Jump to content
Banner by ~ Ice Princess Silky

NostalgicPony

User
  • Posts

    466
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NostalgicPony

  1. Lol, the world full of lesbians and gays would not survive to the point in which they develop technology needed in order to develop the systems in which we have now. There would be no sperm bank because we would all die off. We all came from cavemen. Imagine them all being gay. They wouldn't last at all. The species would go extinct because no one would make babies. They, in this sense, "broken."

     

    Hence why such a hypothetical is nonsense and has such a low percentage of ever happening in the world. However it is still possible with such technology in regards to giving females the oppertunity with male sperm donors to be injected to become fertile and people would be reproduced and with the chances of it not being Homosexual would still happen. But really, I highly doubt our world would result in just only Gay's and Lesbians since of course, there is such a mix diversity of sexuality out there, it is always changing rampant.

  2. Lets try taking it to the extremes.

     

    In World A everyone is gay or lesbian.

     

    In World B nobody is gay or lesbian.

     

    What do you think the conditions (regarding reproduction) of the two worlds would be?

     

    If I had to guess, I would say that World A is going to have a big reproduction problem while World B would not. Do you disagree? I'm interested to see what you have to say on this.

     

    I'm sure there will always be an initiative to continue the human race. Of course you're giving rather vague hypothetical situations seeing that I can highly doubt seeing a world with only Gays and Lesbians as opposed to one world where everyone is assumed Heterosexual. We also have technology, and with that we have sperm donor banks and artificial wombs. Also Gay and Lesbian couples would want to seek children to raise, so their option is sperm donor and artificial wombs, etc. You can call this unnatural I suppose, but it is possible in your hypothetical example.

     

    But I'm rather confused with your objective approach, you claim those that are inclined to love someone of a gender or person that is incompatible of engaging in reproductive intercourse is broken. But what if sex is not the main component in a relationship? I know I see it that way at the moment, I rather just love someone for who they are and not get involved with sexual intercourse. Do I control that though? Most likely not, I cannot force myself to have sex if it does not appeal to me. Does that qualify me as " broken " ? Maybe if someone was a Eugenicist and looking for the able man and thought that sure, not to point fingers at you though.

     

    Truth is, we all have these odd subjective standards of what is " broken ", as Stryker has stated, Humanity has many broken elements that most of us can't control or we voluntarily engage in. Someone with Autism may have some mental deficiencies, but does that make them broken and not perfect? After all, many brilliant scientists and mathematicians had Autism and the like and outnumbered many groups of non-Autistic academic individuals, but even them too are not broken because they cannot grasp the high standard that these Autistic intellectuals have.

     

    So really, even if you think many of us are " broken " because either we cannot reproduce to save the worlds population and continue what mother nature had created for us, what about the other natural aspects of humans? What about discrimination? we are naturally prone to choose one over the other, but we cry out to others to stop discriminating because it is immoral, or what about our rather repulsive greedy reflexes us humans have? we are born with free will and self-determination and we have our own self-interests even if it results in greed that affects others. Would we be broken for not discriminating or choosing not to be greedy since it is out of line of what humans tend to do? Just like reproductive intercourse, even though we are built to have the opportunity to do so, are we supposed to under natural standards? I guess that depends on the individual's self-interest of how the natural mind and the natural environment molds.

     

    Of course I'm not offended by your remarks, don't get me wrong. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my bones. But I just wanted to get my popular opinion out to shed another perspective on the matter.

  3. Yeah, it kinda just confirms what I thought and perhaps didn't quite relay with the color analogy.

    It's bit tricky as some consider pansexuality to be the default state from which the rest spans, some consider it to be subset of bisexuality, some consider it to be made up definition along with polysexulity and omnisexuality (some or most consider it synonymous to pansexuality)... And when the psychologists (sexuologists) can't really agree, then I guess it's fair to say it comes down to personal opinions.

    Either way, I have said "I think that one should embrace love (emotional and/or physical), no matter where it comes from, when it it mutual." so I guess that by most of the definitions would actually make me pansexual, no?

     

    Well, Polysexuality is where your attracted to most form of sexualities as opposed to a Pansexual who is completely gender blind, we could say its similar, but not completely the same. The same applies to Omnisexuality. Basically, Omni/Poly's see gender and sexuality has an large element in relationships, whereas Pansexuals don't and often ignores peoples sexuality or biological sex and just loves someone from the inside of who they are. Explaining a Pansexual's love nature is hard to explain sometimes. :P

     

    I guess you could say you are a Pansexual, it depends if you don't love them because of their gender or sexuality (aka gender blind), otherwise maybe. But that's a concrete love philosophy that I wholeheartedly support anyways.

  4. Sounds to me like someone just wanted to add something special looking to their sexual identity, because it still sounds pretty much the same to me. Again, no offense to anyone.

    It just looks to me like  

    A: "I like blue color."  B: "Yeah, but I like panblue color, meaning I like blue in all it's shades!"  A: "Yeah, that's what I said."

     

    Not quite. The difference between a Bisexual and a Pansexual is that a Bisexual is attracted to the male gender and the female gender, a Pansexual on the other hand does not see gender as a element in a relationship or attraction. They often disregard genders as a barrier and often loves someone more based around their character rather then the more physical gender attributes of someone aka genitalia, breasts, etc. A Pansexual could really careless about that and would rather just cuddle the person and love them.

     

    This video may help explain things better:

     

    • Brohoof 1
  5. The Avalanches are AMAZING. One of my favorite groups on Modular Records (along with Tame Impala and Wolfmother) But these guys have brought up a new and unique way of producing music through a synchronized process. That is why listening to the album Since I Left You is better when you listen to the whole part because every song connects with each other through out the album.

     

    Since I Left You and Run DNA are my favorite songs, along with a few others.

  6. By "sexually attracted" I mean, well this is hard to explain, uhm, I feel "pulled" towards them and I really like him or her, but like I said, wouldn't ever want to have sex with that person. The "attraction" is there, but I just don't want more than that.

     

    Your somewhat like me. Even though I don't find sex disgusting, I just don't seem appealed to it. That is why images like pornography are not a huge turn on for me and I often avoid looking at them. However, I'm still attracted to people on different levels rather then for the sex.

    • Brohoof 1
  7. 2) I think gays are similar to people who have cancer, it is a disease because they are abnormal to how the body should be. Why do I think this about gays? well loving another man is obviously an abnormality because two men can't reproduce. Just like cancer patients, I don't treat them any different than anyone else.

     

    I'm just really curious but what is your view on Pansexuality and Pansexuals? I mean, they don't love people because of their gender, but they love them for their self-character/personality mostly. Do you think that's cancerous as well?

  8. Well, I don't really have many but here goes..

     

    1. I strongly dislike intolerance/hate, I mean it is okay to dislike something and have boundaries and all, but it irks me to see people spread pure ignorance and hate among others and target them as an attempt to ruin their life and make it hell for them. To me, hating on someone or something is just pure negativity that is unnecessary and only damages your self-character and others around you. Everything ought to be approached with some sense of reasoning before harsh judgement. I have nothing against people that do hate and are intolerant though, but it just bothers me sometimes.

     

    2. I strongly dislike drugs and alcohol as well as smoking. I have nothing against people that consume them and I have no intention on creating or being associated with campaigns to make it illegal and what not, I may support the notion to quit and live a sober and straight edge life, but it's not on my agenda right now. Not everyone that consumes these kinds of substances are bad and can still live on successfully in life, but I would prefer to stay sober n such.

     

    3. I dislike coercion and control, everyone should live their life the way they want without much interference. Live by the golden rule and the non-aggression axiom and you should be able to life your life the way you want it.

     

    4. Gender Roles, again, people should be able to love and enjoy what they like and desire, even if its something unusual to someone else. As long as it isint harming anyone else, it's completely fine. There is no need to judge them negativity or think of them any different. Live and let live.

    • Brohoof 1
  9. My all time favorite war film is Letters From Iwo Jima, a Eastwood masterpiece along with Flags Of Our Fathers. Der Untergang is also a international masterpiece. And Grave Of The Fireflies is the most powerful anime war film ever that I have watched.

     

    Others include:

     

    • Joyeux Noel
    • Pearl Harbor
    • Valykire
    • Saving Private Ryan
    • Band Of Brothers TV series is also good
    • Das Boot
    • U-571
    • Patton
    • Flyboys
    • Red Tails
    • Winter in Wartime
    • Platoon
    • The Boy In The Striped Pajamas
    • Schindler's List
    • Tora! Tora! Tora!
    • Brothers
    • Empire Of The Sun
    • Barefoot Gen
    • Hart's War
    • The Pianist
    • Defiance
    • Miracle at St. Anna

     

    Those are all my favorites so far..

  10. 7/10

     

    Now for some nostalgia..

     

    Note: This is a fanmade video for the song along with some audio edits of the voices.

     

     

    The original song name is Poppy Seed (Reprise), it was a remix done by Boards Of Canada for Slag Boom Van Loon.

  11. I think market globalization is good for the world economy and actually does help impoverished nations.

     

    There is nothing wrong with polyamory.

     

    Compersion is a great.

     

    I think Pansexuality is unique, since it strongly stresses loving someone for who they are rather than what they are.

     

    The state should not permit the death penalty since it involves the state initiating violence and aggression against the individual.

     

    Restorative Justice is more efficient then state sanctioned penalties.

     

    Employers should not be penalized for hiring immigrants that are illegal, it is their choice to hire.

     

    I am not a big fan of dubstep.

     

    Tolerance is a great virtue.

     

    Nostalgia is amazing.

    • Brohoof 3
×
×
  • Create New...