ZethaPonderer

You look like a slime capable of eating flesh from any living creature you come into contact with. Seen horror videos of how terrifying slimes can be other than RPGs.

*exaggeration ho* Get away from me you anti-social psycho pony *exaggeration ho*!!!!!! Don't stare into my soul in a dark alley!!!

I share similar personalities to 2 particular anime characters, Neji Hyuga [Naruto]: Stern, disciplined, and intelligent. Goku [Dragonball]: Careless, Naive and originally a Pure-Hearted individual aka innocent. Nowadays, not the case for me being Pure-Hearted, since I'm expanding my horizon to understand the dark side of the force and learning how NOT to give in to temptation. Note to self and to those who might be interested: NEVER DEVELOP FEELINGS FOR FICTIONAL CHARACTERS.

Houndoom

Y'know to be fair, the debate of sexuality is still going on whether its nature or nurture so how can we even begin to claim certainty that homosexuality is natural? Same also goes for hetero and trans as well since there are so many factors to consider when it comes to sexuality e.g. psychological, genetics, neurological, environment etc. So trying to label people as homo, hetero, trans, cis, straight etc. are all false dichotomies based on what I've read and experienced throughout my life. I've read this pretty interesting comment from a top user in Quora, Dave Featherstone who definitely is the only one making any sense when it comes to the issue of defining sexuality as nature or nurture. https://www.quora.com/Is-sexuality-nature-or-nurture The answer is apparently neither according to him, but I encourage you to read his points and see where he's coming from. Wrap your head around that one.

Bored now with this Banned Game. I'll just live up to my vow at post haste and unban all of you, including you meme. Banning people senselessly is incredibly tiresome. I'm tired. I'll just go to sleep.

You're still banned on my terms if no one brohoofs 4+ on the aforementioned reply @meme. And that goes for all of you. ALL OF YOU.

Ok, I think that ban 'joke' came off too strong with the way how I worded it . Maybe in terms of songs, yes that is undeniable Disney quality music, but for the rest its all meh. To be fair though I was just trying to go along with the theme of The Banned Game. Sorry if that came off too strong. Still it would be retarded on my part to ban someone just for comparing MLP to Disney. XD

@WiiGuy2014 I would love to ban you for comparing MLP to the legend that is Disney. But since you like cupcakes, consider yourself unbanned for now. An announcement, I will live up to my vow. My vow shall be that I will unban all of you, will never commit mass bannocide and will forever leave The Banned Game. ALL OF YOU. That includes *sigh* you too @meme

Have an apple. Ponies are alright eating apples. Don't feed them too much carrots though. Carrot = Sugar for Horses or Equines

This concept would only make sense to those who have trouble distinguishing between what is fantasy and what is reality, or people who just want to use anything as a means of escapism, or people who are simply lonely virgins. Sadly, it's the latter along with the middle.

@.Wolfe. Banned for indiscriminately banning my lack of having an avatar.

Banned for overestimating your ability to wear so many hats. I will not believe this unless you change your avatar to depict wearing 10 hats.

Banned because... You're Ban-able. 10 hats? Say it ain't so.

Banned for wearing too many hats. That's four hats you're wearing so far on your avatar, how much can you possibly wear?

OBJECTION!!! To quote Miles Edgeworth, "I object! That was... Objectionable!" Nah, but seriously your point is strong for me to counter effectively when I ponder if UN-intent is equivalent to Intent. It's almost debating whether inaction is still considered an action. Such a bizarre, mysterious paradox. OBJECTION!!! To quote Miles Edgeworth, "I was hoping to come up with a question while I was objecting... I didn't." Nah, just kidding I have some. If actions speak louder than intentions, then does this mean that a hypocrite can easily get away with their crimes by simply acting the complete opposite of what their intent is to get something out of it based on their own self-interest? If this is the case, then oh boy what a world we live in. Hypocrites rule the world and are reeking havoc. D: This is why I cater to intentions, because sure your actions may speak loud, but your intention is a symbol of proof to show the consistency of the loudness of your actions. Sure it may come across as judging, but that also depends on where we draw the line as well. If we judge people based on self-defense then there's nothing wrong with that. I think I may have found the missing piece but correct me if I'm wrong. It's being steadfast or consistent with your actions. If you're consistent, your intentions will for the most part be shown through your actions. Is there a disagreement to this statement? Other than those arguments, I agree with most of them SFyr. Very Enlightening. HOLD IT!!! Ahh, but do we WANT to trash talk people? Especially to those who deserve it under our own perception?

Justin Beiber's Baby and Rebecca Black's Friday. So terrible in a mesmerizing way for how these songs were even considered approved by the music industry in the first place.

Stop nomming my ear. I'm an *insert avatar here* avatar. How does a baby know I have ears? whoops late on post Too slow.

It really depends on what ideology does the government abide by in order to control the people. That is what governments do right? Controlling the ignorant masses like us in hopes that we don't commit acts of stupidity and rebellion that would harm the country in anyway. After all, if humanity did not have free will, governments will not exist. If we humans were pure evil, we would embrace policies and ideals of murdering innocents as an ethically just code to abide by e.g. killing all babies that show little to no potential to be evil or devout followers of the Devil/Satan/Anything that symbolizes the embodiment of evil. (Thankfully, this is not the case and I hope not though reality might surprise me) But, obviously in the end of the day it's how we look at it. We live in a world that has limited resources, its an undeniable economic reality due to the existence of scarcity. But, due to our free will, we can choose either the worst decision to damn humanity and the world due to our own self-interest, or choose the best decision to make the world and humanity a tolerable place due to our own self-sacrificing. What do you choose? Self-Interest or Self-Sacrificing? Sadly, I am just as guilty like most of humanity who adhere to the path of self-interest, but I will soon come to understand what it means to self-sacrifice to forge the harmony that humanity have always depended on.

Not if I ban you first and then commit mass bannocide.

Banned because you dare to meme me and try to prove that memes being funny is all subjective.

Banned for even thinking memes are funny.

First of all it would be a bit silly for MLP to become illegal since it would sound like the dumbest rule ever that would only make me even more curious for why its illegal. Then I will secretly make an organization where I will form a fighting brigade to overthrow the tyrannical government that made MLP illegal in the first place if I found out there was nothing but good and peace out of MLP. Am I pondering too much here? Perhaps, but just because I don't like a cartoon that is all about making friends and getting along with one despite our differences doesn't mean it deserves to be illegal. Hence I will establish a rebellion to overthrow the illegality of MLP. It's injustice to me. Who cares if its made for girls.

Banned for discriminating against the user's avatar. He has a right to own the gun as long as he shows responsibility towards bringing order and justice in life. Guns don't kill people, People kill people for stupid reasons.