Veronica The Miffvixen

1. The reason I stated the term as such is because pansexual implies there is more than two sexes. Which... isn't the case, as biology points out. 2. The comparison I was trying to convey was that of the dysphoric nature of the two. The two have differing causes, but they have a similar progression (A good comparison is stating them as being two fugues built on similar counterpoint, but in different keys). And note that traits can widely vary in occurence. However, I have reason to believe you may be including homosexuality caused by choice (Yes, I've seen cases of it), homosexuality by mental illness (When you see what can happen to the mind when someone is mentally ill, polarization of your attraction standards isn't farfetched at all), and homosexuality by hormone issues (Which is surprisingly prevalent). 3. I choose not to experience sexual attraction. When I desire to feel such, I will resume experiencing it. People don't seem to understand the concept of choice all that well these days...

1. Panamourous = Bisexual. Whilst bisexual that means being attracted to either SEX, any one of the weird classifications people decided to make up is a different matter. Panamourous would be the state of being attracted to all forms of GID classification (and the standard gender identities). So you would be Panamourous bisexual. 2. To be honest, I don't know why they removed it. Its manifestation and seems to be remarkably similar to hypersexuality, though not necessarily so drastic. It would be a type of Amoural Identity Dysphoria, truthfully. What supports this is the paucity of homosexuals compared to heterosexuals. Were it chance or trait-bound, the incidence rate would be far higher, the total number of LGB adherents would be much greater, and it wouldn't have been something that experienced an inexplicable and mysterious explosion in growth over the last century or so (Though Autism spectrum disorders had this case, theories are presented as to why). 3. Nope, I'd be asexual. I'd choose to be. The fantastic thing about all emotion and feeling? I can either accept it or ignore it. If I shot a person up with the right chemicals, I could make them horny as hell or kill their sex drive. The chemicals that drive attraction are powerful and can be synthesized with ease.

1. Oh, I forgot about asexuality. Okay, so, straight, gay, bi, and asexual. Four roads. That's plenty of choices. You don't need any more. 2. Just because someone believes they are something, it doesn't mean they are that. I could believe I'm actually an anthropomorphic fox's soul stuck in a human body, but that doesn't make it true. Besides, GID is listed in the DSM-IV, and the DSM-V will list Gender Dysphoria. Believe it or not, this can be beneficial for transgenders, as it gives them protection from discrimination, can cover gender-reassignment surgeries (insurance-wise), among other things. In short, they're best off with it classified as a mental illness, because it grants many benefits that most lobbyists overlook. Here's a document on the nature of GID in the DSM-IV: http://www.aclu.org/files/images/asset_upload_file155_30369.pdf 3. People, in a sense, do. Say I have lesbian thoughts. That's all fine and dandy. But whether or not I choose to acknowledge those thoughts is up to me. I can choose asexuality, the magical fourth road you pointed out. And lo, I have made a decision not to like that gender.

Here's how biology works: There are two valid chromosome setups for determining sex, XX and XY. No YY or YX. Biology states it as binary. Either you're attracted to an XX or and XY, or you get lazy and say "Both. Because why the hell not?". No fourth road for the people who don't like those options, sorry. And yes, a decision is required. Just because you have feelings for a person doesn't mean jack crap. Only when you actually act on them does it matter. And guess what? In order to act on it, you have to DECIDE to act on it. We aren't automatonic, we have to choose to do things. And choosing to ignore or acknowledge your feelings? That's one of those choices.

Veronica approves. Funny, I would have thought I wouldn't be the only girl to brohoof you on that by now.

Events have happened leaving me as an "unsure" now. I'm considering going full asexual. Truthfully, the very concept of love is really starting to bore me. Mainly because it's either made into something vile and carnal, or it's made into something saccharhine, pathetic, and meaningless. More and more, I just see kids either seeing life as some "experiment" or they'll be quick to say they are either bi/pan (the reason normally being them being too lazy to actually decide, given clear choices) or that they're straight/gay, but not fully so (Which means they either DON'T know what they really want or that they are those annoying people who try to make up new orientations to feel special). And then you have people who will choose whatever odd term they can imagine to describe their orientation, because apparently they can't find any other way to feel special and different. Perhaps love once had a meaning to people. Perhaps it was more than an action or a disgustingly saccharhine thought at some point. But I really don't know how far back I have to spin a clock to reach that point. Bottom line, I'm not going to waste my life pursuing what people have succeeded in making pointless. Perhaps I'm venting because I'm tired, or because, concerning love, everyone seems to be either a prick or a moron. Who knows, who cares? I assure you, I don't.

Because why not? The first is The Honour of The Duel: The second is unnamed:

You have limbs. It's like a high five, but you approach from the sides and slap across.

It was between "broyiff" and "yiffslap". The second sounds easier.

*broyiff*

UNLIMITED!

I just realized... *LES GASPS* This makes me Darth Sidious! UNLIMITED POWER!