-
Posts
2,860 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Character Archive
Frequently Asked Questions
Equestrian Empire Character Archive
Golden Oaks Memorial Library
Pony Roleplay Characters
Events
Blogs
Status Replies posted by Frostgage
-
Soon...the anime returns.
-
Soon...the anime returns.
-
Hi sir have you heard of this bundle
It's 1500 games for 5 bucks with all proceeds going to charity
Some of the games are usually worth 25 bucks by themselves so it's about 8000 dollars worth of content
I don't know if you're the gamer type but even if you're not there's a bunch of game creation tools and tilesets in there too to give extra bang for your exceedingly few bucks
-
Hi sir have you heard of this bundle
It's 1500 games for 5 bucks with all proceeds going to charity
Some of the games are usually worth 25 bucks by themselves so it's about 8000 dollars worth of content
I don't know if you're the gamer type but even if you're not there's a bunch of game creation tools and tilesets in there too to give extra bang for your exceedingly few bucks
-
-
Soon...the anime returns.
-
Soon...the anime returns.
-
Hi sir have you heard of this bundle
It's 1500 games for 5 bucks with all proceeds going to charity
Some of the games are usually worth 25 bucks by themselves so it's about 8000 dollars worth of content
I don't know if you're the gamer type but even if you're not there's a bunch of game creation tools and tilesets in there too to give extra bang for your exceedingly few bucks
-
Let's start from the null hypothesis that the game does not make players cry, i.e. the proportion of criers is 0 --> ρ = 0.00
Is the true population proportion significantly greater than 0?
Sample proportion = .1, Standard deviation = .0474
z = (.1 - 0)/.0474 = 2.11. Assuming a normal distribution, this corresponds to a cumulative probability of .9826 (probability of observing a proportion less than the one we sampled, if our null hypothesis is true).
1 - .9826 = .0174. (Note: since our proposed population proportion is 0, data can only fall to the right of it i.e. be greater than it, so I think that we need to double this figure to utilize the normal distribution appropriately. But I'm not certain) --> .0174*2 = .0348
Using a 5% level of significance: .0348 < .05, so we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the game does indeed make players cry
-
-
Hi sir have you heard of this bundle
It's 1500 games for 5 bucks with all proceeds going to charity
Some of the games are usually worth 25 bucks by themselves so it's about 8000 dollars worth of content
I don't know if you're the gamer type but even if you're not there's a bunch of game creation tools and tilesets in there too to give extra bang for your exceedingly few bucks
-
-
Hi sir have you heard of this bundle
It's 1500 games for 5 bucks with all proceeds going to charity
Some of the games are usually worth 25 bucks by themselves so it's about 8000 dollars worth of content
I don't know if you're the gamer type but even if you're not there's a bunch of game creation tools and tilesets in there too to give extra bang for your exceedingly few bucks
-
-
This ALSO reminds me of something that I just learned
In yesterday's lecture for my statistics class I learned that people using the normal distribution to try and measure the stock market contributed to the 2008 crisis. While the range of potential daily outcomes looks pretty close to a bell curve, this distribution it dramatically underestimates the frequency of days that are several standard deviations below the mean. So people were caught off guard when they had several very bad days which caused them to panic which caused other people to panic which caused... well you know how these things go
People always joke about statistics being lies but it's just humans that screw up interpreting them (sometimes deliberately sometimes not)
-
-
-
Hi sir have you heard of this bundle
It's 1500 games for 5 bucks with all proceeds going to charity
Some of the games are usually worth 25 bucks by themselves so it's about 8000 dollars worth of content
I don't know if you're the gamer type but even if you're not there's a bunch of game creation tools and tilesets in there too to give extra bang for your exceedingly few bucks
-
-
-
What a year. And we're not even halfway through it lol
-
What a year. And we're not even halfway through it lol
-
What a year. And we're not even halfway through it lol
-
What a year. And we're not even halfway through it lol
-
What a year. And we're not even halfway through it lol
-
sovietwave is now my new favourite aesthetic
kinda makes me wanna learn russian
-
Frosty I have a problem
It is a bad problem and very not good
The sentence "the smallest positive integer not definable in under sixty letters" defines a positive integer in under sixty letters
-
Very interesting stuff indeed. My thoughts relate to our earlier discussion of the signs of numbers. The linguistic/written content used to express numerical concepts is an arbitrary structure created by humans, best evidenced by the fact that 12, twelve, dozen, XII, doce, etc. all mean the same thing depending on your time and place in history. However, for example, Sir Newton did not decide that the derivative of the concept expressed by "3x^2" equals 6x, he merely discovered it to be true. I can't speak to other universes which I have not yet visited, but I'm willing to put my trust in this mathematical relationship holding true in ours.
-