You say Trump was associated with KKK, but how much? You need sources for your claims. And there is a pic of Hillary hugging some ex-KKK guy too. So I am not sure how much he truly is associated with the KKK so everything you say, without much evidence it can't really change the mind of someone who is aware of inaccuracies mistakes and propaganda. I think any candidate would fall though because its the kind of people who tend to be attracted to that position. Also I think Hillary lost because everyone assumed she would win, so less people voted. Also wasn't Nixon an actor before? Trump just played his cards right and people are right when they say the presidency is a popularity contest. It doesn't get whom is most qualified, it gets whom is in the spotlight the most.
In reality it should be a double-blind position, but if that happened people would exploit the system from candidate swapping. And there are images to some polls that say Hillary had a 99% chance of winning. Polls are notoriously easy to corrupt at every aspect of interaction to how they occur in the environment.
I agree there needs to be a stop to the violence, but wasn't there some billionaire hiring antifa, and he did this stuff to other countries too? He is using the PC movement for financial gain. Also its kind of ironic the 'pc' movement is being violent which is not pc.
Also to be fair this is exactly like the Iron Will episode with Fluttershy. Empowerment feels good, provides a moral high ground. Sun Tzu said the moral high ground is needed for long term conquests for the support of the masses, and so the warriors have their hearts in it. Ancient cultures always claimed the moral high ground often calling other cultures they exterminated evil for various reasons, but the true motive from those causing these assumptions to the masses, was gain. Gain can be selfish, or it can be for the good of a group. Consequence is what determines such a thing, long term consequence. If people could not execute these plots, then this would not be a problem. Because it is and can and has been or being executed, it can be predicted and countered. So there is no excuse to say we are confused and leave it at that, or to let our emotions control us. Empowerment is the same as allowing yourself to be used from a feel-good emotional response. Its inciting rebellion is what it is.
Also the reason why people do not have dialogue, is because they do not accept that they could be wrong, they are not trying to understand others. They are just trying to assert their stance, which is why the right calls the left 'ideologue's. Because they simply are seeking validation for their stance and agreement, rather than proper discussion. Self aware discussion should have both sides ready to admit they may entirely be wrong at a moments notice if severe enough evidence contrary to their position presents itself. Identifying as something, comes at a cost, for both the right and left.
The cost it takes to maintain your identity is at the expense of truth. This means ignoring contrary information, due to the lens you perceive things through. That is the real problem with society, and the cause of this moral high ground which is essential for battle. People need to be more humble, and less absolute.