular or because it suits people looking for a little more epicness from their music. 

Barring that, there is still good stuff being made. 

And I won't say that rock has fallen to the wayside – several of those bands I've mentioned have no trouble in getting massive crowds at concerts or venues, and some of their albums regularly get golds and platinums. And certain bands have enjoyed mainstream success, sometimes by mixing electronic or hip-hop, such as twenty øne pilots, Fall Out Boy, Panic! At the Disco, and Imagine Dragons. And I don't see it as any kind of "dumbing down" of musical taste – genres need to evolve and we can't always be stuck with old, restrictive standards. People need to stop being so purist and refuse to adapt with the times.

If hip-hop or pop isn't your cup of tea, that's fine, though you shouldn't poorly judge people for listening to it – especially hip-hop, which is a fairly diverse genre that spans from political hip-hop to horrorcore to trap. Maybe you should consider tolerating it as a legitimate musical genre.

1. Alternative Rock

2. Post-punk Revival + Blues Rock

3. Pop Punk

4. Electronic + Ambient

5. Power Pop

Though I also listen to some bands or musicians that will fit into neither of the above. Occasionally I listen metal (which I got hooked after watching Patton and Lombardo perform together), emo (Weezer helped introduce me into Sunny Day Real Estate), or hip-hop (from a few of RHCP's albums back when they did more rap rock), though most of the bands I like fit into those genres – Arcade Fire, Boards of Canada, The Black Keys, Faith No More, Green Day, Radiohead, R.E.M., RHCP, The Strokes, Weezer, and the White Stripes are some I can name off the top of my head. I think it's good that most people don't overly restrict themselves to certain genres, since many of the bands I listen to have been willing to experiment and take parts from different genres.

1 hour ago, Kyoshi said:

Gonna be the odd one out on this one. I fully support Hong Kong, I definitely do not support the Chinese government, however, what this player did was not in the right place at all. I do think Blizzard was a tad too harsh, but he did break their rules so a punishment of some kind should be expected. Him shouting "Free hong kong!" at a game tournament doesn't do anything for Hong Kong's cause and neither does protesting some video game company. People on the internet, like they do, think that protesting a big video game corporation is helping the protesters when it isn't in the slightest. Besides, if they are going to protest Blizzard, they might want to do so with literally every major corporation on the planet because all major companies do business in China and why wouldn't they? China has the largest market in most industries. The amount of gamers in China far outnumbers the amount in North America, easily.

It is an increasingly complicated situation, but the current internet outrage towards Blizzard is a waste of time and pointless. 

People should be allowed to voice their political opinion on any occasion though. We can easily compare this to Colin Kaepernick's kneeling during the national anthem in protest of Trump. People argued back then how Colin shouldn't have brought politics into the NFL, or how him kneeling wouldn't do anything to reduce police brutality. But these kind of actions force organizations and companies to take action, or at the very least allow viewers to be more politically aware.

Also, I know some people may dislike Bethesda due to their multiple mishaps with Fallout 76, but you don't need the Chinese market to make tons of money, if Fallout 4 and Fallout: New Vegas sales are anything to go by. And other games like Battlefield 4 and Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 have still topped video game sales records despite them being banned in China.

2 hours ago, Varrack said:

One of the only times I've cried during this show was when the song start playing. God, that really hit a soft spot. It's half-amazing, half-torture to watch a timeskip of your favorite characters change them. Twilight's and Spike's new designs alone were enough of a shock.

I do kind of wonder if G5 will begin where G4 ended, much further in the future and involving different ponies while still remaining in Equestria. And maybe the old characters will pop up in the background occasionally. Idk how I'm gonna handle the wait.

Oh man...it's hurts to see it end after years of watching it, but at least this episode gave it closure.

I honestly don't mind if it ends up taking place in an entirely fresh and new universe. Needless to say, I feel like the current generation has had a good run and if we were to basically make a sequel or extension to it, it might affect the quality of the show itself. This show has already ended up a great note, lasting nine years with nine seasons. Plus, there would be many more opportunities to tell stories with a new blank slate.

10 hours ago, Shimmer Muffin said:

Average salary. But, I've been to Turkey, and it was amazing! Next stop - Greece, they have wonderful cuisine! 

If you want some less conventional places to go:

– Puebla, Mexico. It's one of the oldest colonial cities in North America and has a noticeable European influence to it. Its downtown is a UNESCO Heritage Site and is one of the most beautiful yet underrated cities in the world. 

– Quebec City, Canada. Another old colonial city. It's one of the few cities that has its city walls intact, and Old Quebec has a particularly French charm compared to the modern and bustling Montreal. It's like a slice of France that's been transported right here to the New World. 

– Chiang Mai, Thailand. A picturesque Thai city filled with Buddhist temples and close to nature. They also have the Elephant Nature Park, which rescues endangered elephant species from poaching. 

– Taipei, Taiwan. A modern Taiwanese city at the northern tip of the island, known for their bustling night markets, hot springs, and towering skyscrapers. They also have many buildings that trace back to the Japanese colonial era, the Qing Dynasty, and the Dutch and the Portuguese colonial era. 

– George Town, Malaysia. Malaysia's 2nd largest city, tracing back from the British colonial era. Its downtown is also registered as a UNESCO Heritage Site, with British colonial buildings mixed in with modern skyscrapers and buildings. It's like the Malaysian version of Hong Kong. 

4 hours ago, Ganondox said:

Going to elaborate on that. Sometimes people share FMRI images as evidence that people only use a portion of the brain at a time. However, the images being shown don't represent absolute activity, it's just the difference between it and a baseline state. The raw data shows all of the brain is used 100% of the time, it's just that blood flow and levels of activation change with different activities. 

Mythbusters also did an episode on this myth and they have proven that even while sleeping at least 20% of your brain is "active" to keep your bodily functions working. That doesn't mean that the other 80% is doing nothing, but that it's just dormant until you wake up. 

7 hours ago, Zenchi said:

Maybe the misconception came from the fact we hold within us, around 98.8% 'junk dna', or DNA we simply dont use. However, recent studies and efforts to decode this massive mound of information, reveals more. Such as, its necessary for evolution, holds certain 'switches' for other aspects of the genome, and is part of an ongoing process of evolution. Mutating genomes, that your DNA either incorporates, or disregards. It is literally information accumulated over millions of years

We are only 3% different from orangutangs. I wonder what would happen if one were to 'activate' this, and potentially change 98.8%. 

Cant claim to understand it just passing along interesting thoughts. Who knows, maybe it is pure potential 

The myth also stems from newspapers and other forms of media misinterpreting neural studies in the 20s and 30s. Around that time, neurological researchers had discovered that most of our brains are made up of glial cells and not just neurons. Journalists misinterpreted this as believing that only a small amount of your brain is actually "used", though neurologists have eventually discovered that those glial cells in fact play an important role of suppling nutrients to neurons and keeping them alive. 

On 9/5/2019 at 5:53 AM, Dreambiscuit said:

I’m NOT saying I object to shows with a moral lesson! I simply dislike script writing that has to spell out the moral of every episode as though the viewer is incapable of determining the point of the story on their own. Many shows I love, including MLP, have the same flaw and I don’t care for it. It’s great to have a good moral, but not so great to beat the viewer over the head with it. The modern cartoon shows you mention are indeed garbage and I agree completely that they have no value on any level (except maybe Teen Titans Go for its spontaneity). I’m not against Captain Planet or what it stands for, in fact I’m not against it at all; I just prefer a slightly more subtle approach.  

A lot of Captain Planet's episodes lack a lot of nuance and depth, and even the tongue-in-cheek environmentalist messages is sends out is quite surface-level. Recycling is often promoted as a solution but the waste hierarchy (reuse first, reduce second, recycle third) is never mentioned in the series. Nuclear power and GMOs are also poorly understood not just in Captain Planet but also in mainstream media. And other issues like how eating and transportation habits factor into carbon emissions are simply ignored.

Other animated movies like Wall-E and How to Train Your Dragon cover topics of environmentalism better – Wall-E talks about how human wastefulness can lead to environmental destruction, and How to Train Your Dragon uses a fantasy setting to indirectly discuss animal and environmental conservationism. And for anime, Princess Mononoke covers environmentalism fairly effectively. And then there's obviously Avatar. 

All in all, Captain Planet's just your stereotypical edutainment cartoon series from the 90s, so beyond the environmental message it wasn't a particularly great show. I enjoyed Arthur more, which educated kids in a more interesting and deeper manner. Even today the series hasn't lost its appeal – they even did a well-written and mature episode on autism. 

3 hours ago, Cpl_Dixon said:

I live kind of close to a track that runs freight, I don't know the line name or anything like that, all I know is that I can occasionally hear it from my house.

It could be Union Pacific or Canadian Pacific owned freight tracks. Both freight companies operate in Wisconsin, mostly connecting Duluth or Minneapolis to Milwaukee or Chicago. Most of the Midwest is scattered with freight tracks – Chicago is a massive railroad hub. 

Both San Jose (where I permanently live) and Santa Barbara (where I go to college) are served by Amtrak's Coast Starlight, which comes once a day in both directions. San Jose is additionally served by three commuter rail lines though: CalTrain (San Francisco-Gilroy), Amtrak's Capitol Corridor (San Jose-Sacramento), and the less frequent ACE (San Jose-Stockton). Santa Barbara is also served by Amtrak's Pacific Surfliner (San Luis Obispo-San Diego). The track in Santa Barbara is owned by Union Pacific, so occasionally you'll see a UP freight train pass by. 

If light rail counts, San Jose also has a light rail system called the VTA.

On 8/18/2019 at 6:05 PM, Prospekt said:

There's a track just east of downtown in my college town. You can hear the freight trains a few times every day and night, even from the university.

The nearest major city has some of those, plus a stop on a cross-country Amtrak route. There is also an electric light rail train that reaches a good portion of the metropolitan area, as well as downtown and the airport.

Sounds like Denver. The California Zephyr passes through there. Recently, the city invested a ton on revitalizing LoDo and Denver Union Station and rapidly expanding the RTD. 

On 8/18/2019 at 5:33 PM, Envy said:

There are train tracks in the downtown area of my town as well as the downtown of the local city. I really don't know much about them, though. If I ever see trains on them, they are definitely freight trains. I don't know if we even have any areas for passenger trains. I know there used to be a train station, but it got turned into a Jazz museum.

And that sounds like Tulsa. Tulsa used to have a train station, but due to the decline of passenger rail transport and the construction of the I-44 the Tulsa-Kansas City passenger line was dead in the 60s. The city was lucky enough to preserve its station; some other cities weren't so lucky and their train stations were either left in disrepair or torn down entirely. Most passenger railroad companies were killed to make way for the highways. Tulsa went highway-crazy like many other American cities and now their downtown is trapped in a mile-sized highway loop and filled with empty parking lots. 

1 hour ago, Black Sabbath said:

I don't really like that you singled out Islam here. Especially not since according to this data from the Anti-defamation league the vast majority of extremist murder in the US 2018 were committed by right-wing extremists. But then again, terror attacks carried out by Muslims receive on average 357 percent more media coverage than those committed by other groups, so it's not weird that people tend to single them out. 

Look, I'm not trying to downplay the acts of Muslim terrorists, I just want people to realize that this issue isn't going to be solved until we remove all extremism. 

This kind of sentiment is dangerous as well. We've all seen how certain politicians can easily twist this into general Islamophobia. 

People should also realize that while mass shootings are high-profile tragic events, gun violence happens on a daily basis and most of it goes unreported. Any kind of conversation on this shouldn't overly laser focus on mass shootings but gun violence as a whole. 

7 hours ago, Sherbert MGS said:

20 BUCKS AN HOUR?!

is that aussie dollars?

It's around $13.50/hr in USD. Either way, minimum wage usually only tells half of the story of living standards in that region – purchasing power is another important factor. In some places, goods and services can be far more expensive than average, decreasing purchasing power even when minimum wage there is higher. It's $11/hr in California, but that doesn't really help much when in most coastal cities, housing is extremely expensive and you still have to make far more than minimum wage to afford rent. 

$12/hr in California, but in the Bay Area it's $15/hr. The cost of living in the Bay Area is so expensive though that you'll need to make several times the min wage or work more than one job to actually afford to rent a house. Housing in the Central Valley is much cheaper and within the grasp of min wage workers there. 

I believe Rarity would be more of pony who appreciates the older architectural styles. The Leaning Tower of Pisa is Romanesque, and the Statue of Liberty is Neoclassical. Both architectural styles focus on decoration, varied geometry, and overall grandness. She might be a bit more tolerable to the newer Art Deco that the Empire State Building represents. The WTC is Modernist and Burj Khalifa is futurists and both would be a big "no" for her. 

Ideally, Rarity would be better represented by the Victorian style, which focuses on ornateness. The Palace of Westminister might suit her more. 

Maybe further up north into the Pacific Northwest, or even go into Canada and live in British Columbia. Or maybe back to Taipei, Taiwan. The climate's mostly tolerable, and I won't feel too out of place living in these places. Plus, the Northwest is known for being bike and fairly transit-friendly. 

Don't really need to bring any sort of technology, but germ theory and pasteurization would vastly improve the quality of life of ancient civilizations and significantly extend their citizens' life expectancy. 

Ideally Sanders or Warren. I have no love for Biden or Booty Judge Buttigieg who continue to cling onto 90s Third Way centrism, and Harris is too sketchy for my tastes. 

On 6/29/2019 at 7:14 AM, ~Angel Dust~ said:

I like Tulsi the most at this point, though I'd also vote for Bernie or Yang. They seem to be the only three of this huge race that seem to have any concern for their constituency. Normal. For democrats, the rest are all corporate and Warren is also a traitor to her constituency. For republicans, it's not even worth my time to really even look at this point. I've only ever heard of one republican I really invested much any interest in, but that's because he was more like the republicans of 60 years ago that were actually not fringe right lunatics.

Bill Weld or John Kasich (who hasn't completely declared candidacy yet)? Bill Weld is actually not a nutjob and supports LGBT rights and abortion, and he has done decently well when he was formerly MA's governor. He's also much friendlier on undocumented immigrants than Trump is. John Kasich is also somewhat alright with a good track record as Ohio's governor and is a bit closer to what Republicans originally were when they were sane conservatives and not Tea Party/alt-right crazies. 

On 5/28/2019 at 5:03 PM, TheTaZe said:

What in gods name are you talking about? You obviously haven't listened to much music if you don't think it has changed a lot since the 90's. It has changed so much since the 90's that I can't list everything.

Let's take Grunge for an example. Grunge was big in the 90's. Do you hear grunge a lot nowadays? Not really. 

It is noticeable in other genres as well. Rap rock was a thing in the 90s, with bands like Rage Against the Machine (with an anarchist touch), Kid Rock, and Limp Bizkit. Red Hot Chili Peppers also dabbled in it in the 90s, though it still shows in By the Way. It ended up dying along with nu metal by the turn of the 21st century. And now in recent years, trap has become more prevalent and the increased popularity of music platforms online has led to "SoundCloud rap" entering the mainstream. 

Even music today has changed quite a lot compared to music in the 2000s. Emo has faded out of popularity – My Chemical Romance has disbanded, Fall Out Boy has moved to pop-punk, and Panic! At the Disco has moved towards baroque pop. And while grunge had died in the 90s, post-grunge died in the 2000s – it had ended up over-saturating the radio stations and people didn't like it for watering down grunge too much. Notoriously bad bands like Creed and Nickelback certainly didn't help.