Jump to content
Banner by ~ Wizard

TheEngineer

User
  • Posts

    307
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Interests
    Philosophy, history, writing, MLP, gaming, and thinking.

TheEngineer's Achievements

Butterfly

Butterfly (5/23)

188

Brohooves Received

  1. Oh come on guys, stop the punnishment! It's just tearing at the threads of my sanity!
  2. Hey look, buddy. I'm an Engineer. That means I solve problems. Not problems like what is beauty. Because that would fall within the purview of your conundrums of philosophy. I solve practical problems.

    1. TheEngineer

      TheEngineer

      Tis' fine! I'll be the philosophical engineer, you can be the practical engineer, and perhaps the cloppy engineer as well.

       

  3. It depends entirely on the context for me. When I'm watching the regular show, they are just cute and adorable as always! When I'm cuddling with my Twilight plush, they are also amazingly cute! But everyone once in a while...
  4. Both! I have good intentions in life and really enjoy helping people, but I do engage in some activities that some would consider "sinful" with absolutely no shame!
  5. Well, there's my ignorance for not owning one. My main issue with the WiiU is that it doesn't seem to be worth a purchase in terms of the games out for it. Also, I do have a bit of an issue with Nintendo stance on visuals not mattering as much as gameplay. How can one blame developers for wanting more artistic freedom in terms of realism and the smoothness of visuals in their games?
  6. There's quite a bit to say about this topic. I'm not sure anyone really hates Nintendo aside from the fanboys and Game Informer; but Nintendo has had a checkered history in recent times in terms of games and consoles they've released. In general, yes, though, gamers have been a bit harsh on Nintendo. The Wii was a great system. Sure, it paled in comparison when it comes to power, but if you are buying the Wii for power you aren't Nintendo's audience. The Wii was a fantastic creative system that had very little power usage, interesting controls that did work at times, and a decent library of games. People, however, looked in all the wrong places for good Wii games. I remember being disappointed with the lack of shooters until I played The Godfather: Blackhand Edition for the Wii which was unbelievable fun. It really was a blast running around and picking fist fights with people, and felt better than any fighter the 360 or PS3 could conjure up. Still, I sometimes wonder if people who played the Wii had ever bothered to play Super Paper Mario, Super Mario Galaxy, Super Mario Galaxy 2, Mario Kart, the Metroid Trilogy, or the numerous other first party games that rocked. Another department the Wii did well on was miscellaneous third party games that were genuinely a good time or unique. Endless Ocean was a game that really struck me with its beauty and relaxing music. In short, the Wii sucked....if you didn't know where to look. The other drawback, of course, was that good games didn't come out as often as they did with third parties working day and night on the other consoles. You also had to be patient. Now, with the WiiU, I do think that Nintendo has earned a lot of criticism. They've reverted back to a tablet format for the controller and I'm honestly tired of see tablets everywhere. The WiiU, also, while it is an improvement feels like just that. I was looking forward to a new direction but I honestly think Nintendo dropped the ball here. Still, though, there are some good games on the WiiU and, though it's still a bit expensive, it is right for certain people. With all of that said, though, I believe the reason Nintendo has been receiving so much flack is because the great games haven't been on their consoles as of late. The Last of Us, Spec Ops, Fallout, the Tales series, Bioshock, Dishonored, and many more aren't on the WiiU and it's a shame. Sure the WiiU gets the occasional port like Deus Ex and Batman Arkham City, but it's not the same as having a steady flow of new and groundbreaking games. The real reason Nintendo deserves some criticism is not bad hardware, it's because they've been leaning too much on their go-to franchises and not appealing enough to the developers of some truly monumental games. In all fairness, Microsoft doesn't do much either but they have a more powerful console and brand recognition which gets them instant developer recognition. Sony, to their credit, has become much more aggressive in trying to get developers onboard and coming up with new first party IPs. I would almost say that Sony has become the new Nintendo in terms of having a flood of great games on their console.
  7. We simply wish to have our philosophical views known, that's fair enough. Atheism/agnosticism/non-belief in general isn't a religion, but it does reflect various conclusions that can be profound much like the belief in a God can be something profound and philosophical to adherents to a religion.
  8. I hate to depart from the original post too much, but I have to disagree about chaos. Chaos is needed for change only when people do not see the intrinsic value in improving the human conditions without need but because we can benefit as individuals and as a whole.
  9. I voted that it was ok. The reason why and my main complaint is that the episode is largely pointless. The ponies in it don't really learn much about themselves or any real lesson. It's just sort of a crises and then another crises and then a resolution that has no real bearing on the characters themselves. Contrasting this to DragonShy illustrates many problems recent episodes have been facing. Many have no real point besides creating a problem and then having an adventure. In DragonShy, by contrast, there was an adventure but it wasn't forced (the crises made sense) and the lesson learned was a valuable one for Fluttershy; who had to confront in a very personal way a problem that she herself had. In all, the episode does well; but it doesn't have that same feel as do earlier episodes. It's important for the creators of MLP not to forget where the show began in seasons 1 and 2.
  10. Then I could simply adjust my topic to say, "Are Harmony and Celestia the real villains?" That would make more sense, I just used evil as in the context of the show.
  11. This is a theory of mine that I recently put together about the show. I would appreciate any feedback, especially if you can find holes in my argument. Criticism is always welcome! Chaos and evil are supposed to go hand in hand in Equestria. The Tree and Elements of Harmony both have been used to vanquish discord and restore the rule of Celestia and Luna which means that life is harmonious for Equestria. They oppose and have tamed Discord, who is supposed to represent the forces of Chaos. It seems so straightforward: Celestia is good and Discord evil. Well, it is straightforward, until you consider cutie marks. Cutie marks are symbols that tell a pony his or her destiny in the MLP universe. Most of what we know about them is positive and comes from Twilight and her friends. Still, what about those ponies who cutie marks remind them of a destiny set for them which isn't so positive after all? Consider Snips and Snails, the servants who work in Canterlot, or any pony whose cutie mark reminds them that their destiny is to do repetitive tasks all day long, every day. In the MLP universe they are imprisoned by destiny. Not only not are they recognized as not important by those marks, but they will be constrained by their destinies and constantly reminded of them. This isn't just one or two ponies, but probably hundreds or even thousands. Imagine how many ponies in the show have servant, labor, or other unfortunate positions in Equestria; that is a number far larger than Twilight and her companions. The nature of destiny in MLP is not expounded upon much, but it is clear enough that a force outside of the control of most ponies is responsible for it. Destiny or fate is, by definition, outside of one's control. This is why the Cutie Mark Crusaders, no matter how much they try, cannot force their cutie marks to appear. Can this force behind destiny and cutie marks really be benevolent when it sets a destiny for ponies who are forever trapped in a life of insignificance or suffering? At the very least, it is difficult to answer that question in the affirmative. If this force is malevolent then, who is responsible for it? Here, we reach the logical conclusion, the destiny of ponies is part of the grander schematic of Harmony or order. Only within the framework of order does every pony having a predetermined place in society make any sense. This is hinted at throughout the series as each pony, under Celestia's rule and the forces of harmony, is supposed to find their cutie mark which shows them their destiny. Therefore, though Celestia may not be at fault, the underlying forces of harmony certainly are and Celestia is invested in defending the status quo. Which side, then, is really evil? Is it not possible that the real injustice in Equestria stems from the force of Harmony itself; backed by royal sisters? In fact, we have had it backwards the entire time. While we looked to Celestia and Harmony for goodness, hundreds of ponies were saddled with destinies that doomed them to a life of insignificance and suffering. Indeed, as the ponies who have these cutie marks stayed in our blind spot, we also missed the only possibility of escape from this destiny: returning the world to it's natural uncertain state. Though Discord the character may have been selfish, the forces he represented are the only escape from a predetermined world in which ponies live as automatons to Celestia's order.
  12. I've always been a bit 50/50 on this sentiment. For me, yes, I prefer to stay away from that part of the fandom. I'm not against any kind of brony (unless they are hating on others, bullying, in which case I am more concerned about why they are doing it), still, as with any fanbase you are going to find really disturbing things. Personally, I like the idea of Equestria without homicidal Pinkie Pie or Fluttershy. For me, it is a peaceful place that shows a lot of the good that can come from our world like love and kindness. Some bronies have turned Equestria into an entirely adult world filled with war, violence, sex, and alcohol. That's not me, it never will be, I like to see the show as it is and smile when the ponies turn things around with kindness in most of the episodes. Still, if you don't like that part of the fandom, you just don't read their material, watch their youtube videos, or go into their chatrooms.
  13. Unfortunately, in today's materialist society, making money seems to be all that matters. In any case, I do mostly agree with you about the burden of taxation. /)
×
×
  • Create New...