Jump to content
Banner by ~ Wizard

About "It's About Time" (Spolier Alert)


Frankenbrony

Recommended Posts

(edited)

This has probably been brough up before, but what is the sequence of events here?

 

Twilight meets Future Twilight, who attempts to warn her not to worry about the future because nothing will happen in the next week. But how did this start? What happened first? It seems that Twilight is doing something because of something that happens in the future, which only happened because of what happened in the past, sparked by what happened in the future. Worse, all of this happens because somewhere along the way, some incarnation of Twilight Sparkle was afraid that her past self would worry about something that didn't happen.

 

This is the sort of thing that makes people in Star Trek fear going into the past. We are either forced to abandon a linear view of time, or else throw away the whole idea of cause and effect.

Edited by Frankenbrony
  • Brohoof 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

(edited)

So basically your saying that the cycle of events would never have occurred because in order for the events to happen the event would have to happen first.

 

Actually a really interesting point, If what your saying is correct then we can interject that both cause and effect and a linear view of time is incorrect in equestria; here is why -

 

If twilight had visited herself in the past the events that had lead up to it would have already occurred in that timeline, so we are faced with a dilemma. How had the chain of events started if twilight hadn't visited herself to trigger the cycle in the first cycle?

 

There is no "cause" in the original case.

 

Time cannot be linear in this as it causes a feedback loop.

 

paradox and mindf***. I rest my case. 0.o

Edited by Extraho Vinco
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a possibility. Maybe Celestia is related to Discord (interesting thought, as well).

 

The classic way around such a paradox is to bring in the possibility of a parallel universe, in which a change in the course of history creates an alternate future instead of something logically impossible. Twilight could still make an error like this and warn a parallel self not to worry. The first visitor to the first Twilight would have started a chain that doesn't lead to a feedback loop or a paradox, but would still beg the question of what made her start the chain. That isn't much help in the end, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a time paradox. The initiating event perpetuates itself.

  • Brohoof 2

pete-alonso1.jpg.f27295daeb2f61a9d83493a73c62079d.jpg

Domine, tu omnia nosti, tu scis quia amo te.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(edited)

My name is Time. This episode did not appease me as it defied my laws and f***ed with the timeline, so therefore, the conclusion is sending the episode into a paradox.

Edited by Prince Dusk
  • Brohoof 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a time paradox. The initiating event perpetuates itself.

 

But how would that be possible? The event would be inclined to mimic itself. Just saying its possible because its impossible dosent make sense.

 

There's a possibility. Maybe Celestia is related to Discord (interesting thought, as well).

 

The classic way around such a paradox is to bring in the possibility of a parallel universe, in which a change in the course of history creates an alternate future instead of something logically impossible. Twilight could still make an error like this and warn a parallel self not to worry. The first visitor to the first Twilight would have started a chain that doesn't lead to a feedback loop or a paradox, but would still beg the question of what made her start the chain. That isn't much help in the end, really.

 

I guess what I'm asking is how would the initiating event come to being. I guess this is all a philosophical discussion now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(edited)

Yes, this is a certain trope with time travel usually called a "Bootstrap Paradox". You may have also seen in it the short story that coined the term, or in things like the third Harry Potter story.

 

If you were to try to find a purely logical start of the cycle, you probably couldn't. It is possible that the "first" Twilight had a reason to go back and things played out until the loop eventually stabilized like we see in the episode. They did fix up a lot of potential dangers around Ponyville. But I think there's something more to it.

 

Something similar happens in Donnie Darko, which uses what I call the divine intervention theory of time travel. Essentially, our universe is an entirely logical place, and the only way a time loop can be created (an effect without a cause) is by something not bound by the laws of physics. In the film, time travel exists to teach someone an important lesson.

 

I mention this because the lesson Twilight needed to learn was pretty clear. She was becoming way too stressed and was about to go Lesson Zero again (she never really learned anything from that). Taking place in Equestria makes things much easier to explain, because magic is readily available and definitely takes precedence over the physical laws of the universe. The time loop could have been due to something like fate (which we have seen in Cutie Mark Chronicles), though my initial impression was that Celestia's magic could be strong enough to create it, especially with her rushed greeting in the library.

Edited by Randomiser
  • Brohoof 3

"...and this great blue world of ours
seems a House of Leaves
moments before the wind."

OC: Dream Pop

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this is a certain trope with time travel usually called a "Bootstrap Paradox". You may have also seen in it the short story that coined the term, or in things like the third Harry Potter story.

 

If you were to try to find a purely logical start of the cycle, you probably couldn't. It is possible that the "first" Twilight had a reason to go back and things played out until the loop eventually stabilized like we see in the episode. They did fix up a lot of potential dangers around Ponyville. But I think there's something more to it.

 

Something similar happens in Donnie Darko, which uses what I call the divine intervention theory of time travel. Essentially, our universe is an entirely logical place, and the only way a time loop can be created (a cause without an effect) is by something not bound by the laws of physics. In the film, time travel exists to teach someone an important lesson.

 

I mention this because the lesson Twilight needed to learn was pretty clear. She was becoming way too stressed and was about to go Lesson Zero again (she never really learned anything from that). Taking place in Equestria makes things much easier to explain, because magic is readily available and definitely takes precedence over the physical laws of the universe. The time loop could have been due to something like fate (which we have seen in Cutie Mark Chronicles), though my initial impression was that Celestia's magic could be strong enough to create it, especially with her rushed greeting in the library.

 

Your smartness hurts my brain. :(

 

I like your reasoning skills though, so *brohoof*


signatureformlpforum.gif

Cred it to DragonShy for the AWESOME sig!! :3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But how would that be possible? The event would be inclined to mimic itself. Just saying its possible because its impossible dosent make sense.

That's sort of the point to the paradox. Finding an exact moment of emergence apart from the timeline is impossible because that event has already been incorporated into the timeline.

 

Randomiser summarizes the whole problem rather succinctly.

  • Brohoof 1

pete-alonso1.jpg.f27295daeb2f61a9d83493a73c62079d.jpg

Domine, tu omnia nosti, tu scis quia amo te.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a note: I did not read anyone's post, except those I have quoted, to save time, so if this has been said before, sorry.

 

What if one Twilight were to completely not go back in time at all? wouldn't that mean she wouldn't be in the state she was, and not be in Canterlot as well?


signatureformlpforum.gif

Cred it to DragonShy for the AWESOME sig!! :3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this is a certain trope with time travel usually called a "Bootstrap Paradox". You may have also seen in it the short story that coined the term, or in things like the third Harry Potter story.

 

If you were to try to find a purely logical start of the cycle, you probably couldn't. It is possible that the "first" Twilight had a reason to go back and things played out until the loop eventually stabilized like we see in the episode. They did fix up a lot of potential dangers around Ponyville. But I think there's something more to it.

 

Something similar happens in Donnie Darko, which uses what I call the divine intervention theory of time travel. Essentially, our universe is an entirely logical place, and the only way a time loop can be created (a cause without an effect) is by something not bound by the laws of physics. In the film, time travel exists to teach someone an important lesson.

 

I mention this because the lesson Twilight needed to learn was pretty clear. She was becoming way too stressed and was about to go Lesson Zero again (she never really learned anything from that). Taking place in Equestria makes things much easier to explain, because magic is readily available and definitely takes precedence over the physical laws of the universe. The time loop could have been due to something like fate (which we have seen in Cutie Mark Chronicles), though my initial impression was that Celestia's magic could be strong enough to create it, especially with her rushed greeting in the library.

 

This is a brilliant explanation!

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

(edited)

In ocarina of time, link, as adult link, meets the windmill man in the future who tells him that a kid 7 years ago played the song of storms in his windmill, causing it to go out of whack. The man teaches him the song of storms as adult link. Link then goes back 7 years into the past and plays the song of storms he only learned in the future. He did NOT know the song as a child, which means he was not the original kid who played the song, and he therefore replaced the kid in time. So, who was the original kid who played the song of storms?

 

It's just like that scenario. We'll never know, since it no longer has happened due to time screw ups, and we should just look at it as an interesting mystery.........or it's a paradox.

Edited by Pegasus25
  • Brohoof 1

RaritySignature.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In ocarina of time, link, as adult link, meets the windmill man in the future who tells him that a kid 7 years ago played the song of storms in his windmill, causing it to go out of whack. The man teaches him the song of storms as adult link. Link then goes back 7 years into the past and plays the song of storms he only learned in the future. He did NOT know the song as a child, which means he was not the original kid who played the song, and he therefore replaced the kid in time. So, who was the original kid who played the song of storms?

 

It's just like that scenario. We'll never know, since it no longer has happened due to time screw ups, and we should just look at it as an interesting mystery.........or it's a paradox.

 

Please stop blowing my mind -_-

 

:D you're either really really good at this, or google is.

 

I'm going with the first option!


signatureformlpforum.gif

Cred it to DragonShy for the AWESOME sig!! :3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(edited)

In ocarina of time, link, as adult link, meets the windmill man in the future who tells him that a kid 7 years ago played the song of storms in his windmill, causing it to go out of whack. The man teaches him the song of storms as adult link. Link then goes back 7 years into the past and plays the song of storms he only learned in the future. He did NOT know the song as a child, which means he was not the original kid who played the song, and he therefore replaced the kid in time. So, who was the original kid who played the song of storms?

 

It's just like that scenario. We'll never know, since it no longer has happened due to time screw ups, and we should just look at it as an interesting mystery.........or it's a paradox.

 

Well actually a similar thing happened in a show called sanctuary, the main character is immortal and happened to be blasted back into the past, so she lived through the timeline as her older self but never interfering with her younger self's timeline up until the point she is blasted back into the past (which then she reveals herself). So now I have not actually played ocarina of time but wouldn't it be a similar event where there would actually be two links in the same time period?

 

And what you described isn't a paradox, its actually a linear event with a defined start and end.

Edited by Extraho Vinco
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This episode makes no sense. AT ALL. This should be a paradox. The action would keep recurring for eternity. Because twilight keeps resetting time. I noticed this instantly.


youtube-icon.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well actually a similar thing happened in a show called sanctuary, the main character is immortal and happened to be blasted back into the past, so she lived through the timeline as her older self but never interfering with her younger self's timeline up until the point she is blasted back into the past (which then she reveals herself). So now I have not actually played ocarina of time but wouldn't it be a similar event where there would actually be two links in the same time period?

 

And what you described isn't a paradox, its actually a linear event with a defined start and end.

 

 

I've got a feeling I'm going to need to use this more than once in this thread.

 

 

 

Posted Image

  • Brohoof 1

signatureformlpforum.gif

Cred it to DragonShy for the AWESOME sig!! :3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This episode makes no sense. AT ALL. This should be a paradox. The action would keep recurring for eternity. Because twilight keeps resetting time. I noticed this instantly.

 

It is quite interesting yes?

I do like the explanation of celestia starting the loop though, usually something like this only happens when you put a lot of careless time travel into the equation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is quite interesting yes?

I do like the explanation of celestia starting the loop though, usually something like this only happens when you put a lot of careless time travel into the equation.

 

I seem to have missed that part. -_-

 

Care to explain?


signatureformlpforum.gif

Cred it to DragonShy for the AWESOME sig!! :3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a note: I did not read anyone's post, except those I have quoted, to save time, so if this has been said before, sorry.

 

What if one Twilight were to completely not go back in time at all? wouldn't that mean she wouldn't be in the state she was, and not be in Canterlot as well?

 

Theoretically, Twilight cannot do anything other than what she did, because she would always be facing the situation under the exact same conditions.

 

Something similar happens in Donnie Darko, which uses what I call the divine intervention theory of time travel. Essentially, our universe is an entirely logical place, and the only way a time loop can be created (a cause without an effect) is by something not bound by the laws of physics. In the film, time travel exists to teach someone an important lesson.

 

I mention this because the lesson Twilight needed to learn was pretty clear. She was becoming way too stressed and was about to go Lesson Zero again (she never really learned anything from that). Taking place in Equestria makes things much easier to explain, because magic is readily available and definitely takes precedence over the physical laws of the universe. The time loop could have been due to something like fate (which we have seen in Cutie Mark Chronicles), though my initial impression was that Celestia's magic could be strong enough to create it, especially with her rushed greeting in the library.

 

Yeah, I had wondered about Celestia's greeting. It seems as though she expected Twilight to be there, in the crazy state of appearance that she was. So when you think about it, Celestia must have had some knowledge of what was happening. Also, it ties in the part before the theme song that otherwise doesn't appear to fit at all.

 

So this puts it into a better perspective:

 

(1) Twilight is going crazy obsessing over things not being planned out perfectly for the next month.

(2) This wakes Spike up, alerts him that things are not going to go well. Perhaps he goes upstairs and writes to Celestia expressing his concerns.

(3) Celestia does something, and it results in Twilight seing a vision of her future self. This could have been just a vision. Or an alternate reality. (But when Twilight actually does travel through time, everything happens exactly the same as at the beginning of the episode, so that casts doubt on the idea that the original meeting was just a vision.)

(4) Twilight reacts as we see in the episode, thereby learning the lesson not to worry so much about the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Join the herd!

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...