NostalgicPony

I would say I am 50/50. I don't care to be the dominate type and I don't wish to feel superior and pretend that everything around me is a competition. I love stuffed animals and other girly things sometimes, but I am not going to wear makeup and get my nails polished. I embrace many feminine aspects like loving, tolerating, caring, being academic, being emotional, etc. As for my masculine side, I suppose working, acting serious and striving for greatness. But honestly, screw the labels, I can be whatever the heck I want regardless of what's too much of this and too little of that

That's pretty much it on my iTunes, but I'd have to check whats on my phone later, which has aaaaalllooootttt more bands/songs and stuff.

Ohhh.. well in that case. EWWWW GET AWAYYYY (jking, luna <33 )

Kissed by Lyra? Interesting.

Uhhh.. I dun even know. 5/10.

LUNNAAAAA <33

10/10

I collect the following: Militaria Coins Books Radios Cameras Old papers Art Deco Steampunk Figurines Genuine Hat's -shot- Other pieces that intrigue me. But yea, that's what I got.

SO 10/10 <33

Hmmm... I've seen you around some parts of the forum and from what I can tell, you seem nice. 8/10

Hence why such a hypothetical is nonsense and has such a low percentage of ever happening in the world. However it is still possible with such technology in regards to giving females the oppertunity with male sperm donors to be injected to become fertile and people would be reproduced and with the chances of it not being Homosexual would still happen. But really, I highly doubt our world would result in just only Gay's and Lesbians since of course, there is such a mix diversity of sexuality out there, it is always changing rampant.

I'm sure there will always be an initiative to continue the human race. Of course you're giving rather vague hypothetical situations seeing that I can highly doubt seeing a world with only Gays and Lesbians as opposed to one world where everyone is assumed Heterosexual. We also have technology, and with that we have sperm donor banks and artificial wombs. Also Gay and Lesbian couples would want to seek children to raise, so their option is sperm donor and artificial wombs, etc. You can call this unnatural I suppose, but it is possible in your hypothetical example. But I'm rather confused with your objective approach, you claim those that are inclined to love someone of a gender or person that is incompatible of engaging in reproductive intercourse is broken. But what if sex is not the main component in a relationship? I know I see it that way at the moment, I rather just love someone for who they are and not get involved with sexual intercourse. Do I control that though? Most likely not, I cannot force myself to have sex if it does not appeal to me. Does that qualify me as " broken " ? Maybe if someone was a Eugenicist and looking for the able man and thought that sure, not to point fingers at you though. Truth is, we all have these odd subjective standards of what is " broken ", as Stryker has stated, Humanity has many broken elements that most of us can't control or we voluntarily engage in. Someone with Autism may have some mental deficiencies, but does that make them broken and not perfect? After all, many brilliant scientists and mathematicians had Autism and the like and outnumbered many groups of non-Autistic academic individuals, but even them too are not broken because they cannot grasp the high standard that these Autistic intellectuals have. So really, even if you think many of us are " broken " because either we cannot reproduce to save the worlds population and continue what mother nature had created for us, what about the other natural aspects of humans? What about discrimination? we are naturally prone to choose one over the other, but we cry out to others to stop discriminating because it is immoral, or what about our rather repulsive greedy reflexes us humans have? we are born with free will and self-determination and we have our own self-interests even if it results in greed that affects others. Would we be broken for not discriminating or choosing not to be greedy since it is out of line of what humans tend to do? Just like reproductive intercourse, even though we are built to have the opportunity to do so, are we supposed to under natural standards? I guess that depends on the individual's self-interest of how the natural mind and the natural environment molds. Of course I'm not offended by your remarks, don't get me wrong. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my bones. But I just wanted to get my popular opinion out to shed another perspective on the matter.

LUNAAA <3

So far the only fluent language I can speak is my native English. I do speak very little German and Latin but I can recognize the words and know what it means sometimes. I plan on taking Latin in university.

Well, Polysexuality is where your attracted to most form of sexualities as opposed to a Pansexual who is completely gender blind, we could say its similar, but not completely the same. The same applies to Omnisexuality. Basically, Omni/Poly's see gender and sexuality has an large element in relationships, whereas Pansexuals don't and often ignores peoples sexuality or biological sex and just loves someone from the inside of who they are. Explaining a Pansexual's love nature is hard to explain sometimes. I guess you could say you are a Pansexual, it depends if you don't love them because of their gender or sexuality (aka gender blind), otherwise maybe. But that's a concrete love philosophy that I wholeheartedly support anyways.

Not quite. The difference between a Bisexual and a Pansexual is that a Bisexual is attracted to the male gender and the female gender, a Pansexual on the other hand does not see gender as a element in a relationship or attraction. They often disregard genders as a barrier and often loves someone more based around their character rather then the more physical gender attributes of someone aka genitalia, breasts, etc. A Pansexual could really careless about that and would rather just cuddle the person and love them. This video may help explain things better: