I'm glad it gave you that much joy, and I appreciate your understanding. Your take on the analysis community, though, reminds me of when I first saw Pirates of the Caribbean 3, before I was any kind of critic. I really wanted it to be good, and right up to the credits, I kept trying to put a good face on everything that happened. But after years of never going out of my way to watch it and turning glum every time I did, I wasn't sorry to start considering the idea that it's okay to want for better, that you could instead cope with disappointment by thinking about what could/should have been improved. It's great to be able to enjoy something, even with its flaws. But if everything's "great," then basically, nothing is. With everything there is to see, I'd rather not be watching something just because it's on.
I get that deliberately stepping back to think about something while you're watching it can hurt the experience, and I get that some critics come across as though that's exactly what happened. Personally, I think the way to go is to react first and analyze that reaction after. (I'm sure I seemed like a guy out for blood in this one, but even now, after 4 1/2 seasons, I still haven't given enough flat-out negative reviews to fill up a "10 worst" list.) But even critics you don't agree with can have value, helping you think out why you liked something they didn't or vice-versa. It's all a way to explore something you're interested in a little more.
To answer your question, yes, I do think that having to fit stories like these into 1 part episodes can make it harder for the writers. But any story can be done well. Editing, compressing, and reworking are also skills that go into being a writer, and it wouldn't be fair to the episodes that have pulled off larger scale stories to say that it somehow can't be messed up anyway, because it's "too hard." I do think it means trade-offs, like higher risk and higher reward when you succeed or some of the blame going to whoever decided the story only warranted 1 episode. But I don't think that means anything they come up with is okay.