Jump to content
Banner by ~ Ice Princess Silky

AlicornSpell

User
 View Profile  See their content

  • Posts

    300

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by AlicornSpell

  1. AlicornSpell
    I am started to not go on YouTube anymore since I heard that they are going to the extreme now when it comes to stuff like censorship and copy right laws. One of my friends who has a YouTube account recently almost got banned just because of a song he was using in one of his videos. Also, with YouTube comments, when you post them, there's sometimes a glitch that makes it so they won't be posted. And also, with YouTube comments, it looks like someday in the future, YouTube is probably going to get rid of all YouTube comment sections since it seems like they starting to do that now since a lot of YouTube comment sections are disabled now.
  2. AlicornSpell
    Here's the three actors who I think could have played his son. Actor number one: Sebastian Stan Actor number two: Thomas Doherty Actor number three: Freddy Carter
  3. AlicornSpell
    My favorite is the 2003 live action movie.
  4. AlicornSpell
    Those could be Pegacorn, which is a cross between Pegasus and unicorn. Not exactly an Alicorn.
  5. AlicornSpell
    There's only been official female Alicorns on the show.
  6. AlicornSpell
    Here's the TV Tropes page that is about the Westermarck effect: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LikeBrotherAndSister Here are a couple of a sentences from the "real life" section of the TV Tropes page about the Westermarck effect: A particularly nasty example of this trope occurred in 16th century France. At the time, marriages among royalty were arranged, and some of the unions were less than joyous. As a result, someone got the bright idea that if the young princes were raised with their respective fiancées from an early age, they would become accustomed to one another and grow up to form stable marriages. Unfortunately, since the couples weren't too closely related by blood or adoption, no one counted on the Westermarck effect described above. Thus, when it came time for the couples to grow up and get married, they saw each other as this trope, and the process of trying to produce heirs squicked them so much that they did so as little as possible, if at all. The nasty part comes in when, due to lack of heirs, the ruling Valois dynasty died out, and the resultant Succession Crisis led to civil war. Here's a quote I found on the internet a long time ago about a guy talking about his female friend he knew for a long time and how he couldn't see her as anything romantic: "in my experience, I am a heterosexual male, and there was several instances where I have seen my life-long best friend (female) completely nude and was not aroused at all. Since I have been around her for so long, and saw her more of as family than a possible mate. I felt more like when you walk into your parents room while they are getting it on rather than lets say, walking into a prostitute house."
  7. AlicornSpell
    Possible, but still very rare. I never had feelings for any of my childhood friends because they felt like siblings to me. And I never knew anyone who fell in love with their childhood friend.
  8. AlicornSpell
    While it is very rare, some people have fell in love with their childhood friend and married them, but they are a minority compared to the married couples who first met each other as adults. The whole "falling in love with your childhood friend thing" does happen a lot in Anime/Manga and other forms of fiction, but it rarely actually happens in real life. The Westermarck effect, also known as reverse sexual imprinting, is a psychological hypothesis that people who live in close domestic proximity during the first few years of their lives become desensitized to sexual attraction. Here's the Wikipedia page about the Westermarck effect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect So basically, If you knew someone before age 10 & were consistently around them, there is often an effect on your brain where you’ll associate them as a sibling. You simply won’t be attracted to them. There are a few small Jewish communities in Israel that raise children collectively & are having issues with people not marrying within the immediate community due to not being attracted to people they were raised with.
  9. AlicornSpell
    Her original classic design from Sonic CD? Or her current design?
  10. AlicornSpell
    Also, a lot of romantic couples basically disappear from each other and don't become good friends with each other after they break up or divorce. As I said, A platonic best friend is way more likely to stay in someone's life than a romantic partner is. A platonic best friend is way more likely to protect you and have your back than a romantic partner is. Most people have only known their spouse since sometime during their adulthood, and sometimes since their teenage years, but rarely since their childhood years. Most platonic best friends have known each other since their childhood years. So most platonic relationships have a big advantage over romantic ones in the sense that platonic best friends usually grow up together while most married couples don't usually grow up together. You are more likely to be closer to someone that you knew since childhood than you are to someone that you knew since sometime during your adult or teenager years. Most people have best friends since their childhood (at least most of the times). It takes a great amount of time to build such a strong bond.
  11. AlicornSpell
    Yes, rice counts.
  12. AlicornSpell
    The original clean haircut design? Or the spiky hair design?
  13. AlicornSpell
    My is mashed potatoes.
  14. AlicornSpell
    How so? Usually platonic best friends help a person a lot more than their romantic partner or spouse do.
  15. AlicornSpell
    How is it good to have a romantic partner?
  16. AlicornSpell
    Actually, I looked at a lot of divorce rates, and it does seem like more than half of married couples do get divorced. And also, less people are getting married now.
  17. AlicornSpell
    I do not think romantic love is real or special. About more than half of romantic couples either break up with each other or divorce each other, while most platonic best friends remain friends until death. I think that having a platonic best friend is a lot better than having a romantic partner or spouse is. I started to think that the concept of romantic relationships is not a good thing. There are a lot of toxic romantic relationships, while there isn't that many toxic platonic relationships. Like an example is that abuse happens a lot in romantic relationships, while abuse is rare in platonic relationships. So there is a lot of abusive romantic relationships, while there is isn't that many abusive platonic relationships. Why do you think abusive romantic relationships have a term for them called "domestic violence", while abusive platonic relationships don't have a term for them? It's because abuse in platonic relationships are very rare, while abuse in romantic relationships happens a lot.And also, a lot of people cheat on their romantic partners with someone else, while most people won't do stuff like that with their platonic best friends. And also, it seems that fathers usually hate it whenever their daughter gets a boyfriend (even if the boyfriend is a good guy), and it seems that they often hate the idea of their daughter dating, and many fathers seem against the idea of their daughters dating. There are even shirts made for daughters that say "I'M NOT ALLOWED TO EVER DATE" and shirts made for fathers that say "DADS AGAINST DAUGHTERS DATING".Brothers also tend to act the same way that fathers do whenever their sister gets a boyfriend (even if the boyfriend is a good guy). It seems brothers (like fathers) hate the idea of their sisters dating.So it seems that most fathers don't ever want their daughters to find love and be in a romantic relationship with someone, and it also seems that most brothers don't ever want their sisters to find love and be in a romantic relationship with someone.So those could also be other reasons why the concept of romantic relationships isn't a good thing because of how protective fathers and brothers tend to be whenever their daughter or sister dates someone.
  18. AlicornSpell
    I don't see what's so special about being romantically in love with someone. I mean about more than half of romantic couples either break up with each other or divorce each other, while most platonic best friends remain friends until death. I think that having a platonic best friend is a lot better than having a romantic partner or spouse is. You're going to have a much deeper spoken understanding and connection with your best friend than you are with a romantic partner or spouse. Having someone who's like a sibling to you is a lot better than having a romantic partner or spouse is. And you will most likely have a much stronger bond with a person who's like a brother or sister to you than you would with a romantic partner or spouse.
  19. AlicornSpell
    Does your best friend even understand you more than your husband does?
  20. AlicornSpell
    And also, I heard that most people can live a life without romance and can still be happy. But most of the time, if someone doesn't have any platonic friends in their life, it can affect them really bad mentally; much worse than living a life without a romantic partner. So wouldn't that be proof that the romantic type of love isn't that special?
  21. AlicornSpell
    Also, it seems that fathers usually hate it whenever their daughter gets a boyfriend (even if the boyfriend is a good guy), and it seems that they often hate the idea of their daughter dating, and many fathers seem against the idea of their daughters dating. There are even shirts made for daughters that say "I'M NOT ALLOWED TO EVER DATE" and shirts made for fathers that say "DADS AGAINST DAUGHTERS DATING".Brothers also tend to act the same way that fathers do whenever their sister gets a boyfriend (even if the boyfriend is a good guy). It seems brothers (like fathers) hate the idea of their sisters dating.So it seems that most fathers don't ever want their daughters to find love and be in a romantic relationship with someone, and it also seems that most brothers don't ever want their sisters to find love and be in a romantic relationship with someone.So those could also be other reasons why the concept of romantic relationships isn't a good thing because of how protective fathers and brothers tend to be whenever their daughter or sister dates someone.
  22. AlicornSpell
    But isn't having someone who's like a sibling to you a lot better than having a romantic partner is? Also, because of her being like a sister to you, wouldn't you be closer to her than you would with a romantic partner?
  23. AlicornSpell
    Sometimes I think the romantic type of love isn't real, while I never doubted the existence of the platonic type of love.
  24. AlicornSpell
    Also, there are a lot of toxic romantic relationships, while there isn't that many toxic platonic relationships. Like an example is that abuse happens a lot in romantic relationships, while abuse is rare in platonic relationships. So there is a lot of abusive romantic relationships, while there isn't that many abusive platonic relationships. Why do you think abusive romantic relationships have a term for them called "domestic violence", while abusive platonic relationships don't have a term for them? It's because abuse in platonic relationships are very rare, while abuse in romantic relationships happens a lot. And also, a lot of people cheat on their romantic partners with someone else, while most people won't do stuff like that with their platonic best friends. So those would be other reasons why platonic love is a lot better than romantic love is.
  25. AlicornSpell
    Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...