Finia 260 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 I mean most mammals seems to be built that way. With some exceptions, i believe elephants also have them on their chest, and so do humans and apes. I mean technically speaking it would be pretty awkward and inconvenient to have them down there when its more beneficial as a nourishing material that one can hold up when one recieves children. But i've always wondered if that wasn't the case, how would it be like. I mean i am certain that animals have just the same types of hormones as humans. They just communicate differently and more on signals and instincts. While humans can talk and share ideas in a beneficial way. But how would it change our lives if teats where slightly above the crotch like most mammals have. I mean if you'd look at a girl (Well guys too. But its not as visible due to milk being nourishing for child) But in general, would you say it would be different approach than what it is now. Just wondering Just a thought that crossed my mind 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chirox the pony 1,336 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 Well bit of an odd question but I think if it was like that no one would question it and I don't think it would change life much. No matter how hard I try these ponies will simply never leave me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawning Demon 952 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 I seriously don't know why but when I first saw this threads title this was my reaction: 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finia 260 July 8, 2015 Author Share July 8, 2015 I seriously don't know why but when I first saw this threads title this was my reaction: For some reason i feel like Peter Parker in that video. Hehe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawning Demon 952 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 For some reason i feel like Peter Parker in that video. Hehe. So you have an awesome "WTF" face. xD 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larkybird~ 734 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 That'd make certain things really awkward. And not just well you know...but standing, sitting, laying down... Other mammals it works because they walk in four legs. The only times the teats are visible is when they stand up on their hind legs or on their back. So it doesn't look weird because you can't constantly see or rather notice since humans wear clothes to conceal theirs them. And even primates who's yes are located the same place don't walk like us so we don't see them all the time. It'd look really really off and weird if they were located you know. There. It wouldn't be a massive life changing thing. It'd just be awkward for people to see on a daily basis. http://i.imgur.com/1m3V4im.jpg ^full sized avatar picture there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CandyStrike 603 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 Well, women would be able to go topless without it causing a fuss. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finia 260 July 8, 2015 Author Share July 8, 2015 (edited) Well, women would be able to go topless without it causing a fuss. The outlook would not pop out on the chest to say the least though, so thats a good point :-3. I guess that would be beneficial in terms of lack of embarrassment ^ _ ^ Edited July 8, 2015 by Finia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colt .45 259 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 Well you could look at them like this... Hey! My eyes are up here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ribbonfree 2,384 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 It would definitely lead to a significant redefinition of a 'feminine' shape, how clothes work... aesthetically and practically (in terms of clothes design, maybe how weight distribution works for girls (it would be a pretty big change). I mean, that crotch area is closer to the center of gravity so theoretically larger breasts might be less of a mechanical nuisance if they occurred at the crotch area? Damn this could lead to all sorts of interesting and utterly weird considerations... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyoshi Frost Wolf 42,202 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 They would still be pointlessly considered taboo in most of society, the only difference is a slight change of position. Can't say this question has ever crossed my mind though. Redeem me into childhood. Show me myself without a shell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChoroChii 284 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 Then we'd be putting our children between our legs?? Wtf. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finia 260 July 8, 2015 Author Share July 8, 2015 (edited) Then we'd be putting our children between our legs?? Wtf. Imagine if our bodies would devolve to hooves and stuff . Although its beneficial for 4 legged creatures in terms of it ^ _ ^. Its natural selection kicking in to seek the beneficial part, nature working. yuuush ^^ Edited July 8, 2015 by Finia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Regulus 2,769 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 Why do we have to remove the upper ones? Instead of just one row of two, wouldn't it be more like... three rows of two, like most other mammals? Tumblr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grepper 3,193 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 This is certainly a strange question. Depending on how far down they are located, women's pants would need to be designed differently. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Beam 1,179 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 I'm flabbergasted. Really, this question just ripped the mightiest confusion I've ever had in my life. Although, it is still a pretty amusing picture to imagine. Awkward, but amusing. Main OC Shadow Beam EqE OC Astro Shine Deviant Art Hi there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ochre_Dust 329 July 8, 2015 Share July 8, 2015 Most of the breast tissue in human females is fat, stored there to produce their distinct shape which is (theorized) to imitate the shape of the buttocks, which in turn are indicative of a female's health and receptiveness to sexual advances in most mammals. If humans had teats, I imagine that humans would commensurately lose all excess fat buildup there when not nursing, just like other mammals. Undergarments would probably be underwear that sits very high on the waist to cover everything, and then there would be rebellious young 'uns with their fancy Calvin Klein Low-rider undergarments, for that extra breezy rush when you're riding your motorcycle. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuyNamedEarl 1,332 July 9, 2015 Share July 9, 2015 I have nothing to say to this. 1 Creator of MLP Ruined Vines and Recorder Sh*t Equestria's Biggest Hip-Hop Nerd Everyday is Leg Day! Follow me on Twitter: @EarlBrony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest July 9, 2015 Share July 9, 2015 I'm sorry that this is off topic but this thread is really strange... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ochre_Dust 329 July 9, 2015 Share July 9, 2015 I'm sorry that this is off topic but this thread is really strange... You're not wrong, but counterfactual, alternate-reality thought exercises can be fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisa 5,553 July 9, 2015 Share July 9, 2015 This thread's weird. But to be on-topic, well, clothes would change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCS 7,537 September 25, 2015 Share September 25, 2015 Wait, you mean people's nips don't live above their crotch? My life is a lie. Seriously though, I don't know. I don't really understand biology at all, but it's fascinating. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Cedar 1,408 September 25, 2015 Share September 25, 2015 Nature knows what it's doing. They are in a place most convenient for the mother to nurse, whatever that mother happens to be. They're on humans' chests because a mother holds her baby. They're on a horses' abdomen because their foals stand to nurse and it keeps them in a slightly more convenient place than the ribcage where all the very large and important lungs are. Cats and dogs lie down, so they have rows of them. You may as well ask why we don't have six of them (answer: because multiples are rare in humans. animals on average have twice as many as they do offspring at a time). 1 Roleplaying OC: Red Cedar - Cast Character: Applejack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawzy 1,302 September 25, 2015 Share September 25, 2015 (edited) well....girl's would finally have a good excuse for saying "do I look fat?" and what would happen if they got really big? 0.0 you wouldn't be able to walk properly, you would have to tie them in a knot around you're waist. Or you could get teat extenders and then make you're teats really really long and then you could let them flop down next to you're legs and then when people give you that funny look you can just say "I'm an octopus...deal with it" Edited September 25, 2015 by Rawzy 1 Think For Yourself. Be Yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scrubbed user 3,417 September 25, 2015 Share September 25, 2015 I am completely incapable of imagining such an image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Join the herd!Sign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now