SwigglySwiggly

@@Silverwisp the Bard, Lol I have so many flaws but didn't realize i want to kill you Thanks, these sort of comments are the ones that makes people draw better

Galileo was imprisoned for life and died in prison because he proposed the round earth theory. The Catholics were the ones who imprisoned him for proposing his now proven theory (Christianity hasn't branched off Catholicism at this time period) There are nice atheists and nasty atheists, just like Christianity has nice churches and bad churches (Westboro Baptist church). Both sides are guilty

Spent some 15 minutes sketching up this beauty then darkened the lines the next morning. Opinions? Criticism? Praise? Share your thoughts! Sorry my printer is acting up, and you're going to have to tilt your head to the left.

I haven't been back to the sonic fandom in years.... wonder how my old mates are doing...

Watch out! the evolutionists are after our minds!

Another Debate?! IT IS ON! This has been discussed about TJ and also applies to Dawkins, same reason I respect TJ view but not his execution, Dawkins is way more professional than TJ and ism ore appealing to the Atheist Community. The creator (in this case, God) could not have created maths because the Greeks (who believed in Zeus & such) had a better understanding of maths than christians at the time. The Greeks had the use the old numeral system (I, II, III, IV, V, VI) That system is slow and primitive, the roman numerals are hard to work with, but they still beat the rest of the world in maths. Till today it is unknown if Math is universal or a creation of man to understand the world. (lets avoid philosophy) Scientific Law dis-approves the existence of god... why would god create something that dis-proves him? Time and space are 4 of the 11 dimensions (and they're the only 4 dimensions known to man) God's view of space was limited and The Bible views the world/space as a limited place (flat earth theory) but science proved space is forever expanding equally in all 3 physical dimensions (a sphere shape) e] Why do creationists think we atheists think that the world came from nowhere?. Here's the widely accepted theory of the universe: The world has always been and will always be, the universe didn't appear out of nowhere, it came from the big bang. WARNING EGGHEAD STUFF (about the big bang) The name big bang is misleading... the world didn't EXPLODE into existence but "expanded" from a collapse point. Space expands equally everywhere (the only shape to do this is a sphere) so the world is a sphere... but we do not live IN the sphere we live ON it... (mind boggling) and the sphere is expanding in all directions.... but eventually it will have to stop expanding and collapse into itself. It's nasty because in the end everything in the universe will be crushed together into a single point... then it will expand again. (this goes on and on and on and on) Its like blowing up a balloon and the world exists on the balloon... then the balloon deflates then blows up again. (its sad to know that our world will come to an end like this (according to science))

I'll shoot you for that quote, (its not a religion its a theory of science) I understand I was religious too (until I took an arrow the the knee) but you're emotions shouldn't judge your actions within a debate. I agree TJ does that (because he is an asshole), but Richard Dawkins is a respectable man because unlike TJ, he doesn't argue/bash on religion, he debates (a debate is more friendly than an argument).

Its a non debate topic that ended up with a debate

no the topic was about discussion but it turned into a debate XD

this topic didn't boil down to a mess though, it was a fair debate

I'm not upset, I'm actually quite hyped because I find debates fun, I only said that we should keep this at debate level because debates often go out of hand. I was never upset, don't worry. gg (unless you want another round) @, Thanks for intervening while I was afk (don't want a debate to turn into an argument) @@Dark Heart, This topic is about TJ and he has view and opinions on religion too (kinda explains how this debate started) I can say otherwise, I've been to christian and catholic churches and the theme is different but everything else is exactly the same (prayers, traditions and suchsuch)

Well mate, heres the real plot twist..... if you want to kill the thing that look Molestia down, you are going to have to kill Hasbro (they copyrighted her ass)

(I'd like to keep this at a debate and not escalate it any further, we shall keep this at debate level, a tear within the Brony community is the last thing we need, we're all brothers and sisters after all.) Brimstone/sulfur same thing (I think the Bible called it brimstone instead of sulfur) The supposed ark on Mt.Ararat has been there for a long time and has been known to mankind for a while now. (what is Sodom?) It's funny how no-ones been able to dig up the Ark. The ark is visible on the mountain but so far we know its NOT made of wood... quite possible a fissure in the earth (fissures and ships both have an oval like shape) so until someone goes to Turkey and digs up that hole in the ground... this Ark theory will remain un-bunked. Neither you or I am right, both our opinions are just theories. And the Brimstone/sulfur has nothing to do with the ark... I don't see how brimstone and ships are related. (Unless Noah built a combustion/steam engine on the ark that runs on the flammability of Sulfur, don't take this seriously though) Besides mt.Ararat is a Mountain, not just a mountain but a dormant VOLCANO... that kinda explains why there is ALOT of sulfur. The sulfur argument is invalid and is not related to the debate. Volcano=sulfur (if you ever want to dig up the ark thingy, don't breathe, sulfur is BAD!) And I don't see how the treasures in the Grand Canyon is related to this topic (maybe you can explain later). Besides I'll attempt to debunk this, the grand canyon has/had water flowing through it (I think it still flows, idk I'm not American) water is what living beings need to live. The natives used to live in the grand canyon (they mysteriously disappeared some time ago). The natives lived in small towns/cities carved straight into the grand canyons's walls, the natives had a quick way of messaging other tribes via smoke and mirrored lights (the messaging system was similar to Morse). The natives of America lived in a massive span of area and had amazing communication at range. This remains a mystery... but wtf? its not related to the ark is it? (btw if you missed this, I have pretty much debunked everything) ^^^ I can say otherwise because I was once a Catholic (Christianity branched off of Catholic) I've read the bible as a child and its VERY religious. (fun fact, Christianity, Catholics, Jewish and Islam all worship the same god, just differently (and yet they shall be debunked)) EDIT!= A fissure in the earth would mean the exposure of Sulfur..... (a fissure in the earth will expose sulfur but I don't think you can dig a hole using an Ark as the tool) (christians and catholics share the same holy book)

The deathnote requires the user to know the victim's face when he writes down the victim's name. (I'm assuming you haven't seen Deathnote the movie or the anime?)

WARNING EGGHEAD STUFF read at own risk Isn't uranium-lead dating very similar to carbon dating? (i'm no scientist but this is what I have been taught) Uranium turns into lead after it decays, the time period it takes to decay is called "Halflife" Uranium-lead dating is when you detect the radioactivity in uranium to check how long it's halflife is left (how long its been decaying/turning into lead) Carbon dating is checking the halflife of radioactive carbon (you have radioactive carbon, I do, we all do) and we check how long its been decaying to date it. Both methods are similar Dinosaurs being carbon dated to only die a thousand years ago? that's an easy answer. (this mystery has already been debunked) The article is very misleading but still true, the reason why the dinosaur's carbon dating was only 1000 years because it's radioactive carbon has been recycled within an isolated environment (this prevents the ageing affect and makes it seem as if the fossil hasn't aged at all) , an environment such as the ocean is a good example, the deepest parts of the ocean have been isolated for such a long time. This was an error in carbon dating. "The ark is to be 450 feet [140 meters / 300 cubits] long, 75 feet [23 meters / 50 cubits] wide and 45 feet [14 meters / 30 cubits] high. Make a roof for it and finish the ark to within 18 inches [1 cubit] of the top" ^Quoted from the bible^ So 3220m squared of space and 14m tall? with 14m verticall space you can stack 2 giraffes on each other so there can only be 2 floors. so 7440m squared and 7m tall is the total space. And to fit 2 of each animal.... and animals need food and you don't want them eating each other (or they'll go extinct) and drinkable water (sea water kills). We can already see the Ark doesn't work. PS. its fake Nikolai is known for his scientific accomplishments... not his religious accomplishments. Nikolai is not a creationist scientist but a scientist who is also a creationist. Creationist scientists try to prove that there was a flood and try to date the judgement day. Scientists who are creationists are just as smart as scientists who are atheistic. Just because a scientist is religious and discovered something not about religion, doesn't make religion right, it makes the discovery right. (I'm gong to keep my quote^) I dislike TJ but agree with his views, he's an asshole and I agree that Scientist who are also creationists are not idiots. But like I said, just because they're creationist, it doesn't mean they proved religion right.

@, HUSH NOW! show your respect and condolences to her highness!

@, We will form a human chain around the funeral site, just like they did to stop the westboro!

@, Swiggly trotted ahead of the group, he was unaware that his pace was picking up but slowed down and took another bar of chocolate out of his bag. "Sabel, I hope you know where we're going... I don't want us to get lost and end up as fish food" @, Swiggly noticed Storm looking at the water. "don't worry, its just one of those fish monster things... no biggie"

*places banquet of flowers* ~sniffle* I will miss you Princess Molestia...

If you mean Creation Scientists, like Ray Comfort or John Pendleton then your argument is invalid. How is any of their stuff even science? its all bs. But if you meant Scientists who are Creationist, like Newton and Einstein (Einstein was a deist). Those scientists made discoveries to get a better understand of this world, not to prove their religion.

In the Deathnote series the user can manipulate the victim before the victim dies, or choose how the victim dies. If I got the Deathnote, we will run out of Darwin awards very quickly

He as good views... but he executes them like... crazy bat shit.