You know, this is the second time you've had a hard hitting introspective piece that's resonated with me, and I'm sure if I dug into it there'd be more. I don't really see myself as any of the above, either. I honestly think that humans are a spectrum of inconsistencies and flaws. We are who we are; walking contradictions, and a courtesy we extend to someone might be retracted from someone else -- even if that's someone who's quite deserving of it.
I feel like putting on moral labels of good or bad can feel like getting put on a pedestal. Or worse. A cage. I think wearing good, bad, or neutral is limiting. I truly think it's irresponsible to try to define each other with these characteristics, so much so where using strictly those three qualifiers is putting less character retrospective than even a DnD character. I know there are days where I've helped people with no gain to myself, as well as there are days where I've just shut the world out and stopped caring. Does one outweigh the other? Is one inherently better? I don't know, but they're both definitely real. It's tricky, you know? Because it's kinda just human nature to try to quantify and qualify everything around us. Science theory, theology, mysticism, esotericism. People just want to understand and feel like the world is real to them. And they do that, in part, by labelling things. Categorizing things. Compartmentalizing what they can and focusing on it later.
What really struck me was how you eluded to using kindness consciously. That it's something you can willfully retract as needed. As if it's being used in contrast to a darker world around you that maybe you can try to brighten up a bit. And, I think I try to behave similarly. I have my own past, my own reasons for the things I say and do. Obviously, right? I mean, we all kind of do at the end of the day. But the way you use kindness, it isn't performative. And that, to me, means choice. A choice to offer warmth even when it can be misunderstood or taken advantage of. A choice to give people a chance even when they can betray you and your trust, and maybe even hurt the people close to you. It's strength, not flawlessness. And yes, strength with limits because everyone has a threshold. Even the kindest among us will walk away at some point.
I don't believe that anyone is inherently good just because they make that choice, the choice of kindness. Choosing kindness and love first is maturity. And I wouldn't say you're neutral, either. I'd say you're more in equilibrium. Someone who is aware of the scales they're balancing. Someone who knows what can tip it in either way, and chooses moment to moment, not to let it.
And lastly, calling someone "good" shouldn't imply sainthood or divinity. To me, it just means they care. That they try. That they don't or try not to weaponize the pain of others against them. And you know what, honestly, if you don't accept the word or the title, I just wanna say... people who try like you do? They're rare, I think. Or maybe I just don't know where to find them. Whether that makes you "good" or not is irrelevant, because to me, it just.. matters.
Thank you.