General Chat Thread

[NewCalamity 3,454]

Mayyyybeee

 

[Unpredictable Ranger 696]

*runs away upon seeing @Kyronea's post*

[Hawk Moth 390]

I call blasphemy. Unless your written works are beyond awful, I doubt that a simple illustration surpasses your literature.

 

I think I'm a good writer, but I still think my best is still inferior to that of any artist. Art takes more skill, therefore they're deserving of respect.

[The Soldier 2,044]

 

It's one of those arts where RD (finally) has boobs.

[Starshine 16,334]

 

I am fully capable of walking on a straight lineee~ *thud*

[Unpredictable Ranger 696]

@, it's like comparing salad with turkey salami. Because different forms of creativity should be valued not on the same wavelength as the other.

 

Artwork is not the same as writing. While someone who is good at drawing is good at drawing (duh), he/she may not be good at literature.

[Hawk Moth 390]

@, well if I can write then it must not be anything special. All it is is typing. Art requires so much more of the body and mind.

[be my waifu 2,842]

Art takes more skill, therefore they're deserving of respect.

 

You are objectively wrong.

 

Writing is an art itself. Sure, anyone can write an essay for English class, and get an A on it. But to create a masterpiece of literature, to use a language to create vivid scenes in the imagination that captivates a reader... That is no simple task.

 

I'm not saying literature is superior to art either; they both have equal standing. You can't place writing underneath any other form of art because it is one, and has just as much merit.

[Hawk Moth 390]

You are objectively wrong.

 

Writing is an art itself. Sure, anyone can write an essay for English class, and get an A on it. But to create a masterpiece of literature, to use a language to create vivid scenes in the imagination that captivates a reader... That is no simple task.

 

I'm not saying literature is superior to art either; they both have equal standing. You can't place writing underneath any other form of art because it is one, and has just as much merit.

 

Well, I'd trade every ounce of my writing "talent" for mediocre art skills. No one wants to read anything, but if I could draw then I'd be respected. I could make webcomics and comic books, and people would like me, but all I can do is write, and barely anyone is interested. Most people are in a default state of TL;DR.

[Unpredictable Ranger 696]

@, what do you mean by

Art requires so much more of the body and mind.

?

[Hawk Moth 390]

@, what do you mean by

?

 

It requires dexterity and mindfulness. It requires a high degree of mental visualization.

[Unpredictable Ranger 696]

@, ehhhhhhh, I find it that literature also requires a very high mental capability of visualising the unseen-able and then the challenge is to put them into words (which I am not good at!).

Edited April 25, 2013 by Fluffle Puff

[Hawk Moth 390]

@, ehhhhhhh, I find it that literature also requires a very high mental capability of visualising the unseen-able and then the challenge is to put them into words (which I am not good at!).

 

I'm terrible at visualization. I can't even see what my characters look like in my head. Again, all I can do is write. I can't visualize worth a damn.

[Starshine 16,334]

 

Pick one (?.?*)

[Hawk Moth 390]

 

Pick one (?.?*)

 

It depends. Man boobs and butts? What about nice butts or weird flabby boobs? Or giant cellulite butts or nice perky boobs? If I can assume that the quality is constant across the board than boobs :3

[Haven Celestii 9,385]

Mayyyybeee

Well, im totally ok with this. :3

 

 

 

Pick one (ﾟ.ﾟ*)

Butts.

No contest.

 

Also, whos that other pony arguing with her?

[Unpredictable Ranger 696]

@, I didn't mean to say visualising characters! The visualisation of a story or scene in a story in terms of literation (wait, is that even he correct word I just picked up?)~

@@Ruby, y u no reply mah status update posted on ya profile feed??? 

[Starshine 16,334]

 

 

It depends. Man boobs and butts? What about nice butts or weird flabby boobs? Or giant cellulite butts or nice perky boobs? If I can assume that the quality is constant across the board than boobs :3

You're weird :v

 

But I agree. Boobs are fine too

 

 

 

Butts. No contest.

Butts! o/

 

It's Backy

[Haven Celestii 9,385]

 

@@Ruby, y u no reply mah status update posted on ya profile feed??? 

Umm, I didnt know I had gotten one.

 

You're weird :v

 

 

Butts! \o/

 

It's Backy

 

Hmm.

Imma have to look her up.

[Electrobolt 2,069]

*pokes into the chat thread* Um... Hello... Is it safe in here?

[Haven Celestii 9,385]

*pokes into the chat thread* Um... Hello... Is it safe in here?

Bolty, you know its always safe here. :3

[NewCalamity 3,454]

*pokes into the chat thread* Um... Hello... Is it safe in here?

Forever and ever.

[Unpredictable Ranger 696]

@@Electrobolt, Nope.avi >:3

[Electrobolt 2,069]

Bolty, you know its always safe here. :3

 

Forever and ever.

 

Really? Well then, good to---

 

@@Electrobolt, Nope.avi >:3

 

=| Um, whatever you say, fluffy pony...

[Hawk Moth 390]

Actually I change my answer to butts. If you have a nice butt then you're more likely to a tight, sexy body. Boobs are nice, but the most important thing in terms of physical attractiveness is enough fat to not be skeletal but not too much. That optimal amount of fat should be expressed by a nice butt. From my research though, that body type doesn't guarantee nice boobs, and if I had to chose one over the other, I'd take nice butts because I know a great body also comes along with it.