Here's my point of view of analysis; very little of it is entertainment, mostly opinionated. That's why it's an analysis, because they analyze roughly in​ mainly their perspective and how they interpret something. Unfortunately, some people take this show a bit too seriously. Would be nice to have some entertaining analyzers.

Here's my point of view of analysis; very little of it is entertainment, mostly opinionated. That's why it's an analysis, because they analyze roughly in​ mainly their perspective and how they interpret something. Unfortunately, some people take this show a bit too seriously. Would be nice to have some entertaining analyzers.

Exactly why it's important to be a bit tongue-and-cheek about this. It's a kid's show about horses. It's, like, the definition of stuff that you don't take seriously.

Sure, between the two I prefer people why try to be entertaining than opinionated(to me the former makes them feel more genuine and shows they just want to have fun, whereas the latter often just feels robotic, or they try to sound smart...), but personally the best reviewers/analysts are the ones that go both ways, they try to inform people but still try to be fun and entertaining, which is why I prefer people like Silver-Quill and Caddicarus among others