Count to a million

[DasCapschen 7,766]

432777

[Dawnchaser 🌄 8,092]

432799

Edited December 6, 2017 by Dawnchaser

[lomk 20,663]

432

@Kawaii Besu Notice me, Senpai. 

Except the count is off.

432800. 

[Dawnchaser 🌄 8,092]

1 hour ago, rdluvrd00d44 said:

432776

Dog blood. Yay. 

How's everybody else?

So the count was off?

I apologise for not noticing

432801

[lomk 20,663]

432803

I'm on mobile, thank you very much. 

Life's hard for a pimp. 

[Kawaii Besu 28,011]

9 minutes ago, rdluvrd00d44 said:

-snip-

Well, at least the Mac was put to good use. A throne of cash thrown down the Apple hole.

432802

[Dawnchaser 🌄 8,092]

4 minutes ago, rdluvrd00d44 said:

432803

I'm on mobile, thank you very much. 

Life's hard for a pimp. 

So? I'm also on mobile

#OcassionalyScrollUp

432804

[Kawaii Besu 28,011]

432805

Gdi, SSDs are such a Celestia-send.

Well, boot times aren't much different from my old system tbh. But damn, everything just feels snappier. Everything opens in a second flat instead of ten seconds flat. RD has got nothing on SSDs.

[lomk 20,663]

432806

What is your boot time?

I came off a WD Black booting in just under 50 seconds to a Samsung EVO booting in about 10-15 seconds. I would be surprised if your boot times didn't change much. 

Edited December 6, 2017 by rdluvrd00d44

[Telferi 6,906]

432807

 

[Dawnchaser 🌄 8,092]

432808

[Kawaii Besu 28,011]

432807

My boot time was about 15 seconds, including the POST screen.

Right now, it goes between 5-10 seconds. Sometimes it shows the Windows loading screen, sometimes it just goes straight from the POST screen to the login screen. Sometimes, the mouse and keyboard wouldn't get detected for five seconds in the login screen. Not sure why, but, ye.

Windows 10 has some fast boot option in the power management settings. Guess that's why it boots quite fast even on an HDD. But startup programs would take a minute or two before they would fully open. Right, now, in mere seconds.

And, o ye, my SSD is a WD Green 240GB. Certainly not the best writes (only 150MB/s, as fast as my Seagate HDD ), but the reads are still snappy af. Also, ye, the cheapest SSD I could find.

Until I realized the 850 Evo was on sale for not much more

But, hey, I doubt I would see the difference I suppose.

[DasCapschen 7,766]

432808

Why a WD Green?
no! Green is for long-life low-performance, energy save and shit ; hence it's "green" ...

WD Blue for normal use and WD black for fast ; WD red etc are for nas etc so lets ignore those colors

[Dawnchaser 🌄 8,092]

432811

[DasCapschen 7,766]

432812

Hi Dawn

[Dawnchaser 🌄 8,092]

432813

Hi Caps How's you?

[Kawaii Besu 28,011]

44 minutes ago, Das Capschen said:

432808

Why a WD Green?
no! Green is for long-life low-performance, energy save and shit ; hence it's "green" ...

WD Blue for normal use and WD black for fast ; WD red etc are for nas etc so lets ignore those colors

It's an SSD tho.

According to Userbenchmark, the reads aren't far off from the more premium ones. Yea, writes are one thing, but I don't copy stuff into my SSD.

Also, ye, it's the cheapest 240GB SSD I could find. :T

432814

[Dawnchaser 🌄 8,092]

432815

[DasCapschen 7,766]

432816

[DasCapschen 7,766]

432817

...

[DasCapschen 7,766]

432818

14 hours?

[Kawaii Besu 28,011]

432819

[DasCapschen 7,766]

432820

Fiwweh

[Telferi 6,906]

432821

[DasCapschen 7,766]

432822

TELF