Jump to content
Banner by ~ Ice Princess Silky
  • entries
    35
  • comments
    105
  • views
    12,957

My stances on homosexuality have changed. There are some cons though.

TheMarkz0ne

Entry posted by TheMarkz0ne

1,083 views

 Share

I have been viewed as a bigot on this site. Now I want to settle some disclaimers before diving into the topic and will kick start a discussion to avoid TLDR excuse.

 

-I am against gay marriage for the secular reason that in nature, you have a mother and father. Boom that's it. No gay parents exist because they can't procreate and raise children.

 

- I think homosexuality should be legal. But children should not be taught sex ed. Many gays in the LGBT are teaching sex ed as early as Kindergarden( disgusting )

 

- I am not doing this from a religious perspective. Homosexuality has it's own domestic issues and this whole marriage thing will be taken for granted because EVERYONE gets divorced.

 

I have a sexual attraction to men, and lately been questioning emotional attachments of romance to certain men. I can't deny that. And I love woman( what man wouldn't?) So my views on homosexuality are fair, they aren't one sided in favor of LGBT and the whole liberal agenda.

  • Brohoof 1
 Share

8 Comments

Recommended Comments

Sudo Krenton

Wow I wrote a lot... jeez... well, I put it in a spoiler. x'D Sorry....

May I add that some people do think that it is possible for same-sex couples to raise children via adoption? The American Academy of Pediatrics(APP) states that it is 100% a O.K. for same-sex couples to raise children. On the other hand, we have (groans from readers) the American College of Pediatrics(ACP) that disagrees 100% with the AAP, saying that it's unhealthy for the child. I, for one am also against the concept of same-sex couples raising children. There are some attributes which men cannot posses and vice versa that makes the traditional marriage the best for the child.

 

Regarding your second point, it astounds me with how early they want to teach this concept of genders and sexuality to these kids. Horrifying, in fact. Peppa the Pig (a tv show with an audience of ages 2-6) had the question put up to make the main character (Peppa) a lesbian. My question for this is how will the child know or comprehend, and if he/she doesn't comprehend what's being transmitted, how vivid in speech or actions will they have to go to get the point across that she's a lesbian? Sexuality is a very delicate topic, and I don't want the media to butcher it.

 

The mere fact that puberty and hormones raging doesn't begin until 11-13, and society wants to teach about it in Kindergarten? Not to mention that gender/sexuality preferences will be defined better during and after puberty, so teaching it early doesn't really help at all. In my opinion, either school should teach it later, or parents should discuss it in "The Talk." Sure you can say, "But I want my child to find out who he/she really is." Hold up, hold up. So you'd rather teach your child about genders and sexuality, rather than for the child to come to a natural conclusion?......... This is just a big mess, and gosh... there's a lot.

 

Regarding your mention on divorce... Statistics have it that same-sex couples have a higher divorce rate, as well as have shorter marriages than the traditional family. Yet more reason why same-sex couples should not be raising children. To be adopted, and then to go through a divorce, in my opinion is scarring. The kid thinks his life is getting better, and then it gets in the dumps again.

 

 

 

Same with you, I am not doing this from a religious perspective, and I am Bi as it is.

Link to comment
GenderIsAnIllusion

The thing about sex Ed is that it has been proven that teaching your kids about sex early helps reduce the chances of teen pregnancy. Not only that, but if you look at groups in our society that only teach abstinence (Catholics for example) it has been proven that these groups have significantly higher rate of teen pregnancy. And it's not just gays...... Many proactive parents are doing this.

 

Also divorce happens,..... That's no reason to ban gay marriage... Every group does it.

 

Also in nature yes.... Man and women must be united.... But in today's day and age we can inpregnate without the need for sex... Just need a donor (or a carrier if it's a male couple)..

 

These aren't to hate on you, just informing you so you have a better perspective on the issues.

  • Brohoof 2
Link to comment
GenderIsAnIllusion
cant gays allready adopt or serigate?

 

I don't see why they can't. Gay parents is better than single parents, and being a single parent is perfectly permitted.... What evidence is their to suggest gays cannot raise a kid equally, of better than straight parents?

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
BastementSparkle

I think being against gay marriage for the purpose of them being unable to raise kids isn't exactly fair. Marriage isn't all about kids. Would you also be against marriage between a straight, but infertile couple? What about a straight couple that doesn't want children? You're assuming marriage has to lead to children, it doesn't.

  • Brohoof 5
Link to comment
aoEAF2FBvC0MIo2Q

Well, your views aren't really worth fighting for (or even against at this point) so it's not like what you say will amount to anything whatsoever. You can try and fight the tide but I think you already have an understanding where that will lead you.

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Join the herd!

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...