36. That's the amount of views that my last blog post apparently received. Perhaps if I want to gain the attention of a larger audience, I shouldn't start off with a topic on a common cycle, because the thought of the ending inevitably being one of those "and everybody stopped giving a damn" tropes when the reader has skimmed through half of the paragraph obviously isn't entertaining. So what can I do? Feature a research paper from some university webpage so the reader can later interpret it as
Nearly a month ago, when I was discussing about a community that I have then believed to have abandoned its own morals, I didn't really put any thought to the fragility of the forum that I referred to as "A", and when I speak of fragility concerning forum communities, I often speak of how one little action could bring one community down, even when it's not as blatantly displayed as the moderator/admin actions on "B-1-4". It wasn't blatant at all, though. The closing of A was the result of apathy
Just found a reliable community with an owner I can trust to not be so unpredictable. I'll refer to this as A and owner as G, and I'll refer to the former forums as B and the owner as J. After so much arguing, I don't think I can reinstate common sense for J. How can someone be so forcibly well-intended to be successful that it results in the completely opposite and in fact total destruction of what remained of the late great members (Alright, I'm being a bit narcissistic here.) that fueled the
Don't ask me about this. Just go with it or do your own Googling. These comics may contain inside jokes within the 4chan/krautchan /int/ community as well as the subreddit dedicated to it, so there is a chance (Let's be real, you won't get it at all.) that you may not get the specific rules for it which are mainly decided in said subreddit.
These comics are meant to be satirical and inaccurate all in good fun.