Jump to content
Banner by ~ Discord The Overlord

Dsanders

User
  • Posts

    2,600
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Dsanders last won the day on October 26 2013

Dsanders received the most brohooves!

About Dsanders

  • Birthday 1995-07-23

Title

  • Title
    Shunset Sheeeemar

Contact Methods

  • deviantART
    cassandrastarxsandos

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

MLP Forums

  • Favorite Forum Section
    Everfree Forest

Recent Profile Visitors

223,885 profile views

Dsanders's Achievements

Griffon

Griffon (16/23)

5.8k

Brohooves Received

Single Status Update

See all updates by Dsanders

  1. *sighs* I have to take elementary algebra for the next two years. That assessment test was poorly laid out and despite studying a lot of Geometry, there was hardly any questions about that on the test. I studied in all the wrong areas ... complete bullcrap. FML

    1. Show previous comments  11 more
    2. Dsanders

      Dsanders

      Well the last problem makes sense now. Thanks for the help. Is the "multiply by numerator and divide by denominator" rule applicable for simplifying any multiplication problem involving a fraction and whole number? For example, would the same method work if it was 5/9(67)? That would equal 37.2 and that would be correct right?

    3. SasQ

      SasQ

      Multiplication is just a list of factors. Some of those factors can be inverses (or parts of a whole). The denominator of a fraction usually collects all those inverses under the division bar, and all the non-inverted numbers (wholes) over the bar. So 5/9×67 is (5)(/9)(67). And as long as multiplication is commutative, you can reorder those factors whatever you please, eg. shift all inverses to the end of the list: (5)(67)(/9), which is 5×67/9.

    4. SasQ

      SasQ

      67 is prime, so you cannot factor it any further, and the fraction 5×67/9 or 335/9 is irreducible. But 9 fits into it 37 whole times, so you can put it as (9×37 + 2)/9 and then split as 9×37/9 + 2/9 which is the same as 37×9/9 + 2/9, and this simplifies to 37 + 2/9 (37 wholes and 2 ninth parts of the remainder). If it were 2/10, then you could write 37.2, but since it's 2/9, it is actually 37.222222... or 37.(2) (a repeating decimal).

×
×
  • Create New...