The Banned Game

[rmlpwny 12]

Banned because that statement spawns a paradox. If anything can happen, than it is impossible for something to be impossible. But if nothing can be impossible, then that means that this statement is flawed, which means that things can be impossible, which means that the first conclusion of "it is impossible for something to be imposible" is sound logic, which validates the saying "anything is possible", which starts the whole accursed cycle over again.

[Dsanders 5,747]

Banned because the below statement is true.

 

The above statement is false.

[Milk Wave 454]

Banned cuz i'm 5 months pregnant ;3

[rmlpwny 12]

Banned cuz i'm 5 months pregnant ;3

If that's true, banned beause you shouldn't be worrying about things like this, and congratulations!

If that's hypothetical, then banned because that isn't true.

[Dsanders 5,747]

@, 

Banned because that is amazing! 

 

Banned because you've broken the chain to what would of been an awesome paradoxical discussion..

 

 

 

And banned because @@rmlpwny, just brought it back! yay for paradoxes

Edited July 13, 2013 by Dsanders17

[rmlpwny 12]

Banned because that is amazing! 

 

Banned because you've broken the chain to what would of been an awesome paradoxical discussion..

 

oh well haha 

Banned because you can't ban someone twice without unbanning them!

[Dsanders 5,747]

Your on...

 

You are not not not not not not banned.

 

Are you banned or not?

[rmlpwny 12]

Your on...

 

You are not not not not not not banned.

 

Are you banned or not?

Even negatives cancel out, so yes i am. Banned for banning me

[Dsanders 5,747]

Banned because good job.

 

Here's another paradoxical Q.

 

A barber (who is a man) shaves all and only those men who do not shave themselves. Does he shave himself?

[rmlpwny 12]

Banned because good job.

 

Here's another paradoxical Q.

 

A barber (who is a man) shaves all and only those men who do not shave themselves. Does he shave himself?

Banned because that is not a paradox. He does shave himself once, then he cannot anymore since he has shaved himself.

[Milk Wave 454]

Banned cuz when I talk in this color, im talking about my pony Moon Wave ;3

[rmlpwny 12]

Banned cuz when I talk in this color, im talking about my pony Moon Wave ;3

Banned because I don't know whether you are speaking or your OC is breaking the fourth wall, since you used both colors.

[Dsanders 5,747]

@@rmlpwny,

 

Banned because it is called the Barber paradox. lol

 

Good explanation. You have now entered level 2...

 

 If a crocodile steals a child and promises its return if the father can correctly guess exactly what the crocodile will do, how should the crocodile respond in the case that the father correctly guesses that the child will not be returned?

[Milk Wave 454]

Banned cuz I never break the fourth wall D:<

[rmlpwny 12]

Banned cuz I never break the fourth wall D:<

Banned because you just did.

 

@@rmlpwny,

 

Banned because it is called the Barber paradox. lol

 

Good explanation. You have now entered level 2...

 

 If a crocodile steals a child and promises its return if the father can correctly guess exactly what the crocodile will do, how should the crocodile respond in the case that the father correctly guesses that the child will not be returned?

Banned because he shouldn't have been stealing children to begin with, and he should return the child anyway. He never said anything about not stealing it back.

[Milk Wave 454]

Banned cuz oh well, i'm just happy about the baby ;3

[Dsanders 5,747]

Banned because you just did.

 

Banned because he shouldn't have been stealing children to begin with, and he should return the child anyway. He never said anything about not stealing it back.

Banned because interesting answer...once again. lol

 

Is the word "heterological", meaning "not applicable to itself", a heterological word?

[rmlpwny 12]

Banned because interesting answer...once again. lol

 

Is the word "heterological", meaning "not applicable to itself", a heterological word?

Banned because both yes and no. By applying to itself, it inherently does not, starting a paradox, but also validating both responses.

*This is also true of the reverse, i.e., it does not apply to itself, therefore it does, etc.

Edited July 13, 2013 by rmlpwny

[Milk Wave 454]

Banned cuz im guessing no.

[Dsanders 5,747]

Banned because this not a paradoxical question but just a very interesting paradox in my opinion.

 

"If there is an exception to every rule, then every rule must have at least one exception; the exception to this one being that it has no exception." "There's always an exception to the rule, except to the exception of the rule—which is, in of itself, an accepted exception of the rule." "In a world with no rules, there should be at least one rule - a rule against rules."

[rmlpwny 12]

Banned because this not a paradoxical question but just a very interesting paradox in my opinion.

 

"If there is an exception to every rule, then every rule must have at least one exception; the exception to this one being that it has no exception." "There's always an exception to the rule, except to the exception of the rule—which is, in of itself, an accepted exception of the rule." "In a world with no rules, there should be at least one rule - a rule against rules."

Banned because with all these paradoxes, I'm starting to get that feeling you get where you hear/see/say a word too much and it starts to sound odd.

[Dsanders 5,747]

Banned because noo not really...I just love them. 

[rmlpwny 12]

Banned because noo not really...I just love them. 

Banned because peer pressure is telling me to.

[Milk Wave 454]

Banned cuz am I a paradoxical enigma?

[rmlpwny 12]

Banned cuz am I a paradoxical enigma?

Banned because if that is true, then you also are not a paradoxical enigma.