Jump to content
Banner by ~ Ice Princess Silky

Dark Qiviut

User
  • Posts

    4,700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dark Qiviut

  1. In response to the post: "DEM" and "IAEBB" are acronyms. "DEM" means "Deus Ex Machina," "IAEBB" is "It Ain't Easy Being Breezies."

    1. Azrael the alicorn

      Azrael the alicorn

      Ah, got it. I didn't watched IAEBB cause so many people consider it a weak episode.

  2. Part of what changed the episode from meh to plain bad was the characterization. Not simply the stupidity of the characters, but how poorly characterized they were in general. Twilight had pretty bad characterization herself. When Pinkie was scaring the filly, she should've scolded her for that attitude. Then at the end, she was convinced that the Fluttershy/1st edition cover was a fair trade. Anyone with an ounce of common sense would've immediately called this trade off. In order to progress the suspense, her IQ had to be dialed back (which has been a problem this season, the series in general, and a major speculation in response to the DEM in IAEBB). Rainbow Dash may have flaws, but there's a time and point where instead of explaining how flawed a character is in the form of a fallacy, it's time to realize how poorly characterized a character was. Dash is one of those characters. Just because she's desperate for the first-edition book doesn't mean she'll willingly trade part of her family! Brashness and naivety don't equal stupidity! Her disastrous characterization in Act 3 pushes her two steps back after a brilliant performance in TT123 and is a perfect reminder of her inconsistency thus far. What Dash did was basically sell Fluttershy. She committed slavery! Simply to force the audience to laugh. Writing characters OOC simply to force comedy is bad-quality humor. Not to mention her agreement to slave-trade Fluttershy for the book does two things: destroys any bit of subtlety in the Chekhov's Gun and adds in an unnecessary portion of the conflict. Fluttershy's character growth post-RF was nullified. After Rainbow Falls, she'd been improving, mainly in her starring roles. (Contrary to what some here assume, Fluttershy's conflicts vary considerably. Filli Vanilli and IAEBB are internal and external, respectively; FV is about FS's stage fright preventing her from publicizing a personal hobby, IAEBB being forced to kick out the breezies because they were in much more danger in FS's world. Here, her shyness is bastardized for laughs and to foreshadow the slave trade. It's as if her characterization was reverted back to square one. And in case you're wondering, Fluttershy was indeed traded into "indentured servitude." In layman's terms, a temporary form of slavery. Here's what the DD trader said: Emphasis mine. For God's sake, can Fluttershy be given more consistent characterization? As Fluttershy's my most favorite character, seeing her flanderized to such a degree with ZERO quality control should embarrass DHX. Pinkie Pie really teetered that line; unlike PAP, she definitely crossed it by chasing the poor filly away, reminding the audience of her worst appearance, Filli Vanilli. Because of the way she was written, she basically convinced Twilight to continue hoarding her books. Rarity and Applejack suffered the same issue here as did Simple Ways: out-of-character stupidity. Only this time, both were affected.
  3. Since the "Pick a Flaw" episode discussions have been a success, I think we should start flash backing to do "Pick a Flaw" discussions for past episodes (including the comic arcs; early S4 episodes; and, maybe, EQG >)) in the near future.

    1. ghostfacekiller39

      ghostfacekiller39

      I'd love to see your pick-a-flaw for EQG xP

       

      That'd be a hoot, I dare say.

    2. DryGuy84 (Inactive)

      DryGuy84 (Inactive)

      Yea, I'd be down for that, but I'm gonna have trouble picking a flaw for the Rainbow Dash Micro-Series comic if we do it (I really hate that thing).

  4. Since the "Pick a Flaw" episode discussions have been a success, I think we should start flash backing to do "Pick a Flaw" episodes (including the comic arcs and, maybe, EQG >)) in the near future.

    1. Sugar Cube

      Sugar Cube

      It's a great concept. I'd welcome more Pick a Flaw threads in the future. ^.^

  5. Going about the tradition of discussing episode flaws in @@Doctor XFizzle's "Pick a Flaw" topics, this one is about discussing a possible quality flaw from Trade Ya! that sticks out most to you and/or the episode at large. In the last topic, "Other" won the most votes. Like the others, there's a poll above for you to choose as well as explain, including an "Other" option. Like what Fizzle said in other threads, if you had to choose ONE reason to dislike an episode or find to be the flaw that bugs you the most, which is it? Please explain your reason(s) below. Be advised that discussing the main flaw(s) does NOT mean he or she hates the episode. These topics merely direct its discussion in a different light.
  6. Watching my recording of my family Passover seder. XD

  7. Not a good idea. Although it says "MLP Forums," this is a fan forum. We talk a lot about the show, but the MLP Forums encompasses much more than that. We have Sugarcube Corner, Cloudesdale Coliseum, the top section here, the role-play boards, convention relations, and the Poniverse forums. This forum is made with the intention of bronies to gather and discuss beyond Friendship Is Magic. "Hoof-bump" may be official, but it's not catchy. It doesn't have a smooth, organic flow in its vocality. "Brohoof"'s syllables transition far better. One ingredient that makes the MLP Forums stand out is how personalized it is. The "brohoof" has been the main handshake in the brony fandom for so long (and gives your knuckles some exercise *sweatdrop*), and "brohoof this" instead of "hoof-bump this," "like this (a default on many boards)" or "pos-rep/neg-rep (another default system)" gives the MLP Forums character and personality. Just like "brony," "brohoof" is gender-neutral, and changing it to "hoof-bump" enforces the blatantly SEXIST lie of "brony" and "brohoof" = "male FIM fans," when that's factually false.
  8. I wrote this in another blog. Not even close. In fact, it's possibly the worst Rarity-centric episode outside of Simple Ways. At this point, her best episode is Sisterhooves Social, Rarity Takes Manehattan, or Suited for Success.
  9. Because of how important the items are, te Rainbow Falls Traders Exchange reminds me somewhat of the Antiques Roadshow.

  10. So far, "Trade Ya!"'s vocabulary is pretty limited. For one, "vintage" is used too much, another is Rarity's reliance on "divine."

  11. For being one of the biggest AJ fans on the forum.
  12. That's actually false. Back when MLP first started, it was marketed to families regardless of age, gender, and culture. This was hinted in the G1 specials and first series, and founder Bonnie Zacherle confirmed this at two conventions. It didn't gear towards "little girls only" until Tales and G2 and later exploited in G3 and G3.5. Like the original G1, the main animated series is also age-neutral and gender-neutral, and the more transparent toys plugged in to simply pander to young girls are criticized or scathed (Twilicorn, Cadance/SA, EQG, the breezies). So, when someone tells me "ponies are for little girls," I just do a few things: Pinpoint to a video where Bonnie Zacherle tells a female brony how MLP was originally developed for young kids, including boys. Tell them how quality doesn't segregate demographics. Ask if they've ever participated in phenomenon related to FIM (i.e., Harry Potter, Powerpuff Girls). Use a famous quote from CS Lewis or Walt Disney about how important it is to not tell stories exclusively to kids. (When it's another brony who uses this strawman [especially to handwave the show's/EQG's quality flaws]) Tell him or her he or she embraces the concept of mediocrity, expose his or her hypocrisy by reminding them how high-quality storytelling and characterization are major backbones of the fandom's growth, and say that he or she is calling FIM an inherently weak product through the "it's for kids/little girls" excuse.
  13. No. "Alicorn" has been used in mythology long before MLP, but the name was very obscure. (Its origin means the horn of a unicorn.) What the fandom did was put the species in the limelight through conversation and art; and DHX decided to canonize the title.
  14. Thus far, each EQG:RR short diminishes in quality. "Shake Your Tail!" is possibly the worst of the four due to its poorly composed verses and rigid animation. (Hamstocalypse Now" is still a contender for its very awkward pacing.)

    1. Azrael the alicorn

      Azrael the alicorn

      And those are just clips. I don't even dare to think how much worst this sequel is gonna be. In fact, i got shiver just by thinking about it.

       

  15. Getting back to writing my review for Thomas & Friends, Series 17.

    1. Show previous comments  6 more
    2. DryGuy84 (Inactive)

      DryGuy84 (Inactive)

      My grammar skills are starting to tank. -_-

    3. Wind Chaser

      Wind Chaser

      @DryColt84

      May I tender you a solution?

    4. DryGuy84 (Inactive)

      DryGuy84 (Inactive)

      Sure, but you'll have to try and hook me.

  16. In other words, the most exciting playoffs of the four major sports is back! From 1994 to last year, the NHL playoff format was one through eight. Very often, you can see a Quarterfinal upset or even a lower-seeded team reach the Stanley Cup Finals. Two years ago, the LA Kings became the first non-division champion in the West (and lowest seed: eighth) to win the Cup. This year, it's a little bit different. Instead of three divisions per conference, it's two: Pacific and Central in the West, Atlantic and Metropolitan in the East. Three teams in each division qualify for the postseason, along with two Wild Cards (either one per division, or two from one), totaling up to eight each. The teams to qualify are: Eastern Conference: Atlantic: Boston Bruins (Presidents' Trophy winner [best record in NHL]) Tampa Bay Lightning Montreal Canadiens Detroit Red Wings (Wild Card #2) Metropolitan: Pittsburgh Penguins New York Rangers Philadelphia Flyers Columbus Blue Jackets (Wild Card #1) Western Conference: Pacific: Anaheim Ducks (Best record in West) San Jose Sharks Los Angeles Kings Central: Colorado Avalanche St. Louis Blues Chicago Blackhawks Minnesota Wild (Wild Card #1) Dallas Stars (Wild Card #2) Instead of #1 vs. #8 and so on, the playoffs are split into #1 vs. #4 and #2 vs. #3 per division. The division winners face the Wild Cards. The team with best record face the Wild Card with the least amount of points, while the other division winner faces the Wild Card with the most amount of points. Here's how this year's playoffs are stacked. Eastern Conference: Boston Bruins (A1) vs Detroit Red Wings (WC2) Tampa Bay Lightning (A2) vs. Montreal Canadiens (A3) Pittsburgh Penguins (M1) vs. Columbus Blue Jackets (WC1) New York Rangers (M2) vs. Philadelphia Flyers (M3) Western Conference: Anaheim Ducks (P1) vs Dallas Stars (WC2) San Jose Sharks (P2) vs. Los Angeles Kings (P3) Colorado Avalanche (C1) vs. Minnesota Wild (WC1) St. Louis Blues (C2) vs. Chicago Blackhawks (C3) The new SCP format is similar to the NBA's and NCAA Basketball Tournaments. You must advance through your own "division" before reaching the Conference Finals and then Stanley Cup Finals. Previously, there was no hard bracket to determine where teams advance, meaning you could have the #8 seed wait for #2 vs. #7 matchup and either face the #2 seed or another team in another Quarterfinal matchup. The new format removes this confusion. So, my quarterfinal predictions? Time to get on with it already! Predictions: Detroit Red Wings in seven. Montreal Canadiens in six. With the Canadiens being the only playoff team in Canada, I think MTL will use it to its advantage. (I don't expect many fans from the other Canadian fanbases to follow suit, though. ) Pittsburgh Penguins in seven. I expect Marc-Andre Fleury to perform after two horrid playoffs. Philadelphia Flyers in six. Stars in seven. Sharks in six. Avalanche in six. Blackhawks in five.
  17. There's a synonym for "enjoying FIM for what it is." It's called "embracing mediocrity" or "feeling apathetic about FIM's quality." So, no, not happening from me.

    1. Show previous comments  7 more
    2. Thrashy

      Thrashy

      I can somewhat agree with what you're saying, but at the end of the day, who's really to say which of the show's flaws are particularly *worth* dwelling on, and which should be forgiven? Because really, what this fandom considers "good" or "bad" has rarely been a constant, from what I've seen. I've witnessed people regard a good episode with the utmost bile, and I've witnessed others treat what I consider to be a pretty "meh" episode with extrem...

    3. Thrashy

      Thrashy

      *e reverence. I'm definitely not opposed to the show improving, but I'd hardly call the fact that many fans are perfectly satisfied with what they've been given "apathy". If we didn't care, we wouldn't keep watching.

    4. Rockymoo
  18. Something far too many people here need to understand: EQG's market audience is girls between ten and fourteen years old. Its base demographic is OLDER than the main series's, which is six-year-olds of any gender.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. Dark Qiviut

      Dark Qiviut

      I know. That's the ironic part of EQG. It has an older demographic, yet isn't good. While FIM's base demographic is both tighter (younger kids) AND looser (more than one gender), yet the worldbuilding is looser and helps the crew write better.

    3. DryGuy84 (Inactive)

      DryGuy84 (Inactive)

      I agree with that statement.

    4. Wind Chaser

      Wind Chaser

      I never would have thought of FiM's target demo including both genders, as I haven't seen Hasbro make any attempt to market the series to anything other than little girls before the fandom or after G1. With that said, I think this kind of marketing is what's holding this whole industry back and why campaigns like "Let Toys Be Toys" exist.

  19. You're a fan of the show or any other professional part of the product? Then whether you like it or not, that makes you a brony and, by default, a definite part of the fandom. (How much you participate in the fandom is up to you. It's possible to be a brony and passively involve yourself in the fandom.) Claiming otherwise means you're overthinking the definition of "brony" and creates divisions in the fandom, the latter the LAST thing we need.
  20. Of the three EQG shorts, rank them from favorite to least favorite.

    1. Dark Qiviut

      Dark Qiviut

      1. Music to My Ears.

       

      2. Guitar-Centered.

       

      3. Hamstocalypse Now.

    2. Wind Chaser

      Wind Chaser

      My list is the same as yours, though all three are good in some way, Music to My Ears was a great piece of both animation and music.

  21. "What do you expect from FIM? Shakespeare?" No, I expect quality writing inside and out. I don't expect perfection, but it doesn't mean the crew shouldn't try to pursue it, or at least put in effort.

    1. Arctic Night

      Arctic Night

      I hate Shakespeare. I expect FIM writing to be better.

    2. ghostfacekiller39
    3. Wind Chaser

      Wind Chaser

      @King_Ghidora

      HERETIC! lol j/k, if you don't like it, you're welcome to it, I'm sure half my high school class didn't know what the f**k he was writing.

       

      I have to have immense respect for the crew, working within the confines of a rigid 22 minute format with zero flexibility and the traditional corporate marketing strategy of Hasbro, a toy-first company that couldn't give any less of a shit about being a media innovator.

  22. HA! "One Million Moms"? More like "One Jackass Leading a Bunch of Suckups." XD

    1. Show previous comments  5 more
    2. DryGuy84 (Inactive)

      DryGuy84 (Inactive)

      @Something Floaty

      That's awful! Why do people think gay marriage is such a bad thing? It's natural, and they deserve happiness just as much as anyone else.

    3. Something Floaty

      Something Floaty

      Because tradition! And religion! And if there's anything we all know, it's that all laws governing the personal and love lives of citizens should be passed according to the religion of others. After all, the Constitution guarantees it!

    4. DryGuy84 (Inactive)
  23. Author's Note: Just like my Friendship Is Magic episode reviews, I'll begin writing them for Thomas & Friends, starting with the season debut, Thomas the Quarry Engine. This one and four other episodes are released for the U.S. DVD, Trouble on the Tracks, on April 8, 2014. Review bumped April 9 to feature the episode and cleanup. As a longtime Thomas fan who stuck with the original seven series and eventually lost plenty of interest because of the really bad storytelling during the HiT Era, Series 17 revived my interest to sky-high limits by being the first good season since Series 7. Great characterization. Lively interaction. More attention to railway realism. And BETTER STORIES AND STORYTELLING. After Mattel acquired HiT Entertainment, the writing team (led by Sharon Miller) was gutted in favor of those experienced with the series before, with new head writer, Andrew Brenner. Bill or Ben? was the best Thomas story not just last season, but the whole CGI Era, too. Thomas the Quarry Engine — written by head writer Andrew Brenner, who also wrote Bill or Ben? — not just rivals Bill or Ben? as the best Thomas episode in the CGI Era, but it's objectively the best season opener since Cranky Bugs. Strengths: Last year, Arc Productions replaced Nitrogen Studios as Thomas's primary CGI animation company, and it provided not just great camera angles, but also plenty of extra details on the characters and scenery. In Bill or Ben?, the red paintwork on their bufferbeam was slowly crumbling away, displaying their hard work and energy they endured over the years. Overall, Arc had a trial year last season; despite its lack of refinery, it was spectacular. Kudos to David Baas (the director of the animation last year and this) for giving the CGI a fresh experience. Arc Productions stepped that up further here: On the HD version, you can see so many tinier details in the rocks, rails, wood, and paintwork of every single engine. And it isn't a gimmick; it enhances the story. On top of that, it's also extremely refined, which was last season's biggest flaw from objective quality standards. Major props to Arc and Brenner for adding Henrietta into the episode and giving her her first speaking role since Daisy in 1986. If you saw my journal, Henrietta has a face now, but it's no longer so shocking. Her characterization was mostly focused on the narrator instead of dialogue, and her dialogue was mostly plain. Maggie Ollerenshaw gave her that wisdom oozing from her voice. It fits the oldie-but-goldie aura both Toby and Henrietta share nicely. Excellent use of Railway Series material by having Toby pick up the quarrymen so they can go home. Good to see the original source not being ignored. On the meanwhile, there's great usage of references from the classics and older Railway Series: a. Diesel calling himself and Mavis "revolutionary." b. Thomas being shoved down the hill and crashing into the buffers beside the station, ala Trouble for Thomas/Thomas & the Trucks. c. Mention of the quarry located at the end of Thomas's branch line. d. Mavis being allowed to extend her work to Brendam Docks every now and then. Great characters VERY IN character. Diesel, Mavis, Thomas, Toby, Henrietta, the Troublesome Trucks, Salty, Cranky, Porter, Hiro, and the Fat Controller are all in top form. None of their lines were out of place, empty, or forced. They had attitude. Personality. In the previous series under Sharon Miller, the voice actors tried to have them in character, but the scripted dialogue was so bad, it only worsened the characterization. Since Series 17, you can tell how much the voice actors really love their jobs; when you write great characterization, you make the jobs much easier and apparently much more fun. Brenner, Arc, and crew took close advantage of it. And even better is Mavis's much needed character development. For a long time, her mentor role has been more or less stuck to one level. This episode advanced her character for the first time since Toby's Tightrope, where she grew from the immature, hypocritical fusspot into a mature female diesel. The little musical number — based word for word off from 1909 — is a very nice twist to the Thomas formula, and with the solid pacing TtQE had, it really belonged here and gave it a solid conclusion. Reminds me a bit like the musical numbers from Friendship Is Magic, only to end the episode rather than in the middle and not be confined to a modernized form of a genre. What was a little surprising is how good the singing was. Weaknesses: Thomas stopped dead when he hit the buffers. The buffers can't withstand such weight; they'd collapse pretty quickly and be crushed by the train's weight. Mavis and Diesel were able to get Thomas's train back on the line without a breakdown train. It would've been better if Mavis or Diesel fetched Rocky or Harvey so they can get the train ready for delivery. Diesel didn't have some on-screen punishment for his misdeed. While Thomas was in the wrong for taking the long, heavy train alone, his actions were justifiable because Diesel purposefully disrupted the flow of the work from Ffarquhar Quarry, and Thomas had to deliver the load of stone before a specific time. After Thomas was scolded for taking the train alone, Diesel wasn't seen for the rest of the episode. But those three obvious flaws don't deter the high quality of Thomas the Quarry Engine. In eight minutes and forty-five seconds, Brenner hones in a high-quality script filled to the brim of attitude, history, and research. Arc Productions's intricate care to the refinement of its Computer-Generated Imagery is treated as an important ingredient to the story, never leaving anything so stilted. Combined with great characterization, solid pacing, and a creative ending, TtQE will leave Thomas fans young, old, past, and present with a strong impression that Series 17 is no fluke. In all, a fantastic episode.
×
×
  • Create New...