web Angry reviewers hate

[Trine 665]

Although fortunately its dying. But there still exists horrible content of basically grown men hamming up anger as comedy. What i hate most is they take a game, crapping on it, telling how companies and those who made it are like blood sucking money hungry corporation.... Ironically they who upload it gets tons of cash on ad revenue does the exact same thing by spamming videos onto YouTube, hypocrite is one thing but its also terrible content that should not exist in the first place.

 

And when i mean angry reviewers that are beyond horrible i of course refers to the one that gullible people without a critical sense suck into called AVGN, TGWTG and Angry Joe. Those 3 are on the list of spamming horrible content stuff like this on the net.

 

I mean its stuff like this that made me glad that Google+ took down their content to begin with, so hearing rumors of a video whining how horrible it was was like divine judgement that was just bitter sweet to my ears.

 

Also if you don't think i'm being sincere about it. Here are just some attempts at making the exact gold mine of hammed up anger, parody and just ridiculing, that should give more of a insight to it. Although it might be somewhat explicit so i'll just put it in spoiler tag.

 

 

https://youtu.be/wmzQkahwbHY

 

Edited May 17, 2015 by Trine

[chirox the pony 1,336]

So let me get this straight, content that you personally don't like is spam and anyone who does like something that you don't is an idiot, way show off your opinion in the most respectful of ways (that's sarcasm). And AVGN and NC criticize companies for making off of bad products, not for making money period. And I don't know what you're talking about with this idea that the google+ update somehow banned them because their channels are still alive and well. If you don't like these channels fine but at the very least don't insult the people who like it and use more valid criticisms. 

Edited May 17, 2015 by chirox the pony

[Trine 665]

So let me get this straight, content that you personally don't like is spam and anyone who does like something that you don't is an idiot, way show off your opinion in the most respectful of ways (that's sarcasm). And AVGN and NC criticize companies for making off of bad products, not for making money period. And I don't know what you're talking about with this idea that the google+ update somehow banned them because their channels are still alive and well. If you don't like these channels fine but at the very least don't insult the people who like it and use more valid criticisms. 

Its not really only me. There are more than me who can't stand those people in general, i am just pointing out the obvious reason for it. Poor products?, you mean the stuff they upload. That's bad taste and product. True enough. Although with games i atleast get what i get, i don't need a screeching twat who grows cash by calling everything they don't like a piece of bleep. Their quality just proves how awful they are and shouldn't have anything to say in the matter.

 

No, it was a time when google+ basically shutted down their videos with copyrighted content, and that to me was just bitter sweet. Just hearing those sad whiney tears that they can't earn cash by crapping on others content was just the greatest thing in general.

Edited May 17, 2015 by Trine

[chirox the pony 1,336]

Its not really only me. There are more than me who can't stand those people in general, i am just pointing out the obvious reason for it. Poor products?, you mean the stuff they upload. That's bad taste and product. True enough. Although with games i atleast get what i get, i don't need a schreecing twat who grows cash by calling everything they don't like a piece of bleep. Their quality just proves how awful they are and shouldn't have anything to say in the matter.

 

No, it was a time when goolge+ basically shutted down their videos with copyrighted content, and that to me was just bitter sweet. Just hearing those sad whiney tears that they can't earn cash by crapping on others content was just the greatest thing in general.

There you go again, "because I don't like something it shouldn't exist", and by bad products I was referring to the games they review. And I doubt they were crying considering the fact they make money from their own websites, and if anything did happen I'm pretty sure it would have been by accident (considering the fact all their videos are still on youtube), and I'm also pretty sure that they would have contacted youtube and youtube would have quickly put their channels back up, tears would have been unlikely. 

[SynBassilicious Pony 322]

And when i mean angry reviewers that are beyond horrible i of course refers to the one that gullible people without a critical sense suck into called AVGN, TGWTG and Angry Joe. Those 3 are on the list of spamming horrible content stuff like this on the net.

 

Uploading videos on a YouTube channel does not equal "spamming horrible content". 

[Trine 665]

Uploading videos on a YouTube channel does not equal "spamming horrible content". 

Well not general users or people who actually think who have big shot channels if thats what you mean. Although general users are more excused since they might test some stuff out or just upload to share with others generally.

Edited May 17, 2015 by Trine

[Celli 4,355]

Let me tell you something about "angry" reviewers like the ones you posted about. They're using characters they made up, that's not actually how they act in real life, they put on an act for what they do. 

 

 

Although fortunately its dying. But there still exists horrible content of basically grown men hamming up anger as comedy. What i hate most is they take a game, crapping on it, telling how companies and those who made it are like blood sucking money hungry corporation.... Ironically they who upload it gets tons of cash on ad revenue does the exact same thing by spamming videos onto YouTube, hypocrite is one thing but its also terrible content that should not exist in the first place.

They do those things because they like it, not because they want to get paid. Also, they shit on games/movies with good reason. They review bad stuff that clearly had no time or effort put into. 

 

 

Because anyone who likes these guys have problems... like you

 

Please don't use the word worship, people simply like what these people make, that doesn't make them bad people. 

Also, they don't review all bad stuff, AVGN reviews some classics like Castlevania, which while a very challenging game, he did not shit on. He got pretty frustrated with the game, but that's the character. Same with Angry Joe, he reviews good and bad stuff, usually current games. Same with Nostalgia Critic. Also, he doesn't use the angry character trope/whatever.

 

I like them because I find the content amusing, and don't just assume that they only care about it for the money. And don't say people who like them have problems, that's not a very nice thing to say.

Edited May 17, 2015 by Celli

[Banul 3,831]

Because anyone who worship these guys have problems... like you

That's the problem i have is when this crap are spammed overall the net, so i want to counter it with saying that no, its horrible. Its garbage.

I could watch a movie that have 3.6 rating if i thought the movie was good. Although the difference between that review is that i can easily ignore it, the obnoxious thumbnails and fans however are just horrible, stupid and braindead people trying to make more people braindead with that sort of content, which is good to criticize and counter back, because of its stupidity it contains with grown up adults hamming up anger "URGH SO ANGRY AT THIS GAME. ITS HORRIBLE 'CAUSE I SAY SO''. So by saying, oh wow this is just awful and insulting for anyone with decent intelligence is simply healthy for anyone who knows better. So when someone try to defend that i will say you are wrong and you should know better. And thats it, if you don't have common decency to see that then i will stop you from spamming this crap by counter argue you, no matter what subjective nonsense you try to pull just to make people more stupid by this stuff that only dumb people understand. You are objectivily wrong if you like this.

 

"Awaits more. .oh wow let people like what they like from you, and i will counter with the obvious you are wrong again, because anyone with common intellect will find this awful. Its simply objectively cringe worthy and horrible. End of story. Psychologically awful"

 

It's funny that you are bashing these videos for saying "URGH SO ANGRY AT THIS GAME. ITS HORRIBLE 'CAUSE I SAY SO", when your argument basically boils down to "URGH SO ANGRY AT THESE VIDEOS. ITS HORRIBLE 'CAUSE I SAY SO", in addition to insulting the people that enjoy them. 

 

And you have the gall to tell people that they're objectively wrong for liking these videos when you don't even know what you're talking about. AVGN is playing a character. That Mega64 video you posted is literally a parody of angry videos. Angry Joe is criticizing big game companies for shady business practices. You may have missed the value in these videos, but that doesn't mean it isn't there.

 

Maybe instead of blanket judging people and insulting them for liking things you don't like, you can try to understand why they like them. If you don't want to see their content, the solution is to not watch their content. It's okay to not like these videos, but don't act like your opinion is the only one that matters. 

Edited May 17, 2015 by Banul

[guest243535531ty43 219]

These "angry" reviewers can also make a lot of good and interesting critiques about the game that you wouldn't see from a more "mainstream" reviewer. You can see that they put effort and creativity into how they worded their review. They (I know mostly about NC and AVGN) can bring a lot of great insights about something in a comical and interesting way.

 

One of my favorite things on the internet is AVGN's final rant about the merit of the video game Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (15 minutes onward):

 

He makes a really convoluted analysis, parodying those who deconstruct and "look too deeply into" everything (which also ties it back into the book that it's based upon, fascinatingly enough), in a hilarious, intelligent way while also making fun of the game. 

Edited May 17, 2015 by estoc

[Ashen Pathfinder 16,165]

Considering the tone this thread has taken it has been locked until further notice.

 

Thank you.