Jump to content
Banner by ~ Ice Princess Silky

movies/tv Two Ceratosauruses vs Allosaurus

Hive King

By Hive King, User

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mephala

Mephala 2,633

Can you make this into like, one thread with a poll or two that you update every week or something? These are getting really clogging, especially since not that many people reply and you make so many. kthxbai

 

Anyways, for relevance purposes, the second one.

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RWB

RWB 229

Eh, betting on the Ceratosauruses, here.

 

The size difference is problematic, but let's not forget that Allosaurus and Ceratosaurus had rather weak bites, and this might be a "death by a thousand cuts" fight, which benefits the pair.

 

Still, a good body check form Allo could win it if he can assure the kill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hive King

Hive King 1,998

  • Author

Eh, betting on the Ceratosauruses, here.

 

The size difference is problematic, but let's not forget that Allosaurus and Ceratosaurus had rather weak bites, and this might be a "death by a thousand cuts" fight, which benefits the pair.

 

Still, a good body check form Allo could win it if he can assure the kill.

Weak bites? Perhaps for one of those larger herbivores, but both are lightly build enough that it doesn't really matter. The Ceratosaur's teeth are larger though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cloud Yeller

Cloud Yeller 69

Honestly you need to define where they are fighting to really be sure.  Allosaurus has a more rigid skeleton and was made to chase down prey on open lands.  Ceratosaurus was shorter but more flexible/nimble and would have been better suited to weaving around obstacles in forested areas.   So if this fight is on the plains, Allosaurus is going to kick some ass.  If it meets the Ceratosaurus in the woods then they will win.

 

Morrison_theropods.png

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hive King

Hive King 1,998

  • Author

Honestly you need to define where they are fighting to really be sure.  Allosaurus has a more rigid skeleton and was made to chase down prey on open lands.  Ceratosaurus was shorter but more flexible/nimble and would have been better suited to weaving around obstacles in forested areas.   So if this fight is on the plains, Allosaurus is going to kick some ass.  If it meets the Ceratosaurus in the woods then they will win.

 

img-3133811-1-Morrison_theropods.png

I think the numbers edge is enough that no matter what, if there is no ambushing, the ceratosaurs can win.

 

But for the sake of argument, let's say it takes place on a mountainous area with plenty of rock formations

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RWB

RWB 229

Probably a good thing Torvosaurus wasn't included here.

 

As long as the Allo, but twice as heavy and just overall superior in a fight,

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hive King

Hive King 1,998

  • Author

Probably a good thing Torvosaurus wasn't included here.

 

As long as the Allo, but twice as heavy and just overall superior in a fight,

Obviously, including him would be spite

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LZRD WZRD

LZRD WZRD 1,929

(edited)

Wasn't this a matchup on Jurassic Fight Club? :lol:

 

I get the feeling that irl two Ceratosauruses wouldn't dare stray into the Allosaurus' territory. I'm putting my money on the Jurassic's apex predator over these two scrubs

Edited by LZRD WZRD
  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hive King

Hive King 1,998

  • Author

Wasn't this a matchup on Jurassic Fight Club? :lol:

 

I get the feeling that irl two Ceratosauruses wouldn't dare stray into the Allosaurus' territory. I'm putting my money on the Jurassic's apex predator over these two scrubs

It wasn't. One of them was cheap shotted and killed before it could even notice the attack and the other wasn't there at the time. This is two on one, not one on one.

 

Also, Jurassic Fight Club sucks in terms of accuracy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LZRD WZRD

LZRD WZRD 1,929

It wasn't. One of them was cheap shotted and killed before it could even notice the attack and the other wasn't there at the time. This is two on one, not one on one.

 

Also, Jurassic Fight Club sucks in terms of accuracy

Yeah Jurassic Fight Club was dumb af lol. Although it was fun to watch, much in the same way Ancient Aliens is. lol History Channel is such a fail though

  • Brohoof 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cloud Yeller

Cloud Yeller 69

I think the numbers edge is enough that no matter what, if there is no ambushing, the ceratosaurs can win.

 

But for the sake of argument, let's say it takes place on a mountainous area with plenty of rock formations

Assuming the Ceratosaurs can coordinate like other pack predators then I think they could take on an Apex predator in such an area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darker

Darker 1,351

(edited)

How? They're not that much smaller, it's like two wolves going after a mastiff

The Allosaurus has the higher level of intelligence, and it's much more capable of worse lethal blows, thanks to the big ass claws it had. Ceratasauruses' horns worked to attract and defend females like typical lions, and were barely used in hunting.

 

They're not Carnotaurus.

Edited by Darker
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hive King

Hive King 1,998

  • Author

The Allosaurus has the higher level of intelligence, and it's much more capable of worse lethal blows, thanks to the big ass claws it had. Ceratasauruses' horns worked to attract and defend females like typical lions, and were barely used in hunting.

 

They're not Carnotaurus.

That's like saying a human can defeat two rottweilers leaping at them because they're smarter. Also, the claws are about the same size as Ceratosaurus's and either of them wouldn't use them too much. 

 

I'm not saying the horns make a difference, it's the fact that killing one would be a challenge for the Allosaurus, not a huge challenge, but still. Two is too much for him to take down

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darker

Darker 1,351

That's like saying a human can defeat two rottweilers leaping at them because they're smarter. Also, the claws are about the same size as Ceratosaurus's and either of them wouldn't use them too much. 

 

I'm not saying the horns make a difference, it's the fact that killing one would be a challenge for the Allosaurus, not a huge challenge, but still. Two is too much for him to take down

 

I'm not sure the two Ceratosauruses would attack so sure to something bigger than them. I see the Allosaurus getting injured, maybe even badly, but not losing. Such a powerful Apex predator like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hive King

Hive King 1,998

  • Author

I'm not sure the two Ceratosauruses would attack so sure to something bigger than them. I see the Allosaurus getting injured, maybe even badly, but not losing. Such a powerful Apex predator like that.

Most big animals wouldn't fight in the first place, their fear is removed. 

 

And that's a bit of a myth. The Ceratosaurus was more primitive, but it survived alongside it and there are no signs that it was less successful

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darker

Darker 1,351

Most big animals wouldn't fight in the first place, their fear is removed. 

 

And that's a bit of a myth. The Ceratosaurus was more primitive, but it survived alongside it and there are no signs that it was less successful

Oh, so these dinosaurs are bloodlusted.

 

I now see Allosaurus losing.

  • Brohoof 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 6 years later...
TBD

TBD 17,228

None they’re all extinct, Mother Nature won on this one as 1# apex predator :devious:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Join the herd!

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...