writing What makes a King

[Salazar Slytherin 3]

What makes a King

By:Salazar Slytherin.

copyrighted   2/15/14

 

A king is just and divine he dowels not in evil nor does he rejoices in it. His love towards his servants is like no other for he knew he was just like them, when he takes court he hears the appeals and weighs them out for he is a just and righteous king. A king forgives his enemies and forgives there trespasses but he shall not let there unjust crimes towards his people continue  , When a king does battle with his enemies he does not showth anger towards them but instead he shows sadness and  grief for no good king enjoys death and destruction. At the battles end he does not taketh from the people for so much was stolen from them already by there old and wicked King, When a wicked King is cast off his royal crown should be spat on for he spat upon his own people. His kingdom should be torn asunder for his power was already token from him, his descendents should be cursed for he himself is cursed. But when he ask for forgiveness by the just King his transgressions should be forgiven , when the king dies he shouldn't sayth on his bed."My work tis done". For a kings work is never done and a Good and righteous king never truly dies, he is kept alive by the memory of his people and they shall honor and love him for all time for he was there King.
 
The end.

 

 

 

[SharpWit 2,666]

This doesn't like a king at all. This sounds like something a king would force you to believe.

[Adente 1,000]

This doesn't like a king at all. This sounds like something a king would force you to believe.

 

Some kings truly were benevolent and good. They weren't all Caligula-esque despots. 

 

 

What makes a King

By:Salazar Slytherin.

copyrighted   2/15/14

 

A king is just and divine he dowels not in evil nor does he rejoices in it. His love towards his servants is like no other for he knew he was just like them, when he takes court he hears the appeals and weighs them out for he is a just and righteous king. A king forgives his enemies and forgives there trespasses but he shall not let there unjust crimes towards his people continue  , When a king does battle with his enemies he does not showth anger towards them but instead he shows sadness and  grief for no good king enjoys death and destruction. At the battles end he does not taketh from the people for so much was stolen from them already by there old and wicked King, When a wicked King is cast off his royal crown should be spat on for he spat upon his own people. His kingdom should be torn asunder for his power was already token from him, his descendents should be cursed for he himself is cursed. But when he ask for forgiveness by the just King his transgressions should be forgiven , when the king dies he shouldn't sayth on his bed."My work tis done". For a kings work is never done and a Good and righteous king never truly dies, he is kept alive by the memory of his people and they shall honor and love him for all time for he was there King.

 

The end.

 

 

Sounds good, very well written. Not to be a spell check for you, but the last line "...he was there King." should be "he was their King." I also am not a fan of any work saying "The End", but that's just me. other than that, sounds good!

[SharpWit 2,666]

 

 

Some kings truly were benevolent and good. They weren't all Caligula-esque despots. 

I'm not saying they're all bad. But considering that history is written by the winners, I don't think there ever was a truly great king before the time of parliament. Even then they were just not half bad 

[Adente 1,000]

I'm not saying they're all bad. But considering that history is written by the winners, I don't think there ever was a truly great king before the time of parliament. Even then they were just not half bad 

 

King Cyrus of the Persian Empire. First recorded leader in history to have religious tolerance, promote individual cultures instead of exterminating them, and a benevolent ruler who used his funds to build roads and infrastructures for far flung areas of his empire, instead of simply using it to line his own pocket. I'd say he was a truly good leader.

 

Or what about Emperor Marcus Aurelius? (The old man from the movie Gladiator who was strangled at the beginning if you were curious) Promoted stability, gave power back to the Senate, and all around popular and competent leader. 

 

I wouldn't say that all Kings were "half bad" at best, some were just genuinely good men who tried to do what was best. Evil and wicket kings make for more interesting talking points than "boring" good kings, so we hear more about the tyrannical ones.

[SharpWit 2,666]

ok, i'll agree that cyrus was a good king, but if you recall in gladiator, Emperor Marcus originally just wanted everything under his rule, not that i blame him, but killing a bunch of saxons for personal gain isn't very nice