Jump to content

My one hope for the series.


Star Petal

Recommended Posts

We all know it is about a 50% possibility that the Windigos might be the final villains in the series, if they don't hold off on Chrysalis or tirek or something. Do you guys think it is remotely possible that they might end up ruining the Windigos like they did the Changelings? I do not want to see the windigos end up the color of fruit loops and suddenly start talking about their feelings like they do. How likely do you think it might be that is what they would end up doing to them if they started doing that? 


Join me on my YouTube Channel. I do Brony videos, Live Stream Gaming, and I have other things too! 

My name is Nightfall Shadow, and you can find me at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEkRdbqqO6pFerLEz-0jEHQ/live

At least I hope that is the correct link to my channel lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Windigos don't seem like the type to have shown enough intelligence to make them redeemable. With the changelings, we at least had Chrysalis so we knew that other changelings might have the ability to talk. With windigos, they're comparable more to timber wolves, just dangerous animals who happen to be drawn to disharmony.

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Star Petal said:

We all know it is about a 50% possibility that the Windigos might be the final villains in the series, if they don't hold off on Chrysalis or tirek or something. Do you guys think it is remotely possible that they might end up ruining the Windigos like they did the Changelings? I do not want to see the windigos end up the color of fruit loops and suddenly start talking about their feelings like they do. How likely do you think it might be that is what they would end up doing to them if they started doing that? 

Then there's this guy :D

1622040__safe_screencap_cropped_gameloft

Anyway, I see Chrysalis as the final villain. Tirek will probably a co antagonist in this season finale 


img-32537-1-post-15132-0-63886300-146778

Sig by Discords

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Windigos seem like wild animals, so I doubt they could be "reformed," and even if they could, they wouldn't talk. There isn't much of a human moral to get out of anything windigos do, so if they're utilized in a future episode, I find it very likely that they'll just be a plot device to facilitate conflict and cooperation between other characters. Plus, they feed on negative emotions rather than positive ones like changelings do, so off the top of my head I really can't imagine how that would be flipped as something not harmful to society. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(edited)

I like to think that they are manifested negative emotions, hence why they feed on them. So by reforming you destroy them.

Edited by FizzyGreen

"You are right Starlight, you are more talented in magic than me. But talent doesn't mean, that you are privileged to have more power. It's the heart! All you need, to have power, is a heart!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Star Petal said:

We all know it is about a 50% possibility that the Windigos might be the final villains in the series, if they don't hold off on Chrysalis or tirek or something. Do you guys think it is remotely possible that they might end up ruining the Windigos like they did the Changelings? I do not want to see the windigos end up the color of fruit loops and suddenly start talking about their feelings like they do. How likely do you think it might be that is what they would end up doing to them if they started doing that? 

Because that's exactly what MLP needs. More friendship.

  • Brohoof 1

All of right-thinking humanity is on my side. Sandwiches are meant to be cut in half. You would never, unless under extreme duress or madness cut a hot dog in half. Picture yourself at a ball park, or even at a restaurant, cutting a hot dog and you will feel an instinctive, entire repulsion at the very thought of it. You can get a soup with a half sandwich, but you’d never serve a half hot dog with a soup. It’s the equivalent of cutting a pizza with a knife and fork. Pashman says anything “sandwiched is a sandwich.” He’s using the derivative verb to describe the sandwich, so he is proving the premise with itself; it is a complete logical fallacy. I hope they’ll openly boo him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Join the herd!

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...