SugarCoatxMarblePie

Welcome to the forums!

-2 This is physically impossible just fyi lol

M t m Flirting: Hey! Wanna practice wrestling, in bed? M t f Flirting: Your cheeks look really soft. All four of them. (lol) F t m Flirting: I need help with some heavy lifting. F t F Flirting: I have cherry chapstick on.

Be a draconequs and randomize pony's controls every 2 minutes. And by controls I mean directional orientation, motor control, etc.

I guess. But somehow I can spy in TF2 (unless team comp is bad and I need to play obj). I just don't like how its like, its basically like slow platforming for side-scrollers, it gets boring. Then Dishonored yeah the blocking/parry thing was messed up for me cuz I turned off the aim assist on it, so I guess you need to time it too well or something idk it was annoying. Plus, inching around and its basically a uniform path, not multiple approaches. No creativity, it just spells out what you need to do for you, early on anyways. And the mechanics were lame n the graphics for me didn't age well. But that's true about MGSV and I did mess around briefly but eh. Didn't get into it. It was a little fun admittedly, more than the other 2, but opportunity cost of other games I never end up playing it. I love Undertale, and I am used to RPGs, played some when I was young. So, it was very easy for me, and I played some touhou before too, but not that much, enough for basic enemies to be simpletons tho. And Alphys' texts for me were the worst part, cuz I have no patience lol, and I don't really care for that humor or excessive characterization. I think its more of a criticism of half of the people who play the game, like, I overtexted people before and this game gets to me how annoying it is so I see it as a satirical criticism of the people who end up playing the game. Some of the fan stuff is great tho, n sans is like, battle-toads difficulty (except you don't die in one hit lol, and it progresses faster than BT). I couldn't bring myself to grind out a second genocide run tho just to have sans there to play now n then. You have to do so many random battles. Also I got a cheat device for UT to make the game more difficult (like playing it on twice the speed) but I misplaced it, so now its just meh. Plus 2x speed would help with those alphys text spam moments lol.

Stealth games, like 4 of them, can't do it. Metal Gear, some ninja Indie game, and Dishonored.

Fallout 4 Infinite ammo, stimpacks, radaways, and berry mentats or mentals w/e they are called (fo:e mixes me up lol) and use infinite jet for slow mo and the berry mint drugs make me sense enemies through walls slightly, and I would zoom around with consoles commands modded to move at 6x the speed and jump 6x as high and rocket all the raiders all over. But eventually get lagged out cuz moving too fast causes too many assets to load at once. And that's just one of like 5 times I messed around in FO4.

Wheatley was basically made to be stupid lol.

Sound Sauce Inhaling oregano Cheeto cheese on my fingers *giggles* Hm an oxymoron would be good. Hmmmm. Obstructed clearing Cold fire smooth sandpaper *laughs* Quiet noise Loud silence The skinny fat boys. Music Group (lol) Clowns with college degrees. Senor senior citizen. Choking to death on a slipper

At that rate might as well call everything a potential dystopia. Tho to take the topic more seriously, I do believe the names matter how the dystopia is formed, and the name will form itself practically, so if you are coming up with a story perhaps make an escalation of events that lead to the dystopic state as historically feasible, then the name writes itself.

The Empire of Dystopia.

The style reminds me of The Amazing World of Gumball.

Talking about dreams with others and this topic is making me dream again. Not lucid yet tho. Aural? You mean atmospheric/environment or some dream effect, tone? Also that subconscious thing is a theory, well rather, its suspected of being true but may not be true (using the word theory involving science lul, scientific theories are actually proven and not normal theories xD I know because of strawman/false equivocation arguments n yada yada). Yeah that makes enjoying lucid dreaming even harder then if she is the trigger specifically. There are probably ways around it, like having a lucid dream funeral or something to bring closure. And what sorta conversations do you have, does it become like 'you are dead..' or is it about regular or random stuff or normal conversations? Then again you said it does the opposite so um. You should prolly try ignoring her or setting up stuff to make her forgotten, like distractions to keep up your working memory. Like studies into Tetris of all things suggest that it uses a fair amount of working memory so it distracts people from PTSD and it lacks triggers that might cause people to have an episode. They even found it can reduce future trauma if you play it before something happens, if I recall, but how the heck would you test that, here play some Tetris, ok now hurry you are off to real battle lol. I might need to double check, possible memory flaw. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/tetris-shown-to-lessen-ptsd-and-flashbacks/ Ah, disturbing film, ok lol. Can't seem to find a tetris study on 'preventing' but I see an article misusing it so maybe I was wrong because of such a thing. When they say prevent they mean do it within 6 hours of the traumatic event and it prevents [a bit of] trauma.

I learned not to explain to crazy.

oh well nvm lol

I am usually very stubborn about whats true or not. But if something happens consistently, it can be measured consistently right, so if science doesn't find anything, that's a sign its not true. Its as simple as that. Like, they could test you and others like you saying they are talking to siri on their phone, and then put the phone down and ask you not to speak to her, but to see if you can sense the evil. Then you will be like yes yeah yes, and then they will be like, tricked ya! There is no siri on the phone, I lied. Then you will be like 'cursesssss' to the heavens lol. Half joking here. Or they could have 5 phones one does have Siri they prove it, then they have you leave the room so you don't see how they shuffle the phones, then you need to pick the one with siri on it. Boom tricked again! Cursesssss! Siri wasn't on any of them lul. So here is a simple study you can do right. A person takes a deck of playing cards, they put just one with a very lightly placed symbol of something holy, then another with a symbol of something evil. Then, you turn around they shuffled, then they place all the cards out, none have dents from the pen cuz thatd ruin the test, then you see which one is good and which is bad. If you do not get it its because you just imagined it, and its easy to test. That will prove it is psychological priming like I mentioned earlier. But to be safe statistically speaking you want to do it 30 or more times and record the results. You cannot change your mind about the symbols half way in if you get it wrong, they have to remain good or bad, and there should be a small quantity of them, like 1/52 is good and 1/52 is bad, so its alot more obvious and quick to reach results that are correct if you are correct, and to not redefine your results after as its cheating and a defense mechanism of coping. And the friend should shuffle it so they do not know where the cards are either. And shuffle thoroughly, and with a new set of cards or damages or bends could tell you. That is more sciencey, testing to find out and making sure it doesn't suffer problems that influence the outcome horribly. Like if you had to just shuffle 3 coins you could track it auditorily or with your eyes when they do so, even subconsciously, and there is a chance you get the odds higher as its 1/3 and if you say do 1/2 of the time it seems like its confirmed. Also body language of a friend could reveal answers and its easy to track if its 1/3 for example. Or a coin could be less shiny than its counter-parts or a different year. It has to be uniform.