I've been laughing at this all the time and through it. George Washington, he said he was with no political party because all they'd do is argue more than get on about the problem, and he said this 200 YEARS AGO, and he was right.
Besides, like Chief Pontiac said in Pontiac's War, 'We're just the cloth in between two blades of scissors.'
But still, even though Obama has done a bunch of bad stuff, including the guns ban, Obamacare, and NDAA, he'd still make a better president than the tyrant and money power and rich Mitt Romney. Romney can't even decide what side of a debate he's going to be on.
I'm just waiting for the day when someone starts rebelling against the government, and someone has attempted.
If you didn't know, a couple of days ago, a small militia in Georgia was found out because they had killed two people giving them away. The media makes them looks like idiots, but I'm surprised that no one went 'Hm... they must have been mad about something to start a militia.' I respect them, yes they did act like idiots and were disorganized, but they had the guts to try and do this. You wouldn't see a lot of people today that would say 'I'm going to stand up against the United States Government.'
Plus, I think Obama has been noticing this too and getting paranoid about it. Passing the NDAA, allowing the president to announce any area in the world to be a war zone for USA, seems fishy. Guns ban against certain types of Automatics, even fishier.
If this cycle keeps on going, The Presidents say they're going to do something else but don't focus on the main problem, then people are going to start trying to take charge themselves, by FORCE.