Myek

I'm currently doing requests for free. The few rules are that I will not produce or distribute for any sexually provocative or gory (With RD as a peasant farmer in the Ukrainian SSR, Brezhnev era being the only exception) requests.

This is a completely unrelated work of mine hence the "I love u" and "LOL", but it now symbolizes the struggle of the pony proletariat against Celestia's racist capitalist regime because I said so.

I usually sleep for 3-7 hours on a school night, but I sometimes take a 1-2 hour nap during the afternoon, so it almost balances out.

Hm, well, I need more dots on my signature so I'll be posting here.

My art is being fursecuted!

I was inspired by the works of Piet Mondrian. You have to think deeper than "lines and colors" to truly understand the powerful symbolism that an artist like myself can provide.

This is the best piece of art that I've ever made for the brony fandom. In fact, it might as well be the only piece of art I've ever contributed to any fandom in my entire life, with the exception of my previous pony OC which was considered too politically incorrect and offensive to be posted. RD as a peasant farmer in the Ukrainian SSR, Brezhnev era Yeah, it's pretty good. I am a professional artist, after all.

So avant-garde. What a magnificent work.

... And then, Albert Camus woke up from a dream about love-tripping ponies and Mexicans and used all of his realizations gained from that dream to write The Myth of Sisyphus. This is actually quite fun. Here's some completely random ORIGINAL CONTENT DO NOT STEAL by me: In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. And God said, "Let there be light," and there was light. God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. God called the light "day," and the darkness he called "night." And there was evening, and there was morning —the first day. And God said, "Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water." So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so. God called the vault "sky." And there was evening, and there was morning —the second day. And God said, "Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear." And it was so. God called the dry ground "land," and the gathered waters he called "seas." And God saw that it was good. Then God said, "Let the land produce vegetation: seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it, according to their various kinds. " And it was so. The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. And there was evening, and there was morning —the third day. And God said, "Let there be lights in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years, and let them be lights in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth." And it was so. God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. God set them in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth, to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. And there was evening, and there was morning —the fourth day. And God said, "Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the vault of the sky." So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living thing with which the water teems and that moves about in it, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. God blessed them and said, "Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth." And there was evening, and there was morning —the fifth day. And God said, "Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind." And it was so. God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good. Now, should I skip to the Jesus (My original character, all rights reserved) part?

At one point of my life, I've known a sizable portion of Spanish, but only because of the fact that I live in a city that borders Mexico. I have only declined since then, and now I have nearly no understanding of a casual conversation in Spanish. I have no interest in learning a new language.

There's this one opinion that I have forgot to include in my previous post. For some reason, what I'm about to say triggers the "CULINARY MURDER" alarm for armchair food critics. Believe me, there's plenty of paid articles on pseudo-journalist sites out there that exist just to spite people with this opinion. ___ Well-done ribeye steak tastes pretty good.

Alright, time to bring this thread back to life. Here's a good one by Cyne, which I think is one of the most memorable of the compilation.

36. That's the amount of views that my last blog post apparently received. Perhaps if I want to gain the attention of a larger audience, I shouldn't start off with a topic on a common cycle, because the thought of the ending inevitably being one of those "and everybody stopped giving a damn" tropes when the reader has skimmed through half of the paragraph obviously isn't entertaining. So what can I do? Feature a research paper from some university webpage so the reader can later interpret it as "I know what you didn't do last night relating to a certain blog, and I don't let go of grudges"? I then realized that just as it isn't anyone's obligation to go to a website or for me to meet demands for a reader, it goes the same for the reader too. I understand that some of my recent blog posts tend to be boring and irrelevant because it is not pop culture or a funny YouTube video or a video game review or even anything remotely of interest to a majority here, and now that I think of it, it is actually a huge motivator for me to keep typing. I can't exactly explain now of why it is, but I believe that it relates to competition. While it isn't good to lack the attention of readers when you're a blogger on any site, it gives a bigger understanding of how I could possibly present myself in my blog posts. Perhaps it isn't just the material, but also the size of the paragraphs? After all, most people won't bother to read a block of plain text, especially when they're on an informal social community environment (Where most people come for instant gratification through a few sentences in forum posts and the like.) and not Wikipedia (Where most people come exclusively for the information provided and are willing to acknowledge the usual amount of paragraphs in a single section for a topic that a person would have probably shown no interest for reading if it wasn't for Wikipedia being the website from which it is being read from.). Unrelated: If you have been aware of this blog's existence since the beginning, you may have noticed that I have been posting much more regularly. I hope to continue posting on this blog at a comfortable pace. For anyone that has ever been genuinely interested with any of my posts, I say, "Thank You."

Nearly a month ago, when I was discussing about a community that I have then believed to have abandoned its own morals, I didn't really put any thought to the fragility of the forum that I referred to as "A", and when I speak of fragility concerning forum communities, I often speak of how one little action could bring one community down, even when it's not as blatantly displayed as the moderator/admin actions on "B-1-4". It wasn't blatant at all, though. The closing of A was the result of apathy. "G" (The owner of A) could not be blamed for anything that followed the attempt for site reconstruction, seeing that he provided a link to the "archive" (Which was in fact an exact copy of G before the site reconstruction). No one cared about being a community anymore simply because it didn't feel "real" (As explained by one user) and because of the declining post rate which was somewhat inevitable in the last weeks from the lack of innovation to keep updating site features, and this lead to apathy. It wasn't anyone's concern or obligation to go on a website constantly, and there would certainly be alternatives that are just as good or better. It was better to forget things, and I'm sure this cycle is perpetual for as long as humanity has formed groups and cultures. So that's gone, what's next? That's what I've been trying to answer. On an unrelated note, I think my writing on here tends to be over sensational, but the thing is, is that it entertains me. Besides from a few other places, I have never viewed writing as a hobby or even entertaining, but I guess it's the diverse audience here that enables me to type out thoughts without worry. You all have different opinions and personalities, and that's wonderful.

My prediction of the world in the future (Let's say, 2025-2080, in first world countries) is that technology will obviously be more developed along with numerous advances in medicine and education and living qualities which would result in higher average life expectancies. I don't expect much to happen in places such as sub-Saharan Africa (Esp. Congo, Rwanda, etc.), but the general progress of mankind in the current and past decades has shown positive effects on the developing world (Mexico, China, Morocco, etc.) so it is plausible that these nations will meet a comfortable standard of living in the future. Of course, feudalism and despots and genocides and wars will still be common, since there was never a second since the start of civilization that none of these were present. As for Kyoshi's comment, I honestly think that he made trivial points and too much of subjective reasoning for me to take serious. Durandal's claim that the inefficiency of politicians has been made prominent by democracy is just a really bad assumption. Corruption and failure and ineffectiveness of the previous system of federalism has obviously existed before Greek democracy, and it is still being proven every day of the year. Back to Kyoshi's comment - "many people in America want to make it a theocracy" Even you aren't exactly happy with religious people calling a center right wing president a "socialist", it isn't as bad as you have just worded it to be. Besides, it's not proper to exaggerate to such an attempt to manipulate words. (Remember, that's how the "theocratic" media got to turn the word "liberal" into a name call and started associating their own values (Ex. political correctness, "feelings", censorship) into their definition of the word, and that somehow stuck with how "liberal" would always be thought as. The "theocracy", as you call it, was also successful with turning the definition of "socialist" to mean a corporatist president that has continued what Bush did to several extents.)

Just found a reliable community with an owner I can trust to not be so unpredictable. I'll refer to this as A and owner as G, and I'll refer to the former forums as B and the owner as J. After so much arguing, I don't think I can reinstate common sense for J. How can someone be so forcibly well-intended to be successful that it results in the completely opposite and in fact total destruction of what remained of the late great members (Alright, I'm being a bit narcissistic here.) that fueled the livelihood of a forum that understood each other? Let me specify a few things here. B has in fact been started over significantly several times. Please excuse me if I later realize that there are inaccuracies/typos in the dates or order as I am not exactly in the condition to be typing out years or months from memory at this time. B-1 December 2010-August 2012 B-2 August 2012-October 2012 B-3 October 2012-June 2013 B-4 Early 2013-Current (And failing) All I see in B-4 is an average game and a misled young man that betrayed his own goals in favor of a abusive moron's opinions (UPDATE: While her opinions were an obvious factor, it shouldn't really be said as J really took any advice from her since J admitted sole response for making bad decisions.) (We'll call her "Q," nothing out of the ordinary to point out besides being a moderator since almost the beginning and a female teenager) and an awful solution for a relatively peaceful and completely on-topic environment. Too bad that if you want people to even discuss anything, you would have to have people. The problem that J believed to exist was that people who came to the forums that were not explicitly focused or interested in the game were somehow creating this magic barrier between people randomly choosing to play or forum, and that mental barrier would effect the potential players in such a way that if they even consider leaving a compliment on the forums, the discussion on it will provocatively gain the attention of the user which would strike them in such an unsettling way that we can almost be considered the main cause of losing users. I was and I am still held as the scapegoat for virtually any problem that occurred during the remaining period of time that was officially left for B-1 to B-3 (Note: B-4 isn't a continuation. The reason why we are familiar with it is because of J's method of telling everyone to play his game on B-4 by putting a banner on the upper midcenter of the website) Here's an analogy for the many elaborate scenarios that the story behind this is based about that I may be continuing to type about; it is of more complexity than the coding of a typical forum (Hehe). I am open to all suggestions for what I can provide through my blog, but understand that I am not obligated and/or willing to fulfill, entertain, or be up to any expectations.

Damn, looks like I'm going to have to do the killing.

Used for sexual gratification as a distraction while I sneak out. Doing myself because I can; bail out of jail with oil money and top connections.