The Banned Game

[Flutterstep 46,288]

Tail nommed for suggesting everyone deserves to be banned.

[CypherHoof 26,479]

21 minutes ago, Flutterstep said:

Tail nommed for suggesting everyone deserves to be banned.

Banned because why would the pumpkin king even HAVE a tail?

[Flutterstep 46,288]

Tail nommed because a king without a tail wouldn’t entail to be crowned, nor would the detail serve for an interesting tale.

[CypherHoof 26,479]

9 minutes ago, Flutterstep said:

Tail nommed because a king without a tail wouldn’t entail to be crowned, nor would the detail serve for an interesting tale.

Could always buy one - then you will have the Re-tail version

(Banned for cautionary tail)

[TBD 17,228]

Banned for a late ban. 

[CypherHoof 26,479]

7 minutes ago, TBD said:

Banned for a late ban. 

Banned because I have seen you post after half a day, so a minute or so is hardly noteworthy...

[TBD 17,228]

Banned because it's only been an hour. 

[GiFTGewEhrSCHutzen-4 8,827]

Venomized because .

[TBD 17,228]

Banned for not having a coco with that. 

[Venomous 18,813]

You are banned because I want to ban someone

[Woohoo 32,565]

Banned for being venomous 

[TBD 17,228]

Banned for whoohooing. . 

[GiFTGewEhrSCHutzen-4 8,827]

Venomized for not giving me Jack Skellington's pumpkins, so I can use it against Applejack's apples. 

[Deleted3133333 3,560]

Banned for thinking that any gross pumpkins could ever be as good as an apple 

[GiFTGewEhrSCHutzen-4 8,827]

Venomized for still not letting me nom....

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

...your tail and ribbon. o3o

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited October 18, 2018 by VenomPLA_04

[Deleted3133333 3,560]

[Deleted. 20 characters]

Edited October 3, 2020 by Shadow/Lilly

[Flutterstep 46,288]

Tail nommed for having licious in your name.

[GiFTGewEhrSCHutzen-4 8,827]

Venomized for holding up that delicious cupcake.... *Noms cupcake*

o3o

[CypherHoof 26,479]

7 hours ago, VenomPLA_04 said:

Venomized for holding up that delicious cupcake.... *Noms cupcake*

o3o

Banned for being insufficently selective in nomming

[TBD 17,228]

Banned for calling nomming on cupcakes insufficient. 

[CypherHoof 26,479]

2 minutes ago, TBD said:

Banned for calling nomming on cupcakes insufficient. 

Banned because that's a different issue (nomming cupcakes without pinkie's approval) but VenomPLA seems to nom anything in line of sight, which seems a bit extreme even for a parasitic gell lifeform.

(come to think of it, haven't seen @The_Gobo in ages...)

[Usager 431]

Ban because you cant overnom things

Edit: ban because ninja

Edited October 18, 2018 by Usager

[TBD 17,228]

Banned for missing out the chance to ban me. 

3 minutes ago, Cypherhoof said:

(come to think of it, haven't seen @The_Gobo in ages...)

He left the forum months ago. 

[GiFTGewEhrSCHutzen-4 8,827]

Venomized for not letting me nom your pumpkins.

[CypherHoof 26,479]

Just now, VenomPLA_04 said:

Venomized for not letting me nom your pumpkins.

Banned for worst euphemism ever....