Autistic Bronies (kinda) - Video

[Lonk Chase 255]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ri-T0ZuT_lM

 

Tada.

 

Give me your thoughts.

If you liked it, go onto YT and like it.

If you really liked it, go to my channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaNkpCoSD4MrXGRfuDt5Zjw) and subscribe. You'll probably see more of those types of videos soon.

 

Bye.

[Grepper 3,192]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ri-T0ZuT_lM

 

Tada.

 

Give me your thoughts.

If you liked it, go onto YT and like it.

If you really liked it, go to my channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaNkpCoSD4MrXGRfuDt5Zjw) and subscribe. You'll probably see more of those types of videos soon.

 

Bye.

 

I don't have any stats for what percentage of bronies have autism, nor am I a statistics expert.

Regardless, I have to disagree with your first point. The Herd Census estimated that 7 to 12.4 million people identify as bronies.

That is a large enough number to be compared accurately to the world population. (It's not as if four people in the entire world are bronies, and one is autistic.)

 

It seems as if you are claiming that fewer bronies are autistic in number than the number of autistic people in the general population, but that's misleading because the general population is much larger than the amount of bronies in the world. That's the whole point of percentages when comparing statistics.

 

If I misunderstood this point, my apologies.

 

I agree with your second point, though. It sounds like a good explanation.

 

The third point seems like an odd line of reasoning, unless you're trying to prove that most of the bronies into Rule 34 are autistic. I'm unaware of any way to prove this because no large survey asking bronies if they clop exists. I looked up autism and its relation to fetishism and found articles on it but no statistics on how many autistic people have fetishes compared to the general population.

 

Some advice for your speaking in future videos: I'd suggest reading from an edited script if you didn't, and speaking more clearly to make it easier to understand both the words you're saying (it was a bit hard to understand at times) and the point you're trying to get across.

Edited December 25, 2015 by Grepper

[Lonk Chase 255]

I don't have any stats for what percentage of bronies have autism, nor am I a statistics expert.

Regardless, I have to disagree with your first point. The Herd Census estimated that 7 to 12.4 million people identify as bronies.

That is a large enough number to be compared accurately to the world population. (It's not as if four people in the entire world are bronies, and one is autistic.)

 

It seems as if you are claiming that fewer bronies are autistic in number than the number of autistic people in the general population, but that's misleading because the general population is much larger than the amount of bronies in the world. That's the whole point of percentages when comparing statistics.

 

If I misunderstood this point, my apologies.

 

I agree with your second point, though. It sounds like a good explanation.

 

The third point seems like an odd line of reasoning, unless you're trying to prove that most of the bronies into Rule 34 are autistic. I'm unaware of any way to prove this because no large survey asking bronies if they clop exists. I looked up autism and its relation to fetishism and found articles on it but no statistics on how many autistic people have fetishes compared to the general population.

 

Some advice for your speaking in future videos: I'd suggest reading from an edited script if you didn't, and speaking more clearly to make it easier to understand both the words you're saying (it was a bit hard to understand at times) and the point you're trying to get across.

 0. I was just winging the narration. No editing except for point #3, where I replaced "a good sized portion of the fandom" or something like that to "a portion of the fandom" for obvious, obvious reasons. Sorry if the stuttering and lack of planning bothered you at all.

1. This video was a lot based on speculation and theories, so that was just a possibility. But hey, I used cool math!

2. That was actually a filler. :3

3. No, I wasn't. It was again a "possibility". I figured that one to be the most controversial, and I was right.

 

So yeah, very unprofessional, but hey, It was my first time doing it. I probably will remake this once I get into the roll of things, but for right now, I tried.

 

Thanks for the feedback.

Edited December 25, 2015 by lonkfania