Hey bro. I have a serious answer about this topic.

Vaccines are never created for prejudicial purposes, they are just a temporarily immunity boost.

Do you heard of Brazil in XIX century? Smallpox was messing around. Various other diseases too. WIthout the obligatory vaccination... You know.

Thanks Oswaldo Cruz.

I apologize for the really long comment. It is just that I have spent a lot of time researching this subject so I know some stuff. Feel free to ask me questions on some of my counters.

Vaccines don't cause neural damage. It just doesn't make any logical sense. The study that suggested that got thoroughly rebutted.

Herd immunity only works if over 92% of people are vaccinated. Currently it is at 91%. Yes some people who have been vaccinated can still catch the disease. Plus there are people that are allergic to the eggs in vaccines. That is why herd immunity is important.

There are people who can get sick, or even die from vaccines. However this number of people dying is under 1%. Compare that the fatality rate of measles which cause 2.3 million deaths per year before vaccines

The toxic additives are so small that they aren't actually toxic. The amount of mercury in vaccines is at such a low amount that are bodies get rid of it before it can cause any damage. Mercury is even in breast milk.

On the flip side, absolutely everything can be toxic in high enough dosages. Including water. Just google "Water toxicity" for more information.

Also 'theory' is the highest point a scientific idea can reach in science. For example, Gravity is still a theory. What you seem to think a theory is is actually a hypothesis. Which is basically a educated guess. While a theory is a heavily tested answer.

Unfortunately people are stupid regarding their bodies. We know that exercise is good for us, but how many people actually do it? We know that we shouldn't eat a lot of junk food, and yet people still eat to much junk food. The reason we have doctors is so that we can focus our decision making on other important things, instead of trying to learn what a doctor has spent over 50,000 hours of their life to learn. 

The reason we have politicians is so that they can make the decisions that will benefit the country as a whole, and not just the individual. What happens when millions of the population die because of measles. A disease that could have been prevented by vaccines that only have a failure rate of <1%? It is even in the "selfish" politicians best interest to keep the population alive and well. Otherwise they won't get as much money.

You said "just because you believe in something doesn't give you the right to force it on others". What happens when they know that vaccines work, but only when mostly everyone is vaccinated? There is a reason we don't have small pox or polio anymore, and the answer is vaccines. Back when vaccines first came out everyone got a shot. And lo and behold the disease is pretty much extinct now. Measles was the same way until parents started to refuse vaccinations.

Regarding whether or not it should be a choice. Say someone is walking down the street with a highly contagious disease. Would you rather him to continue walking. Potentially infecting everyone? Or quarantine him to his house so that he doesn't infect anyone?

I think it should be mandatory that if one should go into a public place they should have been vaccinated. If we stay at home all the time? Great don't get vaccinated. However, how likely is that for everyone?

However, I do agree that it should be a choice, a empathetic choice so that I don't harm anyone by being close to them. However, with the number of people required for vaccines to work properly. How can we be sure that everyone will make that choice?

One other point I think I should address. Vaccines won't weaken our immune system. Think of building muscle. does training muscles weaken them for when we need them? Maybe if you get into a fight right after training, but not if you have been training for weeks prior.

Here is a video explaining vaccines better than I could https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aNhzLUL2ys

I think its dumb not to get vaccinated.

But I still think it should be the parents choice (or yours if youre old enough) to get one. Government shouldnt be in chsrge of what medicines are put in our kid's bodies :/

I think media should encourage immunizing kids, and doctors should tell the parent what the risks are if they choose not to, so they dont focus on the small chances of what bad could happen if they do.

The toxic additives are so small that they aren't actually toxic. The amount of mercury in vaccines is at such a low amount that are bodies get rid of it before it can cause any damage. Mercury is even in breast milk.

Mercury through a shot enters the bloodstream directly bypassing the normal bodily filtration systems that the Mercury would otherwise go through if it was ingested instead of injected. In addition your average vaccine has 51 parts per million which is 25,000 times the safe recommended level in drinking water set by the EPA and your average child is being subjected to dozens of these shots throughout their childhood.

Unfortunately people are stupid regarding their bodies. We know that exercise is good for us, but how many people actually do it? We know that we shouldn't eat a lot of junk food, and yet people still eat to much junk food. The reason we have doctors is so that we can focus our decision making on other important things, instead of trying to learn what a doctor has spent over 50,000 hours of their life to learn. 

It is true that some people make irresponsible choices but does that mean there should be laws banning junk food and forcing people to exercise? We already have restrictions and even bans on trans fats in some cities and the ban on the sale of sodas larger than 16 ounces in New York City so why not go all the way and just make the government dictate everything everyone can say, do, eat and drink? Also there are a lot of doctors that are on the take and since the medical school are being hijacked by pharmaceutical companies have been outright brain washed on a lot of things.

The reason we have politicians is so that they can make the decisions that will benefit the country as a whole, and not just the individual. What happens when millions of the population die because of measles. A disease that could have been prevented by vaccines that only have a failure rate of <1%? It is even in the "selfish" politicians best interest to keep the population alive and well. Otherwise they won't get as much money.

Yes but there are some decisions which they have no business making like personal medical decisions for example. I keep hearing all this talk about how everyone will take vaccines if they are not required but have you ever considered that one reason more and more people might be refusing to take these vaccines is actually a backlash from them being increasingly forced on people as well concerns being completely and totally ignored and tossed aside? If you treat people like children and not allow them to make their own choices than you get a self fulfilling prophecy of people who are so utterly dependent and sheep like that they can't make their own choices.

Mercury through a shot enters the bloodstream directly bypassing the normal bodily filtration systems that the Mercury would otherwise go through if it was ingested instead of injected. In addition your average vaccine has 51 parts per million which is 25,000 times the safe recommended level in drinking water set by the EPA and your average child is being subjected to dozens of these shots throughout their childhood.

And drinking water also contains 666,666 parts per million of Hydrogen, going by that same logic. But of course, that's not how chemistry works at all. Vaccines USED TO contain thimerosal, a chemical compound that is part-mercury. Elements such as mercury lose all of their properties when they become part of a chemical compound, which is why we don't die of chlorine poisoning when we eat salt, or go up like the Hindenburg after ingesting all that hydrogen in water.

There are some mercury compounds out there that have been linked to problems (there is one in tuna in FAR higher doses that was linked to birth defects), but thimerosal, at least in the dose given, is not one.

It is true that some people make irresponsible choices but does that mean there should be laws banning junk food and forcing people to exercise? We already have restrictions and even bans on trans fats in some cities and the ban on the sale of sodas larger than 16 ounces in New York City so why not go all the way and just make the government dictate everything everyone can say, do, eat and drink? 

 

Children should be children, not plague rats.

I am of the mindset that you should be the master of your own body, but this has an extent. I believe you should be allowed to gorge yourself on fatty foods, booze, tobacco, marijuana, cocaine, and even methamphetamine if that is your wish. If you are only affecting yourself, then I believe there is no reason to ban or even fiercely regulate a practice.

Vaccines not only affect you, they affect your children, your family, your friends, your neighbors, and everybody breathing your air. It is a deadly serious matter, and one which, if left to democracy, would be left to the stupidest individuals in the population.

Also there are a lot of doctors that are on the take and since the medical school are being hijacked by pharmaceutical companies have been outright brain washed on a lot of things.

 

I'm not touching this.

Yes but there are some decisions which they have no business making like personal medical decisions for example. I keep hearing all this talk about how everyone will take vaccines if they are not required but have you ever considered that one reason more and more people might be refusing to take these vaccines is actually a backlash from them being increasingly forced on people as well concerns being completely and totally ignored and tossed aside? If you treat people like children and not allow them to make their own choices than you get a self fulfilling prophecy of people who are so utterly dependent and sheep like that they can't make their own choices.

 

This may be true, but if people are going to act like sheep and bah at every discredited study and pseudoscience clickbait, then they might need to be herded like sheep.

I know you don't trust government, and that's fine. It's a healthy attitude to be skeptical, but this goes both ways. Anti-government groups, more often than not, are far worse than the governing body they oppose. They prey on the gullible and easily validated, and use this misplaced trust to convince them of horrible, dangerous lies.

I'm not saying you should eat up every word the government says. Be skeptical. The government has certainly lied in the past. But anti-government and conspiracy theorist groups lie nearly every time they open their mouths. They are, without compare, the greater of two evils. They are not to be trusted in any way.

Mercury through a shot enters the bloodstream directly bypassing the normal bodily filtration systems that the Mercury would otherwise go through if it was ingested instead of injected. In addition your average vaccine has 51 parts per million which is 25,000 times the safe recommended level in drinking water set by the EPA and your average child is being subjected to dozens of these shots throughout their childhood.

The mercury found in vaccines comes exclusively from a compound known as thiomersal (thimerosal for us folks in the U.S.) which is used as a preservative. To quote the CDC, "Since 2001, with the exception of some influenza (flu) vaccines, thimerosal is not used as a preservative in routinely recommended childhood vaccines."

So even if most of the vaccines your kid would be getting don’t contain mercury, what about those that do? Well, they’re fine too. Lemme show ya why.

In the body thimerosal breaks into the compound ethylmercury. Ethylmercury sounds kinda exotic and scary, but in truth not only is it less toxic than methyl- and elemental mercury, it also gets removed from the body at a significantly higher rate and does not accumulate like other mercuric substances do. So what about this whole “higher than the safe recommended level in drinking water” business? Well, most of the people I know don’t receive an influenza vaccine anywhere near as often as they drink water or take a shower, so comparing mercury levels between the vaccines and the water is analogous to comparing a household fire alarm to a CT scan. To elaborate on that, both are radioactive and both are safe, the differences between the two being how much radiation is emitted and exposure time. A fire alarm constantly emits very very low levels of radiation, while a CT scan delivers at a rate roughly 100,000 times higher over a fairly short period of time. If you stood directly next to your fire alarm for a whole day or you had a 15 minute CT scan done, both would leave you irradiated to a safe extent. However, if your fire alarm put out radiation at the same rate as a CT scanner it would be tremendously bad for you. Similarly, mercury in drinking water has a chance to build up as more and more water is consumed. This is not true with a flu shot as it’s a yearly one-and-done deal. Long story short, as long as you and/or your kid are not getting vaccinated for the flu on a weekly or daily basis, you should be fine.

Funnily enough, thimerosal is also found in cosmetics, where it is limited to 65 ppm. Due to international restrictions it can only be used in cosmetics designed for use around the eyes. Now I want you to think about that for a little bit. Shouldn't you probably be more leery of mascara than flu shots?

Really, I see almost no reason why parents shouldn't get their children vaccinated for polio, whooping cough, tetanus, and some of the other more severe viral diseases. After all, these illnesses affect children and the elderly most commonly and severely, and some of them are really nasty. 

Mercury through a shot enters the bloodstream directly bypassing the normal bodily filtration systems that the Mercury would otherwise go through if it was ingested instead of injected. In addition your average vaccine has 51 parts per million which is 25,000 times the safe recommended level in drinking water set by the EPA and your average child is being subjected to dozens of these shots throughout their childhood.

 Vaccines actually don't contain mercury anymore, aside from the flu shot which contains ethylmercury. Even though it is still mercury it won't stay in the bloodstream as you suggest. Also the bloodstream has great filtration in the form of kidneys and liver.

Here is a description as to why:

It is true that some people make irresponsible choices but does that mean there should be laws banning junk food and forcing people to exercise? We already have restrictions and even bans on trans fats in some cities and the ban on the sale of sodas larger than 16 ounces in New York City so why not go all the way and just make the government dictate everything everyone can say, do, eat and drink? Also there are a lot of doctors that are on the take and since the medical school are being hijacked by pharmaceutical companies have been outright brain washed on a lot of things.

Medicine is hard. Like, really hard. It takes many months to develop a new drug. When they do find one they discover that it causes fatigue as well as cure whatever symptom. Pharmaceutical companies test their drugs for a really long time. Before making it to human trials. It just takes too long, and it is really expensive to find a effective drug. They may want to make money, but so does everyone else. They need money to research new drugs, and if these companies didn't exist we probably wouldn't have any of the actual life-saving drugs.

Yes but there are some decisions which they have no business making like personal medical decisions for example. I keep hearing all this talk about how everyone will take vaccines if they are not required but have you ever considered that one reason more and more people might be refusing to take these vaccines is actually a backlash from them being increasingly forced on people as well concerns being completely and totally ignored and tossed aside? If you treat people like children and not allow them to make their own choices than you get a self fulfilling prophecy of people who are so utterly dependent and sheep like that they can't make their own choices.

That's true we don't want sheeple, but where should the line be drawn?

What should or shouldn't be regulated? Honestly banning unvaccinated kids from schools makes sense. As they are just telling them if they want to go here they need to follow the rules. Not a mandatory shot, just a hoop to jump through to make sure that the other kids stay safe.

I’m pro choice. everyone should be free to choose  decide for themselves. 
 

however I’m also pro Solid information and concrete proof and let the public be well informed before they decide. I strongly feel people should seriously do their research and find out if it’s safe. Because just like any drug there will always be side effects.  Know what your getting into before you dive into the jab

Wasn’t the whole point of a vaccine to prevent you from catching a virus.

the “ My vaccine will only work if everyone gets vaccines too” makes zero sense. Wasn’t the point behind getting the jab to protect you from the non vaccine people roaming out there?

Will i get the covid 19 Jab hell no Why because since when did the worlds greatest and most deadly pandemic ever  to shut down an entire planet.  Magically roll out a vaxapalloza celebration with free entertainment. Perks, prizes and who knows you might be the the next jabbed millionaire. 
 

It boggles my mind how people flock to join the jab party. Especially  since prior Vaccines never had such a massive wide palibicity of popularity. How come this was not done for the SARS or the Swine flu, how about AIDS and more. 
 

someting is fishery especially with all the popularity hype over this Covid Jabs.